http://www.aquarianagrarian.blogspot.com/2020/10/what-do-green-party-and-libertarian.html
Image Created on August 31st, 2021
Edited on September 7th, 2021
First published to this blog on September 7th, 2021
A BLOG ABOUT INDEPENDENT POLITICS, POLITICAL ETHICS, ECONOMICS, AND ANARCHISM. Political theory, U.S. politics & election statistics, the political spectrum, constitutional law & civil liberties, civil rights & interstate commerce, taxation & monetary policy, health care & insurance law, labor law & unions, unemployment & wages, homelessness, international relations, religion, technology; alternatives to the state
Image Created on August 31st, 2021
Edited on September 7th, 2021
First published to this blog on September 7th, 2021
Table of Contents
Content
1. Introduction
What follows is a guide to respecting your friends' communication-related boundaries, during this
time of desperate need for social contact, brought on by the "physical
distancing", "social distancing", and shelter-in-place orders which are supposedly necessitated by the Covid-19 pandemic.
The purpose of this article is to explain that non-stop talking (or "monologuing") is not acceptable, even during a time when one is in desperate need of social contact. Taking turns monologuing is better than one person monologuing, but it is still not good enough.
I have written the article below in order to impart a lesson about healthy communication skills. I used to have hopes, dreams, and goals. I do not want my goals - nor who I am as a person - to be entirely subsumed under my need for social contact.
I cannot spend all of my time worrying about other people's problems; I have enough problems of my own. Your friends are the same way.
4. First Text Portion,
Written in October 2020
(Background
Text Explaining the Context of These Images)
I don't want to be the guy who doesn't pick up the phone when his friends need
him. Don't make me consider being that guy.
I want to be part of my friends' lives so I can help
them, not to listen to them talk about ghosts and shit.
People doing non-stop talking to me literally triggers
my P.T.S.D..
I was stood over, yelled at, lectured at, and never
allowed to talk or properly explain myself. That is how my father tortured me.
I cannot sit here and fucking listen to people talk about meaningless bullshit
forever.
If we're having a conversation, there has to be a
purpose. Either you want me to help you, or you do not.
I know I'm a good listener, but I cannot listen to
people go on and vent about their problems, especially if they don't want help
or advice. I cannot be that person. Not yet anyway.
I have a life. I work more than 40 hours a week.
Nobody seems to understand that I can't spend all my free time on the phone and
that I can't have people in my house in the half hour before I leave for work.
It slows me down.
I have extreme difficulties setting boundaries,
especially with non-stop talkers. I need help setting up these boundaries, and
if someone is going to try to be my friend, then they need to be helping to set
those boundaries up.
I need more friends, not more problems, not more
people to test my boundaries instead of respecting them.
I am trying to finish a campaign. My child molester is
on the loose. I am extremely busy.
I cannot be a good listener, or even laugh an
appropriate amount in a conversation, if my mind is consumed with the rage and
uncertainty that have resulted from my father remaining a free man after
molesting me as a child and then brainwashing me about it.
I love you guys. But stop fucking calling me.
5. Second Text Portion,
Written in August 2021
(Background Text Explaining the Context of These Images)
My
father used my cell phone essentially as a tracking device.
He
got phones for me and my mom and brother, essentially only so that he could
harangue us for not responding quickly (because he has abandonment issues).
My
father once fired me from my secretary job for him, for leaving my phone at
home by accident.
My
mom would spend up to 45 minutes at a time on the phone when I was a kid. It
was extremely difficult to get her attention during this time.
Parents,
please remember that small children cannot solve their own problems. If you
ignore your kid for a solid hour, they could die. Cover the phone
for five seconds, talk to your child, and find out whether it's an emergency,
or whether it's something that can wait!
When
my mother's phone rings, she instantly sighs or scoffs, gets visibly agitated,
and says "Jeez" or "what now!?". I never want that to be
me.
I
want to live.
I
don't want to be a prisoner of my phone, an inanimate object that we have all
allowed way too much control over us.
