Sunday, April 20, 2014

Economic Policies for 2012 U.S. House Candidacy


The Federal Budget
   Balance the budget as soon as possible by reducing military expenditures not essential to our self-defense, abolishing unconstitutional and unsustainable bureaucracies, and enacting balanced-budget legislation.

The Monetary System
   Audit the Federal Reserve annually, permit the production of alternative and competing currencies by individual and private actors as well as local governments, and allow interest rates to be set by the market.

The Tax Code
   Abolish the Internal Revenue Service, repeal all legislation permitting taxation by the federal government (with the exception of import duties and fees), urge the states to repeal their tax legislation, and urge local government to enact taxes on the creation of income disparity.

The Banking Industry
   Support legislation to prohibit affiliation between insured depository institutions and investment banks or securities firms, and strengthen the effects of the Dodd-Frank Act by improving transparency in the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Government-Sponsored Enterprise
   Promote the general welfare over special interests by ending all subsidization, bailouts, restructuring, chartering, and contracting of businesses by the federal government; and urge the governments of the states to do the same.

Consumer Protection
   Abolish the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, and permit its re-establishment only under conditions of proper ratification of an amendment authorizing its existence and full congressional oversight.

Campaigns and Elections
   Diminish the influence of special interests such as businesses, unions, PACs, and lobbyists on elections by restoring limited government which promotes the general welfare; and restore privity and competition to the electoral system through open-ballot reforms.

Domestic Capital
   Facilitate an influx of foreign and domestic capital investment by reducing and abolishing tariffs (with the exception of importation duties and fees) and federal taxes on all forms of income and investment.

Interstate Commerce
   Reduce the role of the Department of Commerce to permit federal intervention only when states enact tariffs; monopolies, monopsonies, or outright bans on the provision of goods or services; and end welfare and subsidies to large and small businesses alike.

Agriculture
   Phase out and abolish the USDA, eventually eliminating $145 billion from the current annual federal budget. Urge the state and local governments; unions; charity, religious, non-governmental consumer-advocacy and consumer-safety organizations; and private enterprises to increase their provision of USDA-type services and benefits during the process of transition away from the current system of centralized federal regulation of the provision of agriculture, natural resources management, rural development, nutrition, and food safety services.

Transportation
   Abolish the Department of Transportation, allow state and local governments to take up the administration of its functions, allow the privatization of Amtrak, and support the transition of the functions of the T.S.A. to private and local-government agencies.

Energy
   Abolish the Department of Energy, allow state and local governments to take up the administration of its functions, and advocate for local governments to have the primary role in making decisions regarding exploration for energy sources.

Global Trade
   End U.S. Membership in the W.T.O. and N.A.F.T.A., allow the reduction of tariffs on foreign goods and services independently of those agencies, and facilitate compromise between freedom and fairness of trade based on the subjective values of foreign sovereigns.



Written in January 2012
Originally published January 18th, 2012
Text originally appeared at http://dontvoteforjoe.wix.com/2012






For more entries on banking, the treasury, currency, inflation, and business, please visit:
http://www.aquarianagrarian.blogspot.com/2014/05/response-to-campaign-for-liberty.html

For more entries on budgets, finance, debt, and the bailouts, please visit:
http://www.aquarianagrarian.blogspot.com/2014/05/debt-and-federal-budget.html

For more entries on commerce, please visit:
http://www.aquarianagrarian.blogspot.com/2014/04/notes-on-obamacares-unconstitutionality.html

For more entries on consumers' issues, please visit:
http://www.aquarianagrarian.blogspot.com/2010/10/enlightened-catallaxy-reciprocally.html

For more entries on energy and natural resources, please visit:
http://www.aquarianagrarian.blogspot.com/2010/10/case-examination-of-policy-for-natural.html

For more entries on taxation, please visit:
http://www.aquarianagrarian.blogspot.com/2014/05/tax-cuts.html

For more entries on theory of government, please visit:
http://www.aquarianagrarian.blogspot.com/2014/05/the-general-welfare-clause.html

For more entries on free trade, fair trade, the balance of trade, and protectionism, please visit:

On a Two-State Solution in Israel and Palestine

Written on November 21st, 2012
Edited in April 2014



   In the two-state solution, Gaza and the West Bank form a geographically-separated Palestinian government. In the three-state solution, Gaza gets governed by neighboring Egypt, and the West Bank gets governed by neighboring Jordan.

