Showing posts with label cooperative. Show all posts
Showing posts with label cooperative. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 5, 2017

Links about Cooperatives and the Nonprofit Sector

Joe Kopsick on the Nonprofit Sector

Nonapartism (or Unincorporatism): Cooperative Anarcho-Corporatvism in a Social Market Economy
http://aquarianagrarian.blogspot.com/2013/12/nonapartism-in-social-market-economy.html

Conservatives for Georgism and a Social Market Economy: On Attracting Conservatives and Libertarians to the Philosophy of Henry George
http://aquarianagrarian.blogspot.com/2014/04/diagram-of-public-private-and-third.html

On Labor: Offering Tax Incentives to Firms to Transition Power to Workers and Consumers
http://aquarianagrarian.blogspot.com/2014/04/on-labor-offering-tax-incentives-to.html

Party for Mutualism and Cooperation: 100-Point U.S. Parliament Platform
http://aquarianagrarian.blogspot.com/2014/08/party-for-mutualism-and-cooperation-us.html

A Market-Oriented Solution to High Health Insurance Costs
http://aquarianagrarian.blogspot.com/2017/02/a-market-oriented-solution-to-high.html

States Could Experiment with Export and Resource-Backed Currencies
Resource Map for Portland, Oregon




Nonprofit / Charity / Cooperative Sector / Mutuals

The Charitable Sector (IndependentSector.org)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voluntary_sector

Purchasing Cooperatives (Wikipedia)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wholesaling

Credit Unions in the United Kingdom (Wikipedia)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutual_organization

Consumers' Cooperatives (Wikipedia)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consumers%27_co-operative

National Cooperative Business Association (Wikipedia)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mondragon_Corporation




Nonprofit Sector from Anarchists’, Economists’, & Political Philosophers’ Perspectives

"Free Money for Anarchists" (Will Schnack - YouTube)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=34CPmd4EmTg

"Who Owns the Benefit: the Free Market as Full Communism" by Kevin A. Carson
https://c4ss.org/content/12561

Alexis de Tocqueville's "Democracy in America" (Wikipedia)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democracy_in_America

Jeremy Rifkin's "The Zero Marginal Cost Society"
http://www.thezeromarginalcostsociety.com/

Jeremy Rifkin on the Zero Marginal Cost Society and the Collaborative Commons
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jeremy-rifkin/collaborative-commons-zero-marginal-cost-society_b_5064767.html




Social Responsibility of Business & Cooperatives / Social Purpose Enterprises

The Sharing Economy (Wikipedia)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sharing_economy

The Social Market Economy (Wikipedia)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_market_economy

Social Venture Capital (Wikipedia)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_venture_capital

Social Enterprise (Wikipedia)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_enterprise

Socially Responsible Investing (Wikipedia)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socially_responsible_investing

Seven Cooperative Principles (Willy Street Co-Op)
https://www.willystreet.coop/seven-cooperative-principles

Seven Cooperative Principles (Credit Union National Association)
https://www.cuna.org/Footer/About-CUNA/Seven-Cooperative-Principles-for-Credit-Unions/



Strikes, Boycotts, Divestments, Tax Protests, Economic Secession

Murray Rothbard on the 1977 Chicago Tax Strike

Local Exchange Trading System (Wikipedia)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Local_exchange_trading_system

Economic Secession (Wikipedia)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_secession

American Independent Business Alliance / A.M.I.B.A. (Wikipedia)

Liberty Tree Foundation for the Democratic Revolution
https://www.libertytreefoundation.org/building-democracy-movement-usa



Alternative Social Currencies

Mutuum (Wikipedia)


Economics of Reciprocity

The "Cost the Limit of Price" Principle (Wikipedia)


P2P, Commons, etc.

Peer-to-Peer Networks (Wikipedia)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peer-to-peer_(disambiguation)

Commons-Based Peer Production (Wikipedia)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commons-based_peer_production

The Social Networking Site "Diaspora" (Wikipedia)





Apolitical, Non-Departmental, and Non-Ministerial Government Departments

Quasi-Nongovernmental Organizations / Q.U.A.N.G.O.s (Wikipedia)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quango

Non-Departmental Public Bodies (Wikipedia)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-departmental_public_body

Non-Ministerial Government Department (Wikipedia)




The I.B.W.A.