I
don't enjoy talking on the phone.
Personally I think it's a useful, but deeply flawed, invention. They
invented that shit 150 years ago, and still haven't even come close to
perfecting the sound quality.
It
is difficult to struggle to hear my friends through crackling. It's also
dehumanizing to have to listen to a roboticized voice. It stresses me out
because it feels like I'm not talking to a human being.
It
feels like my friends and family have been replaced by robots.
I
know it's hard for my friends not to talk to me on the phone, but remember that
e-mails and texts - and talking in person - exist too!
Meeting in person may not be possible when we live far apart, but the
only way to talk voice-to-voice long distance is to put up with crackling and
random call-dropping. Maybe you guys can handle the stress of that, but I
can’t.
Last
year [2020], I spent months and months trying to explain -
to ten different people - that they were calling me too often,
and/or for too long.
In
January 2021, I even made a twenty-minute video for YouTube
[titled "Plea to My Friends and Followers: Stop Calling Me on the
Phone!"], in which I named all of the things I can't do when I'm
talking on the phone.
The
things I can't do while I'm on the phone include:
- eating (because chewing makes noise),
- cooking (makes noise),
- listening to or playing music,
- sleeping,
- cleaning my house (if the objects make noise), and more.
I
can’t eat or sleep if I’m talking to you all of the time!
I am
sick of waking up to phone calls, and then waiting for my friends to stop
talking to me on the phone so that I can start my day.
Talking about your problems on the phone, is not the same thing as solving your
problems.
The
more you call me to talk about your problems, the more powerless I feel,
because I literally cannot do anything about them (besides give advice that I'm
not sure whether you'll take or appreciate).
Also, when talking on the phone, it is customary to let the other person
talk at least 10% of the time. This is a joke, of course; 50% is the ideal.
Equal conversations should be 50/50.
If
I'm not talking – or if I slip to far below that 50% threshold – then it's not
always because I have nothing to say.
It's
mostly because I have learned to deal with my problems - and
call the people who can solve them - instead of just going on talking about
them for a half hour, or an hour, or multiple hours at a time.
Another reason why I’m not talking, might be that I don’t feel like I
will be heard, because as soon as I stop talking, you will start talking. And
for minutes and minutes, before I have another chance to speak.
Also, me pausing for half a second, should not be
confused with an invitation for you to speak for another solid twenty minutes.
I
don’t know why nobody ever told you this, but it is not an
equal conversation when you speak for twenty minutes, and then I say “Yeah?”,
and then you speak for another twenty solid minutes. That is not
polite.
I
have tried as hard as I can to be polite about this. But it seems that the more
polite I am, the less my friends get the hint.
I am
sorry that some people will feel personally called-out by this post. But I have
tried to explain this over and over and over again:
I
am trying to put my rapist/father in prison. There is no such thing as “free
time” for me. Say “call me when you have some free time” all you wish;
saying this does not cause me to have more free time.
If I
stopped calling to you – and/or broke up with you – then it is because
I don’t enjoy talking with you as much as you think I do! Take the
hint!
The
more time you talk about your problems (which I cannot solve), the more I think
about the things I am not doing to write about what my father
did to me. The more you talk, the more I am silently stressing-out about things
I need to do around the house, and out of the house at businesses, in order to
move my life forward and solve my problems.
If
you do not understand the concept of “moving one’s life forward”, then I am
sorry, but I am not going to be able to explain it to you. If you think that I
can easily put my other needs aside in order to talk to you, then I am sorry,
but I am not going to stop sleeping, and eating, and cooking, and cleaning, and
showering, and going to the bathroom, in order to make you happy.
I
cannot be of any use to my friends, if I am not solving my problems. I cannot
solve my problems if I am listening to my friends talk on the phone every
single “free” moment I have.
Just
because I have a free moment here and there, that doesn’t necessarily mean that
I want to spend that moment listening to my friends talk.
