Speech to the Illinois District 109 Board of Education Regarding the Forcible Transfer of Children from Parents to the State (August 21st, 2025)

     What follows is my fourth speech to the Illinois District 109 Board of Education, regarding the locker room policy at Alan B. Shepard Middle school in Deerfield, Illinois.

     In February 2025, at Shepard, at least three administrators who were strangers to students, allegedly coerced several 12- and/or 13- -year-old girls into undressing and changing, while evidently failing to ensure that a transgender-identifying student, born male, was able to see them.

     This speech was read at the monthly business meeting of the District 109 Board of Education, which meets on the third Thursday of each month at 517 Deerfield Road in Deerfield, at 7:00 P.M..

     The time limit for speakers is three minutes; this speech would have taken about four or five minutes to read in full. It was delivered with edits, in an abbreviated form.

      Since April, I’ve been advocating for the construction of more locker rooms and restrooms for non-binary individuals. But I just watched an interview with Nicole Georgas, from March, in which she claimed that the locker room controversy began when the trans-identifying student had access to a non-binary bathroom but refused to use it.

     So – assuming that’s true – I'd like to clarify, by saying this:

     It is important to build an equal number of bathrooms – for non-binary, intersex, and transgender people – for the sake of ensuring equal accommodations. If equal accommodations can be ensured, then there is no excuse to object to designating non-binary restrooms as the restrooms that non-binary students are supposed to use.

     The restroom problem has been solved; the new problem seems to be that the trans student doesn't want it solved. But the locker room problem persists; so please build new locker rooms for non-binary students.

     I left you last time by asking you to look up the phrase “forcible transfer of children from one group of people to another”. I mentioned that phrase because it is one of the components of genocide, and because I worry that your staff may have committed it in February.

     To be clear, I am not directly accusing you of genocide. Rather, I am saying that, if children were an ethnic group, then the Illinois Democrats – the people who want you to enforce this locker room policy – would arguably be complicit in genocide (and so might you, by extension, for helping to enforce it, rather than exercising your natural right to conscientiously object to abusing children as part of your jobs).

     To review:

     Since you caused children to fall into the custody of at least three strangers, you arguably committed unlawful detention, and possibly even kidnapping (because transfer that happens without parental knowledge cannot possibly be consensual on the part of either the parents or the child). If it’s not consensual, then it’s coercive; and therefore (covertly) forcible.

     I submit that this is the same type of "forcible transfer of children" which the definition of genocide describes; hence, my concern.

     I will now cite the definition of genocide, from the Cornell Law School’s law dictionary, to defend my argument.

     As I explained, one of the components of genocide is the forcible transfer of children from one protected group of people to another. Also, to commit genocide, someone must target an ethnicity for destruction.

     It is worth noting here - as an aside - that the Universal Declaration of Human Rights says that each of the world's independent nations has "the right to compulsory education" of children. Children have a right to be educated... by force.

     Excuse me, but if we're having a "say something that doesn’t make sense" contest, then I raise you "children are an ethnicity".

     Ethnicity is not a strictly genetic concept, in the way that race is, because it can include religion. Under the widest possible definition of “ethnicity”, children could count as an ethnic group, because they all have a shared custom in common; namely, child's play.

     But even if children could never legally be considered an ethnicity, they are still a protected class (because the case of Troxel v. U.S. affirms that child custody is conditional upon not abusing the child). And parents, likewise, have the protected right to retain custody, provided they refrain from abusing their kids.
     [And if you doubt that the state is a protected class, you can study 11^th Amendment case law regarding the state’s sovereign immunity, its right to extend that immunity to others, and legal limitations upon the right to sue the government.]

     So, then, it would not be out of line to suggest that these children were forcibly transferred from one protected group of people (parents) to another protected group of people (the school, which is part of the state), in a way that comports with the definition of genocide.

 

     Last month, I talked about the sterilization of kids with the puberty blocker Lupron. I don't know how many of you are in favor of puberty blockers, but you should know that eleven- and twelve- year-old girls are having hormone-emitting devices installed in their arms while they scream. I hope you do not support that. But to those of you who do, I say this:

     The children at Shepard were forcibly transferred; some of the girls who were victimized might decide never to have children because of this.

     You also, arguably, destroyed this group of children "as such", meaning that you took their childhoods; destroying them inasmuch as they were children. Destroying a group "as such" is another component of genocide. As Stromboli says in Pinocchio, "They don't come back [from Pleasure Island] as boys".

     So if you're in favor of risking committing kidnapping, and traumatizing people into not reproducing, and sterilizing non-consenting minors with chemicals - and I and the girls' parents are against those things - then whom, exactly, is committing the genocide against trans children?

      There’s more than one theory, here, about who “the real Nazis” are.
     Stop enforcing the locker room policy. The use of force is wrong.

Written and published on August 21st, 2025

Based on notes taken in July 2025.

Edited on August 22nd, 2025.

Abridged Speech to the Illinois School District 109 Board of Education Regarding Transgender Students' Access to Locker Rooms, July 24th, 2025

     The following is the text of a speech which I plan to deliver, in whole or in part, at the July regular monthly meeting of the school board of Illinois District 109.

