Showing posts with label Jews. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Jews. Show all posts

Sunday, October 8, 2023

Israelis' and Palestinians' Unwillingness to Forgive Casualty-Free Attacks Leads to Deaths on Both Sides

       Yesterday (on October 7th, 2023), several periodicals - including The Wall Street Journal - published articles asserting that the State of Israel, and its Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, have "declared war" on the Palestinian militant group Hamas.

     Leaving aside the issue of whether "declaring war" on Hamas serves to legitimize it as if it were a state or political entity, it is necessary to address the mainstream media's narratives regarding the recent violence exchanged between Israelis and Palestinians in the last several weeks.

 

     This "declaration of war" against Hamas follows what ReutersC.N.N., and others described as "surprise attacks", carried out by Hamas against Israeli targets.

     http://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/sirens-warning-incoming-rockets-sound-around-gaza-near-tel-aviv-2023-10-07/

     http://www.cnn.com/2023/10/07/middleeast/sirens-israel-rocket-attack-gaza-intl-hnk/index.html

     However, "surprise attacks" is hardly an honest way to characterize these attacks.

 

     Two weeks ago (on Sunday, September 24th, 2023), N.P.R. published an article titled "Israel strikes Gaza for the third straight day as West Bank violence escalates".

     http://www.npr.org/2023/09/24/1201381201/an-israeli-military-raid-has-killed-two-palestinians-in-the-west-bank?fbclid=IwAR1omulobWR5oOF6Whiku445zRLHBHc9jYhtj63vaI3sxVRd_bMerpgkS50#:~:text=Majdi%20Mohammed%2FAP-,Palestinians%20inspect%20a%20damaged%20building%20following%20an%20Israeli%20army%20raid,24%2C%202023

 

     Right off the bat, it is plain to see, from this article, that the attacks on Israeli targets which were carried out by Hamas over the last several days, were, most assuredly, not "surprise attacks", but were carried out in response to the strikes on Gaza which occurred on September 22nd, 23rd, and 24th, 2023.

     Despite this fact, the Israelis - and Israel-sympathetic media - have been quick to point out that the attacks which occurred in the first week of October, were (apparently) timed to coincide with the fiftieth anniversary of the Yom Kippur War, which began on October 6th, 1973.

     But if these attacks were, in fact, timed to coincide with that anniversary, then that narrative would not make sense, if it could be proven that there had been exchanges of violence in the previous two weeks leading up to that October 6th anniversary.

     In fact, if you read the article that N.P.R. published on September 24th, you will find that – in the very first sentence of the article – it reads: 

     “Israeli airstrikes struck militant sites in Gaza on Sunday for the third straight day, the Israeli military said, after Palestinian militants near the border fence launched incendiary balloons into Israel and threw an explosive at soldiers.” [emphasis mine]


      [Correction, written and posted on October 20th, 2023:

     The aforementioned incendiary balloons might not have taken place before those "three straight days" of Israeli attacks, after all.
     The following article from Al Jazeera clarifies that the recent violence began when "stone-throwing protesters" in Palestine threw stones at Israeli soldiers, prompting the closing of the Beit Hanouna border crossing between Israel and Gaza, which itself prompted Palestinians' launching of incendiary balloons into Israel.
     This article also mentions that Israel killed 12 Palestinians in Jenin in July, which runs contrary to the mainstream media narrative that there was no violence between Israel and Palestine between May 2023 and October 7th, 2023.
     You can read that article by clicking on the following link:
     http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/9/22/israeli-military-attacks-gaza-strip-amid-protests-at-border]

     

     This suggests that the Israeli airstrikes were carried out in response to the aforementioned border violence (although it’s not clear exactly which day those incendiary balloons were launched).

     This shows why it is important to read articles about the Israeli-Arab conflict very carefully.
     Especially because there’s no indication that those incendiary balloons (which started two fires within the State of Israel’s borders) – nor that explosive which was thrown at I.D.F. soldiers – killed or injured anybody.
     I suspect that, if these bombs had killed anybody, then the articles reporting on it, would have mentioned that fact.

 

     We might feel tempted to conclude - from the information above - that those late-September Israeli airstrikes killed Palestinians in response to Palestinian bomb-throwing that killed nobody.

     But that is not accurate either.

     If N.P.R.’s reporting is correct, then so is the sentence from the fourth paragraph in that article, which reads as follows: 

     “There were no reported casualties from the strikes in Gaza.”

 

     Let us assume - for a moment - that “no reported casualties” means “no casualties occurred”, rather than that casualties on the Gazan side occurred but were simply not reported.

     If that is an accurate assumption, then this would mean that the late-September Palestinian bomb-throwing killed zero people, and then was met with Israeli retaliation that also killed zero people.

 

     On March 11th, 2004, nearly two hundred people were killed, and over two thousand people were injured, in a series of coordinated bombings upon the commuter train system in Madrid, the capital city of Spain.

     Shortly thereafter, my high school Spanish teacher, Ken Finkelstein, told us that the people of Spain responded to these attacks by calling for peace and forgiveness. He contrasted this against America’s response to the terrorist attacks of September 11th, 2001, after which President George W. Bush declared “the world will hear from all of us soon”. This statement foreshadowed America’s invasion of Afghanistan the following month, and its invasion of Iraq eighteen months later.

