A BLOG ABOUT INDEPENDENT POLITICS, POLITICAL ETHICS, ECONOMICS, AND ANARCHISM. Political theory, U.S. politics & election statistics, the political spectrum, constitutional law & civil liberties, civil rights & interstate commerce, taxation & monetary policy, health care & insurance law, labor law & unions, unemployment & wages, homelessness, international relations, religion, technology; alternatives to the state
Showing posts with label ownership. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ownership. Show all posts
Tuesday, April 19, 2022
Monday, May 11, 2020
The Economic Spectrum: Visualizing Politics in Terms of Ownership and Distribution
The below image was created in order to depict political economy in purely economic terms. This is to say that the purpose of the image is to focus on the economic facets of each political theory, to such of a degree, that the two axes depicted are not economic and political, nor economic and social, but economic and economic.
The left-vs.-right axis depicts "Who owns the means of production?" (that is, productive workplaces, farms, factories, etc.), while the up-down axis (which would normally depict political authority, centralization, or concentration of power) has been replaced with the question of "How are resources allocated?".
The purpose of the image is to show that ownership and distribution can be done by different entities, and that mixed economies have been proposed. Mixed economic systems are unique in that they do not always believe that just because one group owns everything, it should necessarily allocate everything; and vice-versa.
It would be worthwhile to ask the following questions while reading this image: "Does 100% of the wealth (or resources) really need to be owned by private entities, in order for us to say that capitalism exists? Which is more important to capitalists; that literally 100% of all resources be owned and distributed by private entities, or that private ownership exist at all? Wouldn't a mixed economy be more likely to satisfy everyone, than either a 100% private, 100% societal, or a 100% market-based system?
Click on the image,
(and, if necessary, open it in a new tab)
to see it in greater detail.
Explaining the axes in this image:
Since the up-down axis usually shows high centralization of power and authority at the top, and decentralization and separation of powers at the bottom, it should be easy to understand why high levels of planning are at the top and low levels of planning are at the bottom.
However, this does not necessarily imply that government planning is the only type of authoritarian planning. The fact that the top-right corner exists, shows that corporate planning can be just as oligarchical as government planning can be.
What this means is that, although I have aligned and associated the axis of political planning with the axis of economic planning, they are not necessarily one and the same. It is debatable, and should always remain debatable, whether there is any intrinsic relationship between political, economic, and moral concentrations of power. While they often appear together, that doesn't mean that there aren't any political philosophies which support (for example) high amounts of social and economic control but low amounts of political control.
Moreover, the fact that two economic axes exist, makes it even more difficult to depict economic positions alongside social and political positions (without resorting to using models consisting of three dimensions of more).
Note:
The above image, which I created, is based on several versions of the same type of image, which depict the same axes (ownership and distribution/allocation). Those images are available at the following links, and an example can be seen below.
Readers wishing to learn more about the economic spectrum, should consider researching the following topics:
1) The debate over whether the Soviet Union was practicing communism or "state monopoly capitalism";
2) The debate over whether Lenin's "New Economic Policy" (N.E.P.) was market liberalization and whether it worked;
3) The debate over whether the Nazi regime achieved any privatization;
4) The debate over whether fascism is socialist or capitalist, or whether fascism is part of dirigism, a distinct economic system focusing on government's authority to direct the economic affairs of the nation; and
5) The "market socialist" economics of Yugoslavia under Josip Broz Tito, and articulations of "left-wing market anarchism" which value high degrees of social ownership alongside mostly market-based systems of distribution.
2) The debate over whether Lenin's "New Economic Policy" (N.E.P.) was market liberalization and whether it worked;
3) The debate over whether the Nazi regime achieved any privatization;
4) The debate over whether fascism is socialist or capitalist, or whether fascism is part of dirigism, a distinct economic system focusing on government's authority to direct the economic affairs of the nation; and
5) The "market socialist" economics of Yugoslavia under Josip Broz Tito, and articulations of "left-wing market anarchism" which value high degrees of social ownership alongside mostly market-based systems of distribution.
Based on Notes Taken in Early May 2020
Image Created, and Explanation Written,
and Post Originally Published,
on May 11th, 2020
Wednesday, November 6, 2019
Why Libertarian Socialists Belong in the Libertarian Movement and the Libertarian Party
Libertarianism and the left, far from being irreconciliable, are one and the same; libertarian socialism is not an oxymoron.
