Showing posts with label abduction. Show all posts
Showing posts with label abduction. Show all posts

Saturday, April 3, 2021

Don't Shoot the Messenger: Confirming Robby Soave's Observation That it's Legal to Traffic Sixteen- and Seventeen-Year-Olds

     As comedian -turned- political commentator and podcast host Jimmy Dore has been remarking more and more often lately, "our country is full of the adult children of alcoholics, and the adult children of alcoholics tend to blame the person making them aware of a problem, instead of blaming the person who's the actual cause of the problem".
     Dore's comment seems to very accurately describe social media's reaction to Robby Soave's Twitter comments about the Matt Gaetz teenager-trafficking scandal.

     On April 1st, 2021, the New York Times and other sources reported that Matt Gaetz, a Republican U.S. congressman from Florida, is being investigated by the Justice Department for possibly trafficking a 17-year-old girl across state lines for the purposes of sex.
     Within a day or two of the Gaetz controversy breaking, Robby Soave, a writer and senior editor at the libertarian-leaning Reason magazine, tweeted in response to the scandal. His tweet read, "I really don't think Matt Gaetz committed [']sex trafficking['] even if he is guilty of exactly what the NYT describes. And in fact, the age of consent is 16 or 17 in the vast majority of states." A subsequent tweet of Soave's read, "Yes I am in fact a libertarian thank you for pointing that out".




     Soave's Twitter comments on the Gaetz scandal may seem insensitive, and it might seem like an obvious defense of trafficking teens for sex (and maybe even of pedophilia in general). Or maybe Soave is just "playing Devil's Advocate".
     But on the other hand, when Soave says "I really don't think Matt Gaetz committed [']sex trafficking['] even if he is guilty of exactly what the NYT describes", he might just mean that he personally thinks there is no merit to the reports about Gaetz.

     Still, it may seem insensitive that Soave would say that he doesn't think Gaetz is guilty "even if he is guilty of exactly what the NYT describes". It almost sounds like he's saying Gaetz is guilty and not guilty at the same time, which doesn't make sense.
     But in fact, what Robby Soave is saying about the law is 100% correct. Unfortunately, in the United States, it is currently legal to traffic teenagers across state lines, provided that they are sixteen years of age or older. This was the outcome of the 2017 U.S. Supreme Court case Esquivel-Quintana v. Sessions.

     Thus, Robby Soave may appear to be defending pedophilia and child trafficking, but we cannot conclude, solely from these two tweets, whether he is doing so because of his own personal "ethics" (or lack thereof), or whether he is doing so in order to be on the correct side of the law.
     If it's the latter, then it is sad to consider what this means. In order to be on the correct side of the law, as it stands right now, we have to agree that trafficking sixteen- and seventeen-year-olds across state lines for the purposes of sex, is not a crime against anybody, in the eyes of federal law.
     The law is giving the American people (and especially the politicians and lawyers, and those who wish to become politically involved and taken seriously) no choice but to subjugate their own personal senses of morality regarding child protection, to that of the state. This will not do.



     I found Robby Soave's tweet in a Facebook group called "Communists v. Libertarians Debate Group". Soave's tweet was posted mockingly, by a member of that group.
     Shortly after the Matt Gaetz scandal broke, and Robby Soave made his comment on Twitter, I messaged the member who posted Soave's tweet, with the following message.


 

 



     Hey. Saw your post on Communists v. Libertarians about age of consent laws. Soave might have said what he said out of a desire to lower the age of consent, but he's factually correct.

     The case of Esquivel-Quintana v. Sessions was a federal case that effectively lowered the age of consent in about 20 states, including Florida. This federal case effectively nullified the age of consent laws in those states.

     All federal sex trafficking is under federal jurisdiction, and therefore the states can't prosecute a guy who rapes a 17-year-old as long as he takes her out of state in the process. It's a fucked up situation.

     Unfortunately for some people's narrative, the Huffington Post and Jeff Sessions were on the right side of the issue. HuffPo for reporting the case ("Supreme Court unanimously overturns age of consent laws in 20 states") and Jeff Sessions for trying to prosecute Esquivel-Quintana, who traveled across state lines with a 17-year-old girl.

