Showing posts with label murder. Show all posts
Showing posts with label murder. Show all posts

Tuesday, July 28, 2020

Police Officers Can Legally Rape and/or Kill You in Every State Except Georgia and North Carolina


Click, and/or open in new tab or window, to expand










Learn more about these topics at the following links:

Sources on resisting unlawful arrest with force:

Source on police "having sex with people in their custody" (a/k/a raping them,
and/or coercing them with a promise of release in exchange for sex):

More sources on rape by police:





Original Images Created, and Published, on July 29th, 2020

Edited and Expanded, and Title Changed, on August 6th, 2020.
The original title was "Police Officers Can Legally Rape You
in Twenty-Two States and the District of Columbia."

Images Replaced on August 14th, 20th, 23rd, and 25th, 2020

Wednesday, March 27, 2019

The Obama Murders (Part 1B: Examination of 16 Particular Cases From the First List) (Incomplete)

Table of Contents

I. Introduction, and List of 16 Victims
II. Background on Five Key Players
III. Explanation of 16 Victims' Cases





Content

I. Introduction, and List of 16 Victims

     This article is the follow-up to my previous article "The Obama Murders (Part 1A: 124 Politically Motivated Deaths and Disappearances)", which was published on this blog on October 12th, 2012.
     It is an examination of the facts surrounding 16 cases from that list of 124. The cases were selected based on: 1) their similarities; 2) their degree of connection to one another; 3) their having occurred near the beginning of the Obama Administration; 4) reports by Michelle Malkin from 2011; 5) Larry Sinclair's public statement; and 6) a televised interview with reporter Wayne Madsen, from early 2011, in which he named somewhere between five and ten of the cases explained below.


     You can watch interviews with Wayne Madsen which touch on a few of these victims, by clicking on the following links:
     http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9bZqiTDNEMc
     http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5JoCRpj5Qgk
     http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sNsh-1p8us8
     http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qd-DU9v9TrE


     You can see Larry Sinclair's statements by clicking on the following link:
     You can see the original list of 124 deaths and disappearances by clicking on the following link:



      The purpose of this article is to determine whether, between September 2007 and November 2011, President Barack Obama and close associates in and near his administration, may have conspired to attempt to assassinate persons who may have posed a threat to Obama getting into office and staying there.
     These persons include Congresswoman Gabirlle Giffords of Arizona, as well as sixteen other American citizens who may have been deliberately murdered for various purposes (with or without collaboration by former Vice President Dick Cheney in one or two of those instances).

      The likely motivations behind their possible murders include, but are not limited to: 1) to cover up and discredit facts surrounding President Obama’s citizenship and presidential eligibility status; 2) to cover up and discredit drug allegations leveled at Obama; 3) to cover up and discredit claims of gay sex scandals involving Obama and his former Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel; 4) to neutralize persons likely to cooperate with investigators in a way that would implicate Obama’s involvement in the political corruption scandal surrounding his vacated U.S. Senate seat; 5) to neutralize persons likely to reveal Obama’s connection to fraud scandals involving casino development, real estate, and other deals in Chicago (many of which involve convicted fraudster Tony Rezko); 6) to cover up a scheme to privatize, de-fund, and close schools in poor, predominantly black Chicago neighborhoods; 7) to eliminate those who would seek to prevent the federal government’s favoring of corporate energy-industry interests which promote Obama’s underhanded, duplicitous environmental policy; 8) to cover up a C.I.A. scheme to destabilize Mexico and undermine its national sovereignty by operating a weapons-for-drugs program across the U.S.-Mexico border, and to neutralize bipartisan opposition to the Obama Administration in Arizona with regards to that scheme; 9) to stifle free speech and the right to bear arms in the wake of the Tucson massacre; 10) to cover up prostitution allegations levied at Cheney and other prominent Republican politicians; and 11) to cover up an attempt by Cheney to set up a secret, alternate chain of command of nuclear missiles.


      The sixteen victims were, in chronological order:




1. Orlando Jones
(died in Union Pier, Michigan; on September 12th, 2007; #15 in the original list)


2. Larry Bland
(died in Chicago, Illinois; on November 17th, 2007; #19 in the original list)


3. Donald Young
(died in Chicago, Illinois; on December 23rd, 2007; #21 in the original list)


4. Nate Spencer
(died in Chicago, Illinois; on December 26th, 2007; #22 in the original list)


5. John H. Stroger, Jr.
(died in Chicago, Illinois; on January 18th, 2008; #23 in the original list)


6. Leiutenant Quarles Harris, Jr.
(died in Washington, D.C.; on April 17th, 2008; #24 in the original list)


7. Deborah Jeane Palfrey
(died in Tarpon Springs, Florida; on May 1st, 2008; #25 in the original list)


8. Christopher Kelly
(died in Chicago, Illinois; on September 12th, 2009; #50 in the original list)


9. Michael Scott, Jr.
(died in Chicago, Illinois; on May 7th, 2010; #51 in the original list)


10. Phil Pagano
(died in Crystal Lake, Illinois; on May 7th, 2010; #56 in the original list)


11. Christopher Smith
(died in Phoenix, Arizona; on December 18th, 2010; #69 in the original list)


12. John P. “Jack” Wheeler III
(died in Newark, Delaware; on December 30th, 2010; #70 in the original list)


13. John McCarthy Roll
(died in Casas Adobes, Arizona; on January 8th, 2011; #71 in the original list)


14. Gabriel Zimmerman
(died in Casas Adobes, Arizona; on January 8th, 2011; #72 in the original list)


15. Ashley Turton
(died in Washington, D.C.; on January 10th, 2011; #77 in the original list)


and



16. Tracy Lawrence
(died in Las Vegas, Nevada; on November 29th, 2011; #103 in the original list)











II. Background on Five Key Players



      Before I go into detail about the backgrounds of and circumstances surrounding the deaths of each of the sixteen victims in near chronological order, it shall first be necessary to provide some background on five public personae with whom viewers may not be familiar, and who will be referred to throughout the piece; namely, Wayne Madsen, Larry Sinclair, the Reverend Jeremiah Wright, Rahm Emanuel, and Valerie Jarrett.

      Wayne Madsen is an investigative journalist based in Washington, D.C.. His professional history includes work as a government consultant, and he has either worked for or been affiliated with RCA, the National Security Agency, the U.S. Navy’s Naval Data Automation Command, the National Bureau of Standards, the U.S. Department of State, the Computer Sciences Corporation, and the Electronic Privacy Information Center. He now runs the website WayneMadsenReport.com.
      A contributor to the Alex Jones Show and RussiaToday, Madsen wrote the three-part article “The Story of Obama: All in the Family”, in which he claimed that both of Obama’s parents – as well as both of his maternal grandparents and his stepfather – have ties to the C.I.A.’s financing of political coups in the Eastern Hemisphere. Throughout numerous reports and interviews, Madsen has made mention of about half of the fifteen victims whom this article concerns.