     My teacher’s statement affected me profoundly, and (obviously) I still remember it to this day. And I agree that there is a time for forgiveness. Although it may be difficult to forgive atrocities which see hundreds of deaths (as in the Madrid train bombings) or even thousands of deaths (as in 9/11), it is much easier to forgive attempted acts of violence which result in zero deaths or injuries.

     And that is what has just happened.

     Both sides – Israeli and Palestinian – have just declined to forgive attacks, by one-another, which (evidently) resulted in zero injuries or deaths.

 

     I would never condemn someone for defending oneself; even if it’s an individual human being, or a political entity which claims to have the right to use violence legitimately. But self-defense is far from what is happening here.

     Yesterday (October 7th, 2023), The Times of Israel reported that 1,600 people are wounded, and that at least 230 people are dead, in Gaza, following Israel’s attacks.
     http://www.timesofisrael.com/gaza-reports-some-200-palestinians-dead-1600-wounded-after-hamas-assault-on-israel/

     An article, published today (October 8th) by A.B.C., stated that 1,790 Gazans are wounded, and over 300 Gazans are dead; while Israeli death tolls number over 100, with some 900 Israelis injured.

     http://abcnews.go.com/International/live-updates/israel-gaza-hamas/?id=103804516

     This article from N.D.T.V. claims that six hundred Israelis have been killed in the fighting.
     http://www.ndtv.com/world-news/hamas-rocket-attack-on-israel-israel-gaza-conflict-palestine-over-500-dead-in-hamas-surprise-land-air-sea-attack-on-israel-4460666

     If the worst of these reports is accurate, then this means that at least 900 people are now dead because of both the Israelis’ and the Palestinians’ refusal to forgive attacks that killed nobody at all.

 

     Throwing a bomb at someone does not automatically mean that the target was killed or harmed in any way. We have to read these reports more closely, instead of lashing out, and killing by reflex.

     We have no choice, now, but to forgive attacks that harm nobody; or else we should expect the bloodshed to continue into the holiday season.

     Thus, the only alternative to forgiving casualty-free attacks, is to endorse the murder of not only our enemies, but ourselves.

      As musician Kimya Dawson sang – in her song “Hold My Hand” – “the cycle of violence has to end somewhere”.

 

 Update:

     The Biden Administration has deleted Secretary of State Antony Blinken's call for a cease-fire.

     Read more at the following links:
     http:
//nypost.com/2023/10/09/blinken-gets-blowback-for-now-deleted-sunday-post-promoting-cease-fire-in-israel/

     http://newrepublic.com/post/176090/state-department-blinken-delete-tweets-ceasefire-israel-gaza-palestine




 

Written and published on October 8th, 2023.

Update added on October 12th, 2023.

Correction written and added on October 20th, 2023.


Thursday, August 3, 2023

Eleven Things That Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. Got Wrong About the Israeli-Arab Conflict, in His Interview with Jimmy Dore

     On Wednesday, August 2nd, 2023, Democratic presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., appeared on The Jimmy Dore Show, hosted by comedian-turned-podcaster Jimmy Dore.
     In that interview, Kennedy defended his so-called "unconditional" support of the State of Israel, while making a few minor concessions regarding the crimes committed by the Israelis.
     Kennedy made several inaccurate and/or incomplete statements during that interview.

     During the interview, Dore confessed that he was "not the smartest person" to "push back against" what Kennedy was saying. But Dore invited Kennedy to debate Max Blumenthal (a journalist of Jewish heritage whose father served in the Clinton Administration) on the topic of the Israeli-Arab and Israeli-Palestinian conflicts.
     Since the mainstream media are currently smearing Kennedy as an anti-Semite (over his comments about Covid-19 and Anne Frank), it seems unlikely that the debate between Kennedy and Blumenthal will ever happen.
     That's why I would like to take this opportunity to clear-up a few of the things Kennedy said that were inaccurate.

     You can watch the Israel-Palestine segment, from that interview, at the following address:




     1. Although the Jews were obviously aligned against the Nazis, it's unfair of R.F.K. to conclude that the Jews were "on the side of the Allies" completely. That’s because, in 1947-48, during the War of Independence, the Jews kicked the British and Palestinians off Israeli land, at the same time.

 

     2. While R.F.K. was correct that the 1947 United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine would have given the Arabs four-fifths of the land, most of that land was desert. That plan was not unfair to the Jews; that deal offered Jews plenty of good land.

 

     3. R.F.K. said the Arabs kicked Jews out (which is true), but also that the Jews didn’t kick all the Arabs out. The reason Israel didn't kick the Arabs out, in 1947-48, is because there were (and still are) so many Arabs there, that they couldn't possibly kick them all out. The Israelis did, however, make significant efforts to kick them out, including forcing 700,000 Arabs out in 1947-48, including “driving them into the sea” and onto boats, in an event known to Arabs as the nakba (“catastrophe”). The phrase “driving them into the sea” is now used against Arabs, to stoke fears that they will destroy Israeli civilization.

 

     4. R.F.K. rightfully says "Palestinian children are taught that it's okay to kill Jews". That’s true, but R.F.K. failed to mention that: 1) Palestinians have been under siege for nearly four generations, so they don’t need to be taught racist attitudes in order to find out who is responsible for bombing and imprisoning them; and 2) plenty of Israeli children are taught that it's okay to kill Arabs. Abby Martin can confirm just how many Israelis think it’s not only fine to kill Arabs, and many even seem to think that it is a laughing matter.