     I believe the girl was from California, it was some state where there was a 17 or 18 year age of consent. The Supreme Court found in Esquivel-Quintana v. Sessions that the federal government's "generic federal age of consent" of 16, won out over the states' higher age of consent laws.

     I believe that we either need to let states prosecute traffickers who take minors from their states, or else we need a constitutional amendment setting the age of consent to 17 or 18 nationwide (because varying age of consent laws in each state will inevitably lead to movement of children for illicit purposes).

 



     Many critics of libertarians - and the critics of the Constitution - like to argue that the Constitution is a living document, and that therefore it should not be interpreted too rigidly or literally.
     But it's hard not to interpret the Constitution rigidly or literally, when the U.S. Code rigidly defines all of the legal terms used in constitutional and legal language.
     To say that we interpret the Constitution "too literally", is to admit that we are interpreting it accurately, without saying it out loud.
     The critics of those who interpret the Constitution accurately, and of those of us who read the law and accurately observe from it that teenagers may legally be trafficked across state lines in some circumstances, are thus in denial.


     I would advise that people on the left who want to protect children, should stop criticizing people for noticing the state of the law. Just like the first step of recovering from alcoholism is admitting that you have a problem - and just like Lao Tzu said you must understand your enemy in order to defeat him - it is impossible to change or improve the law, unless we first recognize and admit how bad it is.
     Libertarians do not consider it fun to have to point out hard truths about the sorry state of our government, like that trafficking teenagers is legal, and that it's legal to marry babies in ten states. But we still consider it our responsibility to inform the public about bad laws, despite the fact that, in payment for this, we have only been treated like the people who caused the problem, instead of being treated as the whistleblowers we are. [My video of Joe Biden pinching an 8-year-old girl's nipple live on C-SPAN, for instance, was removed from YouTube for "cyber-bullying and harassment".]
     To reiterate what C. Frederic Bastiat said about the critics of liberty: Our critics act as if our not wanting the state to raise grain, means that we don't want anyone to raise grain; that is hardly the case. What is good for the law is not always good for the people. Similarly, the set of behaviors that are criminally punishable don't always line up with what we morally believe should be the set of behaviors that are punishable. That is why we are having this conversation; because we want the law to line up with morality.


     So don't shoot the messenger. Blame the people who are actually responsible for twenty state age of consent laws going down in one fell swoop. Blame the attorneys who represented Mr. Esquivel-Quintana. If necessary, blame the political parties with whom those attorneys are associated. Hell, blame the people who wrote the federal age of consent law, and the definition of sex trafficking of a minor or ward.
     But don't blame Robby Soave; his comments were necessary.

     The acceptable legal defense for having sexual relations with a minor, is written into the law. Until we recognize that the age of consent is too low, and we raise it and make it uniform across the states, then the current federal law on trafficking minors will serve only as an instruction to traffickers about how to get away with their crimes.
     Until sex trafficking laws are reformed, the rights of children aged sixteen and seventeen, to be free from harm, will be at risk, and those who point out this problem will continue to be mocked into silence. And the federal law on trafficking a minor or ward will be right there, to make excuses for the situation.
     We have to make it illegal to traffic 17-year-olds across state lines, if we want sex traffickers - and people like Matt Gaetz (if he is guilty) - to be prosecuted. Expecting them to be prosecuted, when what they're doing is not yet illegal (and also no longer illegal, since 2017), is irrational.
     Noticing that sex-trafficking older teens is not illegal, is not necessarily a moral endorsement of the practice; it could also be a warning. Noticing that something is not illegal, is not necessarily the same thing as saying it's good that it's not illegal. You can't know for sure what a person means by something they said, unless you read their full statement, and understand the context in which it's being said.





Esquivel-Quintana v. Sessions:
http://www.huffpost.com/entry/supreme-court-unanimously-overrules-statutory-rape_b_592edaede4b017b267edff12

My most recent article about the need to reform laws on age of consent, statutory rape, and sex trafficking:
http://www.aquarianagrarian.blogspot.com/2021/03/before-fully-legalizing-sex-work-stop.html







Written on April 1st and April 3rd, 2021
Published on April 3rd, 2021
Expanded on April 6th, 2021

