Showing posts with label rape. Show all posts
Showing posts with label rape. Show all posts

Thursday, September 23, 2021

Boycott Pedophile Musicians: Thirty Artists Who Preyed on Children (or Tried to, or Were Accused, etc)


Click, open in new tab and/or new window,
and download, in order to see in full resolution.









































Click, open in new tab and/or new window,
and download, in order to see in full resolution.










Compiled in summer and early fall of 2021

Created between mid-September 2021

First published on
September 23rd and 24th, 2021

Edited and Expanded on September 23rd,
24th, and 26th, and October 6th, 2021

Individual images added on October 6th, 2021

Thursday, June 17, 2021

Don't Make Assumptions About What True Sexual Abuse Claims Should Sound Like

     The fact that a sexual abuse accuser did not come forward about sexual abuse earlier, is not proof that the abuse didn’t happen. They may have waited, due to confusion about what happened, or due to a feeling of duty to protect the person from consequences, and/or fear of outing the person for the sake of the accuser's own safety.
     The fact that an accuser seems inconsistent about their claims, is not proof that they are inconsistent. Don’t make assumptions about what true claims of sexual abuse or rape "should" sound like or look like; instead, ask the accuser clarifying questions.

     The fact that an accuser is not always around the accused person, is not proof that the abuse couldn’t have happened because the accuser was never around the accused person. That’s not the same thing.
     The fact that an accuser continues to associate with their abuser, is not proof that the accuser isn’t afraid of that person. They may be associating with the abuser out of feelings of duty, guilt, shame, bribery, manipulation, or brainwashing, or all of the above.

     The fact that an accuser can’t remember all the details of the abuse, is not proof that it didn’t happen. Traumatic incidents - especially those that happen very quickly - are easy to partially (or completely) forget.
     But at the same time, the fact that an accuser can remember all the details of the abuse, is also not necessarily proof that they’re making it up. The fact that many victims don’t fully remember the abuse, does not mean that no accusers will have full memories of what happened to them. That's not the same thing.

     Not everything is the way it seems, the instant that we look at it. The difference between "never" and "rarely" - and the difference between "doesn't" and "doesn't necessarily" - should not be underestimated.
     Please keep these facts in mind when evaluating the veracity of claims that sexual molestation and rape have occurred.



Written on June 18th, 2021
after studying the claims against Michael Jackson

Published on June 18th, 2021


Monday, May 17, 2021

Establishing a Typology of Potential Child Sexual Predators Based on Whether and Why They Offend

Introduction

           I have written this article, and created the infographics below, in continuation of the research I published in my May 2021 article "Dismantling Five Myths About Child Molesters That Are Helping Them Evade Notice, Capture, and Judgment".

     That article can be read at the following link:

     The first infographic can be found in the original article, linked above.
     The second infographic is new.


     I have created this typology - consisting of eight categories of people, six of which are pedophiles and/or child molesters - for several reasons.
     The primary reason is to clarify the distinctions between child molesters and pedophiles, and people who fit into both categories, and people who fit into neither. Another reason is to highlight the distinction between pedophiles who love children in one or more ways, versus predators who target children mostly out of feelings of hatred.
     I believe that this is necessary, to establish an accurate nomenclature to describe predators who harm children sexually, but do not have either romantic feelings, nor feelings of sexual attraction, towards the children they victimize. The idea of calling such people "pedophiles" (which literally means "child lover") does not adequately describe them. [I have classified these people as Type 6; what I call the "Sadistic Abuser".]

     Of course, none of this is to imply, of course, that a person who molests a child because they love them, is necessarily any less dangerous than a person who molests a child because they hate them.
     The purpose of this article is to caution parents that some people might pretend to love their kids in order to get close to them and harm them sexually, while while other people might pretend to hate their kids in order to get close to them and harm them sexually.
     Love of children or hatred of children may be used, as someone's cover, for molesting children.

     I believe that it will also be helpful - to police, criminal psychologists, and psychiatrists - to have a typology of potential child sex criminals, because these professions, and parents, should should be familiar with several paradoxes related to child molesters.
     The first is that - as I explained in "Dismantling Five Myths About Child Molesters That Are Helping Them Evade Notice, Capture, and Judgment" - not all child molesters are pedophiles, and not all child molesters are pedophiles.
     The second is that some people love children so much - including inappropriately - that they cannot bring themselves to molest a child; while other people hate children, and cannot bring themselves to molest a child due to that hatred, despite having a sexual attraction to children.
     The former class of people is called "Righteous pedophiles" or non-offending pedophiles; which I have labeled as Type 1. The latter class of people may be rare, and may even not exist. But still, it's logically possible that there are child-attracted child-hating non-offenders. I have labeled that class as Type 2 (the "hateful pervert" or "repulsed non-offender").

     Another important paradox to keep in mind - which is a major reason why I developed this typology - is that some child molesters feel romantic feelings, or even (what they would describe as) feelings of love, towards their victims and potential victims.
     [Note: In the typology, I have grouped people with healthy affection towards children, together with people who develop romantic feelings towards children. I have only done this in order to distinguish those who have mostly hatred towards children, from those who have mostly love towards children. I do not mean to imply that romantic feelings towards children, and affection, are the same thing; I have only done this for the sake of simplicity. I welcome my readers' attempts to refine this typology and make it more precise.]
     Some abusers even shower their victims with gifts, to manipulate them and stop them from coming forward about the abuse. This is particularly common in familial relationships which involve C.S.A. (child sexual abuse and/or assault). To cite a real-life example, Jeffrey Epstein paid for some of his victims to have housing and to get through college. Abusers like this use the fact that they have helped their victim, to get the victim to put up with more abuse.
     It is important to remember that some offenders fall in love with their minor and child victims, because it helps us remember that someone who is especially affectionate towards children, could just as easily be a pedophile, as they could be a normal person.
     Abuse does not always look like abuse. Sometimes it looks like a loving relationship. It's important to know the warning signs of abuse, to watch for them, and to think about what you have seen.

     


One way of visualizing the information






Click, and open in new tab or window, and download,
to see in full resolution.