International Brotherhood Welfare Association / I.B.W.A. (Wikipedia)

The Modern-Day, California-Based I.B.W.A. (Facebook Page)
https://www.facebook.com/ibwacharity

Joe Kopsick on the I.B.W.A.: "On Reviving the International Brotherhood Welfare Association"
http://aquarianagrarian.blogspot.com/2014/06/on-reviving-international-brotherhood.html






Originally Written in Early September 2017
Originally Published on September 5th, 2017
Edited on September 7th, 2017

Saturday, January 23, 2016

Joe Kopsick on Ryan o'Doud's Black Hand Communique Podcast

Here are the links to four YouTube appearances I recently made, on Ryan o'Doud's "Black Hand Communique" podcast:



The first three belong to a three-part series on cooperative enterprises, and alternatives to global finance:



BHC: KOPSICK ON CO-OPS
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hqfY3E2aE6Q&list=PL6iNMQfyLEUHeTL6U2zgOdcVynwUDP3tt

BHC: KOPSICK ON CO-OPS PART DEUX; KOPSICKER
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rrkmZDL5Qok

BHC: NO FINANCE ROMANCE: KOPSICK ON ALTERNATIVES
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cf39MFdOSzg&index=19&list=PL6iNMQfyLEUHeTL6U2zgOdcVynwUDP3tt



The last video is a simulated political debate between Ryan and myself, covering abortion, the environment, immigration, the economy, unions, and health care:


BHC: ELECTION SLEAZE-IN featuring JOE and RYAN
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1eKsISIHHaE


Wednesday, April 23, 2014

On Labor: Offering Tax Incentives to Firms to Transition Power to Workers and Consumers

