Showing posts with label NATO. Show all posts
Showing posts with label NATO. Show all posts

Thursday, May 8, 2014

Foreign Occupation and Declaration of War

The following was written in April 2014, as part of a response to the Campaign for Liberty's 2012 survey questionnaire for candidates running for federal office.



10. Will you oppose using U.S. forces to occupy a foreign nation without a declaration of war?

     Yes, I will oppose using U.S. forces to occupy a foreign nation without a declaration of war. Although the War Powers Act authorizes the president to deploy limited numbers of troops for limited times, the president cannot authorize attacks or strikes without the approval of the American people through Congress, unless there is imminent danger to the United States.
     The U.S. military should primarily be focused on defending the American people rather than acting in a militant manner and spending as much on so-called defense as the next 15 to 20 nations combined. Our military and intelligence forces should not intervene in the domestic affairs (including elections) of national governments unless refraining from doing so enables such a government's official apparati to inflict imminent harm upon America, and upon law-abiding American people and agencies abroad.
     Although I will to promote diplomacy, trade, and peace with all nations, I do not believe that this should involve formal military alliances, as I believe that we should heed George Washington's advice avoiding entangling alliances with foreign nations. I will support efforts to end formal military alliances with all nations, and to end U.S. membership in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization.
     I believe that our membership in N.A.T.O. - and our close relationships with the State of Israel and Saudi Arabia – only increase the chance of the United States fighting in more wars without congressional approval, and of the U.S. being expected by the international community to fight other nations' battles for them. This only diminishes the independence and military strength of such nations, while allowing them to fund their governments while the U.S. bears much of the costs of their protection.
     I will vote to cut foreign aid completely, but until that time, any foreign aid budget the federal government maintains should not reflect the kind of favoritism towards particular governments and peoples which has been suggested by the recent trends of vastly disproportionate disbursements to Israel and Egypt (which combined contain just over one percent of the world's population).
     Additionally, the U.S. military should not use drone planes to spy in other countries (either to collect information or to attack enemies of the United States) without the approval of Congress and without the authorization of the nation within whose borders and air space the use of such drones occurs.




For more entries on military, national defense, and foreign policy, please visit:
http://www.aquarianagrarian.blogspot.com/2010/10/american-sovereignty-restoration-act-of.html

Sunday, April 20, 2014

Summary of Webster Tarpley's Libya Analysis

Written on March 30th, 2011
Edited in April 2014



   This is what I gather is going on in Libya and thereabouts, based on what Webster Tarpley has to say about the matter:

   The C.I.A., MI-6 (along with British Special Air Services), al-Qaeda (a C.I.A. / MI-6 / Mossad / Saudi / Pakistani intel creation), and other mercenaries have been staging coups throughout the Middle East and North Africa.

   The belligerents consist of the United States, Canada, Britain, France, Italy, the United Nations, N.A.T.O., and the League of Arab Nations.

   The rebels which the Western forces are backing consist of C.I.A. / al-Qaeda brigades out of Saudi Arabia and Egypt, and possibly some originating from Libya itself.

   The Western powers are encouraging the civilian populations of those Arab countries to demonstrate against their leaders, while making it appear as though the Western powers are merely co-opting the revolts in order to oust those dictators.

   The Western powers’ aim is to stop Arab dictators from nationalizing their oil industries and giving oil profits to their people, and to instead direct that oil to the West.

   The Western powers’ plan to accomplish this goal is to install pro-Western puppet regimes wherever possible – be it in segments of the countries or in the entirety of the countries – which will be less hostile to Western interests.

   They desire to balkanize the subject countries in order to make it easier for Western and imperialist interests to control the flow of oil.

   So basically, the idea that the U.S. is co-opting the revolts is a red herring. The U.S. and Britain are actually behind the revolts, and it's the demonstrations - and not the coups - which are being staged.




For more entries on military, national defense, and foreign policy, please visit:
http://www.aquarianagrarian.blogspot.com/2010/10/american-sovereignty-restoration-act-of.html

For more entries on Judaism, the State of Israel, and the Israeli-Arab conflict, please visit:

How to Fold Two Square Pieces of Card Stock into a Box

      This series of images shows how to take two square pieces of card stock (or thick paper), and cut and fold them into two halves of a b...