Two Types of People Who Don't Harm Children Sexually and Don't Want To

1. Normal person with a healthy love for children
     (shown in light green;
          loves children emotionally but not romantically, not attracted to children sexually, does not offend)

2. Non-child-attracted non-pedophile child-hater, a/k/a "normal person" who hates children but doesn't sexually harm them
     (shown in medium green;
          does not love children emotionally nor romantically, not attracted to children sexually, does not offend)



Six Types of People Who Harm Children Sexually and/or May Want To



Type 1: "NON-OFFENDING PEDOPHILE" / "'RIGHTEOUS' PEDOPHILE"
          (i.e., a non-offending child-attracted pedophile)
     [shown in orange;
          loves children emotionally and romantically. attracted to children sexually, does not offend]

     This type of person is a pedophile, but not a child molester. This is sometimes called a "Righteous pedophile" (meaning a person who is sexually attracted to children but does not offend), or a non-offending pedophile. This type of person has inappropriate sexual feelings towards children, and also has romantic feelings and emotional attachments to children.
     This type of pedophile loves children so much that it is inappropriate and sexual, but the intense emotional love of children also prevents the pedophile from offending against children in his or her lifetime. This type of pedophile often wishes that they weren't a pedophile, due to the conflicting feelings they have, being sexually attracted to children while also feeling love and compassion for them.
     To clarify: The fact that someone qualifies as a "righteous pedophile" or "non-offending pedophile", or has been identified as such, does not necessarily mean that they will never offend. Some pedophiles will try to be "righteous pedophiles" who refrain from offending, but will fail. Those Type 1 Righteous Pedophiles who give into the temptation to offend, and hurt a child, will fall into the Type 3 category, the child-molesting child-attracted pedophile.


Type 2: "HATEFUL PERVERT" or "REPULSED NON-OFFENDER"
          (i.e., a non-offending child-attracted child-hater)
     [shown in brown;
          does not love children emotionally nor romantically, attracted to children sexually, does not offend]

     This type of person hates children and feels no emotional attachment to them, and is attracted to children sexually, but does not end up offending in their lifetime. Type 2 individuals are attracted to children sexually, but not emotionally, nor do they develop romantic feelings for children. It's possible that people in this category are too repulsed by their emotional hatred of children, to harm them in a sexual way.
     This is not to say, however, that a Type 2 individual could never molest a child; Type 2 is just the class one falls under if one does not offend during one's lifetime, and is also sexually attracted to children, but not emotionally compassionate towards them. If a Type 2 "Hateful Pervert" or "Repulsed Non-Offender" commits a sex crime against a child, then that person becomes a Type 5 "Hateful Child Molester" or "Perverted Hateful Abuser".


Type 3: "CHILD-MOLESTING PEDOPHILE" / "CLASSIC PEDOPHILE" / "CHILD-LOVING ABUSER" / "CHILD-WOOING ABUSER"
          (i.e., a child-molesting child-attracted pedophile)
     [shown in light blue;
          loves children emotionally and romantically, attracted to children sexually, does offend]

     A Type 3 individual is both sexually attracted to children, and emotionally and/or romantically in love with one or more children. This type of person acts on their sexual and romantic feelings, and will often use those romantic feelings to justify the sexual urges they are feeling (i.e., romanticizing their feelings), and act on those feelings.
     This type is probably more likely than the other types to be mentally ill or retarded, especially emotionally immature, and/or sexually immature in some way, which makes it difficult for them to relate to adults socially and sexually at the level at which one would expect a fully developed adult to interact.
     A "Righteous Pedophile" or non-offending pedophile (Type 1) will become a Type 3, if that individual fails to refrain from harming a child sexually.



Type 4: "REPRESSED CHILD MOLESTER" / "TICKING TIME-BOMB ABUSER" / "UNWITTING ABUSER"
          (i.e., a non-child-attracted child-molesting pedophile)
     [shown in pink;
          loves children emotionally, not consciously attracted to children sexually, does offend]

     A Type 4 individual is not consciously attracted to children, and believes themselves to love children in a healthy way. But a Type 4 person is also an offending pedophile. A person who is abused as a child, and then forgets that abuse, and then finds oneself suddenly accused of molesting a child - and they have no idea why they did it, but are beginning to recover their own childhood memories of abuse - likely falls into the category of Type 4.
     Such a person may be said to be subconsciously sexually attracted to children, due to their prior abuse. Due to their prior abuse, they may also have subconscious resentment, and/or survivor guilt, regarding children who have not suffered any sexual abuse. This may motivate them to find a victim, as a way to transfer the trauma they suffered.



Type 5: "HATEFUL CHILD MOLESTER" / "PERVERTED HATEFUL ABUSER"
          (i.e., a child-molesting, child-attracted non-pedophile)
     [shown in medium blue;
          does not love children emotionally nor romantically, attracted to children sexually, does offend]

     This type of person hates children, and wants to harm them - sexually, and possibly also physically, and maybe other ways as well - due to that hate. Type 5 individuals do offend in their lifetimes, and violate children sexually due to both hatred and sexual attraction. Type 5 individuals do not feel any emotional attachment, nor romantic love, for children.
     If a Type 2 "Hateful Pervert" or "Repulsed Non-Offender" commits a sex crime against a child, then that person becomes a Type 5 "Hateful Child Molester" or "Perverted Hateful Abuser".



Type 6: "SADISTIC CHILD MOLESTER" / "UNATTRACTED SADISTIC ABUSER"
          (i.e., a non-child attracted child-hating child molester)
     [shown in medium red;
          does not love children emotionally nor romantically, not attracted to children sexually, does offend]

     This type of person hates children, and wants to harm them due to that hate. Type 6 individuals do not feel any emotional attachment, nor romantic love, for children. Although Type 6 individuals are not sexually attracted to children, they commit sex crimes against children for reasons of power and control - and in order to take advantage of children's vulnerability - rather than due to sexual attraction or romantic or emotional interest.
     If a person who hated children were on the track to becoming a Type 6 "Sadistic Abuser" - but somehow managed to avoid offending against any children during their lifetime - then that person would belong to the non-pedophilic type which I have shown in medium green in the infographics; that is, a so-called "normal" person who hates children (and is not sexually attracted to them).




Conclusion

     I hope that a deeper and more detailed understanding about the various and overlapping causes of pedophilic attraction, will lead to proper diagnoses regarding typology of potential child sexual predators.
     I also hope that this typology will be helpful in designing psychiatric treatment specialized towards each particular type of pedophile and potential offender. The wrong diagnosis, or the wrong cure, could make the problem worse.
     As I have explained, for some people, hating children keeps them from offending, while for others, loving children keeps them from offending. Therapies for each given condition, should reflect an awareness of these facts.

[Note:
     It may also be useful to establish a typology of potential child sexual predators, based on whether they are: 1) attracted to men, women, or both; and 2) whether they are exclusively attracted to minors, or are attracted to both minors and adults.]





