Written on June 16th, 2012
Edited in April 2014
I'm
not saying that the value of labor should be manipulated so that it
loses its value here... But absent the manipulation of the value of
labor so that the effort of workers gains value (I'm alluding to
minimum wage laws), the going rate for entry-level labor feels like
it should be about 5 or 6 bucks an hour here in America.
...What
I am saying - however - is that that shit should be allowed to
decline naturally; that is, without artificial government
manipulation; that is, government controls should be removed so that
the value of labor can find its real free-market rate, and our
purchasing power and our balance of trade aren't all out of
proportion.
Remember...
We don't have a primarily industrial- / manufacturing-based economy
anymore. We're more of a service economy now. What's allegedly
"backing our money" is more labor / services than it is
goods / products.
Now...
I'd imagine that there are a lot of people who want to keep minimum
wage laws in place, and who even desire that the minimum wage
increase. I'd also imagine that a lot of those same people oppose the
outsourcing of American jobs, prefer unionized to non-unionized
labor, oppose Right-to-Work laws, and oppose benefit and pay cuts for
government employees providing public services.
So
we're living in a primarily service-based economy where the combined
government agencies confiscate 40% of the wealth and employ over 2.2
million people, and most of the debate on labor issues revolves
around government jobs.
Most
of the people on the left want the government to artificially raise
the value of the efforts of workers - including its own workers - who
offer services rather than produce goods. They oppose both
non-interventionism in the value of labor and government intervention
to lower the value of labor.
So
doesn't the left want what could basically be described as a form of
mercantilism or protectionism, except one that focuses on services
instead of industry? Isn't this just liberals wanting America to
protect the value of its economy and its money by keeping
artificially inflated the value of its most valuable assets; its
workers and their labor? Aren't these people more "capitalist"
(specifically, state-monopoly capitalist) than are we free-marketers?
For
more entries on enterprise, business, business alliance, and markets,
please
visit:
http://www.aquarianagrarian.blogspot.com/2010/10/enlightened-catallaxy-reciprocally.html
http://www.aquarianagrarian.blogspot.com/2010/10/enlightened-catallaxy-reciprocally.html
http://www.aquarianagrarian.blogspot.com/2014/05/agorist-protection-agencies-and.html
For
more entries on free trade, fair trade, the balance of trade, and
protectionism, please visit:
http://www.aquarianagrarian.blogspot.com/2014/05/foreign-trade-agreements.html
For
more entries on unions and collective bargaining, please visit:
No comments:
Post a Comment