Monday, February 8, 2021

Opinion: Israelis Probably Lying About Making Contact with Extraterrestrials

Table of Contents


1. Israel and Aliens
2. Israel Needs Good Publicity
3. Americans Turned a Blind Eye to Child Abuse in the 1990s
4. Adaptive Information Processing (A.I.P.) and Trauma
5. The X-Files Substituted Alien Abduction for Child Abduction
6. John Podesta Believes in Aliens
7. Steven Spielberg's E.T. is a Pedophile Grooming Film
8. Disclaimer: Jews vs. Israel
9. Conclusion



Content


1. Israel and Aliens

      On February 1st, 2021, Scientific American published an article titled “Astronomer Avi Loeb Says Aliens Have Visited, and He's Not Kidding”. Avi Loeb is an American-Israeli scientists. He bases his claim that aliens have made contact with human beings, on the idea that the pancake-like shape of the object 'Oumuamua is so odd that it could not be naturally occurring.

     You can read more about Avi Loeb's claims at the following links:

scientificamerican.com/article/astronomer-avi-loeb-says-aliens-have-visited-and-hes-not-kidding1/?fbclid=IwAR1x8-19WOMmYnvNYBTvV87n6PjNSeFQTByJkdnAlyuj3U8T5bfYU8xKcyg

http://www.amazon.com/Extraterrestrial-First-Intelligent-Beyond-Earth/dp/0358278147


     Two months prior to the publication of that article – on December 10th, 2021 – the Times of Israel published an article titled “Israeli space chief says aliens may well exist, but they haven't met humans”.

     The Times reported that Israel's space chief, Isaac Ben Israel, said that aliens exist. This came in response to the claims of retired Israeli “space pioneer” Haim Eshed, that aliens “visited Earth” and “made deals with people”. According to Eshed, Israel has had contact with a “Galactic Federation” for some time now, but the rest of humanity is not yet ready for contact with aliens.


     I, for one, am not buying any of this, however.

     Don't get me wrong; I think it's totally possible that aliens exist, given the size of the universe, particularly the parts of it which humanity has not yet explored (i.e., the vast majority of it). But I wouldn't say “aliens exist” with the confidence with which Isaac Ben Israel has said so. I have no proof, nor any evidence.

     A few notes before proceeding: 1) Not all so-called “U.F.O.s” contain aliens or extraterrestrial beings. 2) U.F.O.s are real, but the belief in U.F.O.s does not necessarily mean a belief in aliens. 3) “U.F.O.” stands for “Unidentified Flying Object”. 4) The fact that there have been objects labeled “U.F.O.s”, means that U.F.O.s undoubtedly exist, but does not necessarily prove that aliens exist. Hopefully no further explanation should be necessary.

     U.F.O.s exist. And aliens may well exist. But the Israelis need to show us more proof. All we have to go on, is bare assertion, and a pancake-shaped asteroid.


     The debate between Isaac Ben Israel and Haim Eshed reminds me of what Noam Chomsky said about the “Overton Window”, the window of acceptable debate.

     Chomsky said that people who want to restrict free speech and restrict debate, create the illusion of free speech, by only allowing debate within a narrow range (or window) of acceptability, but promoting lively debate within that range.

     The publicity which Ben Israel and Eshed received for their views on alien contact, has effectively restricted the debate, so that the only acceptable positions are “We've definitely made contact, and the Israeli space chief said so” and “We've definitely made contact, but don't tell people outside of Israel about it.”

     This narrow range of acceptable viewpoints risks inculcating people into worship and blind obedience of government, and possibly also Israeli or Jewish superiority. [Note: This is not to say that all Jewish people are Jewish supremacists! I am saying the Israeli government takes advantage of the Jewish religion in order to centralize its power.]

     The people of Israel, and the world over, should be cautious about believing what the Israelis say at face value.



2. Israel Needs Good Publicity

     The Israelis are, of course, in a monumental amount of trouble at the moment.

     Ghislaine Maxwell - a possible asset of the M.O.S.S.A.D. (the Israeli equivalent of the C.I.A., the foreign surveillance apparatus) - is in U.S. custody, and faces decades in prison. This, after her ex-boyfriend and protector Jeffrey Epstein was reportedly murdered in his prison cell, amid much debate regarding how it was done, who could have done it, and even whether he was smuggled out and replaced with a body double.