Images created, article written, and blog entry published
on May 17th, 2021

Edited and Expanded on May 24th, 2021

Friday, April 23, 2021

Saturday Night Live Has Aired at Least Fifty-Four Sets of Sketches That Made Light of Pedophilia and Incest

Table of Contents


1. Introduction
2. List
3. Conclusion





Content


1. Introduction

       The following is a list of fifty-four one-time sketches and recurring sketches, which have been put on by the N.B.C. show Saturday Night Live, and poke fun at either pedophilia, incest, or both.
     This is only a partial list. I have estimated that there have been at least 200 sketches, over the show's history, which made jokes regarding these topics.

     To the show's credit, some of these jokes about pedophilia and child molestation were unobjectionable, such as Norm MacDonald's jokes on Weekend Update that scorned Michael Jackson by constantly reminding the audience that Jackson was a pedophile. But the vast majority of them were of questionable taste.
     The following sketches should cause us to wonder whether the producers and cast were having a little bit too much fun "poking fun at" child molestation. That topic should not be made into a laughing matter lightly.
     I believe that Saturday Night Live's constant, subtle barrage of jokes about child molestation, has served to desensitize the American viewing public to the serious problem of child molestation. This problem ruins people's lives, and can drive people to homelessness, drug addiction, mental illness, and suicide. The decision to joke about it should not be made lightly, much less over and over again, as Saturday Night Live has done.

     I have explained, at least a bit, why I feel that the sketches below mock the victims of child molestation and incest. But if, after this, you, the reader, still have any difficulty guessing why these sketches may be offensive, then it may help to keep in mind, while reading this, that many of the sketches mentioned below, feature adults who are dressed up as children, acting out the fantasies which those same immature sketch writers probably hope children and teenagers have.
     Saturday Night Live would, therefore, better be referred to as Age Play Night Live, or Saturnalia Night Live.




2. List


     1. The opening monologue from the episode from the early 1990s which was hosted by Rob Lowe shortly after he made a sex tape with a 16-year-old girl when he was 23 or 24 years old. In the opening monologue, Lowe spoke with Lorne Michaels, Kevin Nealon, and Victoria Jackson, about whether he could survive the scandal. During the monologue, Lowe called the sex tape the best thing that had ever happened to his career.


     2. The recurring "Spartans cheerleaders" sketch - featuring Will Ferrell and Cheri Oteri - from the 1990s, which frequently included jokes about puberty and teen sex. These included the chant "sex can wait, masturbate", Christina Ricci as a teenage girl telling a boy that she was going to make him touch her "boobs", and Jim Carrey as a foreign student telling Cheri Oteri's character about his erection.

     3. The recurring "Mary Katherine Gallagher" sketch - featuring Molly Shannon - which was even made into a movie, Superstar, starring Shannon and Will Ferrell. Those sketches nearly always feature Shannon's character sniffing her fingers after putting them under her armpits, and frequently feature other references to Gallagher's puberty or sexual desires. One such sketch featured Jerry Seinfeld - who dated a 17-year-old girl when he was 38 - as Gallagher's love interest.

     4. Larry David's appearance in a 2020 sketch about the Titanic sinking, in which David plays an old man who tries to get into a life boat by saying that a teenage boy in a life boat was actually a man because he had a "happy trail" (i.e., pubic hair).

     5. A sketch from the mid-1990s - featuring Mark McKinney, Chris Elliott, and Janeane Garofalo - in which Elliott's and Garofalo's characters consult McKinney's character for internet advice, in order to pose as 13-year-old girls on the internet for the purposes of sexual flirting.

     6. A sketch from the 2010s - featuring Aziz Ansari and Melissa Villasenor - in which Ansari and Villasenor play a couple who are trying to start talking dirty to each other. Villasenor's character calls her boyfriend "dad" instead of "daddy".
     [It's noteworthy that two of Ansari's former co-stars, Jerry Seinfeld and James Franco, tried to date teenage girls. Also, Ansari has worked with at least a dozen other actors who have done pedophilic jokes, including Tim and Eric, Will Ferrell, Kristen Schaal, Dave Chappelle, Nick Kroll, Amy Poehler, the Lonely Island, and the creators of The Venture Bros.]

     7. A sketch from the 2000s in which Amy Poehler played a girl at a slumber party, who was being teased by the other girls for putting a frozen hot dog in her "nooners" (i.e., vagina).

     8. A recurring sketch from the early 2000s - featuring Chris Parnell and Julianna Marguiles - in which a man brings his girlfriend home to meet his family, and reveals to her that his parents feed him by spitting food into his mouth. These are referred to as the "Bird Family" sketches.

     9. A sketch from a 1988 episode, hosted by John Larroquette, in which Al Franken appears on Weekend Update as Lyndon LaRouche. As LaRouche, Franken ridicules LaRouche as someone who believes in conspiracy theories that involve child molesters.

     10. A sketch from the mid-1990s, featuring Jim Breuer and David Koechner, as an assembly of men who are eagerly awaiting the publication of that year's Sports Illustrated swimsuit edition. The men sing a song about the swimsuit models, whose lyrics include a question about whether a certain model would "pose with her daughter".

     11. Another sketch about the swimsuit edition featured supermodel Paulina Porizkova and two actual teenage boys. Porizkova is shown promoting the issue while standing behind the two boys as they read it. The episode was hosted by Bronson Pinchot.

     12. A 2013 fake commercial for language learning software Rosetta Stone featured Will Forte as someone's who's learning Thai and planning to go to Thailand "for a thing". The Thai phrases used in that sketch are phrases one would use when buying a prostitute. The country is notorious for underage prostitution, so there's no telling whether the deliberately veiled references to prostitution could refer to child sex slavery in particular.

     13. A 1997 sketch in which host Claire Danes played the Peter Pan character Tinkerbell. In the sketch, Tinkerbell tells Wendy (a child) to stay away from Peter Pan because Tinkerbell "own"s him. Tinkerbell calls Wendy "whore", "slut", "tramp", and "bitch" during the sketch.

     14. Two sketches from 2014 featured Aidy Bryant as "Tonker Bell", a foul-mouthed, rude half-sister of Tinkerbell. Tonker Bell makes sexual references to the Lost Boys in both sketches, and even confesses to having sex with a nine-year-old boy whom she thought was at least 22 because he was "tall". Tonker Bell talks about her mouse boyfriend in front of the children, and even mentions having sex with a had sex with a "tall". In response to James Franco's Captain Hook threatening to throw the children into the ocean, Tonker Bell responds "You're a freak and I like it", apparently deriving sexual gratification from the mention of murdering children.
     In January 2018, Newsweek and Gawker published articles reporting that a woman from Scotland had accused Franco of trying to hook up with her through Instagram when she was seventeen years old. Franco has also been accused, by five actresses, of pressuring his former acting students into doing nude scenes.

