Friday, October 12, 2012

October 12th Press Release - Version 2



10-12-2012

UW Political Science Alumnus Enters Race for U.S. House
Independent write-in candidate to seek Wisconsin’s 2nd-district congressional seat

            Joe Kopsick, a twenty-five-year-old Madison resident and former political science major at UW-Madison, is running as an independent write-in candidate for this November’s election to the U.S. House of Representatives from Wisconsin’s 2nd congressional district.
            In September 2011, he declared candidacy for the seat, which was left vacant when seven-term Democratic congresswoman Tammy Baldwin declined to seek re-election and decided to instead run for the U.S. Senate.
            Kopsick - one of nine candidates to have formally declared intention to run for the office - has had only three opponents since the two major parties held primaries in mid-August. They are Democratic State Assemblyman Mark Pocan; 2010 Republican nominee Chad Lee; and independent write-in candidate Rocky Ison.
            Having failed to collect enough signatures to get on the ballot, Kopsick and Ison have been excluded from three events featuring major party candidates. In late September, the League of Women Voters sponsored a debate which was solely attended by Mark Pocan.
            100 Black Men of Madison excluded Kopsick and Ison from appearing as guest speakers alongside Pocan and Chad Lee at the organization’s general membership meeting which is scheduled for the morning of October 13th.
            Additionally, the Rotary Club of Madison excluded Kopsick and Ison from the debate at the Alliant Energy Center Exhibition Hall which is scheduled for the evening of October 17th. The thirty-minute debate will feature Pocan and Lee.
            On October 7th, Kopsick - a self-described libertarian-leaning independent - spoke at the steps of the State Capitol during the 42nd Annual Great Midwest Marijuana Harvest Festival. He invoked the Interstate Commerce Clause to criticize the constitutionality of federal drug laws; and criticized candidate Lee’s silence on the issue, as well as candidate Pocan’s lack of consistency on matters concerning related personal freedoms.
            Kopsick supports the decentralization and diffusion of political power, whether geographical, structural, or policy-topic-oriented. He promotes the reconciliation of capitalism and socialism through the synthesis of panarchist- and polyarchist-compatible aspects of classical liberalism, Agorism, Mutualism, National Personal Autonomy, and Functional Overlapping and Competing Jurisdictions.
            Kopsick believes that the unnatural geographically- and ideologically-territorial exclusivities, monopolizations and oligarchializations, and concentrations and centralizations of power represent social transaction costs which through malice or negligence  are externalized onto quasi-consenting citizens.
            He believes that agencies creating such transaction costs are inherently corrupt, and that legitimate governance only exists when and where one is free to choose one’s public-goods providers-from among sets of logistically-available independent alternatives which compete fairly and transparently in non-exclusive overlapping physical and ideological territories.
            Kopsick - whose slogans include “less government, more governments” - believes in keeping the markets for political, commercial, and collective-bargaining representation competitive, as well as free from undeserved inhibitions, interventions, and compulsory integrations. A supporter of Neo-Institutional Economics, Kopsick believes that markets and market actors should openly exclude and refrain from associating with unnaturally oligopolistic and disproportionately influential actors.
            An admirer of mid-19th-century theorists Max Stirner and Lysander Spooner, Kopsick desires to fight legal fictions like corporate personhood, which include what he terms “governmental corporationhood”, “union corporationhood”, and “personal corporationhood”. Kopsick believes that it is imperative to refrain from requesting and accepting monetary donations in order to remain consistent with such principles.
            Kopsick believes that if accidental, negligent, and malicious detriment (as well as inadvertent benefit) are sufficiently insured- and protected-against - and non-negligible transaction costs are eliminated from government, the monetary and credit systems, and collective bargaining - then an environment of perfect, total, and complete competition in all markets can lead to a minimally economically-efficient - and an inter-subjectively socioeconomically-just - re-allocative outcome; a manumitted (freed) market.
            Kopsick believes that such an outcome should be brought about by a coalition of diverse and competing firms, syndicates, individual persons, and collectives and cooperatives which offer and seek to offer diverse combinations of varieties of goods and / or services to the public. According to Kopsick, the abundance – as well as the proportionality of market influence - of such agents and agencies is crucial to ensuring that the excesses of actors seeking to associate in markets while wielding disproportionate information or share of trade volume; speculating without full assets; or causing undue externalization of costs, responsibilities, benefits, or detriments; will be guarded against.
            Kopsick also believes that such an outcome would almost certainly feature the widespread imperative to support the vast predominance of systems enacting similarly-proportioned exponentially-graduated redistributive insurance against accidents and crimes against person and property, and that such a system would and should be maintained through boycott and information-sharing as a pillar of socioeconomic-ethical convention under conditions of rationality, scarcity, and dissatisfaction.
            Reifications of such market-preferred redistributive insurance would feature restitution, recompense, and reparations for institutional historical exploitation; as well as consequential agreements to become subject to transparency and oversight regarding the assessment of customers’ and protection agencies’ tendencies to fall victim to crimes and accidents, cause accidents and malicious crimes, and successfully cause the restitution of injustices.
            Kopsick’s campaign is active in social-media coordination; the candidate administers the Facebook group “Joe Kopsick for Congress in 2012”, and runs a YouTube channel called JoeKopsick4Congress, a blog called The Aquarian Agrarian, and an official website, which can be viewed at www.wix.com/dontvoteforjoe/2012.

- Joseph W. Kopsick
  Candidate and Committee Treasurer 
  Joe Kopsick for Congress      



Read version 1 at:


For more entries on Wisconsin politics, please visit:

October 12th Press Release - Version 1


10-12-2012

UW Political Science Alumnus Enters Race for U.S. House
Independent write-in candidate to seek Wisconsin’s 2nd-district congressional seat

            Joe Kopsick, a twenty-five-year-old Madison resident and former political science major at UW-Madison, is running as an independent write-in candidate for this November’s election to the U.S. House of Representatives from Wisconsin’s 2nd congressional district.
            In September 2011, he declared candidacy for the seat, which was left vacant when seven-term Democratic congresswoman Tammy Baldwin declined to seek re-election and decided to instead run for the U.S. Senate.
            Kopsick - one of nine candidates to have formally declared intention to run for the office - has had only three opponents since the two major parties held primaries in mid-August. They are Democratic State Assemblyman Mark Pocan; 2010 Republican nominee Chad Lee; and independent write-in candidate Rocky Ison.        
            As write-in candidates who did not secure ballot access, Kopsick and Ison have been excluded from three events open to candidates with ballot access.
            The events included two debates – one which was sponsored by the League of Women Voters, and the other an upcoming debate sponsored by the Rotary Club of Madison – as well as the membership meeting of a local businessmen’s organization, which will feature Pocan and Lee as guest speakers.
            On October 7th, Kopsick - a self-described libertarian-leaning independent - spoke at the steps of the State Capitol during the 42nd Annual Great Midwest Marijuana Harvest Festival. He invoked the Interstate Commerce Clause to criticize the constitutionality of federal drug laws; and criticized candidate Lee’s silence on the issue, as well as candidate Pocan’s lack of consistency on matters concerning related personal freedoms.
            Kopsick believes that to free the market is to relieve and moderate suffering, desire, and dissatisfaction; to support enlightened, rational consent to associations; and to oppose maliciousness, accidental harm and benefit, information hoarding, the suppression of values systems, inhibitions on price adjustment, concentration of influence and power, and non-negligible transaction costs.
            Kopsick says that the need for economic efficiency and social justice calls upon all members and sectors of society - as a tentative coalition of individuals, businesses, cooperatives, and communities - to promote the consent of the governed, and freer choice and