Friday, February 5, 2021

Solving Overwork and Unemployment: How to Create a Functional Labor and Tax Platform in Eight Easy Steps

     American tax and labor policies are in a state of dysfunction, inactivity, stagnation, and chaos. We must restore functionality and logic to the American economy and its labor market as soon as possible.

     Unemployment, being overworked and overburdened with pressure to accept overtime hours, and struggling to scrape together enough work-hours to qualify for benefits and make ends meet, have all become severe problems in the United States.

     In order to fix this problem, each our overtime laws, our minimum wage laws, poverty threshold laws, and laws on tax credits and basic income, need to work together. Laws on taxes and labor need to be crafted in a coordinated manner which makes sense, with each policy measure logically proceeding from, and being justified by, and making room for the other related policies being implemented, in order to help fulfill the conditions necessary to achieve those policies' goals.


     The following is a set of proposals regarding laws on taxes, labor hours, poverty levels, and related topics. But it is also a set of instructions for those wishing to legislate on economic matters.

     You can come up with your own proposal like this; by going through each of the eight topics, and choosing your favorite proposal from among the two or three choices listed below them. I have called these options are the “Conservative”, “Progressive”, and “Libertarian” plans, which in some cases feature combinations or alterations. [Note: I do not mean to suggest that all conservatives would be likely to support the proposals I've termed "conservative", however; I only mean that the "conservative" reforms are the most conservative reforms, of the reforms I've proposed below.]
     I suggest highlighting your favorite proposal, crossing everything else out, jotting down a few notes based on what's left, and adding your own ideas.

     This proposal can also function as a political survey.


     I recommend selecting either the “a” option for all questions, or the “b” option for all questions, or the “c” option for all questions. I say this because consistency is important, given that the whole idea of this article is to provide a framework for achieving an interlocking set of proposals that make sense together.

     But libertarians and conservatives, conservatives and progressives, and progressives and libertarians each have a specific set of things that they agree and disagree about; therefore I will not discourage my readers from mixing and matching. Just keep in mind that the consistency will be diminished, and the problem may not be fully solved as the result of your choices.


     Feel free to e-mail me at jwkopsick@gmail.com if you have any questions or suggestions about this proposal and survey, or if you would like to tell me your response to the survey.


     Notes about the statistics referenced in this article:

     The 6.7% unemployment rate figure (which I use to estimate a 26.8% "real real unemployment rate") is cited because the unemployment rate was 6.7% in December 2020. In January, that rate decreased to 6.3%, so adjustments should be made wherever necessary, when updating these statistics to generate policy suggestions conforming to the new economic reality and the new statistics coming out.

     The 34.5 work-hours per week figure is based on statistics from 2019.
     The original statistic was 34.4 hours per week, but I have rounded that to the nearest half an hour, for simplicity's sake. More precise numbers should always be used to generate final policy proposals. This article should be used only as a template and place-holder, until closer to the election for which it will be developed and perfected.     




     1. Reduce the standard number of work-hours per week which the government intends to be the standard number used in regards to the pertinent federal labor laws:

     1a. (“Conservative” or “simple/basic” option, only solves half of the problem but could also be a major first step towards finishing the job): Reduce the standard number of work hours per week from 40 to 34.5, the average number of hours worked by Americans.

     1b. (“Progressive” or “complex/extra” option): Reduce the standard number of work hours per week from 40 to 27.2, to account for the number of unemployed people who would start working if they could, which issues from the fact that “real real unemployment” (i.e., U6 or U7) is at approximately 26.8% (so it would require reducing the 40 hours a week by 26.8%, down to 27.2 hours per week).

     1c. (“Libertarian” option): Repeal all laws which establish or suggest a uniform or target goal as it pertains to desired number of work-hours per week (This would be difficult without eliminating vast numbers of government workers).



     2. Repeal or amend overtime laws to reflect the need to reduce competition for labor-hours between temporary and gig workers, underemployed people, and seasonally and structurally unemployed workers (etc.) vs. overtime workers with secure jobs:

     2a. (“Conservative” option, assuming that 1a was followed and completed): Keep overtime laws, but make overtime start at 34.5 hours per week, without increasing the “time-and-a-half” pay requirement for overtime work.

     2b. (“Progressive” option, which might make the problem worse): Keep overtime laws, but make overtime start after 34.5 hours per week, and increase the “time-and-a-half” pay requirement for overtime work to 175% or 200%.