     15. A sketch featuring Aidy Bryant, in which she plays a teenage girl at a slumber party who develops a crush on her friend's dad, and even starts hitting on him and saying lewd things about him. One version of this sketch featured Star Wars actor Adam Driver as the father, while another version featured the singer and rapper Drake.
     [Note: Drake was criticized after teenage actress Millie Bobby Brown (of Stranger Things) revealed that she and Drake had been texting each other, including about boys.]

     16. The "Disney Housewives" sketch features Nasim Pedrad as Jasmine from Aladdin saying that she "had sex with Iago", the parrot owned by evil sorcerer Jafar. She also refers to giving Aladdin a lap dance. Princess Jasmine is canonically 16 years old.

     17. A 2019 sketch called "Cast List", which was cut for time, featured Will Ferrell as a high school drama director. In that sketch, Ferrell's character tells one of the students to have sex as an assignment.

     18. A 2017 sketch which featured host James Franco reading the words in a spelling bee. Nearly all of the words are terms relating to someone sexually humiliating and emasculating their stepson.

     19. Numerous sketches from 2013 feature Kristen Wiig as "Shana", a redheaded "bombshell" who flirts with male co-workers. Shana uses sexual innuendo which gradually becomes filthier and more explicit, including references to coprophilia (feces fetish).

     20. A 2011 sketch featured Andy Samberg as the president of M.T.V., discussing the network's controversial show Skins. Samberg says that M.T.V. got in trouble for showing "fourth graders having sex" and violating "child pornography laws", which Samberg's character says while showing air-quotes with his hands. Next, a clip is shown of the retooled version of the show, now laden with product placements. The young characters discuss having sex and having a threesome. The sketch ends with one male character saying flatly, "I'm twelve".

     21. The three "Uncle Roy" sketches from between 1978 and 1980, which starred Buck Henry, Jane Curtin, Gilda Radner, and Laraine Newman. The sketch is about an uncle who has tricked his nieces into enjoying playing games he has devised; games which allowed him to molest them and have sex with them before the sketches took place. In an interview, Buck Henry has said that he understands why these sketches were controversial, but that they meant to point out that "there's an Uncle Roy in every family".

     22. The recurring "Canteen Boy" sketches, featuring Adam Sandler as a boy scout, and Alec Baldwin as a scout leader who tries to seduce him.

     23. One of the "Schweddy Balls" sketches, featuring Alec Baldwin, features Baldwin's character Pete Schweddy telling radio listeners that children's eyes light up when they are given his "Schweddy Balls" as gifts to eat. These sketches featured Molly Shannon and Ana Gasteyer, playing hosts of a fictional N.P.R. show about food, called "The Delicious Dish".

     24. One of the recurring "Ambiguously Gay Duo" sketches, in which the characters - superheroes Ace and Gary (voiced by Stephen Colbert and Steve Carell) - engage in ambiguously sexual interactions in front of children.

     25. A sketch from the late 2010s, about a blind date, wherein the male at the table - played by Kyle Mooney - suddenly reveals that he is twelve years old.

     26. A sketch from the 1990s, featuring Chris Kattan as Peter Pan and Claire Daines as Tinkerbell, in which Tinkerbell gets drunk and sulks over Peter Pan not being her boyfriend.

     27. A sketch from the 2010s, featuring Dwayne "Rock" Johnson and Bobby Moynihan, in which The Rock plays a scientist who has entered a "most evil invention" contest. His submission is a robot that molests children, which he has molested in order to make it want to molest children.

     28. A Halloween sketch from the 2000s, featuring Will Forte and Jon Hamm, in which Forte plays a man who is going door-to-door, informing people that he is not a sex offender, even though his Halloween costume is that he is legally required to inform people that he is a sex offender.

     29. The 2004 "Harry Potter" sketch, in which then Lindsay Lohan played Hermione Granger after a "growth spurt". The sketch features Horatio Sanz as a horny Professor Hagrid, lusting over Hermione's breasts, and Will Forte as Professor Snape, struggling to hide his perturbation. At one point, Lohan's cleavage is even show through a magnifying glass. Lohan did not turn 18 years old until two months after she hosted that episode.

     30. The episode from 2000 in which Britney Spears hosted and performed as the musical guest, which contained an opening monologue that drew attention to Spears's breasts. In the monologue, Spears denies that she has had breast augmentation surgery, and says that she is eighteen years old and "still growing" while her breasts start moving unexpectedly. Spears had turned 18 years old just five months prior to hosting that episode in May 2000.

     31. An episode from the 1990s that featured Danny Aiello as a bus driver and Cheri Oteri as a little girl named Althea McMittaman. During that sketch, Oteri's character - who we could assume is somewhere between eight and twelve years old - annoys Aiello by constantly talking to him. One of the things that she says is that nobody is allowed to touch her private parts, except when she feels the need to "explore". Next, Althea starts chanting "I touch myself", causing Aiello to almost crash the bus.

     32. A fake commercial, from the 2000s, for "Huggies thongs".
     The sketch ostensibly pokes fun at the sexualization of younger and younger children by the fashion industry, but the sheer number of gratuitous shots of babies' butts is a clear indication that the "cringe factor" is the only thing that makes the commercial "funny".
     As Bill Murray told Eric Idle in an early episode of the show, even if it's not funny, S.N.L.'s audience will laugh anyway, because they know it's supposed to be funny.

     33. One of the sketches from the early 2010s, which depicted a European family of artists, featured Will Ferrell playing a character who reveals that he is going through puberty even though his character is clearly established as older than thirty. Those sketches also featured Fred Armisen and Maya Rudolph, who played the parents of Ferrell's character, both named Nuni.

     34. A sketch from the 2010s in which Lady Gaga played a mother to a girl who was dancing as part of a pageant competition. Lady Gaga and the actor playing the girl's father are shown dancing along to their daughter's routine, and shouting instructions and encouragement at her. The girl is never shown. Throughout the sketch, the dancing gradually becomes more sexual.
     It would be difficult to argue that the sketch does not cause viewers to imagine a little girl dancing suggestively on a pageant stage (not unlike the girls depicted in the now cancelled show Toddlers and Tiaras).
     Before that episode of S.N.L., Tom Hanks appeared in a sketch on Jimmy Kimmel Live! which was remarkably similar to the premise and setup of the Lady Gaga sketch. Hanks played a pageant father who was acting-out instructions for his daughter, but there was actually a little girl there, whom Hanks introduced as his daughter. She was not Hanks's real daughter, however.

     35. In one of the recurring "Stefon" sketches on Weekend Update, Stefon (played by Bill Hader) talks about a club - which is presumably full of adults who are drinking and trying to find dates - that "has everything", including "a child", which he says before a long, awkward pause.