      Larry Sinclair is a felon convicted of fraud and other crimes, and the author of “Barack Obama and Larry Sinclair: Cocaine, Sex, Lies and Murder?”. He claims that in 1999 – when Obama was an Illinois State Senator – Sinclair and Obama had gay fellatio and used cocaine and alcohol together in Sinclair’s rented limousine in Chicago, and also in Sinclair’s hotel room in Gurnee, Illinois the following day. Sinclair’s attorney – Montgomery Blair Sibley – was present at Sinclair’s June 2008 press conference in Washington, D.C., where he discussed his allegations, and was asked a question by reporter Wayne Madsen.
      Sinclair failed two lie detector tests regarding his claims, amidst suggestions that the tests were improperly administered due to Sinclair’s circulation disorders (caused by a nerve injury resulting from his having worked for a moving company); that lie detector tests are not reliable; that – despite the failings of such tests – Sinclair’s answers to the important questions surrounding his relationship with Obama still passed the tests; and that Daniel Parisi – who once owned the porn site WhiteHouse.com, and paid Sinclair $10,000 to take the tests – conspired with political consultant and former Senior Obama Advisor David Axelrod to rig the results in order to cover for Obama, and so that Parisi would not have to pay Sinclair an additional $100,000 for passing the tests.

      The Reverend Jeremiah Wright is the former pastor at Chicago’s six-thousand-member Trinity United Church of Christ. For 36 years – before retiring in 2008, the year Obama was elected president – he played a role in cementing ties between the Christians and Muslims in Chicago’s black community. Wright promoted Reverend James Hal Cone’s black liberation theology, which has roots in the left wing and the civil rights movements of the 1960s, and which sees God as concerned with the poor and the weak.
      President Obama has attended Trinity United on-and-off since the late 1980s, but he denies having heard the particular sermons in which Reverend Wright said “God damn America for killing innocent people” and described the events of September 11th as “America’s chickens coming home to roost”.

      Rahm Emanuel has served a Senior Adviser to President Bill Clinton, and as a U.S. Congressman representing northern suburbs of Chicago. He served in several posts pertaining to federal Democratic political strategizing before becoming Obama’s Chief of Staff in 2009.
      Emanuel succeeded Richard J. Daley to become the mayor of Chicago, following a contentious process to determine Emanuel’s eligibility to run for that position, in the face of questions surrounding whether he maintained a residency in the city.

      Valerie Jarrett is one of President Obama’s two Senior Advisors, as well as an assistant to Obama for Public Engagement and Intergovernmental Affairs. She previously served as an aide to Chicago Mayor Harold Washington, and later as Deputy Chief of Staff to Mayor Richard J. Daley. She has held many positions in the Chicago city government.
      In 1991, Jarrett hired Michelle Robinson as the lead attorney for Mayor Daley. Soon after, Robinson married Barack Obama, and later became the Vice President for Community and External Affairs at the University of Chicago Medical Center, of which Valerie Jarrett is currently the Chairman of the Board of Trustees.
      When Barack Obama was elected president, the office of the junior Senator from Illinois was left open, and then-Governor Rod Blagojevich had the power to appoint his replacement. About this opportunity, Blagojevich remarked, “I’ve got this thing and it’s fucking golden… I’m just not giving it up for fuckin’ nothing.”

      In April 2010, lawyers for Blagojevich filed a motion to subpoena Obama to testify at Blagojevich’s corruption trial about whether he sent “emissaries” to Blagojevich to inform him of Obama’s preferences about who should fill the Senate seat. Although former Illinois Attorney General Roland Burris ultimately received the appointment, it has been alleged that Obama desired that Blagojevich’s choice be Valerie Jarrett.















III. Explanation of 16 Victims' Cases



      Now that we’ve become acquainted with these lesser-known figures who will be mentioned throughout this piece, we’ll move on to discussing the deaths of the second, third, and fourth victims; Larry Bland, Donald Young, and Nate Spencer.
      Each of these men were openly gay black male Chicago residents who died within forty days of one another in November and December 2008, the last of whom died just eight days prior to Obama’s victory in the Iowa Caucus on January 3rd, 2008.
      The first two of these three victims – Larry Bland and Donald Young – were both members of Chicago’s Trinity United Church of Christ, and both were shot execution-style in the back of the head.
     For the sake of relevance, we will skip the first victim for now, and instead look at victims two through four.













      Our second victim Larry Bland worked as a security guard at Northwestern Hospital in Evanston, Illinois. On November 17th, 2008, he was found shot to death in the entryway of the home which he had once shared with his mother Josephine.
      Josephine Bland told a Fox affiliate in Chicago that she had been concerned about the telephone bills her son was running up calling gay sex lines, the amount of time he spent on gay sex sites (including adam4adam.com), and the frequency with which he brought strange young men over to their house. Bland’s mother said that these circumstances led to her moving out of the home which she had shared with her son, who she believes was killed by one of his lovers.



      Two days before that Christmas, Larry Bland’s fellow Trinity United churchgoer – our third victim, Donald Young – was found shot to death in his Chicago apartment. Numerous items were discovered missing from the scene of the crime, leading investigators to believe that Young was murdered by burglars. Young was not only a member of the Trinity United Church of Christ; he was also its choir director, as well as an elementary school teacher.
       In his June 2008 press conference in Washington, D.C. – and in a sworn affidavit he filed with the Chicago Police Department – Larry Sinclair claimed that between September and November 2007, he contacted a representative of Trinity United, and later discovered – only after his death – that this man was in fact Donald Young.
      The purpose of Sinclair’s various calls and text messages was to urge Young to have Reverend Jeremiah Wright ask Obama to amend his publicly-disclosed records of drug use to include the crack-smoking incident – which allegedly involved Obama purchasing an eight-ball of cocaine with $250 of Sinclair’s money on his behalf, the two drinking alcohol together, and Obama pulling a pipe and a crack rock out of his pocket and smoking it while Sinclair performed fellatio on him – which Sinclair claims occurred in 1999.
      As a bit of background, Obama has publicly admitted – numerous times – that he smoked marijuana, and wrote in his 1995 autobiography Dreams From My Father that he had snorted cocaine, and once almost had an acquaintance inject him with heroin.
      Larry Sinclair alleges that during one of the instances in which Young called Sinclair, Young asked why Sinclair had not asked him to urge Obama and Reverend Wright to disclose information regarding a sexual relationship.
      Sinclair later claimed that his question surprised him, because he had never mentioned his sexual relationship with Obama in his conversations with Young. This would seem to indicate that Obama had admitted to having had such a relationship with Sinclair in private talks with Reverend Wright and Donald Young when Young confronted Wright and Obama about Sinclair’s call about Obama’s drug use.
      Reporter Wayne Madsen has claimed that Reverend Wright ran a gay matchmaking service called the “Down-Low Club” for members of Trinity United, who were typically married men.
      Madsen said the abbreviation of the service – D.L.C. – served as a cover, such that anyone overhearing Wright’s conversations would think he was discussing the Democratic Leadership Committee, a non-profit think tank (affiliated with “New Democrats” Obama, the Clintons, John Kerry, John Edwards, Joe Lieberman, and Al Gore) which dissolved in early 2011.
      The well-publicized murders of Larry Bland and Donald Young led some Chicago residents to wonder whether there was a serial killer on the loose targeting homosexual African-Americans.
      Larry Sinclair has alleged that Reverend Wright announced the death of Donald Young at either the 7:30 A.M. or the 11:00 A.M. Trinity United service. This is interesting because – according to the certified copy of Young’s Chicago Death Certificate – Young was found shot at 7:30 A.M., but was not officially pronounced dead by the Medical Examiner until 12:10 P.M..
      Donald Young’s mother Norma Jean told the tabloid The Globe that she believes that persons trying to protect Obama’s reputation had her son murdered.