     2c. (“Libertarian” option): Repeal and eliminate overtime laws altogether, thereby reducing external pressure and incentive to work overtime.



     3. Set a goal to achieve an average American worker income:

     3a & 3b. (“Progressive-Conservative” option): Set a goal to achieve an average American worker income of $34,500 per year.

     3c. (“Libertarian” option): Repeal all laws which establish or suggest a uniform or target goal as it pertains to desired average American worker income.



     4. Raise the poverty level (up from $12,760 per year, per single-person household):

     4a. (“Conservative” option): Raise the poverty level to $17,250 (equal to half of the $34,500 per year goal).

     4b. (“Progressive” option): Raise the poverty level to $34,500 (the average annual income goal).

     4c. (“Libertarian” option): Repeal any and all laws establishing or suggesting any sort of poverty level or uniform poverty threshold.



     5. Increase the minimum wage, to adjust for cost-of-living increases and other economic factors which need updating:

     5a. (“Conservative” option): Set a $17.25 per hour minimum wage. (This is based on the premise that many people may still choose to work for forty hours a week or more, and thus might not need $20/hr. At fifty five-day weeks per year, that comes out to an annual income of $34,500 per year).

     5b. (“Progressive” option): Set a $20 per hour minimum wage (to account for the fact that 34.5 hours of work per week, for $20 per hour, for fifty five-day work-weeks per year, comes out to $34,500 per year).

     5c. (“Libertarian” option): Repeal and eliminate minimum wage laws altogether, in order to remove and criminalize all external suggestions on prevailing, minimum, and maximum wages, which may not only be unnecessary, but which also distort the market by distorting price signals for wage labor. Allow the labor markets to dictate the prevailing wage, and let the free-floating prevailing wage to be the only wage rate that is considered “average”, or remotely “official”, in any way.



     6. Create a tax exemption for poor people which is based on the average annual income suggested by the new minimum wage and standard number of work-hours:

     6a & 6b. (“Progressive-Conservative” option) Exempt all 18-year-olds (most of whom lack proper tax documentation) - and all people 19 and older whom disclosed their taxes the previous year - from all taxes, as long as they do not earn more than $34,500 per year, and can prove it.

     6c. (“(Geo-)Libertarian” option) Exempt everyone from taxes, except for people and businesses which profit from the despoilation of land, and from the improper solicitation of taxpayer subsidies and monopoly privileges. Eliminate all taxes which are levied based on quantity, and only enforce tax laws against those who use violence and/or destruction to earn their livings.



     7. Establish an alternative minimum tax payment that gives taxpayers some choice in regards to how they are taxed:

     7a & 7b. (“Progressive-Conservative” option): Establish an alternative minimum tax payment of $17,250, or up to $17,250, per year; and require that taxpayers choose between the following: 1) report that your annual income was over $34,500 and pay taxes; 2) report that your annual income was under $34,500 and receive an exemption from taxes for that year; or 3) keep information about the amount you earned private, but disclose the sources, and pay the alternative minimum of $17,250.

     7c. (“Libertarian” option): Repeal and eliminate the alternative minimum tax payment.



     8. Provide a basic income (or refundable tax credits which occur on a routine basis), or else pass additional non-refundable tax credits.

     8a. (“Conservative” option): Pass non-refundable tax credits for people with sick, young, old, and disabled dependents, and for people earning slightly more than $34,500 per year but may still need and/or qualify for assistance.

     8b. (“Progressive” option): Pass a universal basic income guarantee for all residents earning less than $34,500 per year; providing a basic income equal to $17,250 per year ($1,437.50 per month).

     8c. (“Libertarian/Friedmanite” option): Pass a Negative Income Tax proposal which builds on the voluntary tax information sharing proposal. Those who elect to provide the amounts in their tax receipts, shall receive refundable tax credits of an amount which is equal to 50% of the difference between the amount they earned in the previous year, and $34,500.



Written and published on February 5th, 2021

Edited on March 17th and April 22nd and 23rd, 2021

No comments:

Post a Comment

Who Took Third Place in Each State?: Which Non-Major-Party Presidential Candidates Did Best in Which States in 2024?

     The map below depicts which presidential candidates came in third place in the 2024 U.S. presidential election.      By showing the thi...