Showing posts with label school. Show all posts
Showing posts with label school. Show all posts

Monday, October 20, 2025

Shepard Middle School Supporters Lament Supposed Destruction of Lake County, Illinois "Community" That Never Existed in the First Place

I. Introduction

     The following is my sixth speech to the Illinois District 109 Board of Education, which governs Alan B. Shepard Middle School in Deerfield, Illinois.
     It is a commentary on the February 2025 actions of administrators at Shepard Middle School, who coerced a group of thirteen-year-old cisgender girls into changing clothes in front of a student who was born male but identifies as transgender.

     The majority of this speech was delivered live, at the regular monthly meeting of that body, on October 16th, 2025.
     Some portions of this speech were omitted in order to fit into the three-minute time limit which are allotted to speakers for public comments.




II. Speech

     Several months ago, one of your students asked critics of your locker room policy why we couldn’t simply ask for a private meeting with staff members, instead of airing our grievances in public.
     The reason, of course, is to subject staff members to the same kind of public humiliation to which you subjected the girls whom you made change in front of a male student.
     Maybe now, after hearing the critiques of you and your policy, over the last eight months, you are closer to understanding how those girls felt, and why they and their families objected so strongly.
     In enforcing this policy, you indicated that it’s fine to subject thirteen-year-olds to public humiliation and to (more or less) public nudity. Which means that you would have little basis from which to claim that it would be wrong to subject you - adults (who, unlike children, can take care of yourselves) - to the same type of treatment.
     I’m sure that you have experienced online bullying as part of the fallout from supporting this policy. But you are very lucky that nobody has come up here, and ordered you to take your clothes off (as one woman did, in another district with a similar policy).


     In April or May, a gentleman wearing a suit, spoke here, and said something like, “Outsiders are coming into our community, and destroying it. They don’t pay taxes here, so they should not have a voice. They are attacking our greatest strength… Our diversity.”
     Let me tell you a little bit about the “community” that we have here in Lake County, Illinois. As a reminder, I grew up in Lake Forest and Lake Bluff, which are just five and ten miles away.


     When I was six, my parents let me and my brother set up a tent in our backyard. Just after we fell asleep, our parents heard two gunshots in the distance, and made us sleep inside.
     A day or two later, a Lake Bluff police officer came to my kindergarten class, to explain what the police do. I asked “Gunshots were heard, the other night, near 524 East Washington Avenue. Do you know anything about that?” He didn’t know what I was talking about.
     Then I asked whether anyone’s phone number started with 9-1-1. I wanted to know whether there was a chance that somebody could dial 9-1-1 by accident.  Sure, using the word “prefix” would have helped, if I had known it. But either way, he didn’t know what I was talking about.
     The cops, here, are dumber than a six-year-old kid. That’s your “community”.


     When I was eight or nine, I got a paper-cut, and went to the school nurse to ask for a bandage. Despite the fact that the school could obviously afford it – and that it would have made me feel better - she said no.


     When I was twelve or thirteen, a parent in the area – Diane M. Ross – was found to have been sending child sexual abuse images over the internet. Principal (and later mayor) Kathleen o’Hara declined to convene a town meeting, to discuss the incident, despite the fact that Ross had been released, after her arrest, and was seen at an event, in the Lake Bluff town square, by concerned parents, milling about – near children – as if nothing had happened.


     On and off, between 1976 and 2023, L.F.H.S. teacher David Miller sexually abused multiple teenage boys. He was only arrested once, and was never sentenced to jail or prison, during that forty-seven year period.
     And Ross and Miler are just the tip of the iceberg. Charles Ritz, Cynthia Martin, Jonathan Dick… I could go on.


     In the 2010s, three teenage boys threw themselves in front of trains in Lake Forest.
     Gee, I wonder why they wouldn’t want to live in a town that protects child molesters!


     This is the “community” that I – and other critics of your policy – am “attacking”, when I caution you not to add to the anxiety of the people who live here, and to refrain from forcing underage girls to undress in front of a male.


     Lake County, Illinois had no community to destroy, to begin with.
     The only community value that Lake County has, is the “conspiracy of silence”, which asserts that this is such a perfect place, that no child ever needs to worry about being sexually abused.
     Which makes it the perfect place, full of unsuspecting people, of whom child abusers can easily take advantage. We’ve been lulled into a false sense of security.
     If this is what you call “a community”, then it deserved to be destroyed.

     
This is why what you have done here, with the locker room policy, is so dangerous.
     You made it even easier to abuse and spy on kids here.


     
What you did in February should haunt you for the rest of your lives, and no amount of education will make up for it.




Written on October 16th, 2025.

Most of this speech was delivered live
on October 16th, 2025.

Published on October 20th, 2025.

Thursday, August 21, 2025

Speech to the Illinois District 109 Board of Education Regarding the Forcible Transfer of Children from Parents to the State (August 21st, 2025)

     What follows is my fourth speech to the Illinois District 109 Board of Education, regarding the locker room policy at Alan B. Shepard Middle school in Deerfield, Illinois.
     In February 2025, at Shepard, at least three administrators who were strangers to students, allegedly coerced several 12- and/or 13- -year-old girls into undressing and changing, while evidently failing to ensure that a transgender-identifying student, born male, was able to see them.
     This speech was read at the monthly business meeting of the District 109 Board of Education, which meets on the third Thursday of each month at 517 Deerfield Road in Deerfield, at 7:00 P.M..
     The time limit for speakers is three minutes; this speech would have taken about four or five minutes to read in full. It was delivered with edits, in an abbreviated form.


      Since April, I’ve been advocating for the construction of more locker rooms and restrooms for non-binary individuals. But I just watched an interview with Nicole Georgas, from March, in which she claimed that the locker room controversy began when the trans-identifying student had access to a non-binary bathroom but refused to use it.
     So – assuming that’s true – I'd like to clarify, by saying this:
     It is important to build an equal number of bathrooms – for non-binary, intersex, and transgender people – for the sake of ensuring equal accommodations. If equal accommodations can be ensured, then there is no excuse to object to designating non-binary restrooms as the restrooms that non-binary students are supposed to use.
     The restroom problem has been solved; the new problem seems to be that the trans student doesn't want it solved. But the locker room problem persists; so please build new locker rooms for non-binary students.