     If elected to the U.S. House in 2014, I will oppose the Card Check bill, as well as the Employee Free Choice Act, and all legislation designed to empower union bosses.
     The exclusive authority to regulate organized labor occurring in the states is not an enumerated power granted to the federal government in the Constitution. The federal government should only have the exclusive authority to regulate labor which occurs in the District of Columbia and in the nation's overseas possessions, and labor in industries over which the federal government exercises duly delegated constitutional authorities to regulate. I would sponsor efforts to return the power to regulate and enforce all other areas of labor policy to the states - and to the people, the labor departments and bureaus, and the local governments within them - as soon as possible.
     I believe that all federal legislation aiming to protect the so-called rights of unions and employers alike is specific legislation affording a special privilege; the General Welfare Clause was included in the Constitution in order to prohibit legislation which does not promote the welfare of all of the people equally. Special legislation concerning unions, enterprises, business associations, and lobbyists and political action committees from both sides of the aisle has only served to empower all of these organizations to participate in the regulation and control of the people. This has resulted in diminished political power for ordinary taxpayers, diminished economic power for ordinary consumers, and a less productive economy.
     I oppose the Card Check bill and the Employee Free Choice Act not because it should be illegal or any more difficult to join or organize a union, nor easier for employers to fire people for engaging in legal union activity. I take this position because the taxpayers – as both the employers of federal workers and the consumers of the services they provide – have the responsibility to ensure that the power of organized labor does not make the delivery of such services unaffordable. Federal workers should bear in mind that they, too, are consumers and taxpayers, and therefore need affordable government just like the rest of us.
     Furthermore, I take this position in order to protect the rights of minorities; in this case, the rights of minority unions alongside those of majority unions. Gaining majority status for being the certified winner in a National Labor Relations Board election should not be the sole method of invoking bargaining obligations on the part of employers; plural and proportional representation would be legal alternatives if legislation requiring majority status were abolished.
     I believe that majority unions should have a role in such bargaining, but so should minority unions, as well as consumers and shareholders, and - in the case of labor by government employees – taxpayers. But agreements between these parties can be achieved through private arbitration (following mutual company and union agreement about which materially uninterested agency shall be deemed trustworthy to arbitrate the dispute) and liens on business properties, rather than through litigation and motivated state intervention concerning what sort of bargaining between companies and unions shall be acceptable.
     I do not support any organization that interferes with individual freedom to associate through federally protected concerted activity for mutual aid and protection, and to bargain collectively on a members-only basis. I take this position regardless of whether it is an employer or a union interfering with these freedoms, and regardless of whether there is an established majority union in the workplace.
Majority unionists should understand that their desire to be the only union in the workplace only puts all of their eggs in one basket. The federal law requiring majority status vote for a union to remain in existence only exposes unions to the risk that a future federal law could empower government to require all eligible voters to weigh in on a union election at their workplace, even if they'd rather not pick a side. I believe that compulsory union voting is one of the most significant sources of political polarization and divisiveness in America today.
     As long as majority unions are free to appeal to the federal government to either abolish minority unions or diminish their power to negotiate, the prevailing union shop / closed shop dichotomy in unionized workplaces can only serve to perpetuate an environment of monopolistic competition over the representation of labor. I oppose such uses of coercive state power to enforce unconstitutional special legislation; this is activity which should be considered in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act.
     Unless and until it becomes politically feasible to repeal all special federal legislation empowering unions and businesses alike, I will propose amendments to the Constitution authorizing the federal government to enjoin states against giving such illegal special privileges and monopoly representation powers to majority unions (often referred to as a “national Right to Work amendment”). I take this position because in 1985 the Supreme Court ruled that nobody may legally be required to become a full member of a union as a condition of continued employment.
     Although the federal government should not be in the business of telling people in the states how to regulate labor therein, in regards to my legislative position on the federal government's jurisdiction over labor (in the District of Columbia, overseas, and in industries it was duly delegated the authority to regulate) - and in regards to my general recommendations for the states – I believe that individual freedom to choose whether to join a union can coexist alongside workers desiring solidarity in collective bargaining.
     I also believe that each government, in its respective sphere of authority to regulate labor, should provide for a more collaborative negotiation between employers and non-employers from across a wider and more diverse set of economic organizations. I would suggest that this be done by prohibiting unions (especially pro-business majority unions known as “business unions”) from making contracts with employers in a manner which does not welcome the input of ordinary people. This includes the input of not only taxpayers, shareholders, and non-shareholding but nonetheless affected “stakeholders”, but most importantly of potential employees who are all too often underinformed about their rights as a result of such contracts.
     Unconstitutionally empowering the federal government to nationalize companies and then to award controlling stakes in them to the public and/or to labor unions with majority status is not the only way to ensure that everyone gets their fair share of influence over how our society and economy are governed. There is a way to passively – rather than actively and coercively – allow ownership and management responsibilities to transition into the hands of workers and consumers.
     Moreover, there is a way to do this while promoting economic growth, without crushing the entrepreneurial spirit of the people or causing people to work past their planned retirement ages unnecessarily, and without diminishing the freedoms of individual workers and minority unions to have meaningful influence on the workplace and in the industry of their choice.
     My recommendation would involve immediately closing all tax loopholes and taxing all corporate income (including capital gains) at a flat base rate, and from there offering tax credits in order to incentivize owners and managers of firms to take steps planning and providing for the gradual transition of ownership and management of such firms to organization modes which are more hospitable to egalitarianism and a balance of workers' rights with the interests of consumers.
     Firms in the public and private sectors alike would be offered tax incentives to essentially evolve into one of any number of types of organizations. Examples of such organizations should include open shop unions; dual and minority unions; workplaces with members-only collective bargaining agreements; autonomous unions and guilds; syndicates; egalitarian labor-managed firms; cooperative corporations; consumer-driven cooperatives; worker-consumer cooperatives (i.e., mutuals); mutual aid societies; cooperative wholesale societies; and voluntary cooperatives.
     I would additionally recommend a hybrid example, combining the functions of as many of these types of organizations as possible into one firm; that is, a voluntary worker-consumer wholesale purchasing cooperative. Such a cooperative should coordinate the planning of purchasing as tightly as possible with other cooperatives like it, and be required to serve any customer who comes to it (on the condition that he or she does not request unjustifiable quantities of the goods and services offered).
     Although coordinating their efforts would save the most money, such cooperatives should remain technically separate organizations, function in a market system, be free to accept and give charitable donations, and be free to have differing practices regarding in which circumstances additional quantities of goods and services afforded to certain individuals above the base level are justifiable.
     The main objective of such a cadre of firms would be to provide a counterbalance against the oligopoly powers of sellers and distributors of labor and capital pertaining to the relevant goods and services produced by said firms. Such firms would accomplish this by pooling wealth in order to save costs in the purchasing and delivery of the relevant goods and services, providing for the affordable organization of production.
     This would occur under the condition of regular negotiation concerning any and all potential conflict which is likely to arise between consumers' demand for low prices and workers' demand for high compensation. A worker who consumes the very good or service which he or she produces, possesses good management skills, and has constructive suggestions concerning improving the workplace, might be asked to serve as a tie-breaking vote in any leadership or management of such a firm.
     The State of Oregon can do better on labor policy without the obstructive effects of association with the federal government. The federal government's ownership of vast tracts of land in the state inhibits (in those areas) the kind of productive labor which would allow the state to afford such a relationship, if only the state had the ability to fully tax the value of the land within it, instead of resorting to taxing the production of its own taxpayers through taxes on individual income. Whether they call the compensation they desire “all the fruits” or “the full product” of their labor, I would urge people of the left and right alike to oppose the eventual abolition of the individual income tax.