     Maxwell's father, for those who don't know, was an Israeli super-spy who died mysteriously on a yacht named for his daughter, after stealing a highly valuable prosecutorial software called PROMIS and providing it to Israel and other actors. More and more Americans are discovering this fact every day, as well as the fact that Harvey Weinstein hired Israeli hitmen from an organization called Black Cube to stalk women whom he thought were going to rat him out for sexual abuse (which was exposed by Ronan Farrow in The New Yorker and his book Catch and Kill).

     The Israelis need a distraction from Epstein, Maxwell, Weinstein and Black Cube, Alan Dershowitz (who defended Epstein, and Israeli spies involved in nuclear secrets theft and 9/11), The Zionist Bronfman family's funding of the NXIVM Hollywood sex cult, and the growing sentiment against Israel's occupation of Palestine and against the pro-Israel lobby in America.

     So why not aliens?


     I believe that we have not made contact with aliens. I believe that the Israelis are lying on purpose.

     I suspect that any Israeli who says with confidence that we have made contact, is making it up in order to promote Israel, which prides itself on its technology (for example, its microchips, and its health technology).

     In early December 2020, the Israeli nonprofit initiative SpaceIL announced that it would be attempting to send three spacecrafts to the Moon in the near future. This comes after an Israeli spacecraft crashed on the Moon in late 2019.
     I believe that these stories about having made contact with aliens, and knowing for sure that they exist, is part of a strategy to 1) cover up for Israel's many scandals; and 2) raise awareness about - and funding for - the Israeli space program and Moon missions, and for its Iron Dome missile defense shield technology (a/k/a “Star Wars”).
     Nothing would boost American donations to Israeli space companies like the possibility that the same country had made contact with aliens. One successful landing of a spacecraft on the Moon, and the Israelis will establish themselves as a space power. And getting one's foot in the door to space exploration, potentially puts Israel in a position to affect the militarization of space.




3. Americans Turned a Blind Eye to Child Abuse in the 1990s

     If you think about it, telling a child “I didn't abduct you, it was an alien abduction!” is a perfect excuse. It barely even requires changing the story. All it takes is finding a scapegoat – an alien, who doesn't exist and can't defend himself against the charge – to substitute for the real kidnapper or child abductor. It's an easy thing for a child to understand, just like “Don't tell anyone or I'll kill you – I mean the aliens will kill you.” Brainwashing complete.
     I believe that this substitution is exactly what has happened, except at a macro scale in our culture. Remember the “Satanic Panic” about ritual Satanic sexual abuse of children in daycare centers and schools in the early 1990s? After no evidence was found in the expensive McMartin preschool trial, Geraldo and other TV show hosts dropped the subject, and looked to new topics to boost ratings.
     What did they start focusing on in the mid-1990s? Sending troubled teens to boot camps on trash TV shows. Around that time, Joe Biden and his supporters were promoting teen boot camps as supposedly “less abusive alternatives to prisons”. Not every teen had that experience. You can learn more about that by researching the child abuse scandals of W.W.A.S.P.S. (World Wide Association of Specialty Programs and Schools).
     Teen boot camps were thus a convenient way to dispose of teenagers who have probably recently been abused, by sending them to be abused by professionals. Is your kid pissed off at you because you ignore him or don't talk to him? Has he started doing drugs because he can't think of any way to cope with your abuse, or feel anything but sadness and despair? He's clearly a “troubled teen” and a “delinquent” who needs some “tough love” (without the love). Send him to a boot camp!

     What else did American media focus on next, in the mid- and late 1990s? Aliens!
     Unsolved Mysteries. X-Files. 3rd Rock from the Sun. Star Trek: Deep Space Nine. Contact with Jodie Foster. Independence Day. Men in Black. The Star Wars prequels. Alien movies and shows were all over the place in the 1990s, and lots of aliens with varying combinations of cuteness and ugliness abounding along with them.
     I now suspect that this all may very well have been a subtly orchestrated and convenient way to distract America and its abused children from discussing their kidnappings and trauma.
     “Rape your kid, then blame it on aliens.” Any parent who knows how to poke holes in a child's argument and claims, should be able to use that advice successfully.