     I left you last time by asking you to look up the phrase “forcible transfer of children from one group of people to another”. I mentioned that phrase because it is one of the components of genocide, and because I worry that your staff may have committed it in February.
     To be clear, I am not directly accusing you of genocide. Rather, I am saying that, if children were an ethnic group, then the Illinois Democrats – the people who want you to enforce this locker room policy – would arguably be complicit in genocide (and so might you, by extension, for helping to enforce it, rather than exercising your natural right to conscientiously object to abusing children as part of your jobs).

     To review:
     Since you caused children to fall into the custody of at least three strangers, you arguably committed unlawful detention, and possibly even kidnapping (because transfer that happens without parental knowledge cannot possibly be consensual on the part of either the parents or the child). If it’s not consensual, then it’s coercive; and therefore (covertly) forcible.
     I submit that this is the same type of "forcible transfer of children" which the definition of genocide describes; hence, my concern.
     I will now cite the definition of genocide, from the Cornell Law School’s law dictionary, to defend my argument.

     As I explained, one of the components of genocide is the forcible transfer of children from one protected group of people to another. Also, to commit genocide, someone must target an ethnicity for destruction.
     It is worth noting here - as an aside - that the Universal Declaration of Human Rights says that each of the world's independent nations has "the right to compulsory education" of children. Children have a right to be educated... by force.
     Excuse me, but if we're having a "say something that doesn’t make sense" contest, then I raise you "children are an ethnicity".

     Ethnicity is not a strictly genetic concept, in the way that race is, because it can include religion. Under the widest possible definition of “ethnicity”, children could count as an ethnic group, because they all have a shared custom in common; namely, child's play.
     But even if children could never legally be considered an ethnicity, they are still a protected class (because the case of Troxel v. U.S. affirms that child custody is conditional upon not abusing the child). And parents, likewise, have the protected right to retain custody, provided they refrain from abusing their kids.
     [And if you doubt that the state is a protected class, you can study 11th Amendment case law regarding the state’s sovereign immunity, its right to extend that immunity to others, and legal limitations upon the right to sue the government.]
     So, then, it would not be out of line to suggest that these children were forcibly transferred from one protected group of people (parents) to another protected group of people (the school, which is part of the state), in a way that comports with the definition of genocide.
 
     Last month, I talked about the sterilization of kids with the puberty blocker Lupron. I don't know how many of you are in favor of puberty blockers, but you should know that eleven- and twelve- year-old girls are having hormone-emitting devices installed in their arms while they scream. I hope you do not support that. But to those of you who do, I say this:
     The children at Shepard were forcibly transferred; some of the girls who were victimized might decide never to have children because of this.
     You also, arguably, destroyed this group of children "as such", meaning that you took their childhoods; destroying them inasmuch as they were children. Destroying a group "as such" is another component of genocide. As Stromboli says in Pinocchio, "They don't come back [from Pleasure Island] as boys".
     So if you're in favor of risking committing kidnapping, and traumatizing people into not reproducing, and sterilizing non-consenting minors with chemicals - and I and the girls' parents are against those things - then whom, exactly, is committing the genocide against trans children?

      There’s more than one theory, here, about who “the real Nazis” are.
     Stop enforcing the locker room policy. The use of force is wrong.




Written and published on August 21st, 2025

Based on notes taken in July 2025.

Edited on August 22nd, 2025.

Thursday, July 24, 2025

Abridged Speech to the Illinois School District 109 Board of Education Regarding Transgender Students' Access to Locker Rooms, July 24th, 2025

     The following is the text of a speech which I plan to deliver, in whole or in part, at the July regular monthly meeting of the school board of Illinois District 109.

     That district includes Shepard Middle School, whose staff allegedly coerced a group of thirteen-year-old girls to change clothes in the presence of a student, assigned male at birth, who identified as transgender, and who may have been within range to see the girls changing.

     The meetings have a three-minute time limit.  The following speech would take about six minutes to read in full.

     The meeting will be held at 7:00 P.M. at 517 Deerfield Road in Deerfield, on Thursday, July 24th, 2025.





     It is truly unconscionable what you’ve allowed to happen here. This should be the last straw and last stand for any rational parents.

     There are so many things here that have been done wrong, that I have enough to say about it to last me the next four months of meetings.

      I could talk more about why my proposal to add bathrooms for non-binary individuals is the safest and most equitable and sustainable solution.

     I could talk about how the way you enforce your locker room policy not only could put children at heightened risk of being trafficked to people they don't know, but also - in effect - actually already did traffic them to people who they (and their parents) didn't know.

     Or I could talk about about how the governor’s ban on the banning of books makes it difficult to get books containing rape, child rape, incest, and pornographic content out of school libraries.

     Or about how - when residents come up here and say “outsiders are coming into our town and attacking us”, or when Asher McMaher says the trans male student was “attacked” – it reminds me of Nazi military leader Herman Goering saying “all you have to do [to get people to support a war] is tell them they are being attacked”.

     I could talk about how Asher McMaher could be sued, for defaming the girls, by falsely claiming  that the boy was attacked when he was just criticized. Especially if you can sue parents, or people who speak here – and take their money - for failing to correctly guess what crimes the staff committed against children, in private, without their parents knowing who had custody of them.

     I could talk about how giving the trans male’s parents whatever they want here, means that you may be ignoring the possibility that the boy’s gender-questioning feelings could be motivated by previous child sexual abuse by a family member or a friend of the family (and a 2021 study showed that 19 percent of trans kids were sexually abused).

     I could talk about how the people who gave you this policy, are aligned with Governor J.B. Pritzker’s billionaire transgender sister, Jennifer, who’s funding a lot of these efforts, and profiting off them (and so is AbbVie, the company that pollutes our county with “volatile organic materials”, while producing Lupron to sterilize adult sex offenders and potentially sterilize confused children as well).

     I could talk about how you’ve failed to post security guards or even greeters at the entrances to your schools, for in case a shooter shows up to an event outside normal school hours (so you’ve failed to guard against shootings and sexual impropriety against children).

     Or about how it’s unconstitutional for you guys to receive federal funds for education, in the first place, no matter where you have the trans kids change clothes.

