Showing posts with label theory of government. Show all posts
Showing posts with label theory of government. Show all posts

Thursday, May 8, 2014

The Proper Role of Government

The following was written in November 2013 as a response to the questionnaire for federal candidates seeking an endorsement from the Liberty Caucus of the Republican Conference (i.e., the Republican Party).

Here is the link to the original questionnaire:

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CC4QFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwi.rlc.org%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2010%2F05%2FFederal-Candidate-Questionnaire.doc&ei=u3B8UqXbBqPiiwL2ioCoDg&usg=AFQjCNHAzM58Dr-APGVchRKzOkVV0TKRyw&sig2=qStOgZ0RAgXVAbnHi2kFtw

This is my answer to Question #1.


1. B & D
   (The proper role of government is to protect individual rights and support useful commerce; not to provide for the common good, nor to preserve American culture)
   The proper role of government is to (B) protect individual rights, such as the natural rights to life, liberty, property, and the pursuit of happiness; and to (D) support useful commerce by ensuring that interstate commerce is well-regulated – that is, uninterrupted, unobstructed, and free from the effects of monopolies and trusts which are harmful to competitive markets.
   The Congress does not have any enumerated constitutional authority to (C) preserve American culture aside from fixing the standards of weights and measures. (A) Providing for the common good is not the proper role of the U.S. federal government (I will explain why in my answer to Question #12, which concerns the General Welfare Clause).




For more entries on social services, public planning, and welfare, please visit:
http://www.aquarianagrarian.blogspot.com/2014/05/taxpayer-funded-benefits-for.html

For more entries on theory of government, please visit:

Sunday, April 20, 2014

Municipal Services, the Fifth Amendment, and Government as a Business

Written on October 13th and November 22nd, 2011
Edited in April 2014



   Because the right or privilege - whether monopolistic or competitive - to provide municipal public services is licensed by government to private enterprises, the provision of municipal public services is not a social welfare program, nor is it a right, nor should it be conceived of as either.

   As such, an individual's use of a municipal service (if and when such an individual pays for that service to be provided) should not be interpreted as a capitulation or a submission to any and all regulations and processes which might be associated with or endorsed by the government having jurisdiction over whatever given municipality; even when the provision of a service is competitive, and especially when the provision of a service is monopolistic.



   One of the most important functions of the libertarians and the Tea Party thus far has been to get Americans to start conceiving of their government as a business. My candidacy encourages this kind of thinking.

   But not in a way that would recommend that we allow corporate welfare, or allow politicians to profit off of financial deals resulting from the legislation they help write, or allow silly things like the U.S. Department of Commerce to continue to exist, but in a way that requires all delegation of citizen power to their representatives in government to take place through contracts which were not signed under the duress of taxation and threatened imprisonment, and in a way that allows the government to be operated for-profit without fear that politicians who struggle to find legal ways to allow government to get rid of toxic assets like Amtrak and the Post Office so that the people will not have to bear their burden and inherit their debts to be ridiculed as privatization-pushers.

   Those who believe that eminent domain and the Takings Clause should only be used to put private property under the management of the public, but decry the sale of public property to private entities as unconstitutional privatization for the benefit of special interests, are giving the government an unlimited license to grow, and to put its citizens in debt.

   If a government does not practice both eminent domain and privatization, then it should practice neither.




For more entries on Fifth Amendment property takings, please visit:
http://www.aquarianagrarian.blogspot.com/2010/10/private-beachfront-property-takings.html
http://www.aquarianagrarian.blogspot.com/2014/04/questions-about-roads-eminent-domain.html

For more entries on enterprise, business, business alliance, and markets, please visit:
http://www.aquarianagrarian.blogspot.com/2010/10/enlightened-catallaxy-reciprocally.html
http://www.aquarianagrarian.blogspot.com/2014/05/agorist-protection-agencies-and.html

For more entries on social services, public planning, and welfare, please visit:

General Philosophy on Government and the Economy

Written on April 27th, 2011



   How are Wall Street and the labor unions to blame for the bankruptcy of this country? It’s the federal government and the Federal Reserve which are to blame. It’s not the unions’ and big businesses’ fault that legal monopoly and being able to print money out of thin air makes bailouts and special-interest legislation so tempting.

   Labor unions sold out when, in the early 20th century, they stopped being based on anarchy, and began to attempt to legally codify the labor-market benefits and “rights” which they had already achieved de-facto.

   Big businesses sold out when they abandoned deregulation and laissez-faire according to the will of the consumer base in favor of government-sponsored self-regulation, toxic asset relief, and industrial nationalization.

   We need to prevent monopolies from forming, instead of using bailout money to encourage them to do so, and build the industrial and entrepreneurial bases of this country back up. That way, we can expand the realm of economic freedom, and make competition free and fair enough to lower prices and increase consumer choice.

   We need to get the government out of the business of guaranteeing labor-market rights, and instead foment labor solidarity by using direct-action and volunteer tactics to bring about independent consumer advocacy, consumer interest, and consumer rights mechanisms. That way, people who care about getting paid a decent wage, receiving sufficient benefits, and encouraging their neighbors to spend more wisely can do so, without relying on governments and big labor to make their decisions for them and sell our careers out from underneath us.

   The private and public sectors need to reclaim their rightful property from governments. The market realm and the labor realm exist independently of governments. It’s not always easy to spot, though.





For more entries on theory of government, please visit:


How to Fold Two Square Pieces of Card Stock into a Box

      This series of images shows how to take two square pieces of card stock (or thick paper), and cut and fold them into two halves of a b...