4. Adaptive Information Processing (A.I.P.) and Trauma

     In the late 2000s and 2010s, I was friends with a young man in Madison, Wisconsin, who suffered from paranoid delusionary schizophrenia, for which he took medication, and was in therapy.
     After knowing him for a year or two, he told me that he believed in aliens. Specifically, he said they were “grays” (i.e., gray aliens with large heads and large, black, oval-shaped eyes).
     Several years later, he told me that his uncle had touched him inappropriately, in a sexual manner.
     The more I thought about these two admissions, the more I began to suspect that they were, in fact, the same event. I believe that my friend thought he was abducted by aliens, but was actually molested – or abducted for the purposes of molestation – by his uncle.
     When something traumatic happens to us, our minds tend to ignore those things, because processing traumatic events – such as abuse – involves admitting to yourself that the abuse has happened. Processing trauma also involves having conscious, present access to a vivid remembrance of how you felt, physically and emotionally, when that abuse was occurring.
     The process whereby the conscious mind is shielded from traumatic memories, is called A.I.P. (Adaptive Information Processing). It is called Adaptive Information Processing because the process of pushing a traumatic memory out of the conscious mind, is an adaptive behavior. If the body needs to fight or flee in order to survive, it wouldn't make sense, from an evolutionary standpoint, if the brain had no way to push less important wants out of the conscious mind, while focusing on the most urgent one (such as fleeing from a predator or from another dangerous situation).
     It's also perhaps worth noting that Aldous Huxley mentioned in The Doors of Perception that C.D. Broad discussed the mind as a “reducing valve” which filters-out information that the conscious mind considers not necessary for us to know. Huxley built upon this idea to elaborate the notion that hallucinogenic drugs open that “reducing valve”, flinging-open the so-called “doors of perception”, allowing us to explore our unconscious and/or subconcious while we are awake (or semi-awake, as in trance states or lucid dreaming states).
     The point being: Our minds filter out information that is not useful to us. Like the spiritual knowledge that we can feel but have difficulty expressing. Or the sneaking suspicion that a loved one physically or sexually abused us in the past; so badly that we forgot about it, or blacked out in the middle of it, or denied it (or all of the above).
     From an evolutionary standpoint, it is not conducive to our survival, to be willing to admit to ourselves that a close relative has sexually abused us. After all, this probably requires confronting that relative, and close relatives are the people upon whom human beings have traditionally relied during difficult times.
     The mind would thus have every reason to block-out information like that, which could only cause trouble in the family (once known as the clan, the basic unit of civilization).
     I suspect that my friend's uncle molested him, and then did something – either overt or covert – to lead him to believe that aliens were the ones who did it. Either the uncle bombarded him with books and TV shows and movies about aliens, to subtly make him think that aliens were the explanation for whatever happened to him that night that he couldn't remember clearly; or else the uncle directly threatened him and blamed the abuse on aliens after being confronted by his nephew.
     I have not spoken to my friend in several years, so some of that is speculation on my part. But it is an educated guess. We were friends for nearly ten years.




5. The X-Files Substituted Alien Abduction for Child Abduction

     Did you ever stop to think about what the show
X-Files is about, aside from merely aliens?
     Fox Mulder spends the whole show – and especially the movie – looking for his lost sister Samantha, who was abducted as a child. Her older brother thinks it was aliens, and will stop at nothing to find out what the F.B.I. knows about aliens, other mysterious beings, and his sister's disappearance.
     Who does David Duchovny's Fox Mulder work for? A secretive F.B.I. director, played by Mitch Pileggi, who's constantly telling him to keep quiet about things he's not assigned to and that are outside of his jurisdiction.
     They're always telling him to stop asking questions. It's a conspiracy of silence.
     It apparently never occurred to Fox Mulder that the fact that his little sister was abducted as a child may suggest kidnappers rather than aliens. Someone apparently forgot to tell a young Fox that kidnappers don't just want money, they might also want to touch your genitals.
     The whole point of the show is to ask the question “Where did Mulder's sister go?” and then half-answer it with a mix of “It was aliens” and “stop asking questions”. The show is back now, and – in a reverse of what happened to Jesse Ventura's Conspiracy Theory - it is focusing on real-life government scandals more than the paranormal.
     It's hard to say whether X-Files wanted to encourage its audience to question their government more (as things seemed), or instead wanted to distract them from kidnappings, with rumors of alien abductions. As far as I can tell - based on Epstein, Maxwell, the Bronfmans, Hastert, and the admissions of former C.I.A. agent John Kiriakou – some of these child disappearances are actually being done by the U.S. government itself.
     Given what we know about how closely our government often works with Hollywood, it's hard not to wonder whether Americans were intentionally bombarded with alien stories, to distract American parents from what they really should have been worried about: teen drug addiction, teen pregnancy, teen S.T.D. rates (including H.I.V.) and who's responsible for all the child disappearances (now that we “know” it's not the school teachers or the Satanists. Right?).