     But those things are boring, and don’t communicate the gravity of the situation. So let’s read this definition of genocide, from Cornell Law, and see how much of it you guys are doing.

     Intent to commit genocide includes any one, or more, of the following acts, even if incomplete or unsuccessful: “Intent to destroy – in whole or in part – a[n]… ethnical… group, as such.” Ethnicity technically means just a “common cultural background”, so that could include children. Playing is kind of a common cultural background.

     Destroy them “As such”… The childhoods of children who were abused, were destroyed. Thus, abused children are destroyed as children. Like Pinocchio’s Stromboli said, “They don’t come back as boys”.

     “Causing … mental harm”… Certainly the girls suffered that.

     “Imposing measures intended to prevent birth”. Bottom surgery, anyone? You didn’t do it, but you support it. It’s being done to 17-year-olds now. Double mastectomies for 13-year-olds. Hormone-emitting devices implanted into 11-year-old girls.

     Forcible transfer from one group to another… Like from parents to the state?

     You – and the people behind this locker room policy - have committed at least three components of intent to commit genocide; against homosexual and gender-questioning minors, by confusing them into thinking they’re trans, then partially or completely sterilizing them, and filling their heads with thoughts of suicide by insisting it's the only alternative to transitioning.

     Everyone supporting that wider set of policies, towards trans-identfying kids, is acting as if children should be treated like pets and slaves whom their parents and a doctor can castrate, at will, for attention and money. You are abducting children from “non-affirming” homes and lying about transition satisfaction rates.

     You, your staff, the Pritzkers, the other Democrats, and AbbVie should all be put on trial for kidnapping, child trafficking, accessory to sex crimes against minors, and attempted intentional conspiracy to commit genocide against gender-questioning and homosexual minors.

     And “even if the incitement is not obvious to outsiders” (like me), incitement to commit genocide "can still be considered direct as long as the intended audience immediately understands the message”. I believe you know very well what you're doing.

     First you have declared war on this nation’s children, now you are committing war crimes against them. The intent to destroy their bodies and spirits is clear.

     And you can’t sue me for saying that, because I just proved it.

     Invoke your right of conscientious objection to a human rights abuse, stop enforcing that locker room policy, stop violating Title IX, and tell your union and governor that you have a responsibility to interfere with the commission of this legalized crime.




Written on July 24th, 2025.

Based on "Speech to the Illinois School District 109 Board of Education
Regarding Transgender Students' Access to Locker Rooms, July 24th, 2025",
which was written on May 15th, June 17th, and July 24th, 2025.


Thursday, March 20, 2025

Reaction to Shepard Middle School Staff Pressuring a Girl to Disrobe in Front of a Trans-Identifying Boy

Part I: Introduction

     The following article is my reaction to March 2025 reports out of Deerfield, Illinois, that teachers and administrators at Shepard Middle School (part of School District 109) attempted to "force" a teenage female student to disrobe in a locker room, in front of a boy who identifies as a girl.
     This incident happened for approximately one week, around the beginning of February 2025.

     Readers wishing to learn more about this story can click on the link below to read A.B.C. 7 News Chicago's coverage of the event.

     This speech would take somewhere between fifteen and twenty minutes to read; while the Board of Education's speaking time is likely limited to three minutes per person.
     The text below consists of the speech that I would give to the District 109 Board of Education if my time were not limited.
     I will attempt to read portions - or a new draft - of this speech, at the district's next meeting.

     The next meeting of the District 109 Board of Education begins at 7:00 P.M. on Thursday, April 10th, 2025.


     [Author's Note, Added March 30th, 2025:

     I made several references, in the below text, to the student being told to strip "nude" or "naked". Since it is unclear whether the student was coerced or expected to fully disrobe (as opposed to partially disrobe) - and since that would probably make no difference from the perspective of the student - I have left references to "nude" and "naked" unchanged. The student's parent has not yet clarified what, precisely, teachers ordered the students to do, and how exactly those teachers prevented them from leaving the room.
     Readers should also keep in mind that I have occasionally used the word "force" as a short-hand for "coercion". Teachers did attempt to coerce one student into (at least partially) disrobing in front of someone, in front of whom she did not want to change. The fact that she resisted, is not proof that no force occurred; that's because the other girls in the room did comply. While teachers will undoubtedly argue that their compliance was consensual and in-line with the rules, it could also be argued that those girls complied because they were given no other option, and therefore were coerced (or forced).
     I will be more careful about by usages of the words "force", "nude", and "naked" in my future writing on this topic, but I used these terms here for a reason; because they are spectrums. Overt physical violence is the most obvious form of violence, but pressure and manipulation are low-grade forms of force just as well. Just as people who are partially clothed, are also partially naked.


Part II: Original Comment

     My name is Joe Kopsick, I live in Waukegan but I attended Lake Forest schools growing up. I’m here to comment about the girls who were forced to strip nude in front of the boy.

 

     There’s an episode of “The Simpsons” in which Marge – as a little girl – is about to start kindergarten, and her older sisters are trying to scare her about school, by saying that there is just one giant toilet, and “they make you all go at the same time”.

     You people in school administration and government are making our reality into a nightmare so bizarre that Hollywood screenwriters couldn’t even make it up if they tried.


     Here are three interesting facts.

     Fact Number 1: Statistics collected by the Associated Press between 2011 and 2015 show that about 17,000 public school children reported molestation over those four years (by either a teacher or a fellow student). A subsequent report by the U.S. Department of Education revealed that fourteen thousand one hundred molestations were reported in just a single school year (2017 to 2018). Divided by 180 school days, that comes out to seventy-eight kids molested or raped, in public schools, somewhere in America.

     Fact Number 2: School shooting statistics from 2018 (roughly the same time period), show that 114 students were shot and/or killed that year.

     What this all means is that American public school kids get molested or raped one hundred and twenty-three point six times as often as they get shot or killed.




     If guns must be banned "even if it could only save the life of just one child", then what about the privacy, safety, and innocence of children? Are those things really less than one percent as important as their lives, that the people educating them should be going out of their way to invent new types of sex crimes to commit against them?

     Instead of turning schools into “gun-free zones” – which are really just “sitting-duck zones” – why don’t we adequately arm the security guards who are protecting the schools, and make sure the security guards are talking to the building’s engineers and making sure that the doors and locks are all working properly?