 

     5. R.F.K. rightfully criticized the killing of individual Jewish people by Palestinians. But he neglected to mention that a reason why Palestinians kill individual Jews, instead of bombing Israeli military targets (to comport with the rules of war), is because choosing Israeli military targets would be insane, due to the totally disparate levels of military technology and capability possessed by the two sides. Taking out an Israeli military base would get Arabs carpet-bombed. It would be a self-genocide mission.

 

     6. R.F.K. said that it is wrong to bomb non-military targets, but he also admitted that Israel has a policy that they will dig under sites being used as Palestinian militant positions. The reason why Palestinians take refuge in schools, mosques, and hospitals, is not because they are trying to make their children and sick people into human shields. It is because they are praying that the Israelis will not be so inhumane as to resort to bombing them even in their schools, mosques, and hospitals. A person only looks like a human shield if you're already willing to shoot at him. It is regrettable that the Arabs keep munitions in these places, but that is what is necessary for their self-defense, because the Israelis are willing to bomb any and all locations which could ever potentially be used for “military purposes” (i.e., self-defense).

 

     7. R.F.K. claimed that “Gaza isn't occupied; it's under self-rule". That is not true. In 2006, Hamas won elections in Gaza, after being encouraged by the Israelis to run in Palestinian Authority elections. Then the Israelis prevented those Hamas members from taking their oaths of office and their seats, and now considers Hamas a terrorist organization. That is not what self-rule looks like. Also, Gaza is surrounded by a fortified perimeter with razor-wire-topped fences and guard towers. Snipers with the I.D.F. (Israeli Defense Forces) will often shoot at children who come "too close" to those perimeter fences. And Gaza is not allowed sea access, because it’s under blockade. And it’s rarely allowed access to Egypt over land. So it is pretty much an isolated country, like North Korea. No country can be sovereign or self-sufficient which has practically no contact with the outside world. The fact that Israeli troops are not patrolling Gazan streets, does not make the Gaza Strip any less "occupied".

 

     8. When asked about the Gaza Strip, R.F.K. said "Why doesn't Jordan open itself up to the Palestinians?". Jordan is not connected to Gaza. Jordan opening itself up, would only help the people in the West Bank; it would not help anybody in Gaza.

 

     9. R.F.K. argued that Arabs can visit the Temple Mount, but Jews are not allowed to, therefore Arabs have more rights. That is not true, because: 1) The Jordanian Islamic Waqf owns that site, and it's allowed to set the rules; 2) Jews obey those rules because there are Arab as well as Judaic rules in place which are designed to protect the holiest sites from being trod on by the wrong people at the wrong times; and 3) a group of radical rabbis (associated with Machon Ha’Mikdash and the Temple Mount Faithful movement) ascended the Temple Mount illegally in the early 90s.

 

     10. R.F.K. seems to be trying to imply - without saying it directly - that the Arabs do not recognize the right of Jews to exist. But the Arab nations only reject the rights of Jews to exist as a state. Israel as a people (i.e., the Jewish people) has a right to exist. But Israel as a state (i.e., the Zionist imperialist Israeli statist government) does not have an inherent right to exist. Nations only have a right to exist if they do not start too many wars with their neighbors. Israel started all but like two of the wars they've been involved in. States do not have the right to exist. They are based on legitimized violence, and monopoly. If "the Arabs won't negotiate", then it’s because they are being forced to accept Israeli statehood, so no real free negotiation is possible, because one of the terms is non-negotiable. It wouldn’t be a huge challenge to get the Arabs to recognize the rights of Jews as a religion, a people, and a nation, because the Jews are those things, and they will always be those things. But there’s no need to intimidate the Arabs into endorsing a form of imperialist statehood that implicitly claims all the world’s Jews as its potential members, even if they have never visited the land. Jews believe they are protected by G-d, not by a king or a military. There is no need for a “Jewish state”, and various rabbis - such as Yoel and Moshe Teitelbaum, Yaakov Shapiro, Yisroel Dovid Weiss, and Elnahan Beck - have argued that the idea of Jewish sovereignty, without properly ordained rabbinic courts (Sanhedrin), is antithetical to Jewish teachings (specifically, the story of King Saul in the Book of Solomon). According to traditional “ultra-Orthodox” Jews, the Temple Mount is not supposed to be completely open to all Jews, until all people miraculously attain complete knowledge of G-d and His word, and join together in worship of YHWH. Secular liberal Jews who oppose Israeli apartheid do not make this argument, but it is true.

 

     11. R.F.K. said “Ehud Barak offered the Palestinians everything they wanted." That is not true because the Palestinians wanted Israel to stop being a state, and Barak did not offer the Palestinians this option. By the way, this is the same Ehud Barak who hung out with Jeffrey Epstein. And R.F.K. allegedly flew on the Lolita Express on February 17th and 27th, 1994.





Click on image, and open in new tab and/or window,
and/or download if necessary, to see in full resolution





     [Post-Script / Author's Note:

     To see a video of Max Blumenthal debunking of Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s talking points, on The Jimmy Dore Show, click on the link below:
     http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eCcVvp0eBaQ

     To read my commentary regarding several potential solutions to the Israel-Palestine conflict, click on the link below, to read my August 2020 article "Why I Support Autonomy, But Not Statehood, for Palestinians":
     http://www.aquarianagrarian.blogspot.com/2020/08/why-i-support-autonomy-for-palestinians.html]





Written and published on August 3rd, 2023.