If I
don’t sleep and cook and eat and clean and shower and use the restroom when I
need to, then it messes with the flow of my day. If the flow of my day is
impeded, then I risk failing to show up to work on time. If I fail to show up
to work on time, I could be fired.
If I
am fired from my job, then I will miss paying my bills. Then – if I don’t get a
new job in time - I could get behind on utilities, and lose my apartment, and
end up on the street or having to live with friends or family. That option is,
to me, not worth it. I would like to stay housed, through my own
power and my own work.
I
will not completely re-prioritize and re-schedule my life in order to listen to
you talk on the phone. I was homeless once; I am not going to be homeless again
solely to make you feel heard. Go find a second person who wants to listen to
you talk.
I
already devoted hundreds of hours listening to ten of my
friends talk – and dozens of hours begging them to stop calling me so much
– all throughout last year [2020].
I
have had enough.
I
know that many of my friends need help, and need someone to listen to them. But
I cannot bear the burden of being the only friend who will listen
to ten of my friends.
I
want to be supportive. And I want you to have friends. That’s “friends”, plural! Please
find a second friend, or I will have no choice but to leave you with no
friends at all!
If
that happens, you will have brought it upon yourselves.
I
love my friends. But if you love someone, let them go!
Introduction written on September 3rd, 2021
Edited and Expanded on September 7th, 2021
Published on September 3rd, 2021
First image based on an
image I created in mid-2021
Second image created in
late 2020 or early 2021
First text portion originally written as a Facebook post,
originally published to Facebook in October 2020
Edited and expanded on September 3rd, 2021
Published to this blog on September 3rd, 2021
Second text portion originally written as a Facebook post,
titled “I HATE FUCKING TALKING ON THE PHONE”,
originally published to Facebook on August 28th, 2021
Edited and expanded on September 3rd, 2021
Published to this blog on September 3rd, 2021
Order of texts reversed on September 7th, 2021
The infographic below is a political spectrum that shows six different political ideologies, and their views on which human needs should be considered basic or essential services that government should provide.
Click, open in new tab, and download in order to expand
What follows is a set of twenty key terms in political theory, and their definitions. These definitions were written by the author of this blog, Joe Kopsick, but were based on the contents of a political theory course that was imparted to him at the University of Wisconsin at Madison in the spring of 2009.
The course was taught by Jimmy Casas Klausen, who assigned students works written by Western political theorists throughout history until the present day. These works included Plato's Republic, Sir Thomas More's Utopia, Niccolo Machiavelli's The Prince, Hannah Arendt's The Human Condition, and famous works by Aristotle, Marcus Tullius Cicero, Thomas Hobbes, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau.
Action
Hannah Arendt says that action is an end in
itself and it is the highest mode of activity and creation. She says that freedom
comes through action, that the freedom of action cannot be eliminated, and that we define
and create ourselves through action.
Alexander [the Great]
Alexander was a Macedonian ruler and
a student of Aristotle. Aristotle says that the Athenian polis was brought to an end through
self-corruption, and its goal changed from common interest to profit. Aristotle
believes that Alexander's goodness saved Greece.
Amour Proprie
Rousseau says that amour proprie,
vain self-love, is unnatural, and that vanity arises only in civil society. In vanity, we
empty ourselves of meaning, as meaning and love can only be given to us by other people. He
says that vanity is the cause of dependence, domination, and inequality, and that
man is naturally independent and unselfish.
Chrematistics
Aristotle believes that
chrematistics, the art of acquisition, trade, and exchange, is an unnatural form of acquisition for the
household. He argues that chrematistics makes gains on the exploitation of others. He says
that living well is self-limitation and self-sufficiency without conspicuous consumption.
Collective Deliberation
Aristotle believes that reason that
is agreed on by everyone is more valuable than orthodoxy. He believes that a group of citizens
gathering to combine their competencies and positive qualities will make policies better
than any one person could. Hannah Arendt believes in active citizenship, civic
republicanism, and the value of political association to develop the power of action, deliberation,
and efficacy.