     Because you guys get paid whether they get shot or molested or not.

     Instead of taking guns away from law-abiding citizens – because some 20-year-old shot up a school (probably because they’re mad that they were molested by a teacher) – why not ban child molesters from the schools?

     How many kids need to be abused in schools before we realize that government is not about civilization, it’s about slavery and submission?


     There’s an episode of “The Office” in which the character Ron Swanson causes a little girl to start thinking that government is not trustworthy. So the girl’s mother gets upset, and talks to Ron. Then Ron Swanson advises the girl: “Listen to your teachers”.

     Here’s another interesting fact, in case you’re still thinking that government is good.

     Fact Number Three: Since thirty-five states have failed to specifically criminalize police having sex while on duty, police officers are essentially free (in those states) to coerce arrested suspects into having sex with them in order to get uncuffed and be set free. That means that in two-thirds of the county – including in Illinois – it is effectively legal for police to handcuff and then rape people without a warrant and without charging them with a crime.

     We must rid ourselves of the delusional notion that the government is here to help us.



     Garbage like that – and like what happened at Shepard Middle School – is why people don’t want to pay taxes.

     I wake up every day, and go to work as a security guard, knowing that every Monday through Friday, nine months out of the year, seventy-eight kids a day or more are getting molested, and I’m not allowed to stop funding it. Teachers use that money to pay union dues, those unions hire lawyers to defend any and all teachers accused of abusing kids.

     You people are forcing me – and every other taxpayer in this country – to fund a nationwide system of rape factories. I’ve chosen to opt-out of having kids (so far). You know what I’m not allowed to opt-out of? Funding a system that allows seventy-eight public school children to be molested per day.

     Take our money out of your pockets and give it back; you are molesting our kids instead of educating them and we want our money back.


     Shepard Middle School claims to provide “private” changing facilities; but what does that mean? First; Are there single-occupant changing stalls, available as alternatives for girls who don’t want to change in front of trans-identifying boys? Second; Even if there are, does that really merit taking away a girl’s access to the girls’ locker room – or a boy’s access to a boys’ locker room – just because they don’t want other kids to see them naked?

     Why should girls’ privacy (and boys’ privacy) be eroded, simply because society erroneously thinks that a trans-identifying person – whether child or adult – should get to see anybody naked that they please, provided that their stated identity matches who’s allowed to enter the room in question?
     A policy that is nonsensical cannot possibly be enforceable.

 

     Shepard Middle School is claiming that nobody was forced to change in front of others. If that is true, then why are we hearing that the girl in question was not allowed to leave the room?

     How does blocking exits not constitute force? The answer is that it absolutely does; therefore, these teachers and administrators should be charged not only with conspiracy to attempt to commit an act of public indecency against minors; but also with false arrest and/or false imprisonment.

     The fact that trapping is not an overt act of physical force, does not mean that it is acceptable to trap minor children in a room as you order them to take their clothes off.

     And the fact that these children have to teach you this, means that you’re not qualified to teach children, because you are dumber than children are.

     These teachers, effectively, arrested students in that locker room. These teachers and administrators are acting like cops. Discipline means teaching; it does not mean physical or sexual abuse.

 

     God forbid your child gets abused by a teacher. Do you know who your teacher’s union is going to hire? Great people like Steve McCollum, who has defended at least two different Lake Forest -area teachers for that crime, and happens to be friends with two child-molesting lawyers; Scott Gibson and Richard Kopsick. Scott Gibson pinched my ass at his pool parties in the 1990s. Richard Kopsick is my father, and he raped me when I was eight and nine years old. He also served on the school board of District 65 in the mid-1990s.

     These teachers (and other child abuse suspects) are hiring friends of child molesters – and, in some cases, probably even actual child molesters, themselves, as well – to defend them in court. So don’t tell me that lawyers are unbiased just because they promise to defend their clients to the best of their ability. Some of these lawyers are defending accused child molesters because they are pro- child molestation.

     Lake County is not safe for children. You have all been lulled into a false sense of security. The professional classes of this county are raping your kids, and they’re doing it with your money.
     In 2021, a sixteen-year-old girl was raped in a school bathroom in Virginia, by a boy who was wearing a skirt.

     This is not an accident; the schools are doing this to your children on purpose. It wasn’t just gym teachers who made these girls disrobe; it was school administrators.

     In May 2023, in North Carolina, a girl, approximately fourteen years of age, was given a lap dance by an adult male transvestite – as part of a school-sanctioned event – while a crowd of students and teachers laughed and cheered.

     This… is… intentional. The goal is to induce compliance and submission, through sexual humiliation; whether in public, or in a space that should be private but has been stripped of the privacy that it once provided.


     We need to stop politicizing this issue, and instead allow each individual student to undress, and use the toilet, in locations that theynot the teachers – believe is the safest and most private. We need security guards to stand, posted, outside of restrooms and locker rooms, to break-up physical and sexual assaults; and to be adequately armed while posted at entrances whose locks are routinely checked to ensure that they work properly and can keep gunmen out. And we need security guards to detain adults who are dancing suggestibly for children, and then hand them over to the police, to be charged with violating laws against public indecency.

     That’s what we need; we don’t need teachers trapping underage girls in locker rooms and forcing them to disrobe while a boy watches.


     How easy does it need to be, for an adult male to enter a restroom where women and girls are present, before we realize that we are completely letting our guards down, and giving attempted child molesters and kidnappers a head start and a free pass?

     It’s possible that some adults are mature enough to handle gender integration in restrooms. But people still get beaten up in bathrooms – and they probably always will – because they’re relatively private – and enclosed – spaces. That’s why the interests of safety, security, and privacy must not be compromised in these places.

     The needs of adults aside, experimental policies desegregating restrooms and locker rooms on the basis of gender identification – when forced upon minors - cannot possibly be consensual, because children can’t consent.

     That’s why – when dealing with minors - adequate but separate accommodations should be made; for trans people, and girls, and boys. If trans people want their own spaces, then that should be conditional upon leaving girls and boys alone to enjoy that same right.

     Furthermore, individuals of any kind who would like a heightened level of privacy, should have access to private, single-stall accommodations, whether they identify as trans or not. But at the same time, each restroom and locker room door should be clearly labeled. with regard as to whom is allowed in, to prevent confusion. Every one of these suggestions can be implemented without resorting to forcing students to prove their gender or sex in order to get in.


