A BLOG ABOUT INDEPENDENT POLITICS, POLITICAL ETHICS, ECONOMICS, AND ANARCHISM. Political theory, U.S. politics & election statistics, the political spectrum, constitutional law & civil liberties, civil rights & interstate commerce, taxation & monetary policy, health care & insurance law, labor law & unions, unemployment & wages, homelessness, international relations, religion, technology; alternatives to the state
Showing posts with label voluntaryism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label voluntaryism. Show all posts
Sunday, December 6, 2015
Sunday, April 20, 2014
John Locke, Roderick Long, and Voluntary Taxation
Written on October 6th, 2012
as an e-mail to Panarchist John Zube
The following was written in regard to Roderick Long's criticism of John Locke's justification
for the Leviathan as an endorsement of monopoly government.
Long
uses a three-person desert island scenario to show that it is unfair
for one person to wield the ability to always resolve the disputes of
others, because that one person might be given too much leeway to
resolve potential disputes which concern him in his own favor.
This
leads me to wonder whether voluntary governance can only occur if
individuals are required to submit disputes which they cannot resolve
among themselves to some - although not necessarily (and preferably
not) always the same - neutral, fair, independent, and uninterested
arbiter.
I
think it is choice - minimally restrained; restrained to selection
from among the existing set of alternatives - that makes government
voluntary, more than it is freedom to self-govern which does so.
This
is because an ungoverned person is free to intervene in disputes
which do not involve him without others asking, and free to act in a
way that affects others without their knowledge and / or consent
(anarchy = tyranny / Statism; panarchy is neither anarchist nor
Statist).
This
is the argument I make to defend the notion that my taxation plan is
truly voluntary, because to create perfect competition requires that
persons become insured against harm to personal and property harm,
and therefore it is reasonable to assume that most public goods
provision would be linked to - and resemble (as in the Agorist
formulation) - insurance.
My
understanding of Konkin's and / or Robert Murphy's views on the topic
is that self-governance should not be prohibited, but that society
would boycott uninsured / ungoverned individuals due to the risks
involved.
For
more entries on justice, crime, and punishment, please
visit:
http://www.aquarianagrarian.blogspot.com/2010/10/thrasymachus-support-for-justice-being.html
http://www.aquarianagrarian.blogspot.com/2010/10/thrasymachus-support-for-justice-being.html
http://www.aquarianagrarian.blogspot.com/2014/04/social-policies-for-2012-us-house.html
For
more entries on taxation, please visit:
http://www.aquarianagrarian.blogspot.com/2014/05/tax-cuts.html
For
more entries on theory of government, please visit:
Labels:
Agorism,
arbitration,
common law,
Free Market,
John Locke,
law,
Libertarian,
Locke,
Lockean,
Market Anarchism,
private law,
Roderick Long,
state,
Statism,
Tax,
Taxation,
Taxes,
voluntary,
voluntaryism
Criticism of the Secret Ballot Voting System
Written on December 8th, 2011
Edited in April 2014
Any
candidate for public office whose campaign does not emphasize the
abolition of the secret-ballot voting system - whether Democrat,
Republican, or independent - favors a secret, private government; one
which rests on power which is maintained through aggressive, violent
force and the threat thereof, rather than on consent, voluntary
association, and duly-delegated decision-making authority.
Secret
ballots make for secret government; government which is - by force
and power disguised as "law" - unaccountable and
irresponsible to the people of which it claims exclusive dominion.
Irresponsible,
exclusive dominion is indistinguishable from the right of private
property; these politicians literally own us. Why should we elect a
politician who does not make it an issue that he will only use his
violence-defended power but once, in order to release us from his
ownership?
Show
me the document that proves you ever authorized one of your elected
representatives to make decisions on your behalf. You can't do it
because the secret-ballot system makes this impossible and "illegal".
"All
votes shall be by secret ballot." - Constitution of the State of
Wisconsin, Article III, Section 3.
Read
"No Treason" by Lysander Spooner.
[The remainder of this entry is a response to someone's comment that "The secret ballot protects my right and yours to vote for whom we choose without intimidation or force. Abolishing the secret ballot would be abolishing the most crucial element of a democratic republic. It's an idiotic idea."]:
It’s
fine when people agree to use the secret ballot, like when they
freely join labor unions, and vote on issues in them. But we’re
talking about the government here. Take the State of Wisconsin for
example.