For more entries on unions and collective bargaining, please visit:


Wednesday, December 25, 2013

Nonapartism (or Unincorporatism): Cooperative Anarcho-Corporativism in a Social Market Economy

    The following is a description of the philosophy of Nonapartism (which might as well be called "Unincorporatism", due to its support of unincorporated people, groups, businesses, and land), followed by an explanation of the types of political representatives which I theorize would likely be present in a Nonapartist governance structure which focuses on representing the Third Sector and promoting reconciliation between various anarchist schools of thought / methods of economy.

   “Nonapartism” intentionally refers to the lack of apartheid (apartness) in relations between sectors – and connotes nonpartisanship - although its technical meaning denotes that it is a nine-part version of “tripartism”, the neo-liberal/neo-corporatist political synthesis which exists in social market economies.
    The tripartist synthesis exists as the representatives of organized labor coming together in a negotiative manner with government and the representatives of organized business in order to jointly regulate the civil social economy.
    Nonapartism aims to achieve collaborative regulation of access to the means and factors of production, distribution, and exchange, in order to ensure free, equal, and uninhibited access, and liberty to utilize, possess, and occupy.
    Nonapartism rejects communal, cooperative, social, or public “ownership” or “control” of the means of production (i.e., communism, cooperativism, socialism, and Statism), in that each is a form of rentier Capitalism which denies and severely limits the right to personal property rights in allodial title, attacking private property rights in the name of the commons.
    The attack on private property rights is problematic because it assumes that private property ownership (the right to exclude) will always be used to exclude. Nonapartism aims to establish a society in which periodic access to private property is the sole condition for the legitimacy of rights thereto. This is to say that demonstrating judicious exclusion legitimizes the right to private property.

     Nonapartism was designed as an attempt to improve upon tripartism, in that it provides for better and more diverse representation of the sectors of society which oppose the corporate State, and the environment of corruption and collusion between government and business which it fosters.
    Nonapartism desires to render tripartism incomplete and irrelevant, by abolishing the distinction between capital and labor, through making labor own its own capital and be its own capital. Nonapartism blends the functions, forms, and manners of representing associations of labor and capital alike.
    Nonapartism holds that organized labor should not be the only actor present in policy negotiations aside from government and business. Therefore, nonapartism criticizes calls for “worker control of the means of production” and “worker ownership of factories”. This is because workers' unions represent the interests of workers; not necessariy the interests of non-working people, consumers, investors, taxpayers, other actors the community or society at large (some of these groups even have an interest in keeping the price and cost of labor low).