Libertarian
socialism hearkens back to the traditions of 19th
century European liberalism; back in the days of Joseph deJacque, the
anarchist of the 1848 Paris Commune. Back when classical liberalism
and calls for revolutionary socialism were all lumped together as
part of “the left”, and back when classical liberal Frederic
Bastiat and mutualist-anarchist Pierre-Joseph Proudhon served
together on the left of the French National Assembly.
Libertarian
socialists aim for
the dissolution of the state, as well as all hierarchical and
exploitative economic structures which the enforcement of the state's
power supports. Libertarian socialists support mutually beneficial
voluntary exchange; and as free, direct, open, and egalitarian
negotiation (on employment and contracts and other forms of
decision-making), as possible. Libertarian socialists support the
achievement of socialism through peaceful means, but also recognize
that achieving justice against an intrinsically self-serving and
violent government, often requires acting without the support of the
law.
Libertarian
socialists believe in abolishing the state, organized and legalized
violence, monopoly, and relationships of domination and hierarchy in
the economy. These relationships of domination include landowner over
land and nature, polluting business over community, landlords over
tenants, bosses over employees, lenders over borrowers, and elected
representative over voter. Libertarian socialists aim to create a
society which is absolutely free, but also as equal as possible
(without sacrificing liberty), just as voluntaryists and libertarians
of the right do.
Liberty from the state, and
equality within that liberty, make libertarian
socialism. Libertarian socialists want to see people so absolutely free, that they
are equal in that total
liberty, and thus have equality of opportunity. Guaranteeing equality
of outcome,
however, would take the “libertarian” out of “libertarian
socialism”, and that would be against our values; libertarian
socialism is thus not inconsistent with the traditional
entrepreneurial libertarian value of freedom of opportunity (and
equality within that opportunity).
That
is what I and other libertarian socialists believe, and that is why
we feel that there is a place for libertarian socialists within the
libertarian movement and the Libertarian Party. We are in the
movement to help make sure that voters (and non-voting lovers of
freedom) understand that libertarians do not want to fetishize, or
over-prioritize, capitalism, private property, competition, markets,
trade, or money. If the Libertarian Party regards its economic
ideology as capitalist, rather than supporting free markets, it is
making a choice for potential voters, which they should and must have
the right to make for
themselves
when we have a free society. That choice is the choice of which
economic system (or systems) one will live under.
A
stateless society will feature a multitude of economic systems,
because the structures which keep the current system enforced, cannot continue to be supported without resorting to legalized violence
(i.e., state
action). That's why, when the state is gone, we will see not only free markets in
defense and security (because the power to make large-scale military
contracts with legally stolen taxpayer money will be gone), we will
also have a free market in economic systems. We will also have a free market in "self-governance", i.e., freedom of choice over who resolves our disputes. and ensures that we abide by voluntary contracts.
That
is
why I and other libertarian socialists believe that the Libertarian
Party should not designate an economic system. I would prefer that
the L.P. cease supporting “capitalism” in name, and instead
declare that we support free markets. Alternatives which I would
accept, include: 1) a declaration that we are neutral
on
economic issues not having to do with the state; 2) a declaration
that we are open to all
so-called
“heterodox” (or non-traditional) schools of economics; or 3) a
declaration that we support either classical liberalism,
laissez-faire economics, or entrepreneurialism.
Whatever we choose, it must be abundantly clear that we do not oppose cooperative enterprise. Anyone who believes that a private, for-profit business can be self-governing, should be able to admit that a cooperative enterprise can be self-governing too. And when all enterprises become self-governing - and are directed by a free, open, and direct as possible negotiation between their workers and clients/customers - external government of economic affairs will no longer be necessary.
Whatever we choose, it must be abundantly clear that we do not oppose cooperative enterprise. Anyone who believes that a private, for-profit business can be self-governing, should be able to admit that a cooperative enterprise can be self-governing too. And when all enterprises become self-governing - and are directed by a free, open, and direct as possible negotiation between their workers and clients/customers - external government of economic affairs will no longer be necessary.