The
land of Wisconsin was conquered (stolen) and secured through force.
Nobody ever unanimously consented to be governed and protected by the
Wisconsin government – especially the people who had the right to
the land – and now people have no choice as to who protects them.
Governments
have a monopoly on the provision of security, and a “monopoly of
legitimate violence” (which Obama has supported). We are forced to
pay them taxes, which gives them the power (but not the authority, by
which I mean authorization) to defend us against real enemies, as
well as any enemies they feel it necessary to invent.
But
even if any group of people had ever unanimously consented to be
controlled by a government which operates under the secret ballot,
those people’s consent would not be binding upon we individuals
today. We are absolutely sovereign to control our own destinies, and
our ancestors cannot compel us into supporting a system which we wish
to have no part in.
Being
that we must consent to be controlled by the government which claims
the exclusive, monopolistic right to protect us within the
territories over which they exercise jurisdiction, the secret ballot
only entrenches the government’s power to do things that we do not
wish them to do, including to hide the results of the elections from
us, or at least from the majority of us, and only show those results
to unaccountable bureaucrats.
The
secret ballot does not protect us against intimidation and force; the
secret ballot is the basis of government intimidation and force. We
are not free to resist the government, and that is why all voting is
done under duress. We are forced to choose between the lesser of two
evils, and we are never free to choose that nobody control us.
If
any one of our politicians were asked to produce a list of the group
of people who delegated their authority to him, he would legally not
be able to do it. Our politicians can also not produce written
evidence that they ever swore an oath to support our government’s
founding document.
They
are not accountable to the people, they are not accountable to a
piece of paper, they are accountable to nobody but themselves.
Clearly the secret ballot is the problem. Whether and how an open
ballot system might be the solution remains to be seen.
I say it’s
worth a shot.
For
more entries on elections and campaign finance, please visit:
http://www.aquarianagrarian.blogspot.com/2014/05/why-voting-is-not-necessarily-evil.html
For
more entries on government secrecy and N.S.A. surveillance, please
visit:
Questions About Ayn Rand
Written on September 28th, 2011
Rand
criticized altruism as the precept that one should give up his life
and welfare for others while demanding that others do the same.
She
said, “It’s fine to help other people if you want to” “when
and if those others mean something to you selfishly”, and she did
not consider reciprocating gifts to others – even those whom one
loves – as a moral duty.
In
light of these comments, it appears that what Rand most abhorred was
not the act of giving to others so much as the promotion of
the idea that one should feel obligated to give to others.
She
also characterized reciprocal altruism as “an exchange of…
presents that neither party wants”.
Did
Rand fail to take into account the free-market principle of
subjective value; i.e., the idea that transactions which are mutually
voluntary are always mutually beneficial by the subjective standards
of all parties to the transactions?
How
can those who subscribe to Rand’s philosophy – evidently equating
the feeling of
moral obligation with coercion and force themselves –
simultaneously advocate the abolition of obviously coercive Statist
social-welfare programs while actively discouraging charitable giving
to those disadvantaged whom they do not know and expect the
disadvantaged to receive any benefit from the moralistic capitalist
system which Rand recommends be practiced?
How
is the Randian capitalist who – when asked to participate in a
mutually-voluntary transaction (which would not take place unless
each party found the transaction to be in his mutual interest and
benefit) – feels it appropriate to actively discourage charitable
giving to the disadvantaged (even at the risk of their prolonged
suffering and death) any different from the socialist laborer who
consents to have profit extracted from him by a capitalist
entrepreneur, and then unionizes his fellow employees, and actively
encourages workplace democracy as well as the eventual violent
overthrow of the capitalist system?
For
more entries on theory of government, please visit:
Friday, February 22, 2013
Agorism and Mutualism: Summaries, and Compare and Contrast
Agorism is a system in which free and voluntary society is pursued through competition with the State and counter-economics.
Counter-economics is market action which is either forbidden by the State (black market) or unapproved or unintended by the State (gray market); for example, "under the table" interactions, tax-dodging, trading-out, sharing, gifting, bartering, and trading.
While minarchism expresses the notion that the State should only secure and defend people, protect their property, and provide essential military, police, and justice systems; Agorists view each of these services as a market in which there should be competition.