   Some supporters of Palestine support Palestinian statehood with full membership in and recognition by the United Nations. This would help Palestinians pursue cases against Israel in the International Criminal Court, which it can't do now because it isn't considered a sovereign country.

   But I don't support Palestinian statehood because I don't support Statism (territorial monopoly on government), and I don't support its U.N. membership because I oppose international government and I think the U.N. Security Council is a five-country tyranny over world affairs.

   I think the Palestinians should pursue nationhood instead of Statism; they should give political minorities the right to have their own government systems (if they can exist without making demands on non-consenting people). I think they can do this by considering common and natural law systems, and constitutional law with emphasis on libertarianism, decentralization of power, and contract rights originating with the people.

   It's also very important that the Palestinian nation or nations (nation = group of people; State = corporatized monopoly government) allow communities to be autonomous.

   This is because the most ultra-Orthodox Jews who oppose Zionism believe that until the Messiah comes, the only kind of man-made government which is permissible is one in which Jewish communities are governed by the rabbinic law interpretations of 23-rabbi courts (sanhedrins), with a 71-rabbi court in Jerusalem.

   Although Jerusalem's court is bigger, it's a decentralized system, and there wouldn't be centralized control over Jewish religious affairs, which in the modern State of Israel is wielded by the Chief Rabbinate of Israel.



   In summary, I support Jewish theo-kritocratic (rule by G-d and [rabbinic] judges; krito = rule by judges) communal autonomy, operating within a form of Palestinian nationhood (not Statism) which embraces individual and local political rights.

   Neturei Karta and the followers of Yoel and Moshe Teitelbaum believe that first, the State of Israel must be dismantled (hopefully peacefully); not just the secular aspects of the government, but the religious aspects too.

   The late Meir Kahane and his brother would argue that only the secular aspects of the State should be dismantled.





For more entries on military, national defense, and foreign policy, please visit:
http://www.aquarianagrarian.blogspot.com/2010/10/american-sovereignty-restoration-act-of.html
http://www.aquarianagrarian.blogspot.com/2014/05/foreign-occupation-and-declaration-of.html

For more entries on Judaism, the State of Israel, and the Israeli-Arab conflict, please visit:

Summary of My Political Views

Written on October 7th, 2012
Edited in April 2014

[Note: this does not necessarily represent the
full breadth of my views as of the present day.]



  1. Constitutional-republican (rule of written law)
  2. Voluntary confederalist (lack of compulsory inter-governmental association)
  3. National Personal Autonomist / National Personal Sovereigntist (citizenry without denizenry / no unnatural territorial sovereignty)
  4. Dual-federalist (geographical diffusion of power)
  5. Multi-federalist / subsidiarist (structural diffusion of power)
  6. Functional Overlapping Competing Jurisdictionist (diffusion of political power across subject matter and policy topics)
  7. Market-anarchist and Agorist (competition in governance and the provision of public commodities)
  8. Synthesis-anarchist (syncretism and reconciliation of systemic economic theories)
  9. Quasi-panarchist (rule according to the will of nearly all)
  10. Longian post-Lockean polyarchist (rule according to the will of free choice from among a set of competing alternative agents and agencies offering to rule)
  11. Proviso-Lockean (rejection of property agreements based on historical exploitation and which impair the utility of others)
  12. Mutualist (mutual support, reciprocity, reciprocal altruism, and voluntary association, cooperation, collaboration, and organization)
  13. New Institutional Economics anarchist (elimination of transaction costs to bring about alternative property rights assignments to internalize conflicts and externalities)
  14. Pan-secessionist anarchist (counter-economicism, counter-culturalism, and counter-politics)
  15. Anti-tripartist / anti-neo-corporatist / anti-integral-nationalist anarchist (opposition to undue government influence on – and intrusion into, and intervention in – the negotiation between agencies of labor and capital)



For more entries on theory of government, please visit:

John Locke, Roderick Long, and Voluntary Taxation

Written on October 6th, 2012
as an e-mail to Panarchist John Zube



   The following was written in regard to Roderick Long's criticism of John Locke's justification for the Leviathan as an endorsement of monopoly government.