     36. The recurring "Boston teens" sketches, featuring Jimmy Fallon and Rachel Dratch, included numerous references to teenagers making out and trying to get laid.

     37. The recurring "Goth Talk" sketch - in which Molly Shannon and Chris Kattan played goth teenagers who hosted a late-night public access show - featured several references to the goth teens' sexual histories. These included Kattan's character, and a character played by Charlize Theron, who reveals that one of the teachers "went down on" her (i.e., had oral sex with her).

     38. A sketch from the late 1990s in which Molly Shannon, Cheri Oteri, Ana Gasteyer, and Sarah Michelle Gellar play teenage girls who are the hosts of a T.R.L. (Total Request Live) -type show about boy bands, features a fictional music artist who is literally an infant boy. He is shown wearing a leather jacket, and it is revealed that he has released a song called "I Want to Give it to You Hard".

     39. A sketch from the mid-1990s, which featured host Nathan Lane playing a nun, who walks around looking at art nudes, and saying the word "pubic" over and over again.

     40. A sketch from the 2000s, starring Rachel Dratch and host Jennifer Aniston, in which the two women play Dickensian ragamuffins (i.e., children), features the young characters singing a song whose lyrics include "I'd decapitate a whore for you".

     41. A recurring series of sketches, which featured Chris Kattan and Cheri Oteri as a couple who talked dirty to each other in front of their friends, included at least one sketch in which Kattan's and Oteri's characters called each other "daddy" and "mama".

     42. The 2019 sketch “Bachelorette Party”, which features host Kit Harrington as a fiancée, stripping for his fiancée at her bachelorette party. One of the bachelorette’s friends is played by Melissa Villasenor, who spends the whole sketch leering at Harington (dressed in a skirt and pasties), but reveals at the very end of the sketch that she is his sister.

     43. The 2014 sketch “He-Man and Lion-O”, starring host Chris Pratt and Ariana Grande, features Kyle Mooney as a young boy wishing upon his birthday cake candles for his He-Man and Lion-O dolls to come to life. They do, and soon after, discover the joys of masturbating. Pratt and Taran Killam play the dolls, who masturbate in front of the boy, before being propositioned for a four-way in a hot tub by the boy’s mother (played by Aidy Bryant).

     44. The 2020 sketch “Sound of Music: Rolf and Liesl”, starring Cecily Strong as Liesl and host John Mulaney as Nazi envoy Rolf. The sketch features the pair singing “Sixteen Going on Seventeen” from the famous The Sound of Music musical (starring Julie Andrews), but puts a twist on the song. Rolf, based on Sound of Music character Rolf Gruber, was played by a 20-year-old actor in the film, named Dan Truhitte. But that fact didn’t stop S.N.L. from re-writing “Sixteen Going on Seventeen” to be about a thirty-eight-year-old Rolf hitting on the teenage Liesl. As a reminder, John Mulaney co-wrote the show’s “Stefon” sketches with Bill Hader, and is friends with pedophiles and Jeffrey Epstein associates Mick Jagger and Bill Clinton.

     45. The 2017 sketch “Golden Ticket”, starring Kristen Stewart as Charlie (the boy from Charlie and the Chocolate Factory), features Stewart’s Charlie acknowledging that he has washed the “balls” of the old man with glasses who lies in bed with Charlie’s grandfather (both of whom are unable to walk). The old man responds that he didn’t ask Charlie to wash his balls, implying that Charlie (a minor) decided to do so himself. Just a few seconds later, Charlie makes reference to the old people “scissoring” each other in bed all day (i.e., having sex).

     46. The 2015 S.N.L. music video “First Got Horny 2 U” features host Elizabeth Banks in a fictional band called “Infinity + 5” with cast members Cecily Strong, Vanessa Bayer, Aidy Bryant, and Kate McKinnon. “First Got Horny 2 U” features the women singing about teen heartthrobs, i.e., teenage boy celebrities, of the 1990s. These include Jonathan Taylor Thomas, and Taylor Hanson (of the late 1990s family pop band Hanson), as well Erik Menendez (who killed his parents after his father raped him and his brother Lyle). Towards the end of the music video, the women are shown dressed as the teen or pre-teen versions of themselves, making out with posters of teen heartthrobs (including Menendez), and making gestures suggestive of masturbation. 


     47. The "Christmas elves" sketches from the 2010s - featuring Louis C.K., Kenan Thompson, Vanessa Bayer, and Ryan Gosling" - which involve the diminutive elves begging, in a seductive and sexually suggestive way, for Santa to "discipline" them. They even make mistakes on the job, on purpose, in order to fabricate excuses to beg Santa to "discipline" them (such as with spanking).

     48. The 2017 music video for "Baby Steps" (or "The Baby Step") by Miley Cyrus. During the 2017 episode which Miley Cyrus hosted, she appeared in a music video for a song about "taking baby steps" - i.e., taking it slow - in a relationship. The sketch featured Miley - and other cast members, including Kenan Thompson - wearing diapers. At one point, Kenan begs Lorne Michaels for an answer as to why he is forcing the cast members to do such humiliating things while on the show. He gets no answer.
     [Note: Miley Cyrus previously appeared in a diaper in a music video; for her 2015 song "BB Talk".]

     49. The sketch from the late 1990s, which features Tim Meadows as "Jingleheimer Joe", the host of a children's show called "Jingleheimer Junction". Will Ferrell plays a character who wears a shirt with a large "F" on it, standing for friendship. He is introduced on the show, to the hosts's dismay, because the other characters have "U", "C", and "K" on their shirts, standing for unity, caring, and kindness. During the sketch, the show is briefly pulled off the air, because Ferrell's character keeps trying to join the other characters, spelling out the word "fuck" in front of the fictional show's audience of children. As if that weren't enough, the characters even break into song, saying "you can do it anywhere, in a park or on a chair, inside and outside."

     50. The "Happy Smile Patrol" sketch from 1999, which featured host John Goodman, Chris Kattan, and Cheri Oteri as actors on a children's show called Happy Smile Patrol. The children's show is interrupted by a newscaster who reveals that the actors have all murdered each other, and that Oteri's character (who played "Glenda Giggles" on the fictional show) became a drug mule and negotiated sex acts with a customs official in exchange for her release from custody, before murdering that official. Each report about the actors joining cults, becoming criminals, and dying at the hands of the police, is followed by a happy "We now return to the Happy Smile Patrol", and a close-up of one of the cast members doing something silly and child-like.