Agorism would therefore see the State monopoly on the provision of those goods replaced by multiple syndicates (or companies, agencies, organizations) which compete against one another for customers.
Additionally, Agorism seeks to specialize services typically provided by the State, causing its functions (such as personal security and defense; detention and arrest; detection and investigation; dispute-resolution / arbitration / adjudication; restitution; and property protection and insurance) to be split-up into separate industries.
Significant contributors to Agorist thought include Samuel E. Konkin III (basic theory), J. Neil Schulman (counter-economics), Wally Conger (class theory), Robert Murphy (private law and defense, and insurance), Brad Spangler, Gary Chartier, Charles W. Johnson, and Mike Gogulski.
Mutualism is an ethical philosophy and theory embracing mutuality and reciprocity, as well as an economic theory. It intends to be the “synthesis of community and property”, and is associated with the phrases “anarchy is order without power” and “property is theft”. Mutualists support titles to landed property, as long as it is continually occupied, used, and accessed.
Proudhon favored possession of land, workplaces, and means of production by individual workers and peasants, or by collectives thereof; and desired that access to land not be arbitrarily withheld from those who desire to labor on it.
Mutualist Pierre-Joseph Proudhon described himself at various times as an anarchist and a federalist, favoring a federation of voluntarily-associating co-operatives (or workers’ associations). He also favored a national bank which would give loans at a minimal interest rate, its administration costs funded by income tax on capitalists and stockholders, and also by the minimal interest rate.
Although Mutualists oppose income derived from loans, investments, ground rent, and interest on capital, Proudhon wrote that he would not support legal prohibitions of those practices. Mutualism is based on the labor theory of value, promotes a system in which trade represents labor, and supports workers earning the full product of their labor as property.
Many Mutualists disagree with the notion that having wealth gives one a right to accumulate more wealth – especially through rent, profit, and interest – viewing such practices as forceful, fraudulent, and / or coercive.
Significant contributors to Mutualist thought include Pierre-Joseph Proudhon (articulation of ethical theory into anarchist theory), Josiah Warren, Lysander Spooner, and William B. Greene.
Disputes between Agorists and Mutualists typically revolve around:
- Whether unoccupied, unused landed property should be protected as a right (especially in regards to the Lockean proviso, which gives that homesteading is permissible only when one adds his labor to it, and enough land is left for others)
- Whether value should be thought of as subjective, or objective (such as value and trade based on labor)
- Whether exploitation of labor by capital for profit is coercive (and objectively unethical), or merely hierarchical (and subjectively unethical)
- Whether the Non-Aggression Principle of voluntaryism and the ethical imperativeness of reciprocity are valid expressions of the Golden Rule and / or an objective ethics (if such a thing exists)
- Whether Agorism and Mutualism are tactics, or philosophical theories
- Whether revolution, insurgency, or reform are feasible or ethical tactics
- Whether internationalism, nationalism, federalism, municipalism, and panarchy are feasible geographical organizational structures
Agorists and Mutualists generally agree that:
- Monopolies of many or all varieties should be opposed
- The right of contract should be supported
- Voluntary cooperation should be promoted
- Counter-economics / social counter-power / dual power, and gradualism are feasible and ethical tactics
- Anarchy is a form of order (articulated by Austrian economists as catallaxy; spontaneous orders include catallaxy [associated with market-anarchism] and stigmergy [associated with social-anarchism])
- Most varieties of capitalism and socialism are insufficiently supportive of individual rights
Counter-economics is market action which is either forbidden by the State (black market) or unapproved or unintended by the State (gray market); for example, "under the table" interactions, tax-dodging, trading-out, sharing, gifting, bartering, and trading.
While minarchism expresses the notion that the State should only secure and defend people, protect their property, and provide essential military, police, and justice systems; Agorists view each of these services as a market in which there should be competition.
Agorism would therefore see the State monopoly on the provision of those goods replaced by multiple syndicates (or companies, agencies, organizations) which compete against one another for customers.
Additionally, Agorism seeks to specialize services typically provided by the State, causing its functions (such as personal security and defense; detention and arrest; detection and investigation; dispute-resolution / arbitration / adjudication; restitution; and property protection and insurance) to be split-up into separate industries.