      The day after Christmas 2007 – just three days after the murder of Donald Young – our fourth victim Nate Spencer was found dead in his home. Spencer’s cause of death was given as septicemia, pneumonia, and complications related to HIV.
      Spencer’s fellow gay black male Chicago resident Tim Hooker runs the blog chgocutie.blogspot.com. On the blog, Hooker has reported the death of Donald Young, as well as the death of Nate Spencer, who he claims had once been his lover. Hooker has amended these posts to chide readers who have posted comments asking Hooker whether he believes there is a link between Obama and the deaths of Spencer and Young.
      Let us now move from Chicago to the nation’s capital, Washington, D.C..



      On April 17th, 2008, our sixth victim Leiutenant Quarles Harris, Jr. – Leiutenant being simply the man’s first name rather than a military rank – was found in his car, dead from multiple gunshot wounds. At the time of his death, Harris was cooperating with federal officials concerning his March 25th arrest for being in possession of large quantities of marijuana, 20 or 21 credit cards, and eight completed passport applications, four of the names on which matched names on the credit cards.
      Harris had been in court for that fraud case only three days before he was murdered. According to court documents, Harris told police that he had conspired with employees of the State Department and the Postal Service to commit credit card fraud.
      It has been reported that in March 2008 – the month Harris was arrested – the passport records of major presidential candidates Obama, Hillary Clinton, and John McCain had been breached by three State Department contract employees.
      Despite claims by then Assistant Secretary of State for Public Affairs Sean McCormack that the cases are not related, Harris’s claim that his friend in the State Department had helped him commit the credit card fraud prompts questions as to whether the Harris case has anything to do with these incidents.
      At least one of these breaches of the presidential candidates’ personal records allegedly took place during a training exercise, in which the employee was asked to show he had learned how to access a person’s files, and in which the employee was urged not to pull up the name of a famous person. That employee allegedly pulled up one of the candidates’ names. Two of these employees were fired, and one was merely reprimanded.
      The employees worked for Virginia-based State Department personal records contractors Stanley Inc. and The Analysis Corporation. The Analysis Corporation – whose CEO John O. Brennan is President Obama’s Deputy National Security Advisor for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism – also deals with information concerning counterterrorism and national security, working with the FBI, the Department of Homeland Security, and the Defense Intelligence Agency.
      We may remember John O. Brennan from May 2011, when he gave public statements concerning the details of the raid on the compound of Osama bin Laden which allegedly caused his death; statements which arguably conflicted with statements made by White House Press Secretary Jay Carney.
      Being that the passport information of Obama, Clinton, and McCain was breached, it is necessary to mention that the breach of this information carries with it the potential that Social Security information was also accessed and viewed, which could be used to find credit card information.
      Reporter Wayne Madsen has claimed that Obama has a false Social Security number issued from Connecticut, where the President never lived. If Madsen’s claim is true, then a person viewing Obama’s social security number would be privy to some very controversial information which could lead to questions about the President’s status as a natural-born citizen, and therefore his eligibility for the presidency. This is keeping in mind that when Harris died, Obama had not yet secured the Democratic nomination.
      With four of our seven total black male victims – three of whom were shot to death – and three of our eight total victims with ties to Chicago out of the way, we can now turn towards Tarpon Springs, Florida.



      There, our seventh victim Deborah Jeane Palfrey was found hanging from a beam in a shed attached to her mother Blanche’s mobile home on May 1st, 2008, some two weeks after she was found guilty of money laundering, racketeering, and using the mail for illegal purposes, and two months before she was scheduled to be sentenced. For these convictions, Palfrey faced up to 55 years behind bars, and was likely to serve between five and eight years.
      Palfrey was known as the “D.C. Madam”, having operated and founded the California-based high-price illegal escort service Debora Martin and Associates, which served clients in Maryland and the nation’s capital. Palfrey had stated that she had had as many as fifteen thousand clients.
      From 1992 to 1993, prior to founding the escort service, Palfrey – who had received a degree in criminal justice and worked as a paralegal – spent a year and a half in jail for pimping, pandering, and extortion. In 2006, Palfrey ran afoul of the law again; her bank accounts were frozen, and her documents were seized during a raid by the I.R.S..
      The following year, Palfrey appeared on ABC’s “20/20” as part of an investigative report. ABC went through nearly fifty pounds of phone records, but decided that none of the clients were high-profile enough to merit being mentioned in the report, despite the subsequent claims of reporter Wayne Madsen, who believes that Palfrey’s clientele included 2008 Republican presidential candidates Fred Thompson, Rudy Giuliani, and John McCain, and then Vice President Dick Cheney.
      Despite this decision by ABC, the scandal led to the admission by Republican U.S. Senator David Vitter of Louisiana and USAID Administrator Randall L. Tobias (who resigned as a result of this admission) of having used Palfrey’s services.
      Military strategist Harlan Ullman and Vice President Cheney were named as Palfrey’s clients by her civil attorney Montgomery Blair Sibley, who also defended Obama accuser Larry Sinclair, has filed a lawsuit regarding Obama’s citizenship status, and announced in early January 2012 that he is running for president.
      Palfrey’s official cause of death was given by police and the coroner’s office as suicide by hanging.
      Reports abound which claim Palfrey had previously considered suicide. When she went to prison in the early 1990s, Palfrey allegedly told a judge that she had considered starving herself to death while incarcerated.
      In early 2007, when University of Maryland professor Brandy Britton – who had been brought up on prostitution charges, and faced six months in jail – committed suicide, Palfrey said that she was “made out of something that Brandy Britton wasn’t made of”.
      After Palfrey’s death, Washington, D.C. writer Dan Moldea – who either was considering writing a book with Palfrey, or was actually in the process of doing so – claimed she told him in 2007 that she would rather commit suicide than go back to prison, and find herself alone and penniless in her late fifties when released. Palfrey had also told ABC that she would never go back to prison.
      According to police, a suicide note written by Palfrey was found addressed to her sister. The outside of the note read, “[d]o not resuscitate (DNR), do not feed under any circumstances”, and the contents of the note read in part, “I cannot live the next 6 to 8 years behind bars for what you and I have both come to regard as this 'modern-day lynching' only to come out of prison in my late 50s a broken, penniless and very much alone woman” and “[y]ou must comprehend there was no way out, i.e., 'exit strategy,' for me other than the one I have chosen here”. Police stated that Palfrey’s mother and sister confirmed Deborah Jeane’s authorship of the note.
      These claims about Palfrey’s consideration of suicide conflict with statements made by Palfrey herself. Prior to her death, Palfrey had contact with syndicated Texas radio show host Alex Jones, and stated on Jones’s radio show that, “No, I’m not planning to commit suicide; I’m planning on going into court on April 7th and I plan on exposing the government in ways that… I do not think they want me to expose them.” She even went as far as to indicate that Dick Cheney was one of her clients, and to threaten to name names.
      Palfrey also told Jones on-air that she believed that authorities would kill her and make it look like suicide, that she was not suicidal, and that if found dead, the cause would be murder. In August 1991 – before going to prison – she wrote to the judge that the San Diego police vice squad had a vendetta against her, saying, “If taken into custody, my physical safety and most probably my very life would be jeopardized… [r]ape, beating, maiming, disfigurement and more than likely murder disguised in the form of just another jailhouse accident or suicide would await me…”.
      After Palfrey’s death, Jones stated that “there is no doubt in my mind that she was murdered”, and claimed that it would be obvious to anyone – even people who are not experts on the analysis of signatures – that the letters addressed to her sister (which some have claimed were written weeks before her death) were not even in Palfrey’s handwriting.
      According to Jones, the owner of Blanche Palfrey’s condo told NBC that Deborah Jeane Palfrey told her mother two days before she died that she believed that she was being followed, there was a hit out on her, and that she had no plans to kill herself. Palfrey’s mother claimed that Palfrey was happy at the prospect of fighting the government on her charges.
      The statements by Deborah Jeane Palfrey, Blanche Palfrey’s landlord, and Alex Jones would seem to indicate that Palfrey’s statement that she would rather die than go back to prison may have been merely hyperbole.
      Given the fact that Palfrey’s attorney claimed Cheney and other prominent Republicans as her clients, that her prosecution and death occurred during the Bush Administration, and that Obama – according to claims by Larry Sinclair and Wayne Madsen – seems more inclined to seek sexual relationships with men rather than women, it would seem that Cheney appears to have a more direct incentive to silence Palfrey, and therefore that Obama is not likely to have had a role in her death.
      Now that we have examined the deaths of the three black gay male Chicago residents in late 2007 – as well as the deaths of the black male admitted identity thief in Washington, D.C. and of the D.C. Madam in Florida which occurred the following spring – we must now delve into the corrupt world of the politics of Chicago and Cook County (President Obama’s home turf) as we look into the deaths of Orlando Jones; John Stroger; Christopher Kelly; Michael Scott, Jr.; and Phil Pagano.