   Long uses a three-person desert island scenario to show that it is unfair for one person to wield the ability to always resolve the disputes of others, because that one person might be given too much leeway to resolve potential disputes which concern him in his own favor.

   This leads me to wonder whether voluntary governance can only occur if individuals are required to submit disputes which they cannot resolve among themselves to some - although not necessarily (and preferably not) always the same - neutral, fair, independent, and uninterested arbiter.

   I think it is choice - minimally restrained; restrained to selection from among the existing set of alternatives - that makes government voluntary, more than it is freedom to self-govern which does so.

   This is because an ungoverned person is free to intervene in disputes which do not involve him without others asking, and free to act in a way that affects others without their knowledge and / or consent (anarchy = tyranny / Statism; panarchy is neither anarchist nor Statist).

   This is the argument I make to defend the notion that my taxation plan is truly voluntary, because to create perfect competition requires that persons become insured against harm to personal and property harm, and therefore it is reasonable to assume that most public goods provision would be linked to - and resemble (as in the Agorist formulation) - insurance.


   My understanding of Konkin's and / or Robert Murphy's views on the topic is that self-governance should not be prohibited, but that society would boycott uninsured / ungoverned individuals due to the risks involved.




For more entries on justice, crime, and punishment, please visit:
http://www.aquarianagrarian.blogspot.com/2010/10/thrasymachus-support-for-justice-being.html
http://www.aquarianagrarian.blogspot.com/2014/04/social-policies-for-2012-us-house.html

For more entries on taxation, please visit:
http://www.aquarianagrarian.blogspot.com/2014/05/tax-cuts.html

For more entries on theory of government, please visit:

Alliance Against Tripartism

Written on September 10, 2012
Edited in April 2014



   The Alliance Against Tripartism opposes the joint government / organized labor / organized capital interventions in the economy and in the law. 

COUNTER-CULTURE, COUNTER-ECONOMICS,
SOCIOECONOMIC SECESSIONISM, and

OPPOSITION TO ESTABLISHMENT INSTITUTIONS



   This group aims to promote:
 
   1) the increase of alternatives to the current prevailing institutional civic, societal, and economic establishments and statuses-quo,

   2) the deconstruction of - and secession from the control of - all structures and agreements supported or endorsed by the State which result in the bestowal of monopolistic and oligarchic privileges - and other forms of institutionalized special treatment - upon agencies of both business and labor alike; and

   3) the deconstruction of - and secession from the control of - all structures and agreements supported or endorsed by the State which result in oligarchical determination and enforcement of unfairly collaborative, collusive, and competitive negotiation and compromise between agencies of business and labor, as well as between classes,

   through the development of theory which synthesizes counter-economic, dual-power, gradualist, counter-cultural, counter-civic, and counter-political tactics,

   also integrates elements of Anarchism without Adjectives, other strains of synthesis anarchism, market anarchy, panarchy, the post-Left, insurrectionary anarchism, individualist anarchism, Mutualism, market socialism, neo-institutional economics, the neoclassicism of the Lausanne School, and social-threefolding studies of Rudolf Steiner and others,

   and reconciles expropriative and propertarian anarchism in a context of economically syncretic insurrectionalism.

   We support alliance with all those who oppose monopoly, oligarchy, autocracy, and dictatorship; stratocracy, class-collaboration, Mussolinian corporativism, neo-corporatism, the promotion of public-private-partnerships and social partnerships by so-called "centrist, Third-Way" neoliberal Keynesians; neoconservatism, protectionist mercantilism, and managerial Statism; state-monopoly capitalism, degenerated bureaucratic collectivism, totalitarian communism, national Bolshevism; national syndicalism, volkisch national socialism, ultra-nationalist populism; and feudalist guild-unionism, Third-Alternative, and Third Positionism.





For more entries on theory of government, please visit:

How to Fold Two Square Pieces of Card Stock into a Box

      This series of images shows how to take two square pieces of card stock (or thick paper), and cut and fold them into two halves of a b...