Post-Script / Author's Note written and added on August 7th, 2023.


Friday, July 30, 2021

Message to Joe Biden and Kamala Harris Criticizing the State of Israel's Occupation of Palestine

      The following is a short message that I wrote to the Joe Biden / Kamala Harris White House on May 16th, 2021, as part of an effort to dissuade the administration from continuing to staunchly support Zionism and the illegal occupation of the Gaza Strip and the West Bank.






     I request that the President and Vice President direct the Departments of Defense and Homeland Security, and the New York Police Department, to cease cooperation with, training of, and supply of armaments to, the apartheid regime of the State of Israel.

 

     Article I, Section 8, Clause 12 requires that appropriations for the army must be limited to two years at a time, so why do Israel and its military benefit from a ten-year aid package? This must be unconstitutional. $3.8 billion in taxpayer funds goes to Israel each year, and it needs to stop; private trade to Israel exceeds this amount and could easily replace those funds.

 

     I request that the Biden Administration direct the U.S. Ambassador to Israel, and the U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, to review and respect the pertinent United Nations resolutions regarding the need to respect human rights, including the prohibitions against siege warfare, and against targeting journalists and public infrastructure.

 

     U.S.-made weapons are falling on the heads of Palestinian children, and it needs to stop.

 

     Please read this article I wrote about how the rights of Jews and Arabs can be respected in the Holy Land, with either a two-state solution, or a stateless solution based on communal autonomy and individual rights.

 

     http://aquarianagrarian.blogspot.com/2020/08/why-i-support-autonomy-for-palestinians.html

 

 

 

Original message written and delivered on May 16th, 2021

Introduction written on July 30th, 2021

Published on July 30th, 2021

Wednesday, February 26, 2020

Thirty-Six Topics to Research Regarding Zionist Cooperation with Nazis and Anti-Semites

Table of Contents




Introduction

I. 1880s-1930s: Jewish Adoption of Zionism and Provocation of Anti-Semitism

II. Early 1930s: Jewish Consideration of Nazism

III. World War II: Deal-Making to Reduce Jewish Deaths and Deport Jews to Palestine

IV. Post- Israeli Independence (Post- 1947/1948): Judeophobic Zionism, Israeli Fascism, and Christian Zionism





Content



Introduction

     The following list consists of thirty-six topics which one should study if one wishes to learn the history of attempts by Zionists and Jewish people to cooperate, make deals with, or even collaborate with, Nazis and anti-Semites.
     I am publishing this list, not to criticize nor condemn the religion of Judaism, nor to condemn Jewish people. Nor do I wish to dismiss the rights of Jewish people to defend themselves when attacked, and to live where they please without harming others. Nor do I wish to pretend that Zionism and Nazism are the exact same ideology; I am only asserting that there is some overlap between the two ideologies.

    The purpose of this article is to explain that Jewish people have cooperated with Nazis and anti-Semites, but also that that cooperation has typically and primarily been done for the purposes of saving Jewish lives, and reducing harm and suffering experienced by Jewish people. Secondary goals of that cooperation were promoting Jewish emigration to Palestine, and establishing a Jewish national homeland (i.e., a state) there, goals which were thought to result in the primary goals of reducing Jewish deaths and suffering. 
     It is a terrible and unfortunate thing that Jewish Holocaust survivors, and other Jewish people, have thought it necessary to turn other Jews in to the authorities, in order to save their own families and themselves. But needless to say, those Jewish people cooperated with their captors only because they were under coercion and pressure. They did what they did out of desperation; from being forced into "cooperating with authority".
     The fact that they were under duress from their authoritarian government that wanted them dead, means that most "crimes" or "wrongs" that one Jew committed against another during that time, were likely done for the sake of each person's own individual survival, without consideration for the needs of others. It also means that some of them developed Stockholm Syndrome; they began to identify with their captors. Sometimes that is what happens when we are under other people's control; we justify the condition we're in, by taking genuine pity upon ourselves, and in doing so we identify with the pity which our captors have for us (which, unlike our own self-pity, is merciless and fraudulent).

     It is a sad thing that our concerns for other individuals break down when we are pitted against each other for survival; especially when we are forced to work for little reward, and worked to death. These were extenuating circumstances, and the fact that Jewish people were under coercion and slave-like conditions, should be considered a mitigating factor, when considering the actions taken by Holocaust survivors.
     This should go, both during the Holocaust itself, as well as afterwards, because survivors who fled Europe still risked arrest as illegal immigrants when they landed in Palestine.
     The Israeli Defense Forces were cobbled together out of three paramilitary groups, which would otherwise be considered terrorist groups, if not for a legal declaration of independence as a sovereign power by Israel in May 1948. Holocaust survivors who fled to Palestine only became "terrorists" because that's what they had to do in order to resist British attempts to limit immigration of Jewish refugees into what was then British Mandate Palestine.
     To quote comedian George Carlin, "One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter."