      On September 12th, 2007, the body of Orlando Jones – the first chronological death of the sixteen victims mentioned in this article – was found with a gunshot wound to the head near Gowdy Shores, an upscale residential community in Union Pier, Michigan (75 miles east of Chicago) where Jones owned a vacation home.
      Less than a week before Jones died, a CBS affiliate in Chicago reported that “a corruption inquiry targeting him was heating up”. The day before his death, Jones met with Robert Stephenson – his friend and legal advisor – to discuss the allegations against him, to review documents that would refute those allegations, and to discuss Jones’s plans to set up his own investment advising firm.
      After the meeting, Jones made a few cell phone calls, but he never returned home, and his family reported him missing the following afternoon, before his body was found hours later. Despite Stephenson’s having said that Jones did not appear distraught or suicidal when they met the day before his death, Barrien County, Michigan police described the death as an apparent suicide.
      After Jones’s death, Stephenson remarked that he was “shocked”, saying “[i]t’s scary that somebody so well-balanced could just do such a thing. He obviously had demons that I didn't know about”, and “[i]f I had had any indication that he was [suicidal], I would have tried to intervene”.
      Before leaving for Union Pier, Jones evidently left a suicide note in his Chicago home. In the note – which has not been made public and has been reviewed by police in both Chicago and Las Vegas – Jones mentioned his wife, his friendship with Lacy Thomas, and – according to the Chicago Tribune – “outlined how [he] wanted his affairs to be handled after his death”.
      Prior to his death, Las Vegas police handed-in a 60-page report to the district attorney, in which they recommended that Jones, Lacy L. Thomas, Martello Pollock, and Kathy Suey (the Deputy Chief of the Homeland Security Division of the Las Vegas police, which includes the Criminal Intelligence Section that conducted the investigation) be charged with misconduct by a public official, bribery, fraud, and theft. District Attorney David Roger said that a decision would not be made for several weeks, which means that Orlando Jones died before charges could be filed.
      Jones was the godson and longtime family friend, the chief of staff, and the political advisor of John Stroger, our next discussed victim, and the president of the Cook County, Illinois Board of Commissioners. During Stroger’s tenure as president, the Cook County Hospital was renamed in his honor, becoming the John H. Stroger, Jr. Hospital of Cook County.
      From 1993 to 2003, Lacy Thomas served as the head of Stroger Hospital. In 1999, Martello Pollock founded the Chicago-based telecom company Crystal Communications Telephone Corporation. Pollock owned the company with Jones, who worked as Crystal’s corporate officer.
      Shortly after Thomas was hired at the Clark County-owned University Medical Center (UMC) in Las VegasNevada’s only public hospital – in November 2003, Crystal received a $24,000 consulting contract for the hospital’s telecom project. Soon after, Crystal was set to receive a $150,000 no-bid contract, and – despite the county Finance Director’s demand for open bidding – Crystal won a $132,000 contract for the project, despite being underbid by $36,000 by a Nevada telecom company.
      UMC officials told detectives that Crystal did little to no work; the county’s Chief Deputy District Attorney later said that one contractor was paid nearly a million dollars, but only produced a half-hour computer presentation of information which was already available to the public.
      Lacy Thomas’s tenure at the UMC lasted until one day in January 2006, when he was fired by the Clark County Manager, and detectives raided the hospital’s offices, seizing computers and boxes of files. In the four years that followed, Thomas was investigated, charged, and prosecuted for concealing nearly 45% of the cash-strapped UMC’s $34 million in losses.
      Las Vegas police alleged that Thomas received kickbacks for steering Crystal’s contract with the UMC towards his friends in Chicago. Investigators discovered that Orlando Jones paid for Thomas and his wife Henrene to take a trip to Aruba in March 2005, and Family Guidance Centers – a behavioral health care company for which Jones lobbied – deposited $14,000 into a bank account for the Henrene Thomas Limited Liability Company.
      While it is quite probable that the death of Orlando Jones was indeed a suicide, and while it is almost certain that President Obama – let alone former Vice President Cheney – had anything to do with his death, a discussion of Orlando Jones provides excellent opportunities to get acquainted with the rampant corruption one will find when looking into Chicago politics, to gain familiarity with the tendency of that Chicago corruption to migrate to elsewhere in the country (in this case, to Nevada), and to introduce our next discussed victim – and fifth chronological victim – John Stroger.