    Although we are not all workers, we are all consumers of consumer goods. Even those of us who forage and hunt for food are compulsory customers of government services. Those who file for unemployment, the unemployed who have stopped looking for work, the social welfare recipients whose income is based on the minimum wage, the unemployed homeless, and ex-convicts are all stakeholders in public policy of society.
    Nonapartism desires that all people finding themselves insufficiently represented by big government, big business, and big unions educate themselves about voluntary association, and the voluntary/social sector (or Third Sector). Nonapartism advocates for the organization, unionization, and formalized representation of marginalized non-working, non-taxpaying, non-investing people's interests.
    Nonapartism is against the interests of pro-corporate, pro-big-union, and pro-big-government unions; the tripartist scheme to take tax revenue, profit, and union dues from every person, robbing them of the freedom to represent themselves in so many important ways. Nonapartism advocates that the disadvantaged unionize to demand from the tripartists what is necessary for them to perform the lowest skill-level jobs; i.e., access to housing, education, job skills training, and everything else employed people are expected to have in order to be a functional member of society.
    Nonapartism asserts that anything people are ordered and expected to possess, they have the right to demand, at no cost to themselves, and paid for through the labor of those doing the ordering and having the expectation.

   Nonapartism advocates for anarcho-cooperativist and anarcho-corporativist groups to regulate neo-liberal and neo-corporatist groups. Respectively, these groups support the regulation of organized labor by liberal-bourgeois elements favoring Statism, closedness, and compulsion in organization; and the regulation of business by conservative-bourgeois elements favoring Statism and protectionist and crony-capitalist interests.
   Nonapartism is informed by the fact that Medieval-era guild unions practiced each social-benefit employee organization, professional self-regulation, and cartelization. As professional associations, the guilds trained their future members in the trades. As trade unions, they set rules on wages, hours, and working conditions, provided for the care of widows and orphans, and provided a support group for people living outside the manors to rely on each other for assistance. As cartels, they got together to control all such trade in a given town, and to make sure anyone wishing to trade speak with, pay, and get permission from the guilds themselves first.
   Nonapartism supports the utilization of existing and theorized social organizations to regulate the professions, provide for the interests of the workers and the people in general, and organize majorities in the markets to form justifiable cartels demanding mutualism and promoting autonomy and egalitarianism, resulting in increased accuracy and reduced cost of representation of the diverse sectors of the economy (aside from labor and capital) and low prices for all market participants.

   Nonapartism criticizes the notion that the low wages paid by Wal-Mart represent the natural result of a competitive market in wages; but rather that it represents unjustifiable, excessive corporate “profit”-taking. The approximately $17 average hourly wage for entry-level labor at CostCo helps illustrate how the function of large retail distributors resembles that of a cooperative wholesale society.
   This is to say that Nonapartism advocates for consumers to voluntary cooperate (direct action; boycott; counter-economics; radical redistribution, homesteading, and reclamation) in their purchase habits – pooling their money, productive assets, and force of consumer demand – in order to lower prices on goods through the establishment of price-ceilings (or cartels) on the markets.
   This would help achieve the widest possible distribution of the factors and means of production, especially if large retail distributors sold wide varieties of machines (such as 3-D printing machines, to which free access could be also provided at libraries and common places).

    Nonapartism supports cooperative anarcho-corporativism, anarchy without adjectives, synthesis anarchism, with equal influence of all sectors of economic society on policy.
    Nonapartism advocates that all resources be allocated to the people by freely, fairly, and amicably competing anarchist individuals, Agorists, freelancers, entrepreneurs, mutuals, co-operatives, communes, autonomous unions and guilds, and cooperative corporations, which would be encouraged to stay autonomous but join confederations.
    Nonapartism hopes to attract individualist anarchists, voluntaryists, anarcho-capitalists, market-anarchists, left-Rothbardians, panarchists, social democrats, anarcho-communists, mutualist anarchists, market socialists, New Mutualists, industrial unionists, Egoists and Egoist communists, anarcho-syndicalists, anarcho-cooperativists, anarcho-corporativists, anarcho-monarchists, Discordian anarchists, religious anarchists, and disaffected tripartists.



