Sunday, October 31, 2021

Communities Should Be More Aware of Threats to Small Children on Halloween


Table of Contents



1. Introduction
2. Original Article
3. Reflection







Content




1. Introduction

     (Written on October 31st, 2021)

     I wrote the article below at the age of sixteen and a half years old. The article was written for my high school writing workshop class.
     I wrote this article to draw attention to the risks which older children who are more interested in the “trick” part of “trick or treating”, pose to younger children who are more interested in treats, on Halloween.
     I am reproducing the article here, below, with the minimum amount of edits necessary, to commemorate Halloween 2021 as well as the eighteenth anniversary of the completion of my article (originally titled “Halloween”).

     I wrote this article because of three major events:
     1) I was sprayed in the face with shaving cream by older kids;
     2) my younger brother had some of his candy stolen one year; and
     3) a hundred or so kids would gather at the park between my middle school and the park and police station, to engage in a melee of an hour-long shaving-cream fight, which was completely impossible to pass through unscathed (if you wanted to start trick-or-treating in the neighborhoods further along in that northward direction in east Lake Bluff, Illinois).
     These factors made it difficult to avoid eventually voicing my opinion on the matter, which I did during my junior year of high school.

     I certainly wrote this article in the interest of protecting smaller children on Halloween. But I should not do any grand-standing, as I alluded to my own activity in the article, without admitting to it.
     Even I, myself, was not immune from – as I mention in the article – getting “caught up in the violence of the moment” while I was among kids who were vandalizing property and spraying shaving cream into other kids’ faces.
     In fact, one year, I was so angry about being shaving-creamed – or so afraid of being shaving-creamed, I can’t remember – that I beat a smaller kid with a thin wooden stick that was part of my costume. I was dressed as a pimp that Halloween. I was about 12 years old.

     Why was I allowed to dress as a pimp for Halloween at the age of about 12 years old? The same reason that kids were getting shaving-creamed in the face as they ran home from gathering candy: a lack of parental supervision.
     Reflecting back upon this essay – and upon Halloween in general – from 2021, it seems that the lesson here should be that parents, the police, and older kids alike, all play a role in making Halloween more scary than necessary for small children.

     [Note:
     In the article below, when I use the phrase “Trick-or-Treating”, I refer to the act of gathering candy without committing acts of vandalism (even though the use of the phrase ordinarily implies a mix of candy-gathering and vandalism).]

 




2. Original Article

     (Written from mid-October to October 20th, 2003)

     The practice of Trick-or-Treating is rapidly becoming a less common form of Halloween fun than going out and vandalizing people’s houses, but should these more dangerous kinds of activities be allowed?
     Typically, people associate Halloween with candy and costumes and being out late at night having fun. But there is a problem that seems to be growing every year. Kids who attend [m]iddle [s]chool or [h]igh [s]chool who think themselves too old to dress up and go out Trick-or-Treating, find it fun to go out when the candy hunt is ending, carrying cans of shaving cream, cartons of eggs and rolls of toilet paper and scare younger children, steal their candy, hit Trick-or-Treaters and houses with eggs, T.P. countless trees in random people’s front yards[,] and participate in shaving-cream fights.
     These actions are destructive and unnecessary, and anyone who commits any of the thoughtless acts of vandalism year after year is wasting his time and could be having just as much fun without putting himself or others in danger.

     In Lake Bluff, for the last few years, students attending Lake Bluff Middle School have been gathering in the park across from the school to have shaving-cream fights. This is a dangerous, unhealthful thing to do and considering its duration, it is the biggest waste of time that regularly occurs on Halloween, taking up nearly an hour of time that could be spent gathering candy from the many residenc[e]s just one block away.
     Much of the danger in this event lies in how many small children follow their older siblings or friends and watch them participate in the fight. If they come anywhere near the park, anyone already involved in the fight could get caught up in the violence of the moment and start spraying younger children, and hurting them if the shaving cream gets in their eyes.
     Another part of the danger: the Lake Bluff Police Station is right on the other end of the park. While the police are hosting a small barbecue with soda, hot dogs and chips, completely free for anyone to enjoy, there is a massive act of vandalism [occurring] directly across the park. There is a high probability that the police will drive around the park and break up the fight, and anyone in direct violation of the law could get in big trouble.

     Throwing toilet paper over people’s trees, hurling eggs at their front doors, and smashing Jack-[o]’Lanterns are also Halloween activities that can easily get out-of-hand.
     This is vandalism and trespassing[,] and could warrant the owner of the house being vandalized to call the police[,] and anyone on their property seen doing these things could be arrested.
     Cleaning toilet paper off of trees and wiping raw eggs off garages, porches and front doors could take days or even weeks[;] and throwing pumpkins to the ground creates waste, [and] ugly orange stains on the sidewalks, and [shows] no regard for the amount of time, energy, money and effort people put into the pumpkin’s design.

     Another common action is walking through the streets when children are walking home and running up to them, spraying shaving cream in their faces, ruining their costumes, and stealing bags full of candy.
     This behavior is mean and immoral and robs the victims of the satisfaction of going from house to house and getting hundreds of pieces of candy all on their own, especially if it is their first time not accompanied by an adult or friend.

     Destroying property, hurting people, ruining their possessions, stealing their belongings and taking away the satisfaction of a night’s work is dangerous, hurtful and does not constitute a good time.
     The process of thinking up a creative idea for a costume, buying or making it, carving a Jack-[o]’-Lantern and spending an evening going from house to house and engaging in polite conversation with strangers (rather than pelting them with things) and collecting piles of candy is fun, safe, and won’t get you into trouble.
     So get out there, have fun and bring a flashlight.

     P.S.:
     Please wear something scary. I don’t scream when I see an M&M; I eat it.