     I suspect that we haven’t even stopped to ask ourselves why trans students can’t play sports with girls or boys, but then shower and change somewhere aside from the girls’ or boys’ designated rooms. So all of these suggestions can be implemented without even prohibiting trans-identifying kids from playing on the team of their choice.

     When gender-separated and gender-integrated teams both exist – and each individual student can choose which team they’d like to be on – each student will have the equal right to freedom of choice and the equal right to privacy.


     A school that refuses to respect the privacy, safety, and decency of its children, must be abolished. A government that refuses to respect the consent of the governed must not stand.

     Forcing people to strip naked is what the Nazis did to the Jews before they shot them to death and then threw them into a shallow grave. It’s what they did to Jewish women before they raped them, and to Jews in general before they gassed them. Anyone who’s even superficially familiar with history should be able to guess what’s coming next.

     It’s also worth noting that the Nazis typically didn’t do these things until after they had already separated the men, the women, and the children from one another like cattle. That’s what administrators are, effectively, doing to your families every morning, when one parent (or more) goes to work, and the child is dropped off at school and placed in the custody of a government employee.

     Something like what happened at Deerfield Middle School will happen again and again – and brand-new forms of child abuse in schools will be invented every year - until public schools are abolished.

     If we cannot completely reform schools - by hiring more security guards, and get social workers (whom are trained to spot signs of abuse) to sit-in on parent-teacher conferences – then we need a vote of total lack of confidence in our schools, and in all levels of our government.

     If we cannot get immediate and sweeping reform, then parents should engage in mass refusal to send children to public schools on the grounds that they are extremely likely to be molested or shot while there.

 


Part III: Addendum

     I’d like to clear something up, regarding the school’s claim that “nobody was forced” to change in front of others.

     I admit that I do not have all the details of the case. But, based on what I can gather: If it’s true that “nobody was forced to change”, then that is only because the girl resisted, and spoke up, and told somebody.

     If the girl had not resisted, then she would have been forced to disrobe in front of others. That’s the issue. We don’t care whether the attempt to make the girl disrobe was successful; it shouldn’t have been attempted to begin with.

 

     I know that I just said we should avoid politicizing this issue. And I still do want to avoid politicizing transgender people’s rights. But I need to mention the Donald Trump rape case in order to make an important point.

     The jury in E. Jean Carroll’s rape case against Donald Trump, found that he did not rape her; yet he was still found liable for civil damages. How is this possible? Because the only reason Trump did not rape Carroll, was because Carroll successfully fought him off. He’s still an attempted rapist, her claim about what happened did not defame him because she didn’t lie and didn’t say what she said out of malice. That is why he was ordered to pay her money.

     The fact that teachers and administrators failed to make one of those female students at Shepard Middle School, strip naked, doesn’t make them innocent, it makes them attempted child sexual abusers. Doesn't matter that they failed; they're still attempted child abusers because they made the attempt.

     It is not these minor students’ jobs to make you teachers and administrators into innocent people, or to save you from your own guilt, by defending themselves against your inappropriate treatment. The burden is upon you – the teachers and administrators - to stop exposing them and to stop preying upon them in other manners.


     Overt physical force is not the only form that force comes in. Threats, intimidation, manipulation, pressure, and taking away viable alternatives without just cause, are all violations of a person’s right to be free from force (and free from having their refusal to give consent, ignored).

     What's really happening here is that you people are terrified that children might learn that it's okay to say "no" sometimes.

     Asher McMaher said the girl’s mother is trying to “use [her] child to push [her] agenda to use this situation to try to harm a kid, who all they’re trying to do is go to gym class”. This accusation is not reasonable.

     For one, if the mother “had an agenda” and hates trans people, then she would have complained at the beginning of the school year – six months ago – instead of in March. Moreover, if her daughter says she was coerced or pressured to take her clothes off – or was unreasonably deprived of viable alternatives which were previously normally available to her – then we have no right to tell her that she did not experience that.

     Nobody is trying to “harm” the transgender-identifying male who was allowed into the girls’ locker room. That student should have the same right to safety and privacy and comfort as everybody else; but at the same time, no minors should be pressured in any way to get naked – or see others naked – unless they’re totally comfortable with it, and the avenues of lodging a complaint or objection are functioning properly.


     Give these students private and safe restrooms and changing facilities. We must not pretend that the comfort of one transgender student means that cisgender individuals do not have the equal right to comfort and privacy.

     Stop pretending that it is so difficult to find an ethical and equitable arrangement without resorting to attempting to coerce students into getting naked in front of people around whom they aren’t comfortable; for whatever reason, and without requiring them to provide a reason.

     The privacy of all children must be respected; end of story.

    

 

"Patr I: Introduction" was written on March 21st, 2025.

"Part II: Original Comment" was written on March 19th, 2025,
and edited and expanded on March 20th and 21st, 2025.

Originally published on March 21st, 2025.

"Part III: Addendum" was written on March 20th - 21st, 2025.

Expanded on March 23rd, 2025.

Edited and Expanded on March 30th, 2035.

Author's Note (in introduction) added on March 30th, 2025.

Thursday, December 28, 2023

Why Political Science Students at the University of Wisconsin at Madison Should Consider Dropping Out

 Author’s Note / Introduction


     The full title of this article is “Why Political Science Students at the University of Wisconsin at Madison Should Consider Dropping Out (Or at Least Changing Their Major)”.


     The following letter was written for the University of Wisconsin at Madison’s “Political Science at Work” event.

     That event took place at Great Hall at Memorial Union, and was organized by SuccessWorks Alumni Relations Team (at the College of Letters and Science Center for Personal and Professional Development), on October 23rd, 2023.

     The purpose of the event was to introduce students to alumni working in professions which theoretically might be available to contemporary students, when they complete their studies, graduate, and enter the work-force.

 

     This letter was provided – before editing was complete – to students who were in attendance.

     This article has been edited and expanded since it was delivered to the two students who chose to speak to me at that event.





The Letter


Dear Students:


     I suppose that I am here to tell you how to use your degree to help yourselves get a job. But the truth is that I have never used my degree to help myself get a job.
     In fact, I told my parents repeatedly that I suspected that I would never use my degree for that purpose, and that I had no intention of doing so.