Summary of Types of the Nine Organelles
of
Nonapartist Cooperativist Anarcho-Corporatism

  1. Organizers
      Representatives of networks of autonomous distributors', managers', and employers' unions; and political and non-political professional societies (including industrial trade unions and autonomous guilds) and voluntary associations

      regulate

          compulsory and State-supported distributors', managers', and employers' unions, and political and non-political professional associations (including industry trade groups, guilds, and unions)
  1. Investors
    a. Lenders
        Representatives of networks of autonomous financiers', lenders, and creditors' unions; and collaboratively-managed citizens' dividend cooperative corporations
            regulate
            State-endorsed financiers' interest groups, lenders' and creditors' interest groups, and stock corporations.
    b. Borrowers
        Representatives of networks of autonomous bondholders', customers', and suppliers' stakeholders' unions
            regulate
            State-endorsed taxpayers' unions, borrowers' and debtors' unions, and suppliers' unions

  1. Enterprises
    a. Hierarchical Enterprises
        Representatives of networks of autonomous entrepreneurs' and business societies and unions
            regulate
            State-supported entrepreneurs', business, and sector associations and unions.
    b. Egalitarian Enterprises
        Representatives of networks of voluntary-cooperative mutual aid and benefit societies, social venture enterprise unions, and business and sector societies regulate
        State-supported unions of cooperative, mutual, and social enterprises.
  2. Workers
    a. Organized Workers
        Representatives of networks of autonomous unions, syndicates, and anarchist guilds regulate
        State-endorsed compulsory and craft unions, nationalist would-be syndicates, and union- shop and closed-shop unions and guilds.
    b. Unorganized Workers
        Representatives of networks of autonomous unions, collectives, and communes of egoists; freelancers' unions; and open-shop, and dual- and minority-unionist, and members-only-unionist workplace
            regulate
            State-endorsed compulsory and craft unions, nationalist would-be syndicates, and union- shop and closed-shop unions and guilds

  1. Consumers
a. Organized Consumers
 
Representatives of networks of autonomous consumer cooperatives; and consumer protection / advocacy and product quality rating interest / focus groups
regulate
State-endorsed consumer protective agencies and consumer cooperatives, as well as
interest groups and lobbying agencies.

b. Unorganized Consumers
Representatives of networks of homeless and unemployed persons' unions and syndicates, and criminal rehabilitation advocates
regulate
State-endorsed social welfare, accuseds', ex-convicts' unions and interest groups.





Detailed Description of Types and Examples of Classes
and of
Vehicles of Anarchist Representation
(Which Would Check the Vehicles of Political Representation)

1. Organizers

      I. Examples:
        • Distributors
          (ex.: Wal-Mart/Sam's Club, CostCo, cooperative wholesale societies)
        • Managers
        • Employers
        • Professional self-regulators
        • Political professional self-regulators
II. Vehicles of Political Representation
(State-licensed, compulsory / involuntary, and / or overly centralized)
      • High- or medium-profit multinational corporate chain distributor retailers
      • Reserve-army-of-labor capitalist managers
      • Employers' organizations / associations / federations
      • Guild unions and professional unions and associations
(ex.: American Federation of Labor-Congress of Industrial Organizations,
American Medical Association, Screen Actors' Guild, etc.)
– Attorneys' judges', politicians', and government workers' unions
(ex.: National Federation of Federal Employees; American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees; American Bar Association; American Trial Lawyers Association; National Lawyers' Union)

III. Vehicles of Anarchist Representation
(non-State-permitted, voluntary, and / or decentralized / diffused)
– Non-profit and non-for-profit cooperative wholesale societies and distributors
– Federations, confederations, and leagues of unions of egalitarian cooperative managers
      • Incorporeal “organizations”; and federations, confederations, and societies of egalitarian cooperative employers
Federations, confederations, and leagues of autonomous guild unions, social- anarchist guilds, and autonomous professional unions / societies
– Jurors' nullification and information rights, and rights of the accused interest and advocacy groups
(ex.: American Civil Liberties Union, Never Take a Plea [Bargain] advocates and groups, and pro-se defense advocates and groups)



2. Investors
    A. Lenders
          (Statists and capitalists involved in public and private finance, credit and lending, stock exchanges)
      I. Examples:
        • Shareholders in publicly-traded companies
        • Financiers
        • Lenders and creditors
II. Vehicles of Political Representation
(State-licensed, compulsory / involuntary, and / or overly centralized)
      • Limited-liability publicly-traded stock corporations
      • National and international financiers' interest groups, lobbying agencies, and PACs
        (ex.: World Bank, International Monetary Fund, World Trade Organization)
      • Lenders' and creditors' interest groups, lobbying agencies, and PACs
III. Vehicles of Anarchist Representation
(non-State-permitted, voluntary, and / or decentralized / diffused)
– High-liability publicly-managed citizens' dividend cooperative corporations
– Autonomous financiers' unions and financiers' syndicates, pro- local finance
interest groups
– Autonomous lenders' and creditors' unions, and lenders' and creditors' syndicates