     That district includes Shepard Middle School, whose staff allegedly coerced a group of thirteen-year-old girls to change clothes in the presence of a student, assigned male at birth, who identified as transgender, and who may have been within range to see the girls changing.

     The meetings have a three-minute time limit.  The following speech would take about six minutes to read in full.

     The meeting will be held at 7:00 P.M. at 517 Deerfield Road in Deerfield, on Thursday, July 24^th, 2025.

     It is truly unconscionable what you’ve allowed to happen here. This should be the last straw and last stand for any rational parents.

     There are so many things here that have been done wrong, that I have enough to say about it to last me the next four months of meetings.

      I could talk more about why my proposal to add bathrooms for non-binary individuals is the safest and most equitable and sustainable solution.

     I could talk about how the way you enforce your locker room policy not only could put children at heightened risk of being trafficked to people they don't know, but also - in effect - actually already did traffic them to people who they (and their parents) didn't know.

     Or I could talk about about how the governor’s ban on the banning of books makes it difficult to get books containing rape, child rape, incest, and pornographic content out of school libraries.

     Or about how - when residents come up here and say “outsiders are coming into our town and attacking us”, or when Asher McMaher says the trans male student was “attacked” – it reminds me of Nazi military leader Herman Goering saying “all you have to do [to get people to support a war] is tell them they are being attacked”.

     I could talk about how Asher McMaher could be sued, for defaming the girls, by falsely claiming  that the boy was attacked when he was just criticized. Especially if you can sue parents, or people who speak here – and take their money - for failing to correctly guess what crimes the staff committed against children, in private, without their parents knowing who had custody of them.

     I could talk about how giving the trans male’s parents whatever they want here, means that you may be ignoring the possibility that the boy’s gender-questioning feelings could be motivated by previous child sexual abuse by a family member or a friend of the family (and a 2021 study showed that 19 percent of trans kids were sexually abused).

     I could talk about how the people who gave you this policy, are aligned with Governor J.B. Pritzker’s billionaire transgender sister, Jennifer, who’s funding a lot of these efforts, and profiting off them (and so is AbbVie, the company that pollutes our county with “volatile organic materials”, while producing Lupron to sterilize adult sex offenders and potentially sterilize confused children as well).

     I could talk about how you’ve failed to post security guards or even greeters at the entrances to your schools, for in case a shooter shows up to an event outside normal school hours (so you’ve failed to guard against shootings and sexual impropriety against children).

     Or about how it’s unconstitutional for you guys to receive federal funds for education, in the first place, no matter where you have the trans kids change clothes.

     But those things are boring, and don’t communicate the gravity of the situation. So let’s read this definition of genocide, from Cornell Law, and see how much of it you guys are doing.

     Intent to commit genocide includes any one, or more, of the following acts, even if incomplete or unsuccessful: “Intent to destroy – in whole or in part – a[n]… ethnical… group, as such.” Ethnicity technically means just a “common cultural background”, so that could include children. Playing is kind of a common cultural background.

     Destroy them “As such”… The childhoods of children who were abused, were destroyed. Thus, abused children are destroyed as children. Like Pinocchio’s Stromboli said, “They don’t come back as boys”.

     “Causing … mental harm”… Certainly the girls suffered that.

     “Imposing measures intended to prevent birth”. Bottom surgery, anyone? You didn’t do it, but you support it. It’s being done to 17-year-olds now. Double mastectomies for 13-year-olds. Hormone-emitting devices implanted into 11-year-old girls.

     Forcible transfer from one group to another… Like from parents to the state?

     You – and the people behind this locker room policy - have committed at least three components of intent to commit genocide; against homosexual and gender-questioning minors, by confusing them into thinking they’re trans, then partially or completely sterilizing them, and filling their heads with thoughts of suicide by insisting it's the only alternative to transitioning.

     Everyone supporting that wider set of policies, towards trans-identfying kids, is acting as if children should be treated like pets and slaves whom their parents and a doctor can castrate, at will, for attention and money. You are abducting children from “non-affirming” homes and lying about transition satisfaction rates.

     You, your staff, the Pritzkers, the other Democrats, and AbbVie should all be put on trial for kidnapping, child trafficking, accessory to sex crimes against minors, and attempted intentional conspiracy to commit genocide against gender-questioning and homosexual minors.

     And “even if the incitement is not obvious to outsiders” (like me), incitement to commit genocide "can still be considered direct as long as the intended audience immediately understands the message”. I believe you know very well what you're doing.

     First you have declared war on this nation’s children, now you are committing war crimes against them. The intent to destroy their bodies and spirits is clear.

     And you can’t sue me for saying that, because I just proved it.

     Invoke your right of conscientious objection to a human rights abuse, stop enforcing that locker room policy, stop violating Title IX, and tell your union and governor that you have a responsibility to interfere with the commission of this legalized crime.

Written on July 24th, 2025.

Based on "Speech to the Illinois School District 109 Board of Education
Regarding Transgender Students' Access to Locker Rooms, July 24th, 2025",
which was written on May 15th, June 17th, and July 24th, 2025.