     While I changed my mind about my intentions at times – working for the Liberty Tree Foundation for the Democratic Revolution (a lobbying organization founded by former Jill Stein presidential campaign manager Ben Manski), and by running for the U.S. House of Representatives four times – I am still struggling to use my degree in order to get a job.

     It has been thirteen years since I graduated. I currently drive the cheapest car I can afford, live in the cheapest apartment I can afford, and still have to work 48 hours per week, at fifteen dollars an hour. I even struggled with drug addiction and homelessness after leaving college.

 

     For one thing, this is because the economy (by which I mean the job market) was terrible when I enrolled at U.W. (in 2005). I spent years thinking, “I won’t have a good job until these Baby Boomers start retiring, and some spaces for me open up, and they’re too greedy to do that until decades from now.” And I was right.

      For another thing, I chose Political Science as my major, after at least five years of knowing that our government is so irredeemably corrupt, that a person like me would never belong as part of it. Granted, my home state (Illinois) is more corrupt than Wisconsin is. But neither state truly embraces freedom.

     Additionally, I have difficulty getting a high-paying job – and using my degree to do so – because I ended up with a 2.3 G.P.A.. [Notes: 1) G.P.A. stands for "Grade Point Average". 2) A 2.3 G.P.A. is the equivalent of a D+.]


     You might assume, from this fact, that my low grades were entirely my own fault. But the truth is that my grades had been steadily slipping since early-on in high school.

     And the reason why my grades had been slipping, was because I was depressed. And the reason why I was depressed, was because of my father (whose controlling nature and failure to help me plan, caused me to miss an opportunity to graduate high school a full year early).

     My father also sexually abused and assaulted me as a child. Not that I was aware of this fact; you see, I suffered from repressed memories of sexual abuse between the ages of 13 and 28 (2000 to 2015).


     For most of you, this will (hopefully) be a difficult thing to relate to. But it needs to be brought up; even if only one person can be helped by it.

     Who among you can honestly say that you are here at college solely due to your own choices? Now, maybe none of you were forced to go to college by your abusive parents in order to help cover-up and distract from the fact that they abused you as children (in fact, Jeffrey Epstein paid for the college tuition of several of his own victims, in order to assuage them, and to legitimize his own abuses). And I hope that none of you were.

     But who among you can say, additionally, that you are not here at college simply because you were expected to do so? That you were told, and expected, to go to some college, because your high school had high rates of students who went on to college, and because not going to college would make you “the odd man out”?

     Is that really a good-enough reason to go to college? Does that reflect the kind of independent thinking that this university thinks can be taught? You should at least understand what you’re getting yourself into, and you should consent to it, right?

 

     The fact is, I was never asked, even once – during my entire four years at U.W.-Madison – whether I was here of my own volition. Not in freshman orientation, not by my guidance counselors (who were more focused on helping me navigate the frustratingly slow course registration programs, which would often require a commitment of days and days waiting to register for a simple set of four or five classes).

     If you are not here of your own volition, then it logically follows that you are here as a hostage (most likely, of your parents).

     In my opinion, it seems that this happened because U.W.-Madison does not value consent; or if it does, then it is only for sexual purposes, and not for economic, social, political, nor contractual purposes.

     You see, when I first enrolled at U.W.-Madison, it was 2005. This was a full six years before almost anybody had ever read headlines indicating that Jeffrey Epstein was friends with Prince Andrew (which was only in British tabloids at the time), six years before it became acceptable to question whether governments could be complicit in child trafficking, and fourteen years before Epstein was finally caught (and the full corruption of the system began to be revealed).

     In 2011 – while in a haze, having forgotten the abuse I suffered at the hands of my father, due to being repeatedly re-traumatized, and forced to depend on my abuser for survival – I knew, somewhere deep within myself, that there were people associated with the government (even people not directly employed by it, such as my attorney father, whose clients include people accused of rape) who abused children. Therefore, I was nearly afraid to discuss the possibility that people who seek political power often do so because they want to abuse children.

 

     One major fact demonstrating that U.W.-Madison does not value consent, is that it preys upon impressionable young 18-year-olds, who are either making decisions using their parents’ money, or else are dependent and nearly helpless due to having to depend on the university and its career advice while working their way through college at low wages.

     Another fact – although I was scarcely aware of it at the time - is that U.W.’s Sociology Department employed a professor named John DeLaMater. This man, who has since passed away, after my time here, served as the instructor of the university’s Human Sexuality courses in sociology.

     Once, while offering interested students an extra-credit opportunity, Professor DeLaMater held up a prize to students who won a contest related to researching human sexuality. That prize was a red T-shirt that read, “Teach your children about sex, or I will”.

     We snickered when we saw that shirt, and heard what it said on it. But I only understood the problematic nature of this prize, and this statement, years later, when I put some things together. You see, another optional assignment that we were afforded in that course, was to view the film Kinsey, starring Kevin Kline. That film depicts sex researcher Alfred Kinsey interviewing a man who had confessed to raping children and animals.

     Since leaving college, I have discovered several disturbing things about Kinsey. First, that he thought it was normal and healthy and beneficial for children to engage in sexual activity. Second, that his inordinate focus on sex criminals, in his research, has been described as unethical, and skewed the results of his research in favor of the perverted and the criminal. Third, that he has been accused by his biographers of attempting to solicit a former Nazi for photographic evidence of sex crimes against children. Fourth, that a statue of Mr. Kinsey has been erected in his home state of Indiana, at its university.

 

     The University of Wisconsin is not telling you this, however; because they want your money. According to financialaid.wisc.edu, the cost of a four-year degree, for in-state students, is currently about $45,000 for tuition for in-state students, plus $54,000 for meals and housing; amounting to a whopping $99,000. And for out-of-state students, this figure rises to a total of $214,000.