     51. The "Bill Brasky" sketches featured John Goodman, Will Ferrell, and other S.N.L. actors playing drunks in a bar. These sketches usually included one of the men drunkenly blurting out something personal and embarrassing about himself. In one of the "Bill Brasky" sketches, John Goodman's character suddenly tells everyone that he's a registered sex offender. In either the same sketch or a different "Brasky" sketch, Goodman's character blurts out "I masturbate to the Teletubbies".

     52. The sketch from the 1990s which featured Chris Kattan as a redneck living in a trailer, who spends most of the sketch drinking and hitting on people who are related to him.

     53. The "Girlfriends" sketches from the late 2010s, featuring Cecily Strong and Aidy Bryant, include numerous references to statutory rape (or at least the stalking of minors by adults, and what could be described as attempted statutory rape). Cecily Strong's character, a teenage girl, casually says the line "...My boyfriend's older" in nearly every sketch, after romanticizing the way her probably adult boyfriend is stalking her and obsessing over her.

     54. The 1982 episode hosted by Drew Barrymore, featured the then seven-year-old girl joking about drinking alcohol and murdering E.T..
     During the opening sketch, Drew walks into a room full of Not Ready for Primetime Players, and informs them that she was told that she could not "say any bad stuff". This line echoed a line previously said by one of the cast members, who specifically mentioned that Drew wasn't allowed to curse or mention sex. Before that sketch was over, seven-year-old Drew ordered a "double" alcoholic drink, because she's a Barrymore.
     During the monologue, a male cast member asks Drew who she wants to marry, and she responds "Steven Spielberg". [Note: Some people suspect Steven Spielberg of being a pedophile, pointing to signs in his film Amblin, and to facts surrounding his proximity to the death of Poltergeist actress Heather o'Rourke, which was possibly the result of rape.]
     During the E.T. sketch, Drew plays Gertie, her character from E.T.: The Extra-Terrestrial. In that sketch, Gertie reveals that she has killed E.T. with a baseball bat, saying "I killed the little sucker". During that sketch, Gertie's older brother Elliot uses the phrase "penis breath", a line which was said in the original movie. The Elliot character says "penis breath" despite the fact that the episode began with all of the actors acknowledging that seven-year-olds legally aren't allowed to work around people using curse words.
     [Note: Saturday Night Live evidently preferred alcohol and sex jokes about seven-year-olds, over Andy Kaufman's off-beat brand of humor (designed to elicit a child-like sense of joy), so much that they needed to kick him off the show permanently, and stop caring whether he lived or died. During that 1982 episode which Drew Barrymore hosted, the players revealed the results of an audience phone-in poll, and revealed that Andy had been voted off of the show forever. Andy Kaufman died in poverty of liver cancer just two years later.]


     It is also worth mentioning that Saturday Night Live alumnus Jimmy Fallon does a recurring sketch on his show Late Night with Jimmy Fallon, in which he plays a teenage girl, complete with a blonde wig and fake braces. In these sketches, Fallon plays a girl named Sara, who hosts a show on Teen Nick (Nickelodeon), and says "Ew!" a lot. These sketches often feature references to teen sexuality.




3. Conclusion

     Maybe a single "Uncle Roy" sketch would have sufficed as an adequate warning that there's a child molester in every family. But repeating the sketch twice was arguably overkill.
     So were the other fifty-three sets of sketches which focused on teen sexuality (and one of which even portrayed a child hitting on an adult) which followed the last of the three Uncle Roy sketches. The last Uncle Roy sketch aired in 1980.
     Aside from the Drew Barrymore episode in 1982, S.N.L. went almost a good solid ten years without joking about pedophilia and teen sexuality much.
     Then came the 1990s.

     Rob Lowe's 1992 teen sex tape scandal (in which he engaged in sex with a 16-year-old girl in a state where it was then legal to do that). Lowe's ability to laugh at himself certainly saved his career, after the scandal had caused so much damage to his reputation that producers of Tommy Boy did not even include his name in the credits.
     Lowe's sex tape scandal has gone largely forgotten, at least among the American public; however, his own son made a joke about it at an event in Hollywood.
     Lowe's mockery of the sex he had with a 16-year-old girl, seems to have been Saturday Night Live's turning point, which indicated that it was diving head-first into a complete lack of self-consciousness; all the while maintaining the air of "edginess". Lowe kept this "edginess" going by donning blackface during that same episode, playing Arsenio Hall in an eight-minute sketch.
     After Lowe's episode ended, and the "Spartans" and "Superstar" sketches began several years later, there was no turning back for S.N.L.. The show was now solidly about teen sexuality; or at least its two most popular sketches were.

     It is evident from the "Spartans" and "Superstar" sketches, that this is all being done in the spirit of mocking the sexual repression promoted by culturally conservative politicians and Catholic school teachers. And it is perfectly reasonable to want to mock people who want to heap unnecessary levels of shame on teenagers who want to start dating and experimenting.
     But too much defense of high school students' freedom to choose to start having sex - coupled with open mockery of anyone and everyone concerned about minors losing their virginity under dangerous or unwanted circumstances - risks turning teen sex into something even more dangerous than a secret. It turns it into a laughing matter, of which people must be ridiculed for being ashamed. This mindset renders rape as simply an unwanted version of something hilarious (i.e., sex). And how can something hilarious be bad, even when it's unwanted? The sex being unwanted just makes it humiliating, which is, again, hilarious.
     Saturday Night Live reflects the mindset of the conservative liberal, and of its network, N.B.C., which is owned by General Electric (G.E.), a war profiteer that makes parts for the U.S. military. S.N.L. reflects a liberal-conservative mindset which enables war and conservatism by mocking conservatism in order to fund the war with ad revenue from the commercials that run during the show. With its liberal left hand, S.N.L. gives us the comedy news, wakes us up about a few things, and boosts a Democratic politician or two; and with its conservative right hand, it lets Donald Trump host after using anti-Hispanic tropes, funds G.E.'s war machine with its ads, and teaches us to laugh at children who are getting raped by adults (I'm talking about you, Cecily).