6. John Podesta Believes in Aliens


     Considering this possibility - that aliens are being used as scapegoats for child disappearances – is it any wonder that former Hillary Clinton presidential campaign manager John Podesta both believes in aliens, and has been accused of child rape?
     http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/clinton-campaign-chief-john-podesta-s-interest-ufos-out-world-n674711
     In October 2016, NBC News reported that Wikileaks had leaked a 2014 e-mail from Rebecca Hardcastle Wright to Eryn Sepp and John Podesta. The topics of the e-mail were extraterrestrial experience and consciousness science.
     wikileaks.com/podesta-emails/emailid/15052
     Does this constitute an admission by the government that aliens exist? No. More likely, it is what the government directed the mainstream media to offer-up to the public, as one of the "real" Wikileaks that they are "allowed to see", in order to distract us from the more concerning contents of the Podesta e-mails.
     The e-mail may be from 2014, but N.B.C. didn't report it until the month before the 2016 election, when Wikileaks released the most damning of the John Podesta e-mails. This, to me, suggests that the admission that Podesta sent e-mails about aliens, may have been published in order to cover for, and distract from, the larger concern.
     The larger concern was, as you may remember, the allegations that he was involved in either cannibalism or child rape, in addition to participating in the occult “spirit cooking” so-called “art” practiced by apparent witch Marina Abramovic.
     Researchers were not without cause to suspect Podesta. A photograph surfaced of him with a bandage on one of his fingers, while instructions from Abramovic on how to do a spirit cooking ritual included cutting oneself on that same finger. Additionally, in the same photograph, Podesta appeared with a fish drawn on one hand, and the number 14 on the other, which researchers speculated is a reference to the Osiris myth.
     Podesta also received an e-mail on October 8th, 2015 – from Hillary Clinton aide Tamera Stanton Luzzatto – saying that her granddaughters (whose ages she listed) would be in a heated pool “for entertainment”. Luzzatto – whose husband David J. Leiter once worked as an aide for John Kerry and also lobbied for Burisma – invited Podesta to the event.
     http://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/46736
     Researchers discovered that Tamera Luzzatto once operated a blog called “Evie's Crib”, which some researchers believe Luzzatto used to profit off of using her daughters as underage camgirls (i.e., showing their naked bodies to paying strangers over the internet).
     Podesta's allusion to Osiris is not the only hint that something was off, spiritually, about the 2016 Democratic presidential campaign of Hillary Clinton. Clinton herself was shown to have mentioned the ancient Caananite Moloch in an e-mail, apparently sarcastically commenting on how her critics seem to regard her as some sort of demon. Clinton may have been making a joke, but her awareness of Moloch is interesting to note.
     Like the Israelis, it looks like John Podesta (and Hillary Clinton, and Tamera Luzzatto) has a lot to distract people from.
     So why not aliens!?