     The university is teaching students to choose a major, and then to become graduate students and then professors of that major, in order to set up what basically amounts to an Amway-style, “divide-and-conquer”-oriented Ponzi scheme, to teach people to teach how to teach useless subjects which students could not possibly help the world, or themselves, by learning. The objective of this is to burden students with more and more student debt (through F.A.F.S.A.), and trick students into thinking that – if they vote for the right control-freak for president – he will forgive all the student debt. But this, too, is a scam; as Joe Biden’s debt forgiveness plan only amounts to a total debt forgiveness for students who attended college at particular times, had less than a certain amount of debt, and have no criminal records whatsoever. Another objective of this cycle is to grow the government, and its cost, until the public sector eats-up the entire economy, eventually swallowing the private sector whole, until there are no unlicensed or lightly-regulated businesses left in this country.

 

     Speaking of the problem of high expenses of attending college: One of the things that we were sold in 2005, as part of our required purchases in order to attend classes, was an expensive digital surveying device, which allowed us to remotely submit answers to questions asked in class. Strangely, I don’t remember any class, aside from Human Sexuality, in which I used this expensive device. And one of the things I was asked – at age 18 or 19 – was how often I was engaging in sexual activity. I was asked this, without any hint of caution as to how or why it may be unethical for professors to ask such questions.

     I repeat: this university does not care about your consent, in economic, social, political, or contractual contexts. It only wants you to consent to sex enthusiastically, so it can normalize the fraternity and sorority systems (and the sometimes sexual hazing which they practice), and so that they can take thousands upon thousands of dollars of your (or your parents’) hard-earned money.

     What is the point of spending between $100,000 and $214,000 on a Big Ten University education, when the internet exists; that is, when most books are already in PDF form, which you can download for free online? Why would they need to take so much of your money, when they can simply teach you how to use a library, a card catalog, and the internet? I don’t know what things are like now, but far too little emphasis was placed on these skills when I was attending.


     When I told a friend that I was about to attend this SuccessWorks event today, he told me that I was supposed to use my degree - and the fact that I had chosen a Legal Studies or Political Science major – to get an internship with a local politician. I was supposed to volunteer my time; which, for students who were strapped for cash, simply amounted to unpaid labor, free for those politicians, which is not much different from pressuring a person into involuntary servitude.

     But then, of course, these opportunities supposedly offered us “exposure”. But the university never told us this, and they certainly never told us that you can die of exposure.

     This university wants you to be utterly reliant on its guidance counselors (whom, in my time here, were rarely available) for career advice.


     But alas, here you are at college. But have you ever stopped to ask yourself “What is the purpose of education”? I bet you haven’t.

     If you must know, the purpose of higher education is supposed to be to equip students with the skills and knowledge necessary to get high-paying jobs, so they can compete in a modern, interconnected, global economy.

     The problem is, however; we never stop to ask ourselves, “Why is competition necessary?” Couldn’t we be cooperating instead? Competition is only justifiable in lifeboat scenarios involving scarcity, but even then, competition is only tolerable; it is still not preferable, nor equitable.

     Additionally: “Why aren’t they teaching us to help other students learn the material?” Just as fifth-grade students are not expected to be able to teach everything they learned last year to the fourth-grade students, you will not be expected to teach younger students unless and until you become a graduate student. But why should things be that way?


     Nevermind the issue of “What do you do if you can’t find a politician to volunteer for, who shares your values and morality”, and what to do if you are disillusioned by that politician’s lack of scruples, or by their commitment to towing the party line to the detriment of the freedom and equality of the people. Nevermind the issue of which politician to volunteer for, if you are a libertarian, a progressive, or a communist.

     As a matter of fact, during my time, a teacher’s assistant told us, point-blank, that “communism doesn’t work”. He said this without supplying evidence, without disclosing that there are literally dozens of formulations of communism which have never been tried, and without entertaining the possibility that the actions of the U.S. military are among the chief reasons why regimes that attempt communism are forced into collapse.

     Nevermind the issue of why your professors won’t tell you that what’s “necessary and proper” (see McCulloch v. Marlyand) for the government to do, is largely a matter of opinion, until it occurs to you that you need to ask them that question, ten or fifteen years after graduating.

     Put all that to the side.

     Instead of “How am I going to use my degree to get a job”, you should be saying to yourself “I don’t even know what I don’t know”, and asking “What do I need to find out about, that I need to find out about?"


     Do you really think that your professors are going to tell you that there were fourteen people who held the post of “president” before George Washington and before the Constitution was signed?

     Do you really think your professors are going to tell you that there are two asteroid belts in our solar system instead of one? Or that the debate about how many planets we have, is not between eight vs. nine (because of Pluto), but rather, eight vs. thirteen (because other dwarf planet exist)? Of course not. Why would they offer you free information up-front, when they could, instead, simply take your money, and teach you nothing?


     Most people enter politics for one reason: because they want power. And sadly, it seems that many people are entering education for the same reason.

     Have you realized yet that the state wields legitimate violence, and, in so doing, legitimizes violence (the use of which is always unethical)?

     Have you realized yet that a government is nothing more than a criminal gang – a mafia – which has legalized the use of violence when it is exercised by itself, but which criminalizes the use of defensive force when it is used by the people without begging and paying their government for the right to do so beforehand?

     Have you realized yet that the public employees who police our street are only obligated to protect and serve people who have private property and private contracts with said police (due to the decision in Warren v. District of Columbia, 1981), while so-called private security guards (which happens to be my profession) are, bizarrely, trained to believe that their purpose is to protect individual members of the public, instead of the private properties which they patrol?

     The world is upside-down. That is why you need people like me, asking you the difficult questions; to shake things up, to get the world right-side up again.


     If you care about getting health care to people who need it, then don’t study political science or try to learn how to write legislation; go to medical school and become a doctor.

     If you are more interested in how to distribute resources to people who sorely need them, then you should be an economist, not a political scientist.

     If you care about expanding the private sector, then don’t get into political science in order to figure out ways to get the government support the private sector. That defeats the purpose, and is antithetical to free-market ideals. Instead, go to business school, or study economics.

     If you are more interested in current events than politics, then you should be a journalist, not a political scientist.

     If you care about other peoples in the world, then don’t study political science. Study languages or linguistics or communication.

     If you are worried about the lack of opportunities which young Americans face (for example, in comparison to people in Germany and China) in acquiring marketable technical skills (rather than simply writing articles that nobody will ever read), then don’t advocate for more student loans, and access to tech courses, through legislation; you should, instead, simply drop out of this college and go to a technical school.