B. Borrowers
(Workers and non-working small and medium-sized market participating civilians involved in paying taxes, borrowing and incurring debt, considering buying stock)

I. Examples:
– Stakeholders (bondholders, customers, suppliers, etc.)
– Taxpayers
– Borrowers and debtors
II. Vehicles of Political Representation
(State-licensed, compulsory / involuntary, and / or overly centralized) – Shareholders, customers', and bondholders' unions
– Taxpayers' unions, and anti-tax and low-tax interest groups, lobbying agencies, PACs, and political parties
(ex.: National Taxpayers Union)
– Borrowers' and debtors' unions; and pro- national and international debt relief,
forgiveness, and co-payment interest groups, lobbying agencies, and PACs

III. Vehicles of Anarchist Representation
(non-State-permitted, voluntary, and / or decentralized / diffused)
– Autonomous combination bondholders' / customers' / suppliers' unions and guilds
– Autonomous tax- and fee- payers' unions, revolutionary tax- and fee- protesting activist groups, counter-economic and Agorist groups
– Autonomous borrowers' and debtors' unions, pro- local interpersonal debt relief
and co-payment interest groups


3. Enterprises

A. Hierarchical Enterprises
(Productive entrepreneurial, capitalist business, and corporate firms)

I. Examples:
– Small enterprises
– Middle-sized and large businesses
– Publicly-traded corporations

II. Vehicles of Political Representation
(State-licensed, compulsory / involuntary, and / or overly centralized) – Entrepreneurs' associations, pro-small-business interest groups, lobbying agencies, and PACs
(ex.: National Federation of Independent Businesses)
– Industry trade groups and pro-business interest groups, lobbying agencies, and PACs
– Business unions / partnerships / alliances / associations

III. Vehicles of Anarchist Representation
(non-State-permitted, voluntary, and / or decentralized / diffused)
– Entrepreneurs' societies, pro-small-business interest groups
– Federations, confederations, and leagues of industrial / labor / trade / craft unions, pro- worker-run and employee-owned business interest groups
– Federations, confederations, and leagues of autonomous business unions / partnerships / alliances / associations


    B. Egalitarian Enterprises
    (Productive cooperative, mutual, and social enterprise firms)
      I. Examples:
        • Cooperative enterprises / cooperative businesses / cooperative corporations
          (ex.: Mondragon [cooperative] Corporation)
        • Mutuals / mutual banking and credit institutions / mutual organizations
        • Social enterprises / social purpose ventures / social profit ventures
II. Vehicles of Political Representation
(State-licensed, compulsory / involuntary, and / or overly centralized)
      • Business and sector associations / partnerships / alliances / federations of cooperative corporations
        (ex.: National Cooperative Business Association)
      • Market-socialist political interest groups, business associations of mutuals
      • Business associations of social venture-capital firms
        (ex.: National Venture Capital Association)
III. Vehicles of Anarchist Representation
(non-State-permitted, voluntary, and / or decentralized / diffused)
– Federations and confederations of autonomous business and sector societies and
cooperative corporations
– Federations and confederations of autonomous mutual aid and benefit societies
– Federations and confederations of autonomous social-venture enterprises



4. Workers

    A. Organized Workers
          (Productive unionized, organized, corporatist, and union-dependent workers)
      I. Examples:
        • Union workers and laborers
        • Guild-union journeymen, apprentices, and masters
        • Syndics
II. Vehicles of Political Representation
(State-licensed, compulsory / involuntary, and / or overly centralized)
      • Labor / craft unions
      • Guild unions
      • National and state syndicates
III. Vehicles of Anarchist Representation
(non-State-permitted, voluntary, and / or decentralized / diffused)
– Autonomous labor / trade / industrial unions
– Autonomous guild unions and social-anarchist guilds
– Anarchist and revolutionary syndicates
(ex.: Industrial Workers of the World / Wobblies)