7. Steven Spielberg's E.T. is a Pedophile Grooming Film

     I shouldn't end this article without mentioning the best-known children's film about aliens, the 1982 Steven Spielberg film E.T.: The Extra-Terrestrial.
     Spielberg, as a reminder, is Jewish-American, and directed the Holocaust film Schindler's List. Spielberg donates to Jewish groups and Holocaust awareness organizations.
     Jewish-American actor Owen Benjamin made several videos in 2019 and 2020, in which he exposed the pedophilia rumors surrounding Steven Spielberg. Benjamin noted that Heather o'Rourke, the star of Poltergeist, died at the age of twelve. Her cause of death was attributed to a congenital colon disorder and Crohn's disease, but the girl's mother said she didn't have that disease. Additionally, the Los Angeles -based coroner who examined the girl's corpse was named “Dr. Frank Sinatra”.
     Benjamin believes that Spielberg, and perhaps some of his associates, anally raped Heather o'Rourke on set, causing her to go into septic shock. Some researchers have published films speculating that Henry Winkler, who had previously worked with o'Rourke on Happy Days, may have lied about how o'Rourke died. Winkler stated that he heard she killed herself.
     There has also been speculation that Spielberg named Amblin Entertainment after N.A.M.B.L.A. (the North American Man-Boy Love Association), and rumors that a drug which appeared in Spielberg's first film Amblin contains references to pedophilia, or at least homosexuality.
     Those rumors, and the Heather o'Rourke death rumors aside, Owen Benjamin explained why he believes that Spielberg's film E.T. is designed to teach pedophiles how to groom children. Benjamin showed several clips of the alien, explaining that he wears a wig, dresses as a woman, and lives in your closet. He also has a magic finger, and he wants to touch you with it. And the ending of the movie is that E.T. saves Elliot during a surgical procedure. The message of the film is that, even if E.T. is ugly, you have to kiss him (like Drew Barrymore does). You have to let him stay in the closet. Your closet, actually! Hide him in a basket and protect him from the cops!
     And you have to let him touch you, because it's for your own good, and it has a legitimate medical purpose!
     If you want to teach your child to distinguish good touch from bad touch, you tell them “nobody is allowed to see you naked, or touch your genitals, unless it's your mommy or your daddy or a doctor, for wiping, or for a medical purpose.” To show an alien touching a child with a magical finger for a medical purpose, to a young impressionable child (who is half-scared-shitless trying to figure out how the fuck E.T. is supposed to be “cute”), negates all possible objections to unwanted touching by an adult.
     Don't want E.T. to touch you? He has to! If he doesn't, you'll die! What, exactly, is the difference between telling a child “If I don't touch you, you'll die”, and “If you don't let me touch you, I'll kill you”?
     Owen Benjamin was right to point out the possibility that E.T. is a pedophile grooming film. Not only because of the reasons I have mentioned; but for several others as well.
     For one, to promote E.T., Knickerbocker toys released an E.T. “finger light” that lights up and glows when you press a button on it. This toy showed up on Lolwot.com's list of “10 of the Most Inappropriate Toys Ever Made”, due to its large size, and arguable resemblance to an adult sex toy (i.e., a dildo).
     I'm sorry that I have to say this, but it's difficult to have to think about whether any pedophilic American parent saw E.T., picked up on the film's message, and used this toy to sodomize their child or children. I do not say any of this as a joke; it is unfortunate that we have to consider this possibility.


     Owen Benjamin has also pointed out that later in his life, Spielberg directed A.I.: Artificial Intelligence, starring Jude Law, and Haley Joel Osment. Osment plays a little robot boy who wants to become human. Owen Benjamin notes that on the poster for the film, Jude Law's character is leading the little boy into a giant human mouth. This arguably suggests that the boy is being symbolically eaten alive by pedophiles. It could also be an allusion to oral sex. The fact that the little boy is a robot and becomes friends with an adult man, might also be a reference to sex dolls.
     Something is certainly creepy about Spielberg's E.T. and A.I.. Between the pictures of Spielberg with Drew Barrymore and Heather o'Rourke on each of his knees, and the kid in A.I., and the little girl screaming “Goodbye, Jews” in Schindler's List, it seems that Spielberg is obsessed with children on some level. And that is undoubtedly cause for concern, whether or not there is merit to the idea that he raped Heather o'Rourke to death.