Only
when we are free to improve land and keep whatever we build and grow
on it, will we all
be
fully free to enjoy the benefits of liberty and property. We cannot
simply resolve to support “property rights”, by supporting the
existing set
of property claims
(many of which are unfounded, undeserved, and supported by the
violent enforcement of outdated government laws). The libertarian
socialists are in the movement because libertarians should want
everyone
to have property, and own businesses (if that's what they want in
life), if the movement is to be taken seriously as having realistic
solutions to poverty.
If
the federal government did not own or manage any land outside of the
District of Columbia, then the third of Western American lands which
it owns and manages, would fall to the states and/or private owners.
If assurances can be made that vulnerable lands won't be exploited,
then the amount of area suitable for development will increase. With
more land available, the price of land will decrease. And since all
labor and capital which you can mix together, has to be mixed
together on
land,
with the price of land low, the costs of developing
that land, including by hiring people to work on it,
will also
decrease.
This is how abolishing the state, and undeserved claims over wide swaths of land, will eventually lead to low prices on everything, and potentially even zero cost for land. The same effects, in terms of price decreases, will also be felt when and if our market systems are used as they were intended; our markets need an injection of price competition and the clearing of markets, so that prices can naturally fall, without governmental economic intervention being necessary to achieve those price decreases.
This is how abolishing the state, and undeserved claims over wide swaths of land, will eventually lead to low prices on everything, and potentially even zero cost for land. The same effects, in terms of price decreases, will also be felt when and if our market systems are used as they were intended; our markets need an injection of price competition and the clearing of markets, so that prices can naturally fall, without governmental economic intervention being necessary to achieve those price decreases.
The
last hundred and fifty years of discourse in political economy has
been consumed with petty squabbles between the representatives of the
interests of labor and capital. But neither capital nor labor will be
free - nor will they be able to deal with one another on fair or free
terms - until the land beneath them is respected. An injustice
anywhere is an injustice everywhere; none of us will be free as long
as the majority of the people with whom we are interacting, are
unfree. Each of us ought to be free to join any union (and as many
unions) as we please (on a voluntary basis). Also, we must each be
free to become independent contractors, which maximizes our power to
negotiate in a direct manner.
The
more people who are independent contractors, and the more people who
own their own home - and the less restrictive zoning laws we have –
the more people there are who can work at home. When people can work
without leaving home, they can protect their own house and family
(instead of somebody else's), and teach the next generation how to
inherit their skills. And the more people who work at home and own
their own home, the more people can build and grow whatever they want
on their own property, and keep all the products of it (without
paying taxes or
rent). And the more people can depend on themselves, the less likely
it will be that they will have to resort to leaving their own
property, selling their labor, selling their products, participating
in markets, or trading, or using money or currency, or participating
in economic activity at
all. Post-scarcity
economics is possible now, because we have abundance, and most if not
all economic activities could easily be made unnecessary.
Only
once we can build and grow what we please on our own property, and
once competition is fully optional,
will competition be fully free.
A free market, in a stateless society, will feature total freedom to
compete, as well as to cooperate, and cooperatively own. Total
freedom to compete, includes the right to compete against the
established predator multinationals which exist today, and which
thrive off of taxpayer-funded subsidies, favors, grants of monopoly
status (such as patents), and other privileges and protections (such
as contractual and legal protections from economic competition and
responsibility for their crimes and frauds).
Corrupt, monopolistic, and rent-seeking firms will likely never be held responsible through the law, and so they must be held responsible through the market; through both competition by all producers against monopolies, and cooperation with other producers with the intent of driving the corrupt monopolists out of business.
Corrupt, monopolistic, and rent-seeking firms will likely never be held responsible through the law, and so they must be held responsible through the market; through both competition by all producers against monopolies, and cooperation with other producers with the intent of driving the corrupt monopolists out of business.
When large numbers of families do not own the homes they live in, and can have their shelter or warmth taken away through a landlord's selfishness or negligence – or through a boss's corruption - humanity is threatened, and the system is condoning child abuse. We must never allow ourselves to become dependent upon anyone whom we would not trust to take care of our families as we would. And that is why nobody who works should be dependent upon a boss (or a machine he doesn't at least partially own, or land in which he doesn't have stake and interest) for survival.
And
once it is no longer necessary for anyone to rent or borrow means of
production (i.e.,
farms,
factories, workplaces, and large difficult to move machines), then
all economic
rents (including rent, interest, profit, and usury) will disappear.
We can have a stateless economy which is “privatized” in its
statelessness, but that does not have to mean that the economy must
be oriented towards extracting as much surplus profit as possible.