     To be clear, what I am saying is that very little of what World War II -era Jews did to "cooperate" with the Nazis, should be construed as collaboration (which goes above and beyond cooperation). This is not to say, however, that no Jewish person has ever intentionally cooperated with anti-Semites and Nazis; some have.
     Even when Jewish cooperation with anti-Semites appears to be intentional (rather than accidental), it still may be accidental. Such cooperation has usually been motivated by: 1) a desire to set aside differences with anti-Semites and find some common goal that they can advance together, in order to reduce tensions (for example, anti-miscegenation, and assured deportation to Palestine); and/or 2) a perceived need to adopt anti-Jewishness in a limited manner (that is, to promote selective rejection of Jewish characteristics).
     The latter has usually been done in order to appease the Judeophobes whom are in charge of the political apparatus of the relevant host-nation. For example, some Western Jews, such as the early Zionist Ze'ev Jabotinsky, have practically adopted the European racists' ideas that the Ashkenazi Jews of Eastern Europe look "Asiatic" and ugly.

     Sometimes, however, Jews adopt anti-Semitism, in order to increase or exaggerate Jewish suffering, in order to make it more visible. The goal of this is to increase Jewish safety.
     It is easy to tell, from studying the stories of Theodor Herzl and Sarah Marshak, why Jewish people would want the suffering of Jewish people to be more noticeable.
     Herzl (see #3) sought to make this suffering more noticeable, by forging a sort of alliance with anti-Semites, saying "the anti-Semites will become our most dependable friends, the anti-Semitic countries our allies" and acknowledging that the Zionists' desire to leave Europe coincided with the European Christian anti-Semites' desire to be rid of the Jews.
     I do not say this in order to promote the idea that all exaggeration of Jewish suffering is staged, nor to promote the idea that all Jewish suffering is the result of faked or staged hate crimes. College student Sarah Marshak (#30) was accused of faking a hate crime after she drew swastikas on her own college dorm room door. But she only did this after someone else did it first - after the authorities failed to find the original vandal, and seemed to have given up on Marshak's case - a fact which was overlooked in reports about the vandalism.
     Marshak certainly exaggerated her victimization, and faked a crime and falsified a police report. But she did it because her previous victimization was being ignored; because the police had not yet found the perpetrator; the one who targeted her specifically, and possibly intended to hurt her. Marshak felt that she needed to manufacture another incident, in order to demonstrate to the police that the threat was still ongoing, rather than an isolated incident that they should treat as if it happened in the past.
     There is some similarity between the actions of Sarah Marshak and those of Theodor Herzl; both sought to increase the visibility of Jewish suffering. Herzl could have very well believed that what he was advocating was the course of action most conducive to increasing Jewish safety. But I feel confident in saying that what Sarah Marshak did was probably not as sinister as what Herzl had in mind.
     I wouldn't accuse Herzl of trying to promote anti-Jewish violence, but it's not unreasonable to ask whether Herzl would have considered limited violence against Jewish people (whatever that means) to be something conducive to his goals.

     Jewish collaboration and cooperation with - and appeasement of - Nazis, anti-Semites, and Judeophobes, happens, and has historically happened, for various reasons. What looks to one person like opportunism and betrayal, may look to another like doing what needs to be done to reduce suffering and to live another day.
     To some, the internment of Palestinians in the State of Israel - and Israel's wars with its neighbors - are intolerable, and could not possibly be justified by either the Holocaust nor the need to keep Jews safe in the present.
     But to the staunch defenders of Zionism, the need to protect "Israel" is so important, that the need to keep Jewish people safe, is subjugated to the need to promote the national security interests of the State of Israel and the Israeli Defense Forces. The needs of "Israel", meaning "the people of Israel", has been subverted to the needs of the State of Israel.
     That is why we must study the above explained and below listed topics, and that is why we must ask whether the militarism of the State of Israel is truly in the interests of the safety of Jewish people.
     We must ask whether the I.D.F. is protecting Jewish lives, or instead arming the enemies of Israel in order to provocateur attacks against Jewish people in order to justify increased military budgets and more lashing out disproportionately at Israel's enemies.
     Study of these topics are necessary; not only for preventing continued misguided, aggressive Israeli militarism in the name of "keeping Jews safe", but also for understanding how good people, and even Jewish people, can be tricked into complacency with fascism and anti-Semitism.
     America has been so eager to "protect Americans and American interests", in fact, that it has resorted to funding its enemies - and even arm and train them, and arm several of its enemies against one another - in order to provocateur them into committing attacks against Americans.
     The United States pretends the Iranians are preparing attacks against U.S. military bases, which could not be attacked by Iranians, if only they had never been set up in lands outside U.S. jurisdiction in the first place.
     In 2015, the United States sold weapons to terrorist groups in Syria and Ukraine. Senator Rand Paul voted for that weapons sale, but he apologized four years later, in 2019. Between 2015 and 2019, it was reported that the weapons sold to terrorist groups in Ukraine and Syria, were used to attack Israelis. The State of Israel, too, sold weapons to terrorist groups in Ukraine and Syria around the same time.
     Here is to the hope that the Israelis will stop emulating America in its penchant for selling weapons to enemies, and here is to the hope that Americans will stop emulating Israel's racist and illiberal surveillance and travel security policies.