8. Disclaimer: Jews vs. Israel

     I have entertained a lot of unlikely, but also difficult, possibilities in this article. I have Jewish friends and family members, and that is why it pains me to have to consider the possibility that there are so many lies coming out of the State of Israel.
     I want to make myself absolutely clear: The State of Israel does not represent all Jewish people. To admit that it doesn't represent all Jews, is not to say that Jewish people are divided on the issue and therefore vulnerable. Admitting that there is disagreement in the Jewish community over what to do in and with the Holy Land, actually helps dispel harmful stereotypes that Jewish people have more allegiance to Judaism or Israel than to their host countries.
     Those who steal nuclear secrets, or traffic children, or engage in other corrupt or criminal acts, have no religion. People who use violence to promote a political or religious agenda have no religion. If religion is an organized form of spirituality designed to help one live in, and adjust to, the world, and to people of other faiths living upon it, then people who commit illegal and immoral acts in the name of religion are hypocrites and liars.
     That is why, I believe, Jesus said “they are the Synagogue of Satan” in Revelation 2:9 and 3:9. He used the term to describe “Those who say they are Jews and are not.” Not all Jewish people are responsible for what Ghislaine Maxwell, or Benjamin Netanyahu, or Jonathan Pollard did, nor for what Steven Spielberg may have done. Only those who say they are Jews but are not. These people use Judaism as a cover for, and a distraction from, their crimes. They deflect criticism by characterizing all criticism of their crimes as an attack upon all Jewish people, or upon the religion.
     None of what I am saying should be construed to disparage the Jewish religion, nor the Jewish people, nor Israeli citizens. I aim only to criticize people in the Israeli government, the Israeli intelligence community and space forces, and certain Jewish-Americans in Hollywood who may be aligned with insidious elements in the State of Israel.
     Those elements are, sorry to say, evidently working to sabotage the United States, through trafficking its children for sex; in order to: 1) seal business and political deals, 2) blackmail people, and 3) use the entertainment industry to sexually groom American children and corrupt their sexual mores.



9. Conclusion

     It's hard to have to consider that Israelis are lying about aliens in order to cover-up the trafficking of children for sex, and the trafficking of nuclear secrets. But that is what I reasonably believe is going on.
     The Israeli plot to spy on the Clinton White House, nearly leaked when the Monica Lewinsky scandal happened. Some believe that she was an Israeli spy. There is widespread agreement among “deep state” or “conspiracy” researchers that an Israeli agent named MEGA had infiltrated the Clinton White House. That agent was almost certainly either Lewinsky, Rahm Emanuel, Leslie Wexner (Epstein's main funding source), or Epstein's girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell. Maxwell was photographed at Chelsea Clinton's wedding while her father was walking her down the aisle. MEGA could also be a reference to the MEGA Group, which Wexner founded.
     It's no coincidence that the 1998 U.S. bombing of Baghdad – about which liberals subsequently conveniently forgot – occurred right as the Lewinsky affair was going public. Even the neo-liberal pro-war propaganda outlet Saturday Night Live acknowledged that the new bombing campaign was a distraction from Lewinskygate.
     Regardless of the identity of MEGA, it's clear that Emanuel was in the Clinton White House, and had previous ties to Israel (through his service in the first Gulf War, and through his father's paramilitary service in the Israeli War of Independence). It's clear that the Israelis had at least several agents attempting to infiltrate the White House. If they didn't need to infiltrate, then they were welcomed inside.



     We need to remember with whom we're dealing here. Ghislaine Maxwell has a submarine company, TerraMar. She has been photographed with Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk, the two richest men in America, both of them funding private space exploration.
     Whether Epstein is alive or dead, if Ghislaine Maxwell is allowed to escape prison (or get out on work release or supervised visitations), she could potentially hide under the sea or even in space. For all we know, Jeffrey Epstein is waiting for her in a SpaceX or Blue Origin ship, satellite, or space station, compliments of whichever of those two billionaires they supplied with more child sex slaves.
     Maxwell, Podesta, Spielberg, Bezos, and Musk have immense power and wealth (and libido dominandi; the lust or urge to dominate). Who can really say what they're capable of?


     They're certainly capable of lying. They've gotten themselves this far by lying, anyway.
     If they'll lie to save themselves, they'd probably lie to cover for each other, or to distract us from Israel's crimes and its spying on the United States (with which several of our politicians probably assisted them).
     The Israeli government certainly needs good press right about now. Becoming the first country to make contact with alien life-forms – and the first people to join the “Galactic Federation” - would certainly make all nations of the Earth bow down to the Israelis for the rest of time.

     But who would want that? Who would that benefit?


     Are you beginning to understand why Alex Jones keeps talking about "trans-dimensional human-alien-hybrid pedophiles coming down from the fifth dimension"?
     There are no pedophile aliens! Alex Jones probably just got high and watched E.T., and doesn't know how to talk about it!











Written on February 8th, 2021
Edited on February 16th, 2021

Memes not created by the author.

Second meme added on June 23rd, 2021

Based on notes written on February 5th, 2021

Links to Documentaries About Covid-19, Vaccine Hesitancy, A.Z.T., and Terrain Theory vs. Germ Theory

      Below is a list of links to documentaries regarding various topics related to Covid-19.      Topics addressed in these documentaries i...