Expecting each person to be independent, can only work with enough
voluntary association and coordination, to make sure that the
purchasing power of the poor and needy are maximized, so that the
poor can afford what they need to live.
We
can and must achieve a free market system that is so radically and
totally free, that the potential of the poor to build and grow and
receive what they need, is not predicated on their ability to beg for
scraps while their work is deliberately undervalued so as to keep
them in dependence forever. A vision of society which allows that is
unfree, and
thus cannot rightfully be described as featuring a free market or a
free economy.
Written on November 6th and 7th, 2019
Published on November 7th, 2019
Friday, June 16, 2017
Yes, That Inanimate Object is Mocking You, and Here's Why
Yes, That Inanimate
Object is Mocking You, and Here's Why:
A Guide for Schizophrenics Trying to Get into Chaos Magick
A Guide for Schizophrenics Trying to Get into Chaos Magick
We've all been there.
You're out somewhere,
and someone's talking to you about Charles Manson. You want to tell
them Tex Did It, but you can't tell whether they're really into
Charlie or they're just flirting with you. It happens all the time.
Then you come home, and
the dark suitcases and blankets that you meticulously arranged on the
large shelf a few hours ago have morphed into an empty floating Darth
Vader shaman's cloak waiting to sexually harass you. Then you turn on
the fan, and your little silver dish full of cookie fortunes gets
blown away, and you pick up one that offends you. What did you
expect?
And don't forget
about the recurring nightmare about being Martin Luther nailing
the 95 Theses to the church, and the papers turn into Jesus, and
you're nailing Him to the Cross! I mean, fuggeddaboutit! It
happens to literally the best
of us (samaan).
You
want to ask someone what's up, and get your line of thinking checked
out; but you don't want to cut yourself with Occam's Razor. We all
know the story; don't feel alone, feel at-one! You
alone
have the power to investigate and solve inconsistencies apparent in
your conscious thought; all you have to do is remember that the
opposite of paranoia is pronoia,
the suspicion that other people are conspiring to help
you. Know that He sees you and takes pity.
Yes, your possessions are mocking you, and for good reason. They scoff at the thought that you might ever truly and fully own them!
Why
would they hesitate to mock you when you mock yourself
so much!? I mean, why wouldn't
you suspect that your friends from across the country sneaked
(snuck?) into your apartment, crawled under your blankets, and
suffocated and died under there? Of course
that's what happened! You've been gone for hours,
and the least complicated explanation is most likely the correct one.
Besides,
your friends wouldn't tell you if they were coming to do that. It
seems considerate, but seriously, sometimes, the nerve
of some sheet-ghosts! Sometimes you manage to ask yourself what the
odds are, but C-3PO, being an android subject to Asimov's laws of
robotics, submits to your order to never again tell you the odds.
Pathetic.
But
eventually, after you take your shoes off with your eyes closed, sit
in a cardboard box, facing southwest, you crawl out of Schrödinger's
Cat-Box, turn on the lights, pull back the blankets, and see that
it's just some pillows that got tucked down under your sheets,
impersonating your
dead friends under the blankets. And for now, that seems logical
enough.
Until
you remember that the folks at the Zen session told you to hold tight
to those pillows. That's when you start pondering whether there
really
is
an alternative to Richard Nixon owning the Moon. If you find yourself (-selves) asking questions like
this, just remember:
“You're not crazy, you're a warlock”, and “Bitch I'm a Witch”.
Keep in mind that a lunatic
is just someone who pays attention to the Moon. Keep watch over Her
bewitching form if you must; just don't let Diana possess you
(like something out of Soviet Russia). “Crazy” has no formal
medical definition; it's just a Willie Nelson song.
You
must learn not to make yourself an easy target for mockery by your
possessions. You can take
the matter of “what you possess vs.
what
possesses you” into Your
W-Hole-Y Unique Hands (R),
and here are twelve
easy reasons how!:
1) Replace your cuckoo clock with a mockingbird, and you'll see what
I'm talkin' about.
2) Choose your new possessions (and familiars) carefully. Be careful how you befriend your new familiars. And if a piece of fruit at the store is giving you the malocchio, yes, it's best to simply avoid buying that type of fruit at that store, because the other Fruit may be spiritually compromised. Unless all pineapples worldwide are similarly cursed. ...Oh shit.