I. 1880s-1930s: Jewish Adoption of Zionism and Provocation of Anti-Semitism

1. Frankish Jews (and the possible influence of Frankish Jewish ideas upon Adolf Hitler)

2. Racialized Marxism (incl. its possible influence on Hitler)

3. Theodor Herzl (founder of modern political Zionism; esp. on provoking anti-Semitism)

4. Vladimir Ze'ev Jabotinsky, and revisionist Zionism

5. Leo Frank (esp. racialized defenses of Frank which cast him and Jewish people as victims)







II. Early 1930s: Jewish Consideration of Nazism


6Claims that “Nazism” stood for “National Zionism” (esp. by Eustace Mullins)


7. The “Nazi / Zionist coin” which commemorated the journey of the Nazi Baron von Mildenstein to Palestine:
http://collections.ushmm.org/search/catalog/irn560259


8. Association of German National Jews (and Max Naumann, and Der Nationaldeutsche Jude)




9. German Vanguard (Der deutsche Vortrupp)




10. Joint approval, by Germans and Jews alike, of anti-miscegenation laws in Germany




11. Joseph Goebbels (esp. defense and support of Zionism, and incl. insinuations that Goebbels was Jewish based on his appearance)



12. Claims that Hitler and Alfred Rosenberg were Jewish (possible)




13. Claims that Dietrich Eckhart was Jewish (unlikely)




14. Gregor Strasser (non-Judeophobic left-N.S.D.A.P. leader; esp. views on Jews and Judaism, and relationship with anti-Semitic brother Otto Strasser)
III. World War II: Deal-Making to Reduce Jewish Deaths and Deport Jews to Palestine


15. 
Crystal Night by Rita Thalmann and Emmanuel Feinermann (esp. re: pre-Krystallnacht resistance of older Polish Jews towards criticism of the government's internal deportation and forced relocation policies; and also Nazis' gifts of cigarettes and small amounts of money to Jews who were being deported)


16Schindler's List (esp. depiction of deal-making to save Jewish lives in)


17. Nazis' support of deporting Jews to Palestine as something preferable to allowing them to go to other places (such as Poland, and Madagascar after the Madagascar Plan was abandoned)


18. British restrictions and limitations on Jewish emigration to Palestine, and British arrests of Jewish Holocaust survivors who fled to Palestine (see also British appeasement of Nazi Germany)


19
. Haavara Agreement
     http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/world-history/adolf-hitler-zionism-zionist-nazis-haavara-agreement-ken-livingstone-labour-antisemitism-row-a7009981.html


20. Zionist Federation of Germany / Zionist Federation of Germany (incl. its head, Max Bodenheimer)


21. Jewish Council(s) of Elders (
Altestenrat)
     http://yivoencyclopedia.org/article.aspx/Judenrate_and_Other_Representative_Bodies


22. Judenrat
     http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/judenrat-history


23. Rabbi Chaim Rumkowski (head of the Jewish Council of Elders of the Lodz Ghetto)

     http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QBJZzu6YsMA


24. Jewish Ghetto Police
     http://yivoencyclopedia.org/article.aspx/Ghettos/Ghetto_Police

25. Use of alcohol and prostitution in concentration camps, by Nazis, to make Jews complacent and encourage cooperation (including forced prostitution of female prisoners to non-Jewish inmates)


26. Nazis permitted Jews to use money while interned in forced labor camps (incl. I.G. Farben's use of "prize-coupons", part of the "piece-work" program)

     http://www.topic.com/the-hidden-history-of-holocaust-money



IV. Post- Israeli Independence (Post- 1947/1948): Judeophobic Zionism, Israeli Fascism, and Christian Zionism


27. Incidences of dissociative amnesia, and especially Dissociative Identity Disorder (D.I.D., formerly known as Multiple Personality Disorder), among Jewish Holocaust survivors who experienced P.T.S.D. and had to hide out as non-Jews (especially those among them who were Germans and had to take on false identities as Germans or even Nazi sympathizers in order to survive without being outed as Jewish)



28. Christian Evangelical support for Zionism (including Rabbi Yaakov Shapiro's and comedian Bill Maher's comments on this topic)



29. Cessation of Israeli hunts for Nazi war criminals (before and after Menachem Begin's reign, and after Eichmann's death and other failed attempts to capture Nazis)




30. The Jewish "quarantine strategy" (regarding how to deal with Nazis who want to march in public)
http://aquarianagrarian.blogspot.com/2019/07/should-nazis-be-allowed-to-march-on.html


31. The Other Side: The Secret Relationship Between Nazism and Zionism by former Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas









34. Right-wing political Zionism and Israeli militarism (incl. sale of Israeli weapons to anti-Semitic Syrian and Ukrainian terrorists)











35. Rabbi Yaakov Shapiro's criticism of Jared Kushner over the likelihood that Kushner influenced Donald Trump to suggest in 2019 that Jewish-Americans should be protected under anti-discrimination laws which protect people based on nation of origin (Shapiro believes that this perpetuates the “Judaism is a nationality, not a religion” myth, and also the myth that “Jews are foreign nationals and dual citizens”, which enables anti-Semitism by legitimizing being suspicious of Jewish people's political allegiances).