3. Reflection

     (Written on November 2nd, 2021)

     I should also mention that the stance on vandalism on Halloween which I held as a teen did not deter me from participating in several minor acts of vandalism around the same time; as I helped some friends from the theater stage crew toilet-paper the home of Lake Forest High School theater director David "Dave" Miller.
     This was at least 14 years before I discovered that Miller had been accused of having sexual relationships with high school -age boys.
     So maybe there are a few people in my community who deserve a little bit of vandalism.
     It's unfortunate that small children became targets of older children who got out of control, but if you think about it, maybe giving kids one day a year when they can get out of control, is what gave those of us from the theater stage crew the nerve to toilet-paper Miller's house as openly (and repeatedly) as we did.









Written from early October to October 20th, 2003

Originally written for a high school language arts class
and submitted under the title “Halloween”

Introduction Written on October 31st, 2021

Published to this blog on October 31st, 2021

Reflection Written and Added on November 2nd, 2021

Wednesday, October 6, 2021

Thirty-One Television Shows That May Be Trying to Promote Pedophilia and/or Child Abuse

     The following list of thirty television shows, consists of shows that either desensitize people to children getting hurt physically or sexually, or juxtapose sexual humor with children.

     By publishing this list, I do not mean to recommend any sort of ban on the broadcast or distribution of said shows (at least not yet).
     This list is solely intended as a way of cautioning adults about shows their children might watch, which could traumatize them, if they saw the wrong clip, or the wrong episode.





1. American Dad! (FOX)

     The show has alluded to the teenage character Steve masturbating, and once featured a Christmas episode about the child-abusing demon Krampus who assists Santa Claus.


2. America’s Funniest Home Videos (ABC)

     The late 2010s era of the show, frequently broadcast videos of children getting hurt, and used them as a source of comedy and entertainment. The show arguably trains people to laugh when children get hurt.


3. Beavis and Butt-Head (MTV)

     The show regularly featured the teenage characters trying to “score” and talking about masturbating and trying to get hand jobs.


4. Big Mouth (Netflix)

     The show deals with sexual issues experienced by pubertal teenagers, and features a grotesque, hairy monster that symbolizes puberty.


5. Community (NBC)

     The show features a scene in which Alison Brie’s character sings “Santa Baby” in a baby voice to the character played by Joel McHale.


6. Dance Moms (Lifetime)

     The show features dance instructor Abby Lee Miller. On the show, Miller has been shown with her foot on a young dancer’s back, giving another dancer an unwanted kiss and making her kiss a boy when she didn’t want to, and two mothers noticing that Miller was “obsessed” with one of the dancers. Several episodes feature the mothers struggling about whether their daughters were being objectified by their costumes and the choreography.


7. Drawn Together (Comedy Central)

     The show features a superhero character named Captain Hero, who, in one episode, wishes for “a twelve-year-old girl and a donkey”. Another episode features the character “Steve from Long Island” saying that he is “into twelve-year-olds” just as he walks off screen.


8. Family Feud (ABC)

     The late 1970s and early 1980s version of the show featured host Richard Dawson, who was known to pressure contestants – wives, and even young daughters – to kiss him on the lips.


9. Family Guy (FOX)

     The show features two pedophile characters prominently; Glenn Quagmire, and Herbert the Pervert. The show makes Quagmire into a beloved character, and then reveals that he has raped underage Asian girls, named his daughter after a sex act, and wants to have sex with his own daughter when she turns 18.
     The show also features numerous references to male-on-male rape (especially prison rape) as a source of humor.
     On the other hand, the show has also depicted pedophiles negatively, in reference to two male characters (one in fashion, and the other in entertainment and looking suspiciously like possible pedophile Bryan Singer) who may have been hitting on the Stewie character. The Stewie character has evolved, over the years, from a baby who sounds like Rex Harrison and is bent on matricide and world domination, to a baby who is simply gay.
    The show has also featured scenes where the references to minors' sexuality are perhaps deliberately vague as to "which side the show is on". One was a television show written by Brian that became incestuous and featured James Woods. Another involved the Griffin family becoming the stars of a reality TV show, which required Meg to be replaced by a more attractive actress (in which the show made a brief homage to Lolita).


10. Golan the Insatiable (Adult Swim on Cartoon Network)

     The first episode of the show begins with a monster walking into a city hall building, in front of a parent and child, and demanding that a statue of a demon be placed in the town square. The show also features vulgar names. Essentially, it is a show about demons, packaged in the cuteness of the cartoon world.


11. Here Comes Honey Boo Boo (TLC)

     The show, which focuses on Alana “Honey Boo Boo” Thompson, who competes in child beauty pageants. The show’s purpose is essentially to glorify the girl’s mother June Edith “Mama June” Shannon, who, for some reason, keeps dating pedophiles. “Mama June” Shannon has dated at least two sex offenders against juveniles; Mark McDaniel and Michael Anthony Ford.


12. It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia (TBS)

     The show once did an episode about putting on a child beauty pageant, which included sexual themes. The show also alluded to man-on-boy and woman-on-boy rape in the “Charlie Wrote a Musical” episode.


13. MadTV (FOX)

     In the early 2000s, Michael McDonald played a recurring character named “Stuart”. Stuart is a little boy with a porcelain face who is, for some reason, six feet tall, with the appearance of a grown man. The show also did a sketch featuring Mo Collins playing Judy Garland’s Dorothy Gale in a sexed-up take on The Wizard of Oz.


14. Modern Family (ABC)

     In the show, Eric Stonestreet plays Cameron “Cam” Tucker, and Sofia Vergara plays Gloria Maria Ramirez Delgado-Pritchett. The show features jokes that involve Cam Tucker referring to children’s “beautiful bodies”, and Vergara’s character making a pun referring to a “mother’s tongue” in the ear of the teenage boy character Manny.