Anyway,
choose your possessions well; and own them, or else they will own
you. How
much time do we waste catering to the upkeep needs of our
possessions? I mean, how many robot servants am I gonna have to
maintain thirty
years from now just to get a Fish or a Pure Pineapple? My
concerns are valid.
3) Our pets' eyes can act as portals into other celestial (and sexual) dimensions. Simply put, if you don't possess your cat, then your cat will possess you. You must claim your pet as your witch's or warlock's (or male witch, etc.)'s familiar.
Force your pet to take your surname as soon as possible! Say you let some female dogs live with you. Make sure they know the score; a renter must submit to her landlord! Marry one of those dogs, and make sure it knows you're its master, and she's your bottom-bitch, or else you won't know which bitch is which witch, bitch! Do some bitchcraft. Give animal husbandry a new meaning.
4) There is actually an easy way to tell for sure whether your pet knows who you were in a past life: Put a Witch Hat on It.TM What will this accomplish? Nothing. ...That is, if you consider looking super cute and witchy and sick af all at the same time “nothing”.
The point is, listen to what your
“mortal” mini- Anubis or Sphinx is trying to tell you about “who
you are”. For more information
on the origins
and meaning of this phrase, please stare into the eyes of a
hastily-Google-image-searched portrait of Madam Helena Blavatsky.
5) Macabre-up your living (and personal!) space. Remind yourself that you will die from being enslaved by your possessions by finally building and putting to use that chandelier made out of human skulls and bones, and marimbas made out of the same, that you designed last bak'tun. Wear a vial full of your brother's blood around your neck. Do a goddamn thing for the Empire.
6) You're not getting any younger (or are you?). Why do you
keep putting off carving that Hebrew typewriter with the keys made
out of dice carved from endangered white rhino teeth that gets
Bluetooth transmissions from the Pakistani volcano that's psychically
informing you that you have Seasonal Affective Disorder (S.A.D.)? You
remember, the one that the invisible rabbi told you about years ago
(or years from now)?
7) Use sigil magick to cash in on domain names! Dramatically increase your ability to claim intellectual property, by using glossolalia to generate new words and languages. Invent new symbols, pictograms, emoji, languages, codices, and cryptograms, then simply add “dot website”. Then cash in on the stock market, and make millions in whichever cosmic or celestial currency you desire! It's a fool-proof plan; not necessarily lunatic-proof, but fool-proof.
8) Stop flipping coins! Submitting your decision-making authority to a piece of currency with a socially constructed value helps money to own you, which, believe me, is the last thing you want to do.
9) The lamp you've affixed to your wall knows which Led Zeppelin
song you're supposed to play when you light the candles, you just
have to ask it politely.
10) Remember that you can never be fully deprived of possessions. At any time, one can request to have a reading performed - by a trained, certified professional, for a reasonable price - to determine possession of (and by) which kind of cups, or swords, etc., one may be struggling.
11) Own yourself, your Flesh, your past, your mistakes, your
actions, and your Word. Emotional and psychological ownership –
especially of your baggage – is a prerequisite for total
self-ownership. Let your Deeds speak for themselves, while emulating
Your Word. Take joy in simple labors like carpentry, fishing, and
wine-making, while pondering christosis, martyrdom, the labors of the
Christ throughout his life, and the role of God as architect or
gardener. Emanate what you emulate. Own your Word, keep
your Word, and may your Deeds become Word-Made-Flesh. Grow the
biogenetic tapestry, and bring Spirit back into Flesh.
12) Be prepared, at all times, to present identification as
well as several forms attesting to your body's (i.e., state-owned
flesh-bagTM, a/k/a yana) privilege to travel and
work, to any and all individuals claiming to be persons of
authority. Surrender your body as requested; you'll get your body
back eventually. It may be full of holes when you go pick up the
stuff you had on you when you got arrested, but you'll get it back
one way or another.
You must be careful and decisive about what to own, and whom you may be attempting to own. Sometimes we call our possessions “mine”, as in “my parent”, “my friend”, “my lover”, etc.. However, in lending credence to this subject / object blending, you risk ignoring the other's “ownership” of yourself in similar relation. Once again, I use the term “the other” lightly, for as Jimi Hendrix asked, “Have you ever been experienced?” It's apparent that your parent should not be apprehensive at preparations for reparations through becoming more than mere apparitions. Don't be possessive, and don't possess people; not in the ghostly way, not in the regular way.