      John H. Stroger, Jr. died on the morning of January 18th, 2008 of complications from a stroke which he had suffered in March 2006, a week prior to the Democratic primary for the reportedly “controversial” 2006 election of the President of the Cook County Board of Commissioners.
      In this election, Stroger faced a challenge by Commissioner Forrest Claypool, who accused Stroger of presiding over a “bloated” government, at a time when Stroger’s critics described his administration as ridden with scandals and patronage.
      Stroger never recovered from the stroke, did not appear in public between the stroke and his death, and resigned three months prior to the election. He was replaced on the ticket by his son Todd, who (with the backing of Chicago Mayor Richard M. Daley) won the election – beating Republican Tony Peraica – serving what would have been his father’s fourth four-year term as Board President.
      Due to John Stroger’s advanced age of 78, and his extensive health problems – he had battled diabetes; prostate cancer; heart problems; and paralysis, seizures, and neurological complications arising from the stroke he suffered in 2006 – he was almost certainly not murdered. But his connections to Chicago politics invite a closer look into his career, as well as his personal and professional relationships.
      Stroger worked and served as an assistant auditor with the Municipal Court of Chicago, as the personnel director for the Cook County Jail, for the financial director of the State of Illinois, and as the 8th Ward Committeeman of Chicago, and eventually chaired each major committee of the County Board.
      Stroger also served as president of the National Association of Counties, and was appointed by President Bill Clinton as a member of the Advisory Committee on Intergovernmental Relations. Before he died, Stroger cast an absentee ballot for Barack Obama in the Illinois Democratic Presidential Primary.
      After Stroger’s death, Chicago Mayor Richard M. Daley called him “one of the most dedicated public servants of our time”, saying “[d]uring a fifty-year career in government, he left a mark on Chicago and Cook County that will be equaled by very few others”.
      Given Daley’s praise of John and Todd Stroger through the elder Stroger’s scandals – as well as John Stroger’s support of Obama, and Daley’s brother William’s having later served as Obama’s Chief of Staff – it would come as no surprise that there have been reports of corruption connecting these individuals.
      While Stroger began his 2006 run for re-election for President of the Cook County Board of Commissioners in 2005, he selected Tony Rezko – who had also headed the finance committee for Stroger’s 2002 campaign – as an honorary chair and head of his campaign finance committee.
      Reports of this selection came just one year after Rezko served on the finance committee of Barack Obama’s campaign for U.S. Senator from Illinois – making contributions which allegedly violated campaign finance laws – and at a time during which reports implicating Rezko’s involvement in various scandals began to surface in the media.
      It has been claimed that Stroger received more money in campaign contributions directly from Rezko than did Rod Blagojevich, Richard Daley, and Barack Obama. The Chicago Sun-Times reported that Rezko contributed nearly $150,000 to Stroger’s campaigns.
      But this campaign finance allegation is not the only instance of possible corruption involving Stroger, the Rezko family, and Obama; Stroger also appointed Rita Rezko to a part-time position in the Cook County Employee Appeals Board, for which she earned a salary of $37,000 a year. According to court documents, this was her sole income when she secured a half-million-dollar mortgage to buy a $625,000 lot next to a parcel of land owned by Obama.
      Rita Rezko later made $50,000 selling part of this parcel to attorney Michael Sreenan, who put the lot up for sale for $1.5 million in October 2007, and contributed $5,000 to Obama’s campaigns.
      Additionally, a company affiliated with Tony Rezko and his wife Rita had a contract to maintain pay telephones at the Cook County Jail while Stroger served as Board President.
      But the relationships between Rezko, the Obamas, and real estate scandals do not end here; they in fact extend to our next two victims – two more with ties to Chicago government – Christopher Kelly and Michael Scott, Jr..



      Christopher Kelly died on September 12th, 2009 at the hospital which was re-named in honor of our last victim; the John H. Stroger, Jr. Hospital of Cook County. Kelly’s estranged wife told police that she received text messages from him saying he had tried to kill himself. She found Kelly inside his car in the parking lot of a lumber yard in County Club Hills, Illinois – a southwest suburb of Chicago – and drove him to a hospital in nearby Oak Forest.
      At Oak Forest Hospital, Chris Kelly became lucid enough to speak to police, but his condition later deteriorated, and he was sent to Stroger Hospital, twenty-five miles away in Chicago. Despite Kelly’s condition having deteriorated, Oak Forest Hospital spokesman Michael Bright stated that Kelly was stabilized before being transported. We can only guess what Kelly told police before his condition worsened.
      Kelly’s death was attributed to salicylate intoxication arising from an overdose of aspirin, and investigators considered the possibility that his death was a murder as well as a suicide.
      Kelly had been indicted three times between 2007 and 2009; the first involved tax fraud; the second, mail fraud involving contract-bid-rigging by his company BCI Commercial Roofing Inc. for an $8.5 million project to do roofing work on hangars at Chicago’s O’Hare International Airport; and the third involved racketeering and extortion charges in a kickback scheme with Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich.
      In the first case, Kelly was indicted for tax fraud in April 2009. He pleaded guilty, admitting to hiding $1.3 million in personal and corporate income from the I.R.S. over the course of five years, and to improperly converting the corporate funds of BCI Roofing to pay some of the millions of dollars in gambling debts which he had incurred in Las Vegas. Kelly also used corporate funds to pay off a loan from real estate developer and political fundraiser Tony Rezko. Kelly was sentenced that June to three years in prison.
      In the second case – the mail-fraud bid-rigging scheme between BCI Roofing and O’Hare – Kelly was prepared to go to trial – which would have occurred the day after he died – but he came up with a compromise to turn himself in when the government moved to revoke his bond. Kelly would have reported for incarceration just six days after his death, and he would have served nearly five years in prison.
      At the request of prosecutors, the judge granted a motion to dismiss the charges against Kelly; this occurred two weeks after his death. Because he wasn’t sentenced while he was still living, Kelly’s guilty plea was wiped clean, and his agreement to turn over $450,000 in cash and home equity to the government was voided. Charges against BCI were also dropped; its attorney Tom Leinenweber said that the “assets of the company will be used for [Kelly’s] wife and children”.
      In the third case, Alonzo “Lon” Monk – Blagojevich’s former chief of staff – testified that in 2003, Monk, Rod Blagojevich, Tony Rezko, and Christopher Kelly plotted with an insider in investment firm Bear Stearns to let the four men split between them $2 million in funds which were illegally procured in a deal by the State of Illinois to permit Bear Stearns to sell $10 billion in pension-obligation bonds (we may remember Bear Stearns from its mid-2007 collapse, which played a significant role in triggering the sub-prime mortgage crisis that caused the [arguably] current recession).
      Facing “an extraordinary amount of pressure by federal prosecutors to cooperate” in court, Kelly pleaded not guilty to the racketeering and extortion charges in this case. Had Kelly survived long enough to be sentenced for his involvement in this kickback scandal, he would have faced up to 13 years in prison, in addition to the combined eight years stemming from the two previous cases in which Kelly pleaded guilty. The trial of Blagojevich and Kelly – who has been described as a friend and adviser to Blagojevich – was scheduled to take place in June 2010.
      As an aside, Blagojevich’s first trial ended in August 2010, over a year before he was sentenced to 14 years in prison, 11 or 12 of which he will actually serve. He was arrested and indicted in the spring of 2009 on federal corruption charges, which included conspiracy to commit mail and wire fraud and solicitation of bribery for his role in the scandal concerning Obama’s vacated U.S. Senate seat.
      Blagojevich hired Kelly as a fundraiser to oversee Illinois’s deal-making with a casino developer who allegedly had mob ties. Eric Holder – who now serves as Obama’s Attorney General – assisted Blagojevich in a battle to help the casino get its license in 2004, and Holder’s law firm later made $300,000 investigating the matter.
      What’s more, Tony Rezko was reported as having “held an option to lease a hotel site next to the proposed casino site”. In late November 2011, Rezko was sentenced to 10 ½ years in federal prison for his conviction of sixteen counts of fraud and corruption relating to a multimillion-dollar extortion scheme to use his influence with Blagojevich to demand kickbacks from businesses with state contracts.
      Being that the outcome of these three cases would have been that Christopher Kelly would be incarcerated from the age of 51 until the age of 72, it is certainly likely that he may have sought suicide as a way to avoid prison. But the fervent belief of Kelly and his attorney Sam Adam Jr. in Governor Blagojevich’s innocence would seem to suggest that – having another person to defend him – Blagojevich may not have been as likely to bear the entire brunt of punishment for crimes which were committed by his associates – Barack Obama included.



      Before considering the possible motivations behind the death of Christopher Kelly, we must examine a related death, that of Michael Scott, our fourth and final victim who shared Obama’s status as a black male living in Chicago.

      In November 2009, Scott’s body was found shot in the head near the banks of the Chicago River on Chicago’s Near West Side. Michael Scott had been a real estate developer, and a member of the team which bid for the 2016 Olympics on Chicago’s behalf. Viewers may remember Barack and Michelle Obama traveling to Copenhagen in late 2009 to secure the bid for Chicago, which eventually lost out to Rio de Janeiro.