15. Nathan for You (Comedy Central)

     Nathan Fielder hosts this “prank show”. The show has featured him subjecting children to at least two potentially sexual situations. In one episode, Fielder appeared to meet with parents who were allowing their son to lay in a sound-proof box while surrounded by adults having an orgy. It’s unclear, however, how much of this was real and how much was scripted and made to look as it seemed. Fielder also did an episode in which, if he failed to escape from a device before a robotic arm pulled his pants down, he would be arrested as a sex offender. The episode ended with a little girl saying that she kind of wanted to see his pants get pulled off. Again, it’s unclear how much of this was simulated; Fielder could very well have prevented the robotic arm from pulling his pants up from the very start.


16. Pen15 (Netflix)

     The show features grown adults playing characters based on themselves as young teenagers. The show once featured a masturbation sequence involving a bedpost.


17. Rick & Morty (Adult Swim on Cartoon Network)

     The show has an episode in which Morty, a teenage boy, gets raped in a bathroom by an alien. The show has also suggested that Rick – or, at least, some version of Rick in an alternate dimension – desires to have sex with his own grandson and granddaughter. The show’s creator, Dan Harmon, has been criticized for making a cartoon about child rape.


18. Rocko’s Modern Life (Nickelodeon)

     The show once created an 11-minute episode in which Rocko’s dog, Spunky, falls in love with a mop (because of its appearance of having blonde hair). The dog proceeds to hump the mop at every opportunity (with a squeaking sound), and Rocko has to discipline him for it.


19. Saturday Night Live (NBC)

     Saturday Night Live has broadcast at least 54 sketches in which pedophilia and child sexual abuse are the punchlines.
     http://www.aquarianagrarian.blogspot.com/2021/04/saturday-night-live-has-aired-dozens-of.html


20. Seinfeld (NBC)

     The 48th, 50th, 51st, and 56th episodes of Seinfeld deal with George being attracted to a teenage girl, Jerry infantilizing his girlfriend in the bedroom, and Jerry trying to have sex with a virgin. Seinfeld began dating his wife, Shoshanna, when she was 17 and he was 38.


21. South Park (Comedy Central)

     The show displays cartoon children in inappropriate situations, ostensibly in order to criticize the exploitation of children. The show is often so nuanced, that it is difficult to tell whether the show is making light of pedophilia and teaching kids dirty words, or being genuinely wholesome. The show has featured the character Wendy (a nine-year-old girl) getting breast implants, and has shown Butters having a vibrating object inserted into his rear end as part of therapy after trauma. The show also did an episode in which Butters became a pimp, convincing girls in his class to sell kisses. In an early episode, Kenny spent hours inside his bus driver’s vagina. After Scientologist Isaac Hayes died, his character Chef was depicted as someone who ran away with a pedophilic cult.


22. SpongeBob (Nickelodeon)

     One character on this children’s show, Mr. Krabs, has a daughter named Pearl, who is of a different species. Mr. Krabs is a crab, and Pearl is a sperm whale. Pearl’s mother is another sperm whale, but is never seen. Some fans have offered a theory: Pearl calls Mr. Krabs “daddy” because he is her sugar daddy. The show also portrays SpongeBob and Patrick Star (a starfish) in sexual manners, emphasizing Patrick’s buttocks, and showing SpongeBob doing pelvic thrusts.



23. Sixteen and Pregnant (MTV)

     No show called “Sixteen and Pregnant” should exist for more than one season. After the first season, you’re not making a documentary; you’re holding auditions for older teenage boys to rape and impregnate younger teenage girls. MTV owns the children’s channel Nickelodeon.


24. Skins (MTV)

     The show portrays teenagers in an overtly sexual way, even appearing to offer sex advice, and promote losing one’s virginity while one is still a teenager in high school.


25. The Mick (FX, FXX, FOX)

     The show features Kaitlin Olsen (of It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia), playing an irresponsible woman named Mackenzie who must become the guardian of her niece and nephew. The show has featured jokes that juxtapose children against alcohol, drugs, and sex for laughs.


26. The Ren & Stimpy Show (Nickelodeon)

     John Kricfalusi, the lead animator of the show, dated a 16-year-old girl who was an assistant animator, when he was in his 30s. The show itself features rubber nipples, grotesque oversexualized human characters, and infantilization of both main characters. Confusion as to whether the dog and cat characters should be dressed or not, and the normalization of bizarre behaviors through lovable anthropomorphized animal characters, are also frequent sources of humor for this “cringey” cartoon show.


27. The Sally Jesse Raphael Show / Sally (NBC)

     Raphael brought teenage girls, who were “dating” grown men in their 30s, onto her show, only to downplay the criminal aspect of what their “boyfriends” (rapists) were doing. Raphael treated the girls as if they were “out of control” rather than the playthings of grown male child molesters.



28. The Simpsons (FOX)

     The show has featured ten-year-old troublemaker character Bart mooning people, references to Ralph Wiggum and other students witnessing Principal Skinner and Edna Krabappel having sex in a janitor's closet, and "Treehouse of Horror" episodes referring to adults eating children.
     The show also did an episode starring the speaking voice (but not the singing voice) of Michael Jackson, appearing as a mental patient named Leon Kompowski, who thinks he is Michael Jackson. The show removed the Michael Jackson episode from syndication after Jackson's death. Jackson was accused of sexual impropriety by as many as 13 different people, at least five of whom verifiably met Jackson and had their photographs taken with him.



29. This is Not Happening (Comedy Central)

     This show, hosted by comedian Roy Wood Jr. (of Daily Show fame), once included an opening sequence that showed children inside of a strip club, playing with money, while surrounded by partially clothes dancing adult women.


30. Tim and Eric Awesome Show Great Job! (Adult Swim on Cartoon Network)

     In 2010, the show did a sketch called “Original Child Clown Outlet”, featuring Will Ferrell. In this sketch, Ferrell is shown beating children who are crying (it is simulated), makes references to sperm donation, and says “Don’t touch the clowns; let the clowns touch you.”