Your
possessions must not define you, for definition means limitation, and
framing. Do you want your possessions to frame you? Huh? Do you want
to get framed? You wanna be Roger Rabbit? Huh!?
Answer me! Oh wait, I
forgot, I'm just some words on a piece of paper (just like you, your
body, your house, your family, your money, your heart, and your
fingerprints, and your DNA). I have no power over you; just like you!
Just like your possessions shouldn't.
But
shudder, for your ritual object magick is too weak (and American) to
fight mere paper and words. The solution: throw The Rock into the
gears, or else throw scissors and cut down the marionette! I don't
tell you how to run your puppet show, don't tell me how to do my card
tricks. Don't let your possessions keep you in your place.
Anyway,
your cat barely even has time
to properly “own
you”, it's busy on the catwalk modeling hats and doing witch shit
with Cat Fabio (our Lord and Savior, the Sphinx among Sphinxes). It's also worth noting that planned
obsolescence is pretty darn anti- Feng
Shui.
Remember, you can 3-D print any shape out of any kind of animal
connective tissue you want. If that
doesn't help the Gypsy read the chicken bones, I don't know what
Will.
So throw them bones down, Hoodoo Man, Lucy-fer's got some
articulation to do! Cast a lot, and cast alot!
Don't
blame yourself for not knowing how to properly Feng
Shui
the eggs; it doesn't take a properly seated Carlos Castaneda to know
that eggs are to be organized half-function (for balance), and
half-form (for zazz). Eggs also belong on anthills, provided that
you're “In the Mood”. For more information, ask your local
friendly neighborhood Romanian. If you put all your eggs in one basket, you're gonna have a shitty Easter. And Jesus had a shitty Easter weekend so that we don't have to.
It's
natural to feel like a many-armed elephant-god, or the demiurge at the center of the planet, when
you're so quickly sorting the items that your nameless saint friend
salvaged from the dumpster. Repent,
for you knew his Name;
from the womb (as if from within Elizabeth), and in the deep forests
of Psyche
where alone one may find The Eternal. Also, he definitely did drug
you that one time you were wondering whether he drugged you. But he
helped you move in and do interior design, and he never crossed the
line of stockings on the floor!
You know that the Pharaoh within you will recognize his possessions once he wakes up; you know how to Mark them. You read Exodus. Remember, the voices aren't real – especially the one coming from over your left shoulder - and the most consciousness-expanding time of your life never needs to happen again. All you have to do is learn to lock your shit up properly. Lock that shit up in your head.
You know that the Pharaoh within you will recognize his possessions once he wakes up; you know how to Mark them. You read Exodus. Remember, the voices aren't real – especially the one coming from over your left shoulder - and the most consciousness-expanding time of your life never needs to happen again. All you have to do is learn to lock your shit up properly. Lock that shit up in your head.
Radically
reclaim your property in the name of freedom to burn Eostre candles
and gum resins. If you must take property, then be
the
sarcophagus, be
the
crypt, be the
catacombs, be
the
pyramid. Your zoning laws fuck with your right to conduct religious
services in your residence because your zoning laws are man-made,
fallible, and impure. Practice fucking with your locks, but be extra
careful not to accidentally lock yourself out of “your own”
house. Bring Yobhel back; immanentize the eschaton and all that jazz. Be Mutualist Landlord Jesus.
Don't
stop bringing trash into the house and looking through it for
fetishes though. You were supposed to hang onto that “Trust No One”
ring, by the way, you weren't supposed to give it to the first cute
barista whose name started with “A”. That's not the kind of
fetish I'm talking about. I mean the damn shamanic
and
anthropological definition
of “fetish”, get your head out of the gutter.
Rest
(and rest well)
assured
(and rest
well-assured)
that the ring and the barista will lie in your abode, each in “its”
own proper place and position. The
point, I guess, is that “We must own ourselves, or we must bone
ourselves”. You don't have to be a Feng Shui master - or watch The Fifth Element or read The Joy Luck Club or any shit like that - to acknowledge that
You Know Where the Bone Goes, and You Know Where the Wood Goes in the room. So
go be a khlyst,
take up thy rod and Walk.