      More details about the death of Michael Scott - and explanations of the deaths of Michael Scott Jr., Phil Pagano, Christopher Smith, Jack Wheeler, John Roll, Gabriel, Zimmerman, Ashley, Turton, and Tracy Lawrence - will be available on this page at a later date.













Information Compiled Between January 2011 and February 2012

Written Between September 2011 and February 2012

Originally Published on March 27th, 2019

Thursday, January 19, 2017

Due Process Violations in Melissa Calusinski's Murder Case


       I was holding Ben up, off of the floor. It looked like he was about to stand on his tiptoes. I thought he was going to stand up, but when I let go of him, he fell.1 He kind of almost slipped when I dropped him.2 Then his head hit the chair.1, 2

      If asked to summarize concisely why the 2009 death of infant Benjamin Kingan was an accident, then this is what Melissa Calusinski would probably tell us. She was charged with intentional homicide in Ben's death, amidst questions; about malfunctioning X-ray software, and about the presence of previous head injuries to the child.
      Several days ago, Calusinski, age 30, marked eight full years behind bars for first-degree murder; at the Logan Correctional Center in Lincoln, Illinois. If she serves out her entire sentence, she will serve a total of 31 years, being released at the age of 53.

      At the beginning of 2009, Melissa Calusinski worked as an assistant teacher at the Minee Subee in the Park day care center in Lincolnshire, Illinois.2 That January, sixteen-month-old Benjamin Kingan died in her care, evidently due to a head injury sustained while in Calusinski's care.
      The way the State of Illinois defines homicides, Calusinski's first-degree murder conviction carries with it the implication that she intentionally killed Ben, or at least inflicted injuries upon him that she knew would be likely to lead to his death.
      Melissa Calusinski's request for a reversal of her conviction was denied last September. Some time this month (January 2017), her attorney Kathleen Zellner appeals the case again. Zellner is known for defending Steven Avery of Making a Murderer fame.

      Although Melissa Calusinski has been convicted of first-degree murder, there is plenty of reason to believe that she is innocent of the charges against her. It also seems that the detectives who interrogated her may have committed numerous violations of her rights to due process of law.
      Among those are:
1) perjury in the courtroom by detectives, prosecutors, and the state pathologist;
2) wrongful suppression or unreasonable dismissal of evidence, including exculpatory evidence;
3) wrongful admission of an incomplete piece of evidence which may not yet have been examined in full detail by either defense or prosecution;
4) wrongful admission of video evidence that shows a coerced confession;
5) misrepresentation regarding legal rights, by police;
6) false arrest, unlawful detention, wrongful incarceration, improper inhibition of right to locomotion, and / or unlawful seizure of an individual's person, all resulting from Calusinski being locked in the room during her voluntary police interview);
7) deprivation of access to several basic human needs during an inappropriately prolonged interview, by detectives;
8) compounding of emotional trauma that Calusinski was already experiencing, through intimidating behaviors by detectives;
9) defamation of Melissa's character by prosecutors, creation of a bias against the defendant in the courtroom, and unethically using Melissa's low verbal comprehension against her in order to distract the jury from the implications of her lack of knowledge of her legal rights;
10) deprivation of Melissa's income, perhaps as high as $20,000 per year for eight years;
11) wrongful conviction; and
12) a possible double jeopardy violation pertaining to the day care center's liability.
      Here are the facts of the case as I see it.

     Given Calusinski's low verbal comprehension,2, 3 vulnerability to suggestion3, and lack of understanding of her legal rights2, it seems appropriate to suggest that Calusinski would have thus been more easily misled, confused, and intimidated into making a false confession. After denying her guilt at least 79 times, she had become essentially coached by detectives to give a story that would explain the way they perceived the extent of Ben's injuries.
      The facts that Melissa never asked for an attorney1, spoke to detectives without a lawyer present, didn't seem to understand the seriousness of the charges3, asked whether the incident would appear on her criminal record, and thought she'd be allowed to go home after the police interview, should help drive home the previous point.
     The existence of a state of duress would be abundantly evidence if it could be shown that police continued questioning Melissa for longer than she was willing to do so, but it is somewhat unclear whether that is exactly what happened.
     So should the facts that Calusinski stated that she was “terrified” and “emotionally exhausted”7 when her voluntary police interview began, and stated that she hadn't slept much in the 41 hours between Ben's death and the start of the interview. Detectives' actions during the interview appear to have aggravated the emotional trauma that Calusinski was experiencing.

      These facts demonstrate a want of understanding on Melissa Calusinski's part, and that coupled with her vulnerability to suggestion (while police instruct her to parrot-back a lie2) strongly suggest that detectives were intentionally manipulating Calusinski.

      Detectives put Calusinski into a state of duress and coercion by locking her into the small 9” x 12” interrogation room
2. Their locking her in was a violation of the law; Calsinski was there voluntarily, and therefore had the right to leave at any time. Judging by the nine-hour duration of her interrogation4, it seems that she was not aware that she had this right; and that suggests that detectives misrepresented her through omission by failing to inform her of her right to leave.
      Calusinski's state of duress was also compounded by deprivation of access to restroom facilities5 and to food5. It is worth noting that being deprived of food and bathroom access – in addition to Calusinski's stated loss of sleep prior to the interview – can contribute to a state of disorientation, which could have compounded Calusinski's known vulnerability to suggestion.
      It is unclear whether she was deprived of water, how long Calusinski was deprived of food and bathroom access, and whether she also should have been provided with a mattress while in custody for that nine-hour period.
      However, if Melissa truly was deprived of food and restroom access (as JWCDaily reported in March 2015), then it would be appropriate to charge officers Sean Curran and George Filenko for allowing that deprivation to occur through negligence, or perhaps even for deliberately declining to inform Melissa of her rights to stop asking questions and end the voluntary interview at any time.

      Another set of factors which contributed to the creation Calusinski's state of intimidation are the basic facts about the interviewing detectives and the set-up of the interrogation room. Melissa was interviewed, seated
in the corner of a 9” x 12” room7, with two large policemen and a table taking up the vast majority of the room. This seems sufficient to establish that intimidation occurred.
      As if that weren't enough, detectives cursed, shouted, and slammed their fists on the table during this voluntary police interview, according to Kathleen Zellner.
3 Reporter Ruth Fuller called the confession the most troubling confession that she has ever seen.3
      Calusinski has stated that she can't explain why she confessed, nor why she demonstrated slamming Ben to the ground.2 The fact that detectives told her that Ben's injuries were consistent with being thrown from a second-story building onto concrete, would perhaps explain why Calusinski felt it appropriate to demonstrate throwing the infant to the floor, while she has otherwise maintained that she accidentally dropped him, and then he hit his head on a chair.1, 2

      Given the apparent fact that police essentially fed Melissa the kind of story they wanted to hear, it seems that the interviewing and arresting officers likely committed some form of wrongful interrogation or misrepresentation. Calusinski's lack of awareness of her legal rights, apparent lack of understanding of the seriousness of the charges, and her belief that she'd be allowed to go home after she confessed, help demonstrate that misrepresentation probably took place at least once between the beginning of the interview and the booking.
      Detectives likely deliberately misinformed or misled Calusinski regarding her Miranda rights, her right to leave a voluntary interview, and / or her right to have an attorney present. Additionally, it is unclear at what point Melissa was formally placed under police custody, given the facts that she stated she was locked into the room, when she should have been free to leave, having agreed to a voluntary interview.
      It seems fair to say that police lied to her about her rights, at least through omission, if not through positive speech. Through either their action or inaction, Calusinski was deprived of food, restroom access, a mattress, a police interview of reasonable duration, and the ability to make statements under conditions of sound mind and judgment.