31. Toddlers & Tiaras (TLC)

     The show features very young child beauty pageant contestants. In a similar manner to Dance Moms, the costumes and choreography push the envelope from dance practice into objectification and exploitation. One episode featured a five-year-old girl dancing inside of a cage.



 

Compiled between 2020 and October 2021

Written on October 6th, 2021

Originally Published on October 6th, 2021 as
"Thirty Television Shows That May Be Trying
to Promote Pedophilia and/or Child Abuse"

Edited and Expanded on October 8th, 2021

Friday, September 24, 2021

Wisconsin Family Resources Use Covid as Cheap Excuse for Denying Families Access, Exacerbating Separation of Families [Incomplete]

The full title of this article is


"Wisconsin Family Resources
Use Covid as Cheap Excuse
for Denying Families Access,
Exacerbating Separation of Families:

Covid Pandemic Exacerbates Social Services Access Hardships
Experienced by Parents of Disabled Children in Wisconsin".




Table of Contents


1. Why Caring About Disabled Families Being Unable to Access Social Services,
     Does Not Make You a "Father's Rights Movement" Fanatic

2. How the Social Security System Makes Families Susceptible to Separation

3. Intent Matters: How Wisconsin's Laws on Child Abuse Define Accidents as Abuse

4. Why Ignoring Intent Creates a Slippery Slope Regarding How Child Abuse is Defined

5. Additional Notes Regarding Standards in Defining Child Abuse

6. Parents Experience Loss of Work, No Compensation for Social Work Visits, Economic Hardship

7. How the Covid Crisis and Family Law Affect Families with Members on the Autism Spectrum

8. The Government Unjustly and Systematically Deprived Disabled People of the Ability to Reliably Access Services; and the Laws and Rights Which Social Services Potentially Violated in the Course of Depriving Access






Content




1. Why Caring About Disabled Families Being Unable to Access Social Services,
     Does Not Make You a "Father's Rights Movement" Fanatic

     [coming soon]




2. How the Social Security System Makes Families Susceptible to Separation


     [coming soon]




3. Intent Matters: How Wisconsin's Laws on Child Abuse Define Accidents as Abuse


     [coming soon]




4. Why Ignoring Intent Creates a Slippery Slope Regarding How Child Abuse is Defined


     [coming soon]




5. Additional Notes Regarding Standards in Defining Child Abuse


     [coming soon]




6. Parents Experience Loss of Work, No Compensation for Social Work Visits, Economic Hardship


     [coming soon]




7. How the Covid Crisis and Family Law Affect Families with Members on the Autism Spectrum


     [coming soon]




8. The Government Unjustly and Systematically Deprived Disabled People of the Ability to Reliably Access Services; and the Laws and Rights Which Social Services Potentially Violated in the Course of Depriving Access


     [coming soon]












Written between June 30th and July 5th, 2021

Published incomplete on September 24th, 2021

Title changed on October 26th, 2021

Thursday, September 23, 2021

Boycott Pedophile Musicians: Thirty Artists Who Preyed on Children (or Tried to, or Were Accused, etc)


Click, open in new tab and/or new window,
and download, in order to see in full resolution.









































Click, open in new tab and/or new window,
and download, in order to see in full resolution.










Compiled in summer and early fall of 2021

Created between mid-September 2021

First published on
September 23rd and 24th, 2021

Edited and Expanded on September 23rd,
24th, and 26th, and October 6th, 2021

Individual images added on October 6th, 2021

Tuesday, September 21, 2021

My Stance on Theories Regarding "Reptilian" Overlords and Alien- or Reptilian- Human Hybrids

      Some people think that Alex Jones believes that alien-lizard-human hybrids control the world. That is not true. We do not know for sure whether Alex Jones believes in aliens.

     While on comedian Joe Rogan’s podcast, Jones told Rogan that he believes that the Nazis believed themselves to be in communication with aliens, but Jones has not directly stated that he believes in aliens.
     Jones sometimes talks about interdimensional beings, but he may be speaking in regard to spiritual dimensions, rather than about real aliens he may have seen. He stated on Joe Rogan’s podcast that he has never been an aliens type of guy.

     People think that about Alex Jones because he has had David Icke on his show, the sportscaster-turned- “conspiracy theorist” who has talked about reptilians.
     But Icke doesn’t really believe in alien lizard humans either; as it is evident from his 2001 book Children of the Matrix, Icke only writes about reptilians in relation to reptilian animal symbolism in ancient civilizations, anthropology, mysticism, and psychology.
     Icke comments on the so-called "reptilian complex" in the brain; that is, the basal ganglia. In Children of the Matrix, Icke makes reference to Paul D. MacLean's "Triune brain" model of understanding the evolution and the different parts of the brain.

     [Note: More information on the "Triune brain" theory can be found at the following link:
     http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triune_brain]
     
     As the theory behind the Triune brain model goes, the reptilian segments of the brain are the most primal, and control the most important parts of the body that we need to survive; the heart and lungs. These parts of the brain developed before the amphibian and mammalian "brains" (or brain fragments) which developed around, and after, the reptilian brain.
     Icke described the reptilian brain as the most basal, and as the most related to ritual. This is why Icke sees the reptilian brain as integrally connected to the ritual aspects which are extremely common in organized religion.
     That's why it’s possible that Icke subtitled his book “How an Interdimensional Race Has Controlled the World For Years – And Still Does” solely in order to get people interested enough to buy it.

     I personally suspect that – on a subtle or perhaps even subconscious level – Icke’s allusions to an animal aspect to humanity (one that feels bestial or inhuman because it doesn’t seem to recognize
our humanity) could be rooted in a desire to expose British royals for their genocidal crimes under colonialism (as well as their sex crimes), and achieve that task without communicating it so openly that Icke could end up imprisoned by the Queen of England.
     After all, Princess Diana once said of Prince Charles’s family, “They’re not human”. Granted, she meant this figuratively; but every bit as figuratively as any reptilian allusions that Icke may have made towards the British royal family and their cohorts over the years.