     Let's put it this way: If the Uncle Roy sketches had never aired - and Buck Henry had instead done a public service announcement against incestuous child molestation on the show - then it would have accomplished the goal that the people of Saturday Night Live will claim that they wanted those sketches to accomplish. So joking about it - especially as much as they did - could only serve to compromise that narrative. The people at S.N.L. compromised the message - that child molesters deserved to be mocked because what they do is evil - and turned it into a message that child molesters deserve to be mocked rather than held accountable because anyone who opposes child molestation is stopping the fun.
     You see, having a live television show with a covert, duplicitous political message, achieves one very important thing for the coastal elites who control the entertainment industry. Creating a live show where "anything can happen" blends reality with fiction. This makes the entire world into a potential part of the show, because the show could potentially be interrupted by messages from the president. That's not actually true, but it's true for all intents and purposes, because the show features numerous "live messages" from the president, and has even allowed presidential candidates to appear on the show and host.
     And if the entire world is just part of S.N.L., then that means the whole world is something to laugh at. And anybody trying to hold people accountable for molesting children, is spoiling the fun. Essentially, they're interrupting the sketch.
     What situation are you in now? Does it feel like a sketch? Well, it's supposed to be funny. So somebody needs to be laughing. Are you in a sad or traumatic situation? Tough shit. In the words of Peter Griffin, "Somebody throw a pie!" You're lucky to be on T.V., so be a good sport.
     And remember what happened to Andy Kaufman: if there's a character you don't like, you can vote him off of the show. Just like on Survivor. And just like how the Greek jurors democratically decided to execute Socrates after threatening to kill his children and wife.
     As William Shakespeare said, "All the world's a stage, and the men and women merely players". [Note: This article was written and published on April 23rd, the anniversary of Shakespeare's death.]

     Do you see, now, how we are all little pawns in Saturday Night Live's game? It is a show where fiction and fantasy take place within reality, with a laugh track. A show where people can be voted off and then mocked until they die of cancer.
     We need to think about what this show is doing to our minds, and the way we perceive humor and even reality itself. It's time that we started thinking about live sketch comedy as a unique form of "reality TV".
     If the people who write, and agree to appear in, these sketches, are not themselves pedophiles, then at the very least, they are mentally ill freaks, who cannot think of anything better to juxtapose against children for laughs, other than the sexual activity which children are not supposed to have.
     Satyr-Day Night Live - or Satan Day Night Live - needs to be cancelled, and yesterday.



Post-Script
     (written July 8th, 2021):

      Unfortunately, in 2016, then President Barack Obama awarded Saturday Night Live producer Lorne Michaels with the Presidential Medal of Freedom.


     The Sinead o'Connor fiasco is worth mentioning as well.
     In a 1992 episode of Saturday Night Live, hosted by Tim Robbins and featuring o'Connor as the musical guest, o'Connor performed the Bob Marley song "War", and sang the words "child abuse" in place of one of the original lyrics. At the end of the song, she tore up a picture of Pope John Paul II, and said "Fight the real enemy". The producers' reaction was to dim the lights, and refrain from instructing the audience to applaud. O'Connor later explained that she was protesting what she perceived as the coverup of sexual abuse of Irish children by the British with the consent of the Vatican.
     The next episode of Saturday Night Live was hosted by Italian Catholic actor Joe Pesci, who presented the reassembled photo of Pope John Paul II during his opening monologue.
     In the 1990s, Saturday Night Live actress Jan Hooks portrayed Sinead o'Connor in all sketches in which o'Connor did not play herself. Many of those sketches mocked o'Connor, and - almost like something out of medieval-era passion-plays, or the _eight minutes of hate" from 1984 - they encouraged the audience to boo Hooks's o'Connor character until she sauntered off-stage crying.
     The mockery of Sinead o'Connor did not stop at Saturday Night Live, however; the producers evidently had to use their other show to make fun of her too. In an episode of S.N.L.'s "sister show" 30 Rock, Kristen Schaal (playing an N.B.C. page) rips up a picture of Sinead o'Connor while on stage.


     Finally, six of the above fifty-four sets of sketches, included Will Ferrell, who was a cast member from 1995 to 2002.
     Several things that Will Ferrell has done, have caused researchers to question whether he is a member of a secret Hollywood pedophile elite.
     The first was Ferrell's 2011 appearance at a Museum of Contemporary Art gala, which had him wearing a white lab coat, eating desserts shaped like human body parts, near a human-shaped, human-size cake laying in a bathtub full of blood. That "artwork" was designed by Marina Abramovic, a "performance artist" connected to James Alefantis and John Podesta. Some suspect that Abramovic is a Satanist, because her use of body fluids in her art could reference the occult ceremony of "spirit cooking". Also in attendance at the Museum of Contemporary Art gala, which Ferrell attended, include Jerry Brown, Debbie Harry, Gwen Stefani, and Deeta von Teese (the girlfriend of accused rapist Marilyn Manson).
     The second thing Ferrell did which irked researchers' suspicion about his values, is the following "sketch" from The Chris Gethard Show, in which Ferrell performs a "ritual of the minds". This "ritual of the minds" is basically an occult birthing ritual, which Ferrell explained was a sort of prayer that The Chris Gethard Show would get better ratings. This clip was shown to Conan o'Brien's audience after it aired on Gethard's show.
     http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XnkfBi7MYWM







Written and Published on April 23rd, 2021

Edited and Expanded on April 25th;
May 12th and 18th, 2021;
and July 8th and 16th, 2021

Title changed
(from "Saturday Night Live Has Aired at Least Thirty Sketches
That Made Light of Pedophilia and Incest"
on April 25th and May 18th, 2021

Based on research collected between 2017 and 2021

Post-Script Added on July 8th, 2021
    

Saturday, April 3, 2021

Don't Shoot the Messenger: Confirming Robby Soave's Observation That it's Legal to Traffic Sixteen- and Seventeen-Year-Olds

     As comedian -turned- political commentator and podcast host Jimmy Dore has been remarking more and more often lately, "our country is full of the adult children of alcoholics, and the adult children of alcoholics tend to blame the person making them aware of a problem, instead of blaming the person who's the actual cause of the problem".
     Dore's comment seems to very accurately describe social media's reaction to Robby Soave's Twitter comments about the Matt Gaetz teenager-trafficking scandal.

     On April 1st, 2021, the New York Times and other sources reported that Matt Gaetz, a Republican U.S. congressman from Florida, is being investigated by the Justice Department for possibly trafficking a 17-year-old girl across state lines for the purposes of sex.
     Within a day or two of the Gaetz controversy breaking, Robby Soave, a writer and senior editor at the libertarian-leaning Reason magazine, tweeted in response to the scandal. His tweet read, "I really don't think Matt Gaetz committed [']sex trafficking['] even if he is guilty of exactly what the NYT describes. And in fact, the age of consent is 16 or 17 in the vast majority of states." A subsequent tweet of Soave's read, "Yes I am in fact a libertarian thank you for pointing that out".




     Soave's Twitter comments on the Gaetz scandal may seem insensitive, and it might seem like an obvious defense of trafficking teens for sex (and maybe even of pedophilia in general). Or maybe Soave is just "playing Devil's Advocate".
     But on the other hand, when Soave says "I really don't think Matt Gaetz committed [']sex trafficking['] even if he is guilty of exactly what the NYT describes", he might just mean that he personally thinks there is no merit to the reports about Gaetz.