36. Jews in Germany say wearing kippah is "unsafe", join party accused of supporting neo-Nazism
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IWEGNDPks3M&feature=youtu.be







For more information, read my previous articles on similar topics:


- The Relationship Between Adolf Hitler and Zionism”, written in December 2010 and published in April 2014:
https://aquarianagrarian.blogspot.com/2014/04/the-relationship-between-adolf-hitler.html


- “Sixty-Three Things That the State of Israel Has Done Wrong”, published in March 2019:
http://aquarianagrarian.blogspot.com/2019/03/sixty-one-things-that-state-of-israel.html
(especially the section “
What Israel Has Done Wrong to its Own People (Jews and Israelis) and to Judaism”)







Compiled, Written, and Published on February 26th, 2020
Edited and Expanded on February 28th, 2020
Links Added on March 13th, 2020

Friday, February 22, 2019

Eighty-Six Links That May Change the Way You Think About World War II

Pre-WWII Treatment of Jews by the U.S., U.S.S.R., and other Countries


S.S. St. Louis the Ship of Jewish Refugees Nobody Wanted”:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MZvh31XXd2U

MS St. Louis - VOYAGE OF THE DAMNED”:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qMLUHcyLWRE

"The U.S. Government Turned Away Thousands of Jewish Refugees, Fearing That They Were Nazi Spies":






F.D.R. Hesitated to Get the U.S. Involved in WWII

Franklin D. Roosevelt “I Hate War” Speech August 14th, 1936”:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cKVaT3YN1ps

“The Almanac Singers – Ballad of October 16th”: (Pete Seeger singing)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HhbrYhL3OPk







F.D.R. Surrounded Himself with Anti-Semites

"Was FDR's Mother Anti-Semitic - and Does it Matter?":
http://www.jpost.com/Opinion/Op-Ed-Contributors/Was-FDRs-mother-anti-Semitic-and-does-it-matter-345786

"Did FDR Betray the Jews?":
http://www.newsweek.com/did-fdr-betray-jews-187118

"FDR Wanted Jews 'Spread Thin' and Kept Out of U.S., Documents Reveal":
- http://www.jpost.com/Diaspora/FDR-wanted-Jews-spread-thin-and-kept-out-of-US-documents-reveal-553336

"Behind the Headlines[:] The Nefarious Role of Henry Stimson":
http://www.jta.org/1984/12/27/archive/behind-the-headlines-the-nefarious-role-of-henry-stimson

"Henry Stimson Approves Passover Furloughs":
http://www.jewishpress.com/sections/features/features-on-jewish-world/henry-stimson-approves-passover-furloughs/2017/04/13/

Review of "The Conquerors":
http://www.fpp.co.uk/History/antisemitism/FDR_Beschloss_Jews.html

"Truman diary reveals scorn 'for cruel Jews'":
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/israel/1435930/Truman-diary-reveals-scorn-for-cruel-Jews.html

"Truman diary reveals anti-Semitism and offer to step down":
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/truman-diary-reveals-anti-semitism-and-offer-to-step-down-95825.html

"We Can Learn a Lot from Truman the Bigot":
http://articles.latimes.com/2003/jul/18/opinion/oe-kuznick18

"Harry and Bess: Never in My House":
http://blogs.timesofisrael.com/harry-and-bess-never-in-my-house/

"No Jews at Potsdam":
http://www.jpost.com/Opinion/No-Jews-at-Potsdam-409613





German-American "Pride" in 1930s America

"Nazis in New York City: 80 Years Ago Pro-Hitler Americans Staged a Rally at Madison Square Garden":
http://www.ampthemag.com/the-real/intersections-pro-nazi-rally-at-madison-square-garden-1939/

"Nazi Speech at Madison Square Garden Rally" (February 20th, 1939):
- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pDJzAAicPfs

"German-American Bund"
http://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/german-american-bund

"American Nazis in the 1930s - The German-American Bund":
http://www.theatlantic.com/photo/2017/06/american-nazis-in-the-1930sthe-german-american-bund/529185/

"The Day the German-American Bund Marched in Grafton":
- http://www.wuwm.com/post/day-german-american-bund-marched-grafton#stream/0

"How Milwaukee's German-Americans Faced Down Fascism Eighty Years Ago":
http://www.milwaukeeindependent.com/articles/how-milwaukees-german-americans-faced-down-fascism-eighty-years-ago/






American Collaboration with Nazis









Auschwitz: Americans and Germans Built It, the Red Army Liberated It

Why didn't America bomb the railroad tracks into Auschwitz?”:

Soviets liberate Auschwitz”:

Soviet forces liberate Auschwitz”:









U.S. and British Betrayal of Soviets

Churchill delivers Iron Curtain speech”:

'You Are the Un-Americans, and You Ought to be Ashamed of Yourselves': Paul Robeson Appears Before HUAC”:








European Acts of Nazi Appeasement

Europe Signed Pacts with Nazi Germany – But Only the USSR Is Still Accused of 'Colluding' With Hitler”:
http://russia-insider.com/en/history/western-leaders-shake-hands-hitler-stalin-blame/ri12668

7 non-aggression pacts and treaties signed by European countries with Nazi Germany”:

Nazi-Soviet Pact: GCSE/AS level history”:
(watch the part in the middle about European nations' pacts with Germany)

Wallis Simpson's affair with Nazi minister Joachim von Ribbentrop:
http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2002/jun/29/research.monarchy








Russia Was the Main Protagonist of, and Lost the Most People in, World War II

'Soviet Union could have won WWII alone'":

How the Soviet Union helped save the world from Hitler during World War II”:
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/the-soviet-union-helped-save-the-world-from-hitler-a7020926.html

Don't forget how the Soviet Union saved the world from Hitler”:

“How Many People Did Stalin Kill?”:
(read for background)

How many Russians were killed during World War II?”:
http://www.quora.com/How-many-Russians-were-killed-during-World-War-II

“How did so many Russian civilians (10 million) perished in the WW2? Were they just in the way or were they targeted?”:
(read the comments)