     Moreover, David Icke was not the first person to talk about this “reptilian-human hybrid” theory. Israeli author and mystic Drunvalo Melchizedek (born Bernard Perona) was writing about the possibility of gray aliens, gray-human hybrids, and the Anunnaki (Babylonian and Sumerian deities who supposedly visited humans), as early as 2011 (or earlier), long before anyone came to associate David Icke or Alex Jones with “reptilian conspiracy theories”.
     In fact, Drunvalo Melchizedek was not the first to speak of otherworldly beings coming down and interbreeding with human beings.

     The pseudepigraphal three Books of Enoch, which is read by Muslims, tells of the Nephilim, giant human beings traditionally explained by some Judaic texts to have been the spawn of human beings and angels who came down from Heaven.
     The Books of Enoch aside, the Old Testament itself – read by all three major Abrahamic religions and more – speaks of angels visiting humans for procreation purposes. The Nephilim giants (or giant-angels) are mentioned in the books of Genesis (Chapter 6), Numbers (Chapter 13), and Ezekiel (Chapter 32). Additionally, Chapter 19 of the Book of Genesis mentions human beings coming to the home of patriarch Lot, wanting to have sex with the angels who were visiting him.

     All of this is not to say that reptiles, aliens, or angels have interbred with human beings, however. My only points are that Alex Jones and David Icke possibly do not believe in aliens, and that human-alien (or human-angel) hybrid theories are at least as old as the Old Testament, if not older.
     This does not necessarily point to alien-human (or alien-reptile) hybrids existing, however; but it certainly does help explain why so many people nowadays seem to think, suspect, or feel that there is an animal, alien, or otherworldly presence in some of our fellow human beings (especially among the elite).





Author's Note:

     The above text first appeared in my July 2021 article "Questions for Sam Seder on Euthanasia and Health Care, Environment and Immigration, General Welfare, and Law Without the State". That article can be viewed at the following address:




Post-Script (Written October 8th, 2021):

     Readers should be cautioned that apocalyptic cult leaders, such as David Berg (the now deceased leader of the Children of God cult), are wont to cite the biblical mentions of the incestuous offspring of Cain and Lot, in order to claim that there is a biblical or religious justification for incestuous acts including child rape.
     There is no justification whatsoever, for incest, nor child rape, nor the use of religion in order to convert followers (i.e., "Flirty Fishing", which is a distortion of Christ's "I will make fishers of men" quotation).
     It is for this reason - and for the sake of decency regarding how children are raised - that God, Jesus Christ, angels, and cherubs, must never be sexualized, nor confused with one another (whether intentionally or unintentionally).









Original article Written on
July 8th, 9th, 12th, 13th, and 14th, 2021

This segment edited on September 21st, 2021

Published on September 21st, 2021

Post-Script Written and Added on
October 8th, 2021

Thursday, September 9, 2021

Thirty Historical Events That Never Happened (or Didn't Happen the Way We Were Taught They Did)

     Many events that we were taught about in history class as children, have been distorted; by the rose-colored glasses through which the American, capitalist, imperialistic public school system chooses to see them, and wishes its servants to see them. This is done in order to elicit national pride, and to do away with the qualms we have about submitting to that system.
     Here is a list of thirty historical events - between 1916 and 2018 - that either never happened, or else happened in a completely different way from how we were told they unfolded.





     Myth #1:

     The evil sorcerer Grigory Rasputin cursed the Romanov family in December 1916.


     Why It's a Myth:

     Rasputin did not curse the family. Rather, he predicted his own death, and said that the Romanovs would die if Rasputin's death was caused by the Romanovs' kinsmen.
     Moreover, Rasputin was not evil, nor a sorcerer, but a monk, a medicine man and healer, a holy man, a horse whisperer, and a person intimately concerned with the struggles of poor and Jewish people in Russia, as well as with the bleeding disease hemophilia, from which Alexei Romanov suffered.
     The extent to which there was a falling-out between Rasputin and the Tsar has been greatly exaggerated. It's entirely possible that the Tsar only sent Rasputin away on a pilgrimage - temporarily, not permanently - due to the immense pressure he felt from his other advisors to do so.

     Source: http://russiapedia.rt.com/prominent-russians/history-and-mythology/grigory-rasputin/

     For more information, read my August 2019 article "Why Some Believe Anastasia Survived, and Other Strange Facts About the Romanovs and Rasputin":




     Myth #2:

     Vladimir Lenin took over Russia for communism, 1917-1924.


     Why It's a Myth:

     Kaiser Wilhelm II, the first cousin of Tsar Nicholas II of Russia, financed Lenin's move from Switzerland to St. Petersburg in early 1917. Furthermore, the Soviet Union never achieved full communism, but only significant collectivization of agriculture.




     Myth #3:

     The U.S.S.R. was established in 1917-1918.


     Why It's a Myth:

     The U.S.S.R. was not established until 1922. The entity that took over Russia in 1917-1918 was the R.S.F.S.R. (the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic).



     Myth #4:

     The Winter Palace in St. Petersburg was stormed in 1917.


     Why It's a Myth:

     The "storming of the winter palace" was not a real historical event, but rather a "mass spectacle" which was staged by Russians for propaganda purposes in 1920. Tsar Nicholas II was not removed through an overnight coup wherein huge masses of people stormed the palace; rather, he was forced to abdicate, and then Alexander Kerensky's Provisional Government was elected. The Romanovs were allowed to take many of their belongings with them when they left Tsarskoe Selo (the Tsar's palace); they were not rushed out and forced to flee overnight.