Corpus Mysticum
The corpus mysticum describes
the body politic of the church. The church is the corpus mysticum of Christ, and the people are part of the mystical
body. The church's spiritual head is Christ represented, and its
second spiritual head is the spiritually-ordained king. This puts the state in a lower
position of authority than the church. Hobbes says that the corpus mysticum is an
artificial body, and this is why we are able to take it apart and study it.
Cynics
The Cynics was a school of
philosophy that questioned and rejected every social convention and claim to authority. Cicero
believes they questioned shamelessly and called Cynicism an "anti-tradition."
Cicero believes that indecency and shame can be justified.
Despotism
Rousseau says that despotism is the
unjust rule of one man. He, Aristotle, and Plato agree that despotism is the worst type of
governance. Rousseau says that the farther away we move from the state of nature and from
despotism, the closer we get to perfectibility. He says that between the state
of nature and despotism, there is happiness in "a middle position between... our
primitive state and... egocentrism...”.
Fortuna
Machiavelli says that fortuna
(fate, fortune, luck, or favor), has direct bearing on a ruler's success or failure to maintain power. He
believes that with virtú, one may triumph over fortuna.
Liberality
Liberality is generosity.
Machiavelli warns that excessive generosity may turn government into a slave. Machiavelli says that
generosity should be practiced virtuously, and not known about. Cicero believes that
generosity helps to build a network of friends, and that a man should measure his actions by
honorableness rather than by his own advantages.
Maieutics
Maieutics is the belief that the
truth is latent in the human mind. Plato says that Socratic maieutics resembles obstetrics. Thus,
Socrates is the "midwife of reason," and his dialectical method is the obstetrics that
gives birth to logos.
Matter in Motion
"Matter in Motion"
is an individual driven by a passion. For Hobbes, the individual is the principal unit of analysis,
and thus the matter of political science. He says that the decay of sense is an obscuring of
motion made in sense.
Nonsenso, Raphael
Raphael Nonsenso is a
character in Thomas More's Utopia. He is a philosopher whom has seen the world as a sailor. He
describes Utopia as the happiest society. He is a representation of Thomas More and his opinions.
Oikos
The oikos is the private
realm of the household, and the polis is the public realm of the political community. Aristotle believes
that wealth and trade are associated with the household economy, and that it is wise to
make a distinction between expertise in household management and expertise in business
management. Hannah Arendt agrees that matters of labor and economy belong to the
oikos. She believes that the rise of the social has destroyed the political by
subordinating the public realm of human freedom to the concerns of mere animal necessity.
[Note: oikos is the root of the word "economy".]
Perfectibility
Rousseau says that perfectibility is
the characteristic of man that desires self improvement. Perfectibility and reason allow men
to evolve, and modern day culture was brought about by perfectibility. Men improve
upon themselves by having a capacity for change which allows them to be molded to fit
their environment. Perfectibility becomes possible when people move away from the state of
nature and from despotism.
Plurality
Plurality is a condition that
preserves unity without being detrimental to either liberty or uniqueness, Hannah Arendt wants the
polis to be an artifact of uniqueness, She says that the rise of the social is bad.
Aristotle agrees, and also says that the household must be distinct from the whole of society.
Sovereignty
Sovereignty is political authority
within a territory. Hobbes believes that sovereignty is unconditional, absolute, and
irrevocable. He believes that the sovereign must be separate from the people in order to
prevent civil war. Rousseau believes that the sovereign and the people should be one and the
same, in order for there to be common happiness.
State of Nature
The state of nature is a state of
anarchy that existed before the rule of law, and before the state had a monopoly on force. The
natural condition of mankind, according to Hobbes, is a state of war in which life is
"solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short" because individuals are in a "war of all against
all". Rousseau believes that natural man is gentle, timid, piteous, non-confrontational, and amoral.
Telos
Teleology is the study of ends. It
is the belief that the essence of something is found in the thing into which it grows. The
telos is the purpose, goal, or end. Aristotle said that the telos of man is to be happy and to
live well and live justly. He also says that living happily requires living a life of virtue.