Why Russians Still Love Stalin

Positive views of Stalin among Russians reach 16-year high, poll shows”:

“Why So Many Russians Still Love Stalin”:
http://theweek.com/articles/467027/why-many-russians-still-love-stalin

“Why so many Russians like Stalin again”:

Red Army veteran about Stalin / Rokossovsky/Khrushchev/historical facts and myths/etc.”:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S8TZ3-he35M&feature=youtu.be

“The Big Question: Why is Stalin still popular in Russia, despite the brutality of his regime?”:

Why was Stalin nominated for Nobel Peace Prize when he did so many bad things?”:
http://www.quora.com/Why-was-Stalin-nominated-for-Nobel-Peace-Prize-when-he-did-so-many-bad-things

“Anthem of the U.S.S.R./Soviet Union by Paul Robeson”:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pO6q_mFjEUg








The Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact Was Not What it Seemed

The Nazi-Soviet Non-Aggression Pact: The 1939 Agreement Between Hitler and Stalin”:
(read for background)

“Russia's War” documentary:
     “The Night Before Midnight” (Part 2 of 10):
          - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PeeX4e7xcCU
     “The Goths Ride East” (Part 3 of 10):
          - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0NuRod84a70

“Woody Guthrie: I Was in the Revolution”:

U.S. During the Molotov Ribbentrop Pact”:
http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=XlhsEIaHU0Y

“5: GCSE History – the Nazi Soviet Pact”:

World War II – Carving up Poland (part 1)”:
http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=reMFluRR2cc

“1939 Soviet-Nazi Pact: Putin defends Molotov-Ribbentrop pact which divided East Europe”:








Steven Kotkin and FinnishBolshevik on Stalin

Steven Kotkin: “Stalin: Waiting for Hitler, 1929-1941”:
(watch from 28:07 to 39:03)

Steven Kotkin: “Joseph Stalin: Waiting for Hitler (Part 2)”:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fq5Q6YfJtC0

FinnishBolshevik: “Zizek & Kotkin on Stalin”:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M3-eFOOE-ss&feature=youtu.be&fbclid=IwAR1Oh9sElXBu1FV4ZOJpI0cBECSCl60sKxk6KJc2gntNd1_OyjvuWDVCeww

FinnishBolshevik: “Thoughts on Stalin”:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lMXN5PmcVCM&fbclid=IwAR1uSsHF6dj4x2xw6p9cqoH9wzB-92-J0i7PLa3RPAjR66vJu7-XxfVD09Q&app=desktop

FinnishBolshevik: “Was Nazism Socialist? (Response to TIK)”:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UMrYyPJI1BA








Joe Kopsick on Nazis vs. Soviets, Communism and Socialism, Gulags, etc.

Joe Kopsick: “Debunking the Top Six Claims that the Nazis Were Socialists”:

Joe Kopsick: “Reflection on the Use of Forced Labor Camps by Anarchists and Communists”:
http://aquarianagrarian.blogspot.com/2018/02/reflection-upon-use-of-forced-labor.html

Joe Kopsick: “Ben Shapiro's 'Socialism is Theft' Ignores WWII, NATO, Corporate Privilege”:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y8kQcpvDFIE

Joe Kopsick: “What Liberals and Conservatives Both Get Wrong About Socialism and Communism”:
http://aquarianagrarian.blogspot.com/2018/09/what-liberals-and-conservatives-both.html

Joe Kopsick: “'Stalin Killed More Than Hitler' Borders on Holocaust Denial”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d0Frkru0Dcs&t=1s&bpctr=1550751360

Joe Kopsick: “The Gulags Were Less Harsh Than American Prisons Are”:
http://aquarianagrarian.blogspot.com/2018/12/the-gulags-were-less-harsh-than.html

Joe Kopsick: "Stalin Killed Fewer People Than Hitler Did, and How Stalin Tricked Hitler with the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact":





Other Links on Stalin

Hitler vs. Stalin: Who killed more?”:


"Einstein, H.G. Wells, and Other Leading Figures Who You Didn't Know Were Pro-Stalin":







Links About the Pacific Theater of WWII

North Korea: Crossing the Line”:

"Japanese Submarine Sunk at Pearl Harbor is Found":
(notice that the first casualty of U.S. involvement in World War II was a Japanese submarine sailor, and that the submarine attack preceded the kamikaze attack)






Additional Links

"Let's Not Leave the Soviet Union Out of Our D-Day History":

"Russia: D-Day not a 'game-changer'; WWII's outcome determined by Red Army victories":

 “The issue of Stalin's legacy and the Soviet Union is an interesting study in how we know what we know”:



“Was Joseph Stalin a Bad Person?”:

“The Holodomor Hoax: Joseph Stalin's Crime That Never Took Place”:

“Let's Be Honest – Stalin Was Less of a Criminal Than Churchill, Truman, and LBJ”:


“Useful Links About Communism”:







Originally published on February 22nd, 2019, under the title
"60 Links That May Change the Way You Think About World War II"

Original set of 60 links collected between August 2018 and February 22nd, 2019
Additional links added on February 26th, March 7th, May 1st, and June 7th, 2019

Links to Documentaries About Covid-19, Vaccine Hesitancy, A.Z.T., and Terrain Theory vs. Germ Theory

      Below is a list of links to documentaries regarding various topics related to Covid-19.      Topics addressed in these documentaries i...