     Myth #5:

     Anastasia and Alexei Romanov were murdered with the rest of their family in July 1917.


     Why It's a Myth:

     The fact that Alexei's corpse, and the corpse of Anastasia or one of her sisters, weren't discovered until 2006, suggests that Anastasia and Alexei may not have been murdered along with the rest of their family in July 1917. The book The Myth of the Basement Massacre explains that all members of the family might not have even been shot in the same room.

     For more information, read my August 2019 article "Why Some Believe Anastasia Survived, and Other Strange Facts About the Romanovs and Rasputin":





     Myth #6:

     Stalinists sabotaged the Spanish republican revolution from 1936 to 1939.


     Why It's a Myth:

     The idea that Stalinists sabotaged the Spanish revolution on purpose, was the opinion of Leon Trotsky and others. But this is not so.
     The Stalinists provided military aid to the Spanish republicans, in exchange for a set of conditions. These included allowing the Soviets to gain influence over military operations in Spain, and the imposition of labor discipline, and the provisions that soldiers may not become drunk (because it would lower their guards when they needed to be ready to fight). Another cause of the Spanish resistance wearing-down was that the republican soldiers had so much democratic power that they could vote their commanding officers out of power. To the Stalinists, who sent them military aid (albeit delayed and insufficient), this was intolerable. Another reason why the Stalinists cannot be blamed for sabotaging the republicans' efforts, is that the Soviets needed to save military equipment for themselves, having tens of millions more people to protect than the Spanish did.

     For more information, read my February 2018 article "Reflection Upon the Use of Forced Labor Camps by Anarchists and Communists":




     Myth #7:

     Josef Stalin capitulated to Nazism in the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact in August 1939.


     Why It's a Myth:

     Stalin did not allow the Nazis to gain control of Soviet territory, nor control of its soldiers. Stalin's U.S.S.R. was the last country to attempt a treaty with the Nazis, after nearly every single country in Europe had already capitulated, and handed territory over to Germany. Stalin knew that Hitler would eventually violate the treaty. Making a deal with Hitler allowed the Soviets to buy time, move industries eastward, and trade the Nazis the weapons and materiel they needed to eventually destroy each other. Stalin's regime could be described as a dictatorship, and perhaps even as anti-Semitic (especially in the last three years of Stalin's reign), but those facts alone do not mean that it was fascist; certainly not Nazi.

     For more information, read my April 2019 article "Stalin Killed Fewer People Than Hitler Did, and How Stalin Tricked Hitler with the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact":



     Myth #8:

     The Nazis and Soviets held a joint military parade in Brest-Litovsk in September 1939.


     Why It's a Myth:

     Brest and Litovsk are not now - and were not then - a single city called "Brest-Litovsk". Rather, they are two cities; the then German city of Brest, and the Soviet Russian city of Litovsk. The military "parade" was not a single joint military parade, but two different parades; one held in Brest, the other in Litovsk. The militaries did meet, but there was uneasy tension between them. Also, they did not collaborate, nor help train one another. The Soviet training of the German air force ended in 1933, the same year Hitler took power. The cities of Brest and Litovsk are now located in the country of Belarus.



     Myth #9:

     The Soviet Union invaded Poland in September 1939.


     Why It's a Myth:

     The Soviet Union's takeover of eastern Poland, in late September 1939, followed the Nazis' takeover of western Poland by a full two weeks. The Soviet Union arguably "invaded" eastern Poland in order to protect it from becoming occupied by the Nazis, and because the Nazis had recognized eastern Poland as within the Soviet sphere of influence in the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact. Later, the Soviets salted the earth in eastern Poland as they retreated, but this was done in order to make the land less valuable to the Nazis, not as an act of war against the Polish people.

     For more information, read my April 2019 article "Stalin Killed Fewer People Than Hitler Did, and How Stalin Tricked Hitler with the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact":




     Myth #10:

     Poles were targeted for genocide in the Katyn Forest Massacre in March 1940.


     Why It's a Myth:

     The twenty-two thousand Poles killed in the Katyn Forest Massacre were not targeted due to their ethnicity; they were targeted specifically because they were military officers, who had been given opportunities to give up information about the locations of enemy Nazi troops, and refused to collaborate with the Soviets against the Nazis. Less than a thousand of those killed were civilian noncombatants.

     For more information, read my April 2019 article "Stalin Killed Fewer People Than Hitler Did, and How Stalin Tricked Hitler with the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact":




     Myth #11:

     The Japanese shot first in the Pearl Harbor attack on December 7th, 1941.


     Why It's a Myth:

     A Japanese submarine snuck into Pearl Harbor on the morning of December 7th, 1941. When that submarine was discovered, a U.S. naval officer fired the first shot in the Pacific theater, killing the Japanese submariner inside. The wreckage of that sub was discovered decades later, and reported in the New York Times.




     Myth #12:

     Japan attacked the United States at Pearl Harbor on December 7th, 1941.


     Why It's a Myth:

     Hawai'i was not one of the United States during the attack on Pearl Harbor; it was a territory of the United States, and was considered as "belonging" to the United States at the time. Hawai'i did not become a state until eighteen years later in 1959.

     Source: Daniel Immerwahr's "How to Hide an Empire"





     Myth #13:

     Pearl Harbor was the only Japanese attack on American targets during World War II, December 7th, 1941.


     Why It's a Myth:

     Japan also attacked Wake Island, Guam, and the Philippines on that day.

     Source: Daniel Immerwahr's "How to Hide an Empire"





     Myth #14:

     The Pearl Harbor attack of December 7th, 1941 was the only successful attack on U.S. military forces during World War II.


     Why It's a Myth:

     On April 8th, 1942, German U-Boats successfully sank three American ships, with torpedoes, off the coast of St. Simons Island, near Georgia. These ships included the oil tanker Oklahoma, and the Esso Baton Rouge. Twenty-three American crewmen were killed in these attacks.