     Still, it may seem insensitive that Soave would say that he doesn't think Gaetz is guilty "even if he is guilty of exactly what the NYT describes". It almost sounds like he's saying Gaetz is guilty and not guilty at the same time, which doesn't make sense.
     But in fact, what Robby Soave is saying about the law is 100% correct. Unfortunately, in the United States, it is currently legal to traffic teenagers across state lines, provided that they are sixteen years of age or older. This was the outcome of the 2017 U.S. Supreme Court case Esquivel-Quintana v. Sessions.

     Thus, Robby Soave may appear to be defending pedophilia and child trafficking, but we cannot conclude, solely from these two tweets, whether he is doing so because of his own personal "ethics" (or lack thereof), or whether he is doing so in order to be on the correct side of the law.
     If it's the latter, then it is sad to consider what this means. In order to be on the correct side of the law, as it stands right now, we have to agree that trafficking sixteen- and seventeen-year-olds across state lines for the purposes of sex, is not a crime against anybody, in the eyes of federal law.
     The law is giving the American people (and especially the politicians and lawyers, and those who wish to become politically involved and taken seriously) no choice but to subjugate their own personal senses of morality regarding child protection, to that of the state. This will not do.



     I found Robby Soave's tweet in a Facebook group called "Communists v. Libertarians Debate Group". Soave's tweet was posted mockingly, by a member of that group.
     Shortly after the Matt Gaetz scandal broke, and Robby Soave made his comment on Twitter, I messaged the member who posted Soave's tweet, with the following message.


 

 



     Hey. Saw your post on Communists v. Libertarians about age of consent laws. Soave might have said what he said out of a desire to lower the age of consent, but he's factually correct.

     The case of Esquivel-Quintana v. Sessions was a federal case that effectively lowered the age of consent in about 20 states, including Florida. This federal case effectively nullified the age of consent laws in those states.

     All federal sex trafficking is under federal jurisdiction, and therefore the states can't prosecute a guy who rapes a 17-year-old as long as he takes her out of state in the process. It's a fucked up situation.

     Unfortunately for some people's narrative, the Huffington Post and Jeff Sessions were on the right side of the issue. HuffPo for reporting the case ("Supreme Court unanimously overturns age of consent laws in 20 states") and Jeff Sessions for trying to prosecute Esquivel-Quintana, who traveled across state lines with a 17-year-old girl.

     I believe the girl was from California, it was some state where there was a 17 or 18 year age of consent. The Supreme Court found in Esquivel-Quintana v. Sessions that the federal government's "generic federal age of consent" of 16, won out over the states' higher age of consent laws.

     I believe that we either need to let states prosecute traffickers who take minors from their states, or else we need a constitutional amendment setting the age of consent to 17 or 18 nationwide (because varying age of consent laws in each state will inevitably lead to movement of children for illicit purposes).

 



     Many critics of libertarians - and the critics of the Constitution - like to argue that the Constitution is a living document, and that therefore it should not be interpreted too rigidly or literally.
     But it's hard not to interpret the Constitution rigidly or literally, when the U.S. Code rigidly defines all of the legal terms used in constitutional and legal language.
     To say that we interpret the Constitution "too literally", is to admit that we are interpreting it accurately, without saying it out loud.
     The critics of those who interpret the Constitution accurately, and of those of us who read the law and accurately observe from it that teenagers may legally be trafficked across state lines in some circumstances, are thus in denial.


     I would advise that people on the left who want to protect children, should stop criticizing people for noticing the state of the law. Just like the first step of recovering from alcoholism is admitting that you have a problem - and just like Lao Tzu said you must understand your enemy in order to defeat him - it is impossible to change or improve the law, unless we first recognize and admit how bad it is.
     Libertarians do not consider it fun to have to point out hard truths about the sorry state of our government, like that trafficking teenagers is legal, and that it's legal to marry babies in ten states. But we still consider it our responsibility to inform the public about bad laws, despite the fact that, in payment for this, we have only been treated like the people who caused the problem, instead of being treated as the whistleblowers we are. [My video of Joe Biden pinching an 8-year-old girl's nipple live on C-SPAN, for instance, was removed from YouTube for "cyber-bullying and harassment".]
     To reiterate what C. Frederic Bastiat said about the critics of liberty: Our critics act as if our not wanting the state to raise grain, means that we don't want anyone to raise grain; that is hardly the case. What is good for the law is not always good for the people. Similarly, the set of behaviors that are criminally punishable don't always line up with what we morally believe should be the set of behaviors that are punishable. That is why we are having this conversation; because we want the law to line up with morality.


     So don't shoot the messenger. Blame the people who are actually responsible for twenty state age of consent laws going down in one fell swoop. Blame the attorneys who represented Mr. Esquivel-Quintana. If necessary, blame the political parties with whom those attorneys are associated. Hell, blame the people who wrote the federal age of consent law, and the definition of sex trafficking of a minor or ward.
     But don't blame Robby Soave; his comments were necessary.

     The acceptable legal defense for having sexual relations with a minor, is written into the law. Until we recognize that the age of consent is too low, and we raise it and make it uniform across the states, then the current federal law on trafficking minors will serve only as an instruction to traffickers about how to get away with their crimes.
     Until sex trafficking laws are reformed, the rights of children aged sixteen and seventeen, to be free from harm, will be at risk, and those who point out this problem will continue to be mocked into silence. And the federal law on trafficking a minor or ward will be right there, to make excuses for the situation.
     We have to make it illegal to traffic 17-year-olds across state lines, if we want sex traffickers - and people like Matt Gaetz (if he is guilty) - to be prosecuted. Expecting them to be prosecuted, when what they're doing is not yet illegal (and also no longer illegal, since 2017), is irrational.
     Noticing that sex-trafficking older teens is not illegal, is not necessarily a moral endorsement of the practice; it could also be a warning. Noticing that something is not illegal, is not necessarily the same thing as saying it's good that it's not illegal. You can't know for sure what a person means by something they said, unless you read their full statement, and understand the context in which it's being said.





Esquivel-Quintana v. Sessions:
http://www.huffpost.com/entry/supreme-court-unanimously-overrules-statutory-rape_b_592edaede4b017b267edff12

My most recent article about the need to reform laws on age of consent, statutory rape, and sex trafficking:
http://www.aquarianagrarian.blogspot.com/2021/03/before-fully-legalizing-sex-work-stop.html







Written on April 1st and April 3rd, 2021
Published on April 3rd, 2021
Expanded on April 6th, 2021

How to Fold Two Square Pieces of Card Stock into a Box

      This series of images shows how to take two square pieces of card stock (or thick paper), and cut and fold them into two halves of a b...