Significant contributors to Agorist thought include Samuel E. Konkin III (basic theory), J. Neil Schulman (counter-economics), Wally Conger (class theory), Robert Murphy (private law and defense, and insurance), Brad Spangler, Gary Chartier, Charles W. Johnson, and Mike Gogulski.
Mutualism is an ethical philosophy and theory embracing mutuality and reciprocity, as well as an economic theory. It intends to be the “synthesis of community and property”, and is associated with the phrases “anarchy is order without power” and “property is theft”. Mutualists support titles to landed property, as long as it is continually occupied, used, and accessed.
Proudhon favored possession of land, workplaces, and means of production by individual workers and peasants, or by collectives thereof; and desired that access to land not be arbitrarily withheld from those who desire to labor on it.
Mutualist Pierre-Joseph Proudhon described himself at various times as an anarchist and a federalist, favoring a federation of voluntarily-associating co-operatives (or workers’ associations). He also favored a national bank which would give loans at a minimal interest rate, its administration costs funded by income tax on capitalists and stockholders, and also by the minimal interest rate.
Although Mutualists oppose income derived from loans, investments, ground rent, and interest on capital, Proudhon wrote that he would not support legal prohibitions of those practices. Mutualism is based on the labor theory of value, promotes a system in which trade represents labor, and supports workers earning the full product of their labor as property.
Many Mutualists disagree with the notion that having wealth gives one a right to accumulate more wealth – especially through rent, profit, and interest – viewing such practices as forceful, fraudulent, and / or coercive.
Significant contributors to Mutualist thought include Pierre-Joseph Proudhon (articulation of ethical theory into anarchist theory), Josiah Warren, Lysander Spooner, and William B. Greene.
Disputes between Agorists and Mutualists typically revolve around:
- Whether unoccupied, unused landed property should be protected as a right (especially in regards to the Lockean proviso, which gives that homesteading is permissible only when one adds his labor to it, and enough land is left for others)
- Whether value should be thought of as subjective, or objective (such as value and trade based on labor)
- Whether exploitation of labor by capital for profit is coercive (and objectively unethical), or merely hierarchical (and subjectively unethical)
- Whether the Non-Aggression Principle of voluntaryism and the ethical imperativeness of reciprocity are valid expressions of the Golden Rule and / or an objective ethics (if such a thing exists)
- Whether Agorism and Mutualism are tactics, or philosophical theories
- Whether revolution, insurgency, or reform are feasible or ethical tactics
- Whether internationalism, nationalism, federalism, municipalism, and panarchy are feasible geographical organizational structures
Agorists and Mutualists generally agree that:
- Monopolies of many or all varieties should be opposed
- The right of contract should be supported
- Voluntary cooperation should be promoted
- Counter-economics / social counter-power / dual power, and gradualism are feasible and ethical tactics
- Anarchy is a form of order (articulated by Austrian economists as catallaxy; spontaneous orders include catallaxy [associated with market-anarchism] and stigmergy [associated with social-anarchism])
- Most varieties of capitalism and socialism are insufficiently supportive of individual rights
Approximate figures regarding topic of argument,
"Agorist-Mutualist Alliance" group on Facebook
For
more entries on banking, the treasury, currency, inflation, and
business, please visit:
http://www.aquarianagrarian.blogspot.com/2014/05/response-to-campaign-for-liberty.html
For
more entries on enterprise, business, business alliance, and markets,
please
visit:
http://www.aquarianagrarian.blogspot.com/2010/10/enlightened-catallaxy-reciprocally.html
http://www.aquarianagrarian.blogspot.com/2010/10/enlightened-catallaxy-reciprocally.html
http://www.aquarianagrarian.blogspot.com/2014/05/agorist-protection-agencies-and.html
For
more entries on theory of government, please visit:
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
How to Fold Two Square Pieces of Card Stock into a Box
This series of images shows how to take two square pieces of card stock (or thick paper), and cut and fold them into two halves of a b...
-
Table of Contents 1. First Introduction 2. Second Introduction 3. Artificial Sweeteners, Feces, Cheese, Antibiotics, Coffee, Alcohol, and ...
-
Table of Contents 1. Introduction 2. Cuomos Tied to Ghislaine Maxwell and Pedophile Producer John Griffin 3. Gavin Newsom's Wife Alleged...
-
The following list of thirty television shows, consists of shows that either desensitize people to children getting hurt physically or ...