     Myth #15:

     The Soviets raised their flag over Berlin during the capture of Berlin in early 1945.


     Why It's a Myth:

     The Soviets did assist in the capture of Berlin, but the famous photo of Soviet troops raising their flag, high above the city of Berlin, was staged for propaganda purposes.





     Myth #16:

     Japan refused to surrender to all Allied Forces in August 1945.


     Why It's a Myth:

     The reason Japan refused to surrender, during its first opportunity to do so, was that the U.S.S.R. was not a signatory of the Allied Forces' invitation to surrender. The Soviet Union did not declare war on Japan until August 11th, 1945; two days after the American bombing of Nagasaki.






     Myth #17:

     Mao Tse Tung took over China for communism on October 1st, 1949.


     Why It's a Myth:

     Mao's "revolution" was backed by Western financial interests; he was funded by the "C.I.A. at Yale" (i.e., segments of Yale University which were involved with the Office of Strategic Services, which later morphed into the C.I.A.). This occurred after the U.S. backed the nationalist forces of Chiang Kai-Shek, which Mao deposed. Additionally, there is debate over whether China ever achieved full communism, and debate over how in-control of China's revolutionary forces Mao was.

     Source: http://www.jstor.org/stable/44326232





     Myth #18:

     Capitalists formed the resistance to the Soviet invasion of Hungary in October 1956.


     Why It's a Myth:

     Hungarian socialist workers, whom were opposed to the Soviet system, formed the resistance to the Soviet invasion; not capitalists.





     Myth #19:

     John F. Kennedy was assassinated by a single bullet, fired by a single assassin, Lee Harvey Oswald, on November 22nd, 1963.


     Why It's a Myth:

     John F. Kennedy was shot by at least two bullets that day. Oswald claimed that he was a "patsy" (that is, a pawn or "fall-guy") between his arrest and his own murder. Some theories assert that it took an entire team, of as many as eight people, to carry out the assassination. Also, the single-bullet theory (or "magic bullet theory") is impossible; for one, magic isn't real, and two, a bullet cannot take a turn in mid-air between penetrating the body of Texas Governor John Connally and entering J.F.K.'s body.





     Myth #20:

     "Tank Man" stopped a line of Chinese tanks with the intent of preventing them from continuing to oppress the Chinese people at Tiananmen Square in Beijing on June 5th, 1989.


     Why It's a Myth:

     "Tank Man" stood in front of a row of tanks because he wanted the tanks to stay in Tiananmen Square; not to prevent them from continuing to oppress the Chinese people.

     For more information, read my June 2019 article "Eight Things You Might Not Know About the Tiananmen Square Massacre", at the following link:





     Myth #21:

     Iraqi soldiers threw hundreds of babies out of incubators, and stole the incubators, in 1990, during Iraq's attack on Kuwait.

     Why It's a Myth:

     This claim was made by 15-year-old Nayirah al-Sabah, in what came to be known as the "Nayirah testimony", delivered to the U.S. Congressional Human Rights Caucus on October 10th, 1990. In 1992, she was revealed to be the daughter of U.S. Ambassador to Kuwait, Saud al-Sabah. Premature babies did die during Iraq's attack on Kuwait, but Nayirah's claim that "hundreds" of babies were thrown out of incubators, which were stolen, could not be verified.





     Myth #22:

     The attacks of September 11th, 2001 were committed by Muslim members of the al-Qaeda terrorist group.


     Why It's a Myth:

     For one, al-Qaeda is a database of U.S.-backed Afghan militants, which America has kept as a bulwark against the Soviets since the late 1970s. Second, the first bombing of the World Trade Center (in 1993) was reportedly spearheaded by Ramzi Yousef, who had apparently been plied into committing the attacks with alcohol and strippers, hardly the behavior of a devout Muslim; therefore, the narrative about "radicalized Muslims committing 9/11" is dubious. Third, numerous evidence exists which supports the presence of Israeli footprints during and after 9/11, such as the "dancing Israelis" seen celebrating the attacks, and the numerous American Zionists who were in power beneath George W. Bush when the attacks occurred.





     Myth #23:

     The attacks of September 11th, 2001 were the first successful attacks on a U.S. military target since Pearl Harbor.


     Why It's a Myth:

     Although the Pentagon was targeted on 9/11, it was not the first successful attack on a U.S. military target since Pearl Harbor in 1941. As explained above, twenty-three U.S. sailors were killed by German U-Boats off the coast of the state of Georgia in 1942. Also, the U.S.S. Cole was bombed on October 12th, 2000, in an attack for which al Qaeda supposedly claimed responsibility. Other U.S. navy ships have been targeted as well, including the U.S.S. Stark incident in 1987 (carried out by Iraq), and the U.S.S. Liberty incident in 1967 (carried out by the State of Israel). The attacks of 9/11 could be described as the first successful attacks on a U.S. military target on U.S. soil since Pearl Harbor, but not as the first successful attacks on a U.S. military target in general since Pearl Harbor.




     Myth #24:

     The attacks of September 11th, 2001 were the only attacks against U.S. military targets committed by a foreign country since the end of World War II. / Muslims or Afghanistan "declared war on the United States" on 9/11.


     Why It's a Myth:

     There is no evidence that any particular national government planned or carried out the 9/11 attacks (unless you count the State of Israel). In 2001, the Afghani Taliban hardly had the resources to carry out such an attack, and there is no concrete evidence that Afghanistan was harboring Osama bin Laden (despite its claims that it wished to turn bin Laden over to the United States). It's possible that the U.K., Saudi Arabia, Israel, and/or Pakistan had advanced knowledge of the attacks - or even participated in committing them - but they could have not done so without knowledge by, and help from, the United States. The 9/11 attacks were thus not an act of war, because no single foreign national government committed the attack without U.S. complicity (or at least foreknowledge).