     I never did go to a technical school, and I regret it all the time, because I don’t have any marketable skills. I would have liked to go to school for music production, woodworking, or electrical engineering, but my rapist father said I could only do so after graduating. I did graduate, but he stopped supporting me after that, so I never went back to school. I started educating myself, which was always – and always will be – an option available to you.


     Now, this is all very different from saying that you should drop out of college because young people who are pressured into performing child labor have an edge at getting and staying employed, compared to people who go to college and choose useless majors.

     Not that that isn't true.

     But the result is the same, because your professors are not going to tell you that there are plenty of businesses that post job offers of $12 or $15 an hour, while expecting people to have Masters’ Degrees (which theoretically entitle them to teach college).


     The point that I’m driving at, here, is that - if you stay in college - then you are probably going to get scammed. Do you really want to dedicate four years of your life regurgitating what is said by people who last had to look for a job forty years ago? Do you really value grades and “money” (whatever that is; really, it is Mammon) more than your own integrity? To paraphrase Mark Twain, “Never let your schooling interfere with your education”.

     And why do we need jobs anyway, or money? It’s not like if you run out of money, or stop using money, you die, anyway. Look up a man named Daniel Suelo; he lives without using money. We are being indoctrinated into thinking that man will die if he does not use money, and it is simply not true.

     We are led to assume that it is necessary to pull as much legal tender out of the economy as possible, because there is scarcity. But is there really? We are being led to assume that scarcity, limitedness, fixedness, and finitude are all the same thing, but they aren’t.

     Water falls from the sky for free, and government sometimes makes it illegal for us to collect it. We are told “nothing is free”, yet the air we breathe is free.

     Most of the things that cost money, only cost money because they legally have to cost money. We will not die without money; we will die without resources.

     We are told that we need money to buy food; yet 1/3 of all the food in the world is thrown away. Does this sound like scarcity (a situation in which we have less than we need) to you?

     So if we don’t have scarcity, then we have abundance. Resources which are abundant, rather than scarce, do not need to be distributed. Not through government, nor through competition, nor even through economic science, nor even economizing itself. Such resources are simply not necessary to distribute; people should just be able to come and collect them, because there are enough to go around. So why do we need politics and government, and economics, to distribute resources which are abundant and therefore don’t need to be distributed in the first place? Nobody at this university is asking this question or thinking this way.

     And a university which fails to impel you to ask important questions like these, is only doing one thing: It is committing widespread education fraud, whether passively or actively and intentionally.

     And if you come out of the University of Wisconsin at Madison, with bad grades, finding difficulty getting a job, then it is not necessarily solely your fault. It is the fault of your professors, who indoctrinated you with propaganda, and led you to assume things that are simply not true; contributing to your forced dependence upon whomever tells you lies the most confidently.


     Get out while you still can. RUN. And never look back.

     Get a low-stress job. Start reading whatever you want in your spare time. Learn how to do something productive like building a table, for your own sake.

     Invest in yourself, and in your own ethics and integrity; not in this university. I beg of you. You don’t want to be like me; sad and ignored, and begging for help and attention that I know I will never receive.

     Do you want to be a real person, or do you want to be a piece of paper? Do you want to be so smart that people can’t understand you? Do you want to be so smart, that you’ll end up wishing you weren’t so smart that you can’t relate to ordinary people? Do you want to view everything through the lens of politics, such that you can’t relate to any problem in the world except through how people and resources can be controlled? Do you want to fail to become the well-rounded person that this university falsely promises that you will be, when you get enough “breadth and depth” in various topics, through your coursework? Do you want to be – as Ronald Reagan said about Democrats – so smart that the things you think you know, just aren’t so?

     If the answer to all of these is “yes”, then you do belong here, but you also probably need therapy.

     Speaking of which, the school psychologist (if he or she exists) should probably try harder to make him- or herself better-known. During my first month studying here, a young woman jumped off a parking garage and killed herself; possibly because she was homesick, was pressured to attend college, or both. Perhaps she had been sexually assaulted; I don’t know. Either way, psychologists and grief counselors need to make themselves more available – or available at all – to help counsel students after such sad events.

     Additional complaints that I have about this university are that: 1) it didn’t teach me time-management skills, and I still have a problem leaving everything – including this letter – to the last minute; 2) I had nightmares about missing classes and tests for years after graduating; 3) nobody here ever told me that, if I wanted to get into Harvard or Yale law schools, it would help if I knew Latin, Greek, or Hebrew; and 4) this university has failed to produce any politician capable of defeating Joe Biden (who molested a child live on C-SPAN2 on January 6th, 2015) for president.


     Hopefully that will be enough to make my point: these people do not give a fuck about you, nor the facts, nor your feelings. They want your money.

     Your intellectual freedom begins today. Congratulations.


     I have so much more to say, but so little space; and it would be unfair of me to pressure you to read any more of the things I would like to say, because they are things that I may have wrongly been led to assume. As Bruce Lee once said, "A good teacher protects his pupils from his own influence."

     As I said, independent thinking cannot be taught, it is certainly not taught here, and anyone who tells you otherwise is trying to scam you.

     Please contact me, Joseph W. Kopsick; not if you would like to learn more, but if you would like to challenge yourself to think harder, and think more independently.

 

 

 

 

 

- Joseph W. Kopsick,

University of Wisconsin – Madison,

Graduating Class of 2009


- Private Security Officer with Howe, Security, Inc.

- Highest wages I have ever earned:

$15 per hour, working legally and taxably;

$20 per hour working a “side hustle” doing personal home organizing


 

- Only political job I have ever worked:

$9 an hour, walking door to door asking hard-working people to hand me their money,

for the Liberty Tree Foundation for the Democratic Revolution (headed by Ben Manski),

in Madison, Wisconsin,

for one month



-          Based in Waukegan, Illinois

- E-Mail Address: jwkopsick@gmail.com

- Phone Number: 618-751-3229




Originally written on October 23rd, 2023

Edited and Expanded on November 6th and December 28, 2023

Published on December 28th, 2023

Waukegan Mayor Sam Cunningham Normalized the Same Type of Political Violence He Claims to Oppose When it is Practiced by I.C.E. (800th Post!)

I. Introduction      The following speech is an address, regarding immigration, which I delivered to the Waukegan City Council on October 20...