      Calusinski's judgment was impaired through deprivations of basic needs through the fault of the police, deprivation of sleep through emotional trauma, and additional emotional trauma and intimidation inflicted by police.
      Aside from simple trauma and intimidation, a demonstrable state of coercion and duress began the first time that Melissa was locked in the interview room. Additionally, wrongful incarceration or wrongful arrest may have occurred; that is, if she was first locked in before she was read her Miranda rights). If that did happen, then Calusinski's natural right of locomotion (i.e., travel) was also probably unduly inhibited, and her individual person was likely improperly seized by police.
      Some of the detectives' statements to Calusinski – such as “that's a bunch of lies”, “that story you're giving us is a load of shit”, and something to the tune of “something else must have happened”3, suggest that detectives were intentionally trying to mislead and confuse Melissa; to coax out of her a confession that would satisfy them. This repetition of blatant lies and concocted stories were not mere suggestions; they were insisted upon, amidst some eighty denials of guilt. Accompanying that insistence were cursing, shouting, and slamming of fists.
      It is worth noting that several interrogation techniques used by officers Curran and Filenko parallel components of the Reid Technique, which can involve officers misleading confusing the suspect into making a false confession by asking them questions and limiting the acceptable answers.
      It seems fair to conclude that police allowed Calusinski to be poorly informed of her rights, and thus misrepresented, through refraining from informing her of her right to leave, and to stop the interview, which was at least 350% longer than even the longest interviews are supposed to be; a fact which is especially unusual given the fact that Calusinski agreed to be interviewed.

      The repeated lies by police and prosecutors were not the only lies that hurt the case for Calusinski's freedom; state pathologist Dr. Eupil Choi may very well have manipulated evidence when he crossed out the word “significant” in an affidavit regarding the head injury which Ben Kingan sustained two months prior to his death.
      When detectives insisted that Calusinski explain Kingan's apparently extremely grievous injury, they told repeated lies about what happened, expecting her to more or less parrot those lies back to them. Her repeated insistence upon her innocence, her statements that she doesn't know why she confessed (nor why she demonstrated practically body-slamming the child onto the floor)2, and the testimony of her co-workers that they never saw her get angry nor frustrated with the children in her care3, all point to the likelihood that police lied repeatedly.
      The fact that Nancy Kallinger stated that she didn't hear screaming nor crying at the time of Ben's death5, suggests that Ben's last moments of life were much less violent than Melissa's body-slamming demonstration made them look. So too does the fact that Ben died foaming at the mouth, in his sleep, laying in a chair. Also, that he died no more than a few days after recovering from a stomach bug, and after suffering multiple previous head injuries; due to bumps, headbanging, and throwing his head back several times shortly before he died.
      Prosecutor Matthew deMartini called Ben's October 2008 injury “microscopic”, while then Lake County Coroner Thomas Rudd stated that that injury was visible to the naked eye.3 Prosecutors conceded that that injury occurred, but also said that the injury was “too small to matter”3, attributing Ben's death exclusively to having been thrown to the ground by Calusinski.
      Additionally, Rudd testified that the previous injury could have easily killed Ben by itself; Rudd testified that Ben was a head-banger; and Nancy Kallinger stated that Ben threw his head back, slightly, twice, shortly before he died. It is my opinion that prosecutors inappropriately downplayed, and wrongfully suppressed, evidence of Kingan's previous injuries. They also likely neglected to discover the total number of head injuries that Ben Kingan sustained during the last two months of his life.

      Ben's 95th-percentile abnormal head growth3 probably should have been attributed to brain swelling resulting from multiple head injuries, not dismissed as if it were not significantly outside the normal range of head size. Additionally, Ben's pediatrician may have failed to pay sufficient attention to the October 2008 head injury (which resulted in a bump that day care workers then reported to Ben's mother)3.
      These facts, Dr. Choi's having edited his affidavit, and the failure of the prosecution team to sufficiently brighten an X-ray of Ben's head, all seem to strongly suggest that some key evidence was ignored, incomplete, wrongfully suppressed, and / or manipulated.
      Because the precedent in Brady v. Maryland established that withholding of evidence violates due process when evidence is material to guilt or puishment; it may be appropriate to investigate prosecutors for withholding evidence, as long as it can be demonstrated that the prosecuting team negligently failed to undertake reasonable effort to brighten the X-ray. Whether deliberate or negligent, the darkness of the X-ray resulted in neither defense nor prosecution being able to observe that piece of evidence in full detail; this points to incomplete evidence.
      Given that head injuries can cause vomiting, it seems equally possible that Ben's vomiting could have resulted from either the head injury or the stomach bug. It is unclear whether Kingan was still suffering from a stomach bug in the day or two leading up to his death (which is to say, after he had apparently recovered from the bug, after drinking Pedialyte). It is also unclear whether orange foam coming from Ben's mouth should be attributed to injuries or a virus.
      However, what does seem clear is this; the head-banging in the last several months of Ben's life - in addition to the stomach bug that he had apparently gotten over at some point in the last three days of his life - were both downplayed and contested by prosecutors as factors contributing to Ben's death. I would hope that the examples of evidence mishandling, which I mentioned above, should be enough to reverse Calusinski's conviction and / or prompt a new trial.

      Calusinski deserves to be compensated for each of the due process violations against her, including defamation of her character, and creation of bias against the defendant in the courtroom. In my opinion, she should be awarded at least $160,000, the equivalent of eight years' worth of her 2008 salary. She should also be given an additional $30,000 or more for defamation of character.
      Any physical assaults she sustained while in police custody (of which there is no apparent evidence) should entitle Calusinski to further compensation, as should the exacerbation of her emotional trauma by police. I feel that Calusinski ought to be entitled to a total of perhaps as much as a quarter-million dollars.
      As I just implied, if it could be demonstrated that Calusinski became victim of physical assault at any point while in police custody (which her videotaped coerced confession would have shown, and didn't), then Calusinski should be entitled to compensation.
      But even if there is no evidence of direct initiation of physical force (aside from the initiation of force implied by an unlawful arrest), it could be easily shown that Melissa was physically and emotionally intimidated by the large, strong detectives who interviewed her. Zellner's statement that police cursed, shouted, and slammed their fists on the table, help bolster arguments claiming emotional trauma and confession under intimidation and duress.

      Given that Melissa was apparently the only employee present in the room when Ben died, it does appear that it was appropriate to hold the day care center liable, due to state requirements that at least two adults be in a room with five or more small children. However, as an employee of Minee Subee in the Park, Calusinski was a subsidiary of the company, which is supposed to be exclusively liable for its subsidiary employees.
      Calusinski should never have had criminal charges read against her, because the day care center that represented her had already made a $2 million cash financial settlement with Ben's family. The Supreme Court has ruled that a person can't be convicted of a charge if a civil debt was already paid off with cash; and as an employee and subsidiary, Calusinski cannot be sued – nor held liable responsible for damages – if her employer has already been held liable. Otherwise, a 7th Amendment due process right has been violated.

