Showing posts with label polyopsony. Show all posts
Showing posts with label polyopsony. Show all posts

Tuesday, October 28, 2014

Seven Basic Conditions for Perfect Competition and a Complete System of Markets


     1. MOBILE FACTORS OF PRODUCTION WITH EQUAL ACCESS: The factors of production (land, labor, and capital) are perfectly mobile in the long run (and mobile despite barriers to trade), and equal access to them is enjoyed.



     2. SUFFICIENT FIRMS, AND MANY BUYERS AND SELLERS: There are no increasing returns to (economies of) scale (i.e., there are enough firms in each industry); a polyopoly-polyopsony exists (i.e., there are many buyers and many sellers); and there is no market power (or power to purchase and determine price), such that each participant is a price taker and no participant influences the price of the product it buys or sells.



     3. INTERCONNECTED MARKETS, AND HOMOGENOUS AND FUNGIBLE PRODUCTS: Any agent can trade any good for any other – directly or indirectly – with any other agent. Goods and services are perfectly homogenous substitutes for one another, their qualities and characteristics not varying between different producers and suppliers.



     4. PERFECT INFORMATION, RATIONAL BUYERS, AND PROFIT MAXIMIZATION: All consumers and producers are assumed to have perfect knowledge of products' production methods, quality, price, and utility; buyers are assumed to be capable of making rational purchases based on information given; and firms are assumed to sell where marginal costs meet marginal revenue (in order to maximize profit).



     5. NO FRICTION, NOR BARRIERS TO ENTRY AND EXIT: Transaction within markets, and entry into and exit from markets, all occur without any barriers or fees of any kind. No friction exists; the complete set of possible bets on future states-of-the-world can be constructed with existing assets (not speculative or leveraged assets) without friction.



     6. INSTANTANEOUS PRICE ADJUSTMENT: The adjustment of supply and demand to one another, and the calculation of price, are instantaneous, rather than slowed, delayed, or inhibited.



     7. PROPERTY RIGHTS, AND NO EXTERNALITIES: Property rights (including buyers' rights, and concerning what is to be sold) are well-defined. No externalities, which effect third parties, occur (whether positive or negative, intentional or unintentional).

Sunday, April 20, 2014

On Monopoly and the Scott Walker Recall Election

Written on June 5th, 2012
Edited in April 2014



   I posted the following in response to someone who said "Anyone who votes for Walker is on the wrong side of history.":

   This whole system is on the wrong side of history.

   People who like Walker should be able to choose to remain governed by Walker, people who like Barrett should be able to choose to be governed by Barrett, and people who like neither - i.e., probably everyone in this discussion - should be able to choose to be governed by someone else.

   Basic government services - that is, the provision of security, defense, protection, and insurance of person and property against those who would harm them and their utility - are commercial markets, just like health care, mail delivery, cell phones, or fried chicken.

   But KFC doesn't have to threaten to imprison people for not eating their chicken in order to stay at the top of the market. Similarly, you don't see Verizon, Samsung, and T-Mobile carving up plots of land, erecting border fences, and guarding borders with guns should their competitors try to break into their claimed consumer base. So why should government be any different?

   Any decent government - just like any decent company - will rise to the top fairly and naturally. Perfect consumer information and total competition in all industries and markets - including government services - will lead to the optimal outcome for all people, without sacrificing any liberty or freedom of choice in the process.

   This system has been called catallaxy (spontaneous order), agorism, polyarchism, functionally-overlapping-territorial-jurisdiction, national personal autonomy, and market anarchy. The idea of multiple competing governments has decades of testimony from libertarians and socialists alike.

   And it's not just a theoretical idea posited by suspected racists; it's a way of life that exists all around us in various forms, and a distilled, constrained, compromised form of it exists in the modern political institutions.

   Proponents of democracy - self-described Democrats and Republicans alike - claim to want more choice in political matters. Well, what system offers more political choices than total competition amongst governments?

   The legal basis for our corporate government goes way deeper than bank bailouts and the personal corruption of our politicians. So deep, in fact, that we may have to occasionally turn to people who understand the intricacies of the Constitution to undo the damage which we have recently seen.

   Google Lysander Spooner, Gustave de Molinari, Paul Emile de Puydt, Otto Bauer, and Roderick Long.




For more entries on elections and campaign finance, please visit:
http://www.aquarianagrarian.blogspot.com/2014/05/why-voting-is-not-necessarily-evil.html

For more entries on unions and collective bargaining, please visit:
http://www.aquarianagrarian.blogspot.com/2014/04/social-policies-for-2012-us-house.html

For more entries on Wisconsin politics, please visit:

How to Fold Two Square Pieces of Card Stock into a Box

      This series of images shows how to take two square pieces of card stock (or thick paper), and cut and fold them into two halves of a b...