Showing posts with label P.A.T.R.I.O.T. Act. Show all posts
Showing posts with label P.A.T.R.I.O.T. Act. Show all posts

Thursday, May 8, 2014

Wiretaps, Searches, and the P.A.T.R.I.O.T. Act

The following was written in April 2014, as part of a response to the Campaign for Liberty's 2012 survey questionnaire for candidates running for federal office.



15. Will you oppose federal power grabs like roving wiretaps and warrantless searches, and oppose PATRIOT Act renewal that includes such items?

     Yes, I will oppose roving wiretaps and warrantless searches by the federal government; and vote to repeal the PATRIOT Act, to oppose its renewal and similar legislation.
     I will criticize the PATRIOT Act on the basis of its lacking both constitutionality and transparency. Given the short duration of time which members of Congress were given to read and consider the bill, the stipulation that only those members who voted for the bill would be permitted to participate in its subsequent amendment, and the fragmented manner in which the bill was constructed – as well as the content of the bill itself - I see no reason to support the act or its renewal.
     I believe that unless danger is imminent and reasonable suspicion of violent crime is present, a wiretap or search is not permissible unless and until a judge has signed a warrant issuing authorization for such an action. Federal agents must not write their own search warrants and enter and occupy people's homes without either permission of the homeowner or a warrant signed by a judge, as did the agents of King George III during the American Revolutionary War.
     Contrary to the attitudes of supporters of the PATRIOT Act, the need to protect our 5th Amendment liberties should never be superseded by the need of law enforcement agencies to gather information quickly and efficiently, nor by the need of judges who sign such warrants to get a full eight hours of sleep at night.
     I will sponsor legislation to augment the protection of the civil liberties enumerated in the 4th, 5th, and 6th Amendments, strictly prohibiting government surveillance without cause, as well as all illegal activities of the National Security Agency's programs, in particular the PRISM data collection program.
     I will also urge states and local governments to legalize the filming of police officers and all elected and appointed public officials, and I will support increased congressional oversight of the Continuity of Operations Plan, in order to prevent the suspension of the Constitution and basic civil liberties in the event of a State of National Emergency. Additionally, I will support review and revision of which agencies the U.S. considers terrorist groups hostile to our country, in order to ensure sufficient domestic homeland security absent the politicizing effects of our military and trade policies towards other nations.




For more entries on homeland security and terrorism, please visit:
http://www.aquarianagrarian.blogspot.com/2011/03/911-heres-what-i-think-happened.html
http://www.aquarianagrarian.blogspot.com/2014/05/identification-and-travel-documents.html

For more entries on high-profile corruption and conspiracy theories, please visit:

Sunday, April 20, 2014

In Response to a Question About the P.A.T.R.I.O.T. Act

Written on March 25th, 2011



Snowflake Digitalis asked:

   "Ok Joe; We're going to start with a softball campaign question. What is Your stance on the patriot act? Would You have voted for it or against it?¿ Would you vote to renew it¿?"



I replied:

   "Like former Republican Georgia congressman and former Libertarian Party presidential candidate Bob Barr, I cannot be certain that I would have voted against the original bill, because there was a stipulation that only those House members who voted in favor of the bill would be permitted to participate in the amendment of it.

   "Being that the bill was virtually guaranteed to pass, these facts - and also the fact that members of the House were only given fifteen minutes to read the bill - mean the congress was put in a very awkward position. I would like to think that I would have had enough principle, courage, and confidence in my own patriotism to criticize the original bill on its unconstitutionality as well as on the basis of a lack of transparency.
  
   "I would always vote against renewing the PATRIOT Act. All searches and instances of wire-tapping should be illegal unless there is probable cause and a judge has signed a warrant issuing authorization for such actions. I do not believe that the need for law enforcement agencies to gather information quickly and efficiently should ever supersede the Fifth Amendment.

   "The PATRIOT Act has created a slippery slope in which federal agents are able to write their own search warrants, just as British police could write their own warrants during American colonization. These warrants can now be issued for such frivolous things as invading people's homes on suspicion of drug possession, and suspicion of involvement with terrorist organizations, which can be construed to be the case even when a citizen is merely sympathetic with innocuous, non-violent Arab organizations which oppose Israel and / or the United States' belligerent foreign policy."




For more entries on military, national defense, and foreign policy, please visit:
http://www.aquarianagrarian.blogspot.com/2010/10/american-sovereignty-restoration-act-of.html
http://www.aquarianagrarian.blogspot.com/2014/05/foreign-occupation-and-declaration-of.html

For more entries on homeland security and terrorism, please visit:
http://www.aquarianagrarian.blogspot.com/2011/03/911-heres-what-i-think-happened.html

How to Fold Two Square Pieces of Card Stock into a Box

      This series of images shows how to take two square pieces of card stock (or thick paper), and cut and fold them into two halves of a b...