You must not allow your name to name you, nor to own you. Don't say your name out loud to anyone, and don't let anyone hang a sign on you; you will recognize them by how they call you. Whether and how we name one another act as both talismans and shibboleths. See the Forest for the trees, and don't confuse the map with the territory. While Matti told us “Although it is not your name, you are naméd it”, names name you not.
You
will see not only the Forest but also the Garden in the cryptic
mirror triptych. If you can't see yourself in that,
I don't know what you can
see yourself in. Try as we may, spare the “final end” (and I use
that
term lightly),
we may never shed our subjectivity nor our objectivity. Each of these
is but one of our properties
(and this time I mean “properties” in the strictest
sense of the word). As we are felt, so too do we feel. Lo, for is it
not (basically) said that a Fish is worth His weight in gold? Is the
Fish's blood not the true medium of exchange (or at least the medium
of exchange for all human sin)?
If that which makes a resource suitable for use as a currency is the scarcity of the material of which it is made, then is it not the scarcity and rarity of the individual human being which make us suitable to serve as the most heavily traded item, and a currency, at once? You get where I'm going with this.
If that which makes a resource suitable for use as a currency is the scarcity of the material of which it is made, then is it not the scarcity and rarity of the individual human being which make us suitable to serve as the most heavily traded item, and a currency, at once? You get where I'm going with this.
Non-magicians (commonly referred to as Muggles) struggle to
comprehend these complex psycho-shamanics (not to be understood as
psychosomatic nor psychosemantics), nor the psychopomp and
circumstance (not to be understood in general). They are to be
explained Gnosis, introduced to L-rd Alan Watts, and informed that
good
psychiatry resembles shamanism
more
than it resembles slipping someone a Mickey. "Psychopomp
and Circumstance"; there's a Song that's Truly
unowned!
Keep Me in mind and heart, and heed Me. I wrote the
flesh-made-Word on your heart in the very Beginning. The real Gospel
is right there at (and in) your fingertips. Own your body as
you own my letter to you, which millennia ago I carved on your flesh
when I wrote your name in the Book of Life, and which you carry with
you as soul-you carries flesh-you around like a vehicle from life to
life. If you don't come to find Me, I will set out to find you; but I
cannot come in unless I Am invited.
Read it carefully, and I will never abandon you. Come keep sparrows
with Me. Together we shall find whether we are, indeed, our sparrows'
keepers. But take seriously the decision as to whether to become an
angel; angels must submit to G-d and the Word, becoming Gaia's
property in the process. Don't even try living before you've
decided whether what you really want out of life is to possess, to
self-own, or to spend your life enslaved to deity.
Pick your Tree wisely, and don't
choose the Cup of Wisdom poorly. To know the Deep Truth (not to be
confused with the Deep State) of this, you must own and keep your
Word, know that an angel is a messenger, read a list of titles of
books by Marshall McLuhan, and then watch Angels
in the Outfield. I
mean, don't shoot The Messenger, really.
In
conclusion, please read my blog, it's written on a scroll of
sheepskin, nailed to a million-year-old Tree – made of, and into, the
True Cross – deep within the Gardened Forest of the human soul, in
the Garish Land of the Garland and the Garlic-Laden Calf, within the
a-maze-ingly labyrinthine fingerprint of genetic creation, buried
next to our hopes and dreams of eternity, yet patiently waiting to be
exhumed so it can burst forth from the impenetrable, synthetic cloud
of nearly primordial mental fog that is “civilized” Babylon, and
reclaim what has been snuck from out its grave; from its rightful
place at the foot of its master.
Nah, I'm totally fucking with you.
But for real though.
This has been a satirical piece.
Written Between June 14th and 16th, 2017
Edited on June 18th and 22nd, and September 14th, 2017
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
How to Fold Two Square Pieces of Card Stock into a Box
This series of images shows how to take two square pieces of card stock (or thick paper), and cut and fold them into two halves of a b...
-
Table of Contents 1. First Introduction 2. Second Introduction 3. Artificial Sweeteners, Feces, Cheese, Antibiotics, Coffee, Alcohol, and ...
-
Table of Contents 1. Introduction 2. Cuomos Tied to Ghislaine Maxwell and Pedophile Producer John Griffin 3. Gavin Newsom's Wife Alleged...
-
The following list of thirty television shows, consists of shows that either desensitize people to children getting hurt physically or ...

