B. Unorganized Workers
(Non-unionized, unorganized, anti-organizational / anti-corporatist, and autonomous and independent workers)

I. Examples:
– Individuals
– Freelancers
– Free-riding workers

II. Vehicles of Political Representation
(State-licensed, compulsory / involuntary, and / or overly centralized) – Representationally democratic voting, private property ownership, pro-
individualist interest groups, lobbying agencies, and PACs
– Pro- New Mutualist freelancers' unionism interest groups, lobbying agencies, and PACs
– Pro- compulsory unionism interest groups, lobbying agencies, and PACs

III. Vehicles of Anarchist Representation
(non-State-permitted, voluntary, and / or decentralized / diffused)
– Autonomous egoist unions / communes / collectives
– Autonomous freelancers' unions
– Federations and confederations of open-shop and dual- and minority-unionist
workplaces



5. Consumers
    A. Organized Consumers
(Organized consumers of predominantly private-sector goods and services)
      I. Examples:
        • Consumer cooperatives
        • Consumer interest, protection, and advocacy groups
        • Consumer research and focus groups
II. Vehicles of Political Representation
(State-licensed, compulsory / involuntary, and / or overly centralized)
      • Pro- consumer cooperatives interest groups, lobbying agencies, and PACs
      • Public and public-private consumer protection boards
        (ex.: Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Departments of Consumer Affairs, credit rating agencies, Better Business Bureau)
      • Pro- public consumer research interest groups, lobbying agencies, and PACs
III. Vehicles of Anarchist Representation
(non-State-permitted, voluntary, and / or decentralized / diffused)
– Federations and confederations of consumers' anarcho-cooperatives
– Diffuse networks of community- and market-based consumer interest / protection
/ advocacy groups, including diffuse networks of business quality and credit rating agencies practicing competing standards
– Diffuse networks of market-oriented consumer research and focus groups and
surveying agencies


B. Unorganized Consumers
(Unorganized consumers of predominantly public-sector [government] services)

I. Examples:
– The unemployed
– The homeless
– Convicted criminals

II. Vehicles of Political Representation
(State-licensed, compulsory / involuntary, and / or overly centralized) – Pro- unemployment insurance social welfare interest groups, lobbying agencies,and PACs
– Pro- housing-relief social welfare interest groups, lobbying agencies, and PACs
– Ex-convicts' unions
(ex.: Voice of the Ex-Offender [V.O.T.E.])

III. Vehicles of Anarchist Representation
(non-State-permitted, voluntary, and / or decentralized / diffused)
– Autonomous unemployed persons' unions and unemployed persons' syndicates
– Autonomous homeless persons' unions and homeless persons' syndicates
– Autonomous families of the accused's unions














For more information on related ideas by the author of this blog, go to:

Feudalism and the Class War
http://aquarianagrarian.blogspot.com/2011/04/feudalism-and-class-war.html

Market Anarchy “Without Adjectives”
http://aquarianagrarian.blogspot.com/2013/03/market-panarchy-without-adjectives.html

Party for Mutualism and Cooperation
aquarianagrarian.blogspot.com/2013/09/proposal-for-cooperative-party-of-oregon.html



I apologize for the quality of the formatting of this entry.
If you would like to be e-mailed a PDF version of this proposal,
please e-mail jwkopsick@gmail.com.





For more entries on enterprise, business, business alliance, and markets, please visit:


http://www.aquarianagrarian.blogspot.com/2014/05/agorist-protection-agencies-and.html

For more entries on the social market economy and the third (voluntary) sector, please visit:
http://www.aquarianagrarian.blogspot.com/2014/04/diagram-of-public-private-and-third.html

For more entries on social services, public planning, and welfare, please visit:
http://www.aquarianagrarian.blogspot.com/2014/05/taxpayer-funded-benefits-for.html

For more entries on theory of government, please visit:


How to Fold Two Square Pieces of Card Stock into a Box

      This series of images shows how to take two square pieces of card stock (or thick paper), and cut and fold them into two halves of a b...