      It is my opinion that Melissa Calusinski and Kathleen Zellner should:
     1) move for judgment that a false conviction has occurred;
     2) co-author a joint statement that will suffice as new evidence, hopefully prompting a new trial;
     3) move to have the case re-tried;
     4) insist on Melissa's innocence on most charges;
     5) consider striking a plea bargain, pleading guilty to a charge lesser than first-degree murder (such as negligent homicide or negligent manslaughter), and asking for eight years prison time served;
     6) seek to nullify Calusinski's conviction (overturning any case law precedents that it may have created);
     7) have Calusinski invoke her Fifth Amendment freedom from self-incrimination when she speaks to an investigator;
     8) moving to charge police officers and prosecutors with potentially multiple counts of each of the rest of the due process violations listed in the list of twelve above;
     9) suing the prosecutors for declining to move to dismiss the case; and
     10) taking any steps possible to have the prosecutors disbarred.


      Additional new evidence which could be created or produced include new testimony by Calusinski's co-workers; new testimony by outside experts on murder and child head injuries; and a newly lightened, clearly visible, sufficiently contrasted X-ray of Ben Kingan's head (taken the day of his death).
      I would recommend that Melissa; her sister Crystal; Nancy Kallinger; Dr. Eupil Choi; now former Coroner Thomas Rudd; all interviewing and arresting oficers; an additional, new expert witness on brain damage in children; and an new expert on murder (one who is willing to testify about under what circumstances people commit murder), all volunteer - or be subpoenaed - to testify in a new jury trial.
      The defense team should move to suppress the video of Calusinski's nine-hour police interview; on the grounds that it is inadmissible because of the states of confusion, intimidation, deprivation, and duress. Any evidence obtained during searches which may have followed arrest according to improper procedure should also be suppressed, due to the doctrine of the fruit of the poisonous tree.
      There are additional facts which suggest not only deliberate misrepresentation, but professional incompetence, on the part of the prosecuting team; this is a piece of information that the defense should emphasize in addition to the possible perjury and misrepresentation committed by the prosecutors. Calusinski should sue her prosecutors for refusing to move for dismissal of the case against her. Successfully drawing attention to the numerous failures and lies by prosecution could aid in an effort to get the prosecutors disbarred.

      I would also recommend that Calusinski and her defense team consider doing nine additional things.
      First, Calusinski might consider sending an apology letter to the Kingan family, expressing regret for her role in Ben's death (that is, if she has not yet done so). Calusinski should be careful to avoid implying that she has remorse stemming from guilt of first-degree murder, but some expression of remorse for her own negligence would likely be appropriate.
      Second, Calusinski's defense should discover exactly what physical evidence Calusinski was originally indicted on. If there was no physical evidence, or if it is unclear what Calusinski was first indicted on, a violation of precedent set by Terry v. Ohio may have occurred.
      Third, Calusinski might consider hiring a male to defend her, rather than her current female attorney. The image of a distinguished man defending an innocent young woman might prove to be more palatable to juries than the image of two women working together to put a first-degree murder convict out on the street.
      Fourth, Calusinski's defense should prepare to appeal her case as many as four times. The defense team should attempt to get two hung juries in a row, and it should appeal every single due process violation, in order to avoid having their request for a new trial denied.
      Fifth, Calusinski should exercise her right to decline to be present at pre-motion hearings. Calusinski should only testify at trials, because at pre-motion hearigs, her statements may be used by prosecution as evidence against her. She should be able to concisely and clearly articulate why Ben's fall was an accident, and why she confessed when she knew she was innocent (or negligent at the very worst).
      Sixth, the defense should move for a change of venue to a new jurisdiction, due to potential bias in juror selection among those in the north suburbs of Chicago who may have heard of the case, especially given the coverage of her case on national major network television. The defense should appeal any and all judgments by the judge (regarding voir dire, i.e., jury selection) which could be construed as collusion with the prosecutor to dismiss jurors without sufficient rationale.
      Seventh, the defense might consider moving to dismiss jurors who have children, because the presence of too many parents on the jury might create a bias against Calusinski.
      Eighth, the defense team must ensure that the jury is fully informed of the rights of the accused; and of the rights of the jury to determine not only the facts of the case, but also whether the law itself is just and whether it is being applied appropriately.
      Ninth and last, the defense should ask an expert on murder to give testimony regarding how often adults commit murder in broad daylight, indoors, in close proximity to other adults.

      Finally, the defense must passionately and meticulously insist that Calusinski has been wrongfully convicted, and it must demonstrate that the last eight years of Melissa Calusinski's life have more or less amounted to deliberate routine misrepresentation of her rights; deprivation of her needs, livelihood, and comfort; violations of her due process rights; and defamation of her character.
      All options should be on the board; including suing or disbarring prosecutors, moving for the firing of the detectives who interviewed Melissa, and moving for the firing of the medical examiner (Dr. Choi). Defense should also prepare to collect evidence that the judge and prosecutors are attempting to mislead the jurors about their rights.
      The fact that Lake County, Illinois has a history of being reluctant to pay settlements after admitting to false convictions and false imprisonments, shows that a grave injustice will have been committed against Calusinski if her appeals fail.
      Melissa's freedoms of self-ownership and travel, her 5th and 7th Amendment (if not others as well) rights to a fair trial and due process of law, and her rights to be arrested and interrogated according to proper procedure, were likely all violated by detectives and arresting officers.
      Even if Melissa Calusinski's negligence caused Ben Kingan's death, she has suffered enough due process violations, and served enough time behind bars, for her negligence. After spending the entire Obama administration in prison, she deserves justice, and she deserves her normal life back.


Sources:
1. “Melissa Calusinski: Detective “Made a Mistake””, Chicago.CBSLocal.com, February 24th, 2016
2. “Melissa Calusinski: Was a Day Care Worker Coerced into a Murder Confession?”, CBSNews.com, July 18th, 2015 http://www.cbsnews.com/news/melissa-calusinski-was-a-day-care-worker-coerced-into-a-murder-confession/
3. “Blaming Melissa”, 48 Hours, CBS News, December 17th, 2016
4. “Daycare Worker Melissa Calusinski Reveals Why She Confessed to Murdering a Toddler: ‘I Was Terrified’”; People Magazine, October 13th, 2016 http://people.com/crime/daycare-worker-melissa-calusinski-confession-murder-ben-kingan/
5. “Is Deerfield “Killer” Innocent? “48 Hours” Suggests So”, JWCDaily.com, March 4th, 2015
6. “Free Melissa Calusinski”, Facebook.com, accessed December 18th, 2016 http://www.facebook.com/FreeMelissaCalusinski/
7. “Questioning Melissa Calusinski”, CBSNews.com, February 28th, 2015 http://cbsnews.cbs.com/news/48-hours-questioning-melissa-calusinski/



Author's Note:

     Court documents reveal that Calusinski was not locked in the interrogation room, although there is plenty of reason to suspect that she believed she was locked in, which would help account for behavior if, indeed, the confession was coerced. 
Any person who reasonably believes they are being detained, are, for all intents and purposes, being detained; and police and private security guards alike subscribe to that code.

     Additionally, it is apparent from court documents that Calusinski had access to food during the interrogation; however, she was not eating at the time because she was distraught and could not bring herself to eat. Calusinski apparently did have water and restroom access at the time.







 Written on January 19th and 20th, 2017

Based on Notes Taken on December 17
th, 20th, and 31st, 2016


Author's Notes Added on June 18th, 2017 and February 27th, 2019


Thanks to Matt Johnson for his assistance and advice



How to Fold Two Square Pieces of Card Stock into a Box

      This series of images shows how to take two square pieces of card stock (or thick paper), and cut and fold them into two halves of a b...