     Myth #25:

     The Afghan Taliban sheltered Osama bin Laden in late 2001.


     Why It's a Myth:

     On October 3rd, 2001, the Chicago Tribune published an article titled "Taliban maintains refusal to turn over bin Laden".

     On October 14th, 2001, The Guardian published an article titled "Bush rejects Taliban offer to hand bin Laden over".

     Well, which is it? Did the Taliban offer to turn bin Laden over to American authorities, or didn't they? If both articles above are correct, then if this did happen, then it must have happened between October 3rd and 14th.
     The Guardian article says that Haji Abdul Kabir, "the third most powerful figure" in the Taliban in Afghanistan, said that the Taliban "would be ready to hand him over to a third country" if they found evidence that bin Laden was behind the 9/11 attacks.

     It's possible that bin Laden was in Afghanistan in late 2001, as American authorities claimed. But the fact that bin Laden was reportedly killed in Pakistan (in a town called Abbottabad) in 2011, suggests the possibility that bin Laden was never in Afghanistan to begin with.
     The fact that opium production dropped the year before 9/11, and skyrocketed back up again after the U.S. invaded Afghanistan, suggests that opium poppies (as well as lithium deposits, and perhaps also the country's underage male sex trade) were the real reasons behind America's invasion of Afghanistan, rather than getting bin Laden.
     Moreover, bin Laden's father had business ties to the Bush family. It's probably more likely that bin Laden was an intelligence asset of the United States, than Afghanistan.



     Myth #26:

     The World Trade Center collapsed on September 11th, 2001 because its steel was melted by jet fuel.


     Why It's a Myth:

     Burning jet fuel is hot enough to melt steel beams in a manner that weakens them, but not hot enough to cause them to collapse on its own. Witnesses reported seeing construction crews enter the World Trade Center in the several weeks leading up to the attack. Physical evidence has confirmed that electric charges were placed on many of the steel beams near a 45-degree angle, allowing the top portions of the beams to slide off of the bottom portions. Numerous videos show that the towers fell nearly at free-fall speed, which is commensurate with what happens during a controlled demolition. Towers 1 and 2 may have been destroyed in a controlled demolition because Building 7 was indisputably demolished intentionally. We know this because World Trade Center owner Larry Silverstein admitted that he told firefighters, "pull it" after World Trade Center Building 7 underwent significant fire damage.



     Myth #27:

     The Pentagon was hit by a plane on September 11th, 2001.


     Why It's a Myth:

     Only five frames of film show an object hitting the Pentagon. None of those five frames show an object large enough to be a plane. All other video tapes were confiscated by the government from local convenience stores and gas stations. Numerous theories suggest that a missile hit the Pentagon rather than a plane. No airplane wreckage was ever recovered from the Pentagon. The hole in the Pentagon was too small and too neat to have been caused by an airplane with wings. For a plane to have hit the Pentagon, it would have had to fly over a highway, where it would have been seen by hundreds of people.



     Myth #28:

     Saddam Hussein's Iraq had W.M.D.s (Weapons of Mass Destruction) in 2003.


     Why It's a Myth:

     Despite the persistent claims of some supporters of the second Iraq War - years after that war ended - that Saddam Hussein allowed W.M.D.s to be smuggled out of Iraq, and into neighboring countries, before the U.S. was able to invade, no weapons of mass destruction were ever found in Iraq. Granted, Hussein gassed Kurds with mustard gas and nerve agents in Halabja in 1985, but that was the same year that America ceased arming Iran exclusively, and began arming both sides of the Iraqi-Iranian War (which lasted from 1981 to 1989). It's possible that the U.S. not only supplied Hussein with the gas, but in fact wanted him to commit those attacks against the Kurds in northern Iraq (whom were allied with Iran at the time). U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell famously held up a vial of anthrax to urge the world to support the war, but that vial was only a model vial, and did not contain real anthrax, much less anthrax from Iraq. Moreover, the documents which indicated that Hussein sought to purchase "yellowcake" uranium from Niger, were later shown to have been forgeries, obtained through officials in Italy, France, and the U.K..





     Myth #29:

     Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro burned trucks loaded with aid on a bridge connecting Colombia and Venezuela in March 2019.


     Why It's a Myth:

     In March 2019, a top member of the opposition to Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro told The New York Times that Maduro's forces had intentionally set fire to a convoy full of humanitarian aid (consisting of food and medicine), on the Francisco de Paula Santander Bridge between Colombia and Venezuela. Critics of Maduro claimed that Maduro ordered the convoy to be set on fire. Shortly thereafter, The New York Times retracted this story, after video footage and eyewitness accounts emerged, which showed that the convoy caught fire when it was hit with a Molotov cocktail. That makeshift bomb was thrown by a member of the opposition to Maduro, not by one of Maduro's supporters.




     Myth #30:

     A "migrant caravan", with Muslim jihadists hidden in its midst, sought to invade the United States in 2018.


     Why It's a Myth:

     Then-president Donald Trump claimed that "unidentified Middle Easterners" were among the Central American caravan of migrants which Fox News repeated was traveling through Mexico to the United States between March and October of 2018. Most of these migrants - about 80% - were from Honduras. No evidence exists to support the claim that "Middle Easterners", nor "jihadists", were taking refuge among the caravan. President Trump exaggerated the fact that many people in the caravan were "military-age males", leading people to believe that militant Muslims constituted a significant segment of the caravan's members. Trump likely did this in order to increase diplomatic tension between the U.S. and its close Central American neighbors, to pressure Mexico into supporting the continued construction of a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border, and to justify the use of U.S. military forces against the caravan and against countries appearing to assist it.







Written and published on September 9th, 2021

How to Fold Two Square Pieces of Card Stock into a Box

      This series of images shows how to take two square pieces of card stock (or thick paper), and cut and fold them into two halves of a b...