A BLOG ABOUT INDEPENDENT POLITICS, POLITICAL ETHICS, ECONOMICS, AND ANARCHISM. Political theory, U.S. politics & election statistics, the political spectrum, constitutional law & civil liberties, civil rights & interstate commerce, taxation & monetary policy, health care & insurance law, labor law & unions, unemployment & wages, homelessness, international relations, religion, technology; alternatives to the state
Showing posts with label Rand. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Rand. Show all posts
Monday, January 4, 2016
Sunday, April 20, 2014
Questions About Ayn Rand
Written on September 28th, 2011
Rand
criticized altruism as the precept that one should give up his life
and welfare for others while demanding that others do the same.
She
said, “It’s fine to help other people if you want to” “when
and if those others mean something to you selfishly”, and she did
not consider reciprocating gifts to others – even those whom one
loves – as a moral duty.
In
light of these comments, it appears that what Rand most abhorred was
not the act of giving to others so much as the promotion of
the idea that one should feel obligated to give to others.
She
also characterized reciprocal altruism as “an exchange of…
presents that neither party wants”.
Did
Rand fail to take into account the free-market principle of
subjective value; i.e., the idea that transactions which are mutually
voluntary are always mutually beneficial by the subjective standards
of all parties to the transactions?
How
can those who subscribe to Rand’s philosophy – evidently equating
the feeling of
moral obligation with coercion and force themselves –
simultaneously advocate the abolition of obviously coercive Statist
social-welfare programs while actively discouraging charitable giving
to those disadvantaged whom they do not know and expect the
disadvantaged to receive any benefit from the moralistic capitalist
system which Rand recommends be practiced?
How
is the Randian capitalist who – when asked to participate in a
mutually-voluntary transaction (which would not take place unless
each party found the transaction to be in his mutual interest and
benefit) – feels it appropriate to actively discourage charitable
giving to the disadvantaged (even at the risk of their prolonged
suffering and death) any different from the socialist laborer who
consents to have profit extracted from him by a capitalist
entrepreneur, and then unionizes his fellow employees, and actively
encourages workplace democracy as well as the eventual violent
overthrow of the capitalist system?
For
more entries on theory of government, please visit:
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
Waukegan Mayor Sam Cunningham Normalized the Same Type of Political Violence He Claims to Oppose When it is Practiced by I.C.E. (800th Post!)
I. Introduction The following speech is an address, regarding immigration, which I delivered to the Waukegan City Council on October 20...
-
To see the above image in greater detail and expand it, click on it, and open it in a new tab or window. To see a higher-q...
-
Click, and/or open in new tab or window, to enlarge Image created in September 2019 Originally Published on September 23rd, 20...
-
Texas Congressman Ron Paul and consumer advocate Ralph Nader Social Libertarianism is the answer to Fascism. Whereas Fascism em...