[Note: To read "The Squirrel and the Acorn", a short essay that I wrote in May 2009 about teleology and political science, please visit the following link:
http://www.aquarianagrarian.blogspot.com/2014/01/the-squirrel-and-acorn.html]
Three Causes of Quarrel
According to Hobbes, the
three causes of quarrel are competition, diffidence, and glory. Men quarrel for gain, safety, and
reputation. He says that in anarchy, these three quarrels lead to a state of war. Rousseau says
that competition does not occur in a state of plenty. Aristotle says that diffidence occurs
when people act out of fear of aggression and seek retribution. Hobbes believes that glory is
exclusive pride for oneself, one's family, or one's homeland.
Author's Note:
To read another glossary - or "encyclopedia" - of political theory terms, which I devised by myself, please visit the following link, and read my August 2018 article titled "Encyclopedia of Economic Systems and Key Terms in Political Theory":
http://www.aquarianagrarian.blogspot.com/2018/08/encyclopedia-of-economic-systems-and.html
Notes taken in May 2009
First published to this blog on August 3rd, 2021
Introduction and notes in brackets written on August 3rd, 2021
The following is a short message that I wrote to the Joe Biden / Kamala Harris White House on May 16th, 2021, as part of an effort to dissuade the administration from continuing to staunchly support Zionism and the illegal occupation of the Gaza Strip and the West Bank.
I request that the President and
Vice President direct the Departments of Defense and Homeland Security, and the
New York Police Department, to cease cooperation with, training of, and supply
of armaments to, the apartheid regime of the State of Israel.
Article I, Section 8, Clause 12 requires that appropriations for the
army must be limited to two years at a time, so why do Israel and its military
benefit from a ten-year aid package? This must be unconstitutional. $3.8
billion in taxpayer funds goes to Israel each year, and it needs to stop;
private trade to Israel exceeds this amount and could easily replace those
funds.
I request that the Biden Administration direct the U.S. Ambassador to
Israel, and the U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, to review and respect
the pertinent United Nations resolutions regarding the need to respect human
rights, including the prohibitions against siege warfare, and against targeting
journalists and public infrastructure.
U.S.-made weapons are falling on the heads of Palestinian children, and
it needs to stop.
Please read this article I wrote about how the rights of Jews and Arabs
can be respected in the Holy Land, with either a two-state solution, or a
stateless solution based on communal autonomy and individual rights.
http://aquarianagrarian.blogspot.com/2020/08/why-i-support-autonomy-for-palestinians.html
Original
message written and delivered on May 16th, 2021
Introduction written on July 30th, 2021
Published on July 30th, 2021
Table of Contents
1. First Introduction
2. Second Introduction
3. Artificial Sweeteners, Feces, Cheese, Antibiotics, Coffee, Alcohol, and
Cancer
3a. Artificial Sweeteners, Shit, and
Cheese
3b. Shit, Probiotics, and Alcohol
3c. Antibiotics and Bacteria, vs.
Antivirals and Viruses
3d. More on Artificial Sweeteners
3e. pH Levels, Sugar, and Cancer
3f. Salty and Spicy Foods
4. Animal Products and
Pets
5. Vitamin C and D, and Molds and Fungi [to be added at a later date]
6. Doping Up the Patient [to be added at a later date]
Lately – in the wake of the Covid-19
pandemic – the C.D.C. (Centers for Disease Control) and the N.I.H. (National
Institutes for Health) have cornered the market on issuing health advice.
The chilling effect on free speech, which this state of affairs has created, has gotten so bad that Wisconsin Senator Ron Johnson recently found it necessary to criticize those agencies for disregarding the age-old practice of “getting a second opinion” on your health before making a potentially life-saving or deadly decision.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qt_7uMJRn-U
This series of images shows how to take two square pieces of card stock (or thick paper), and cut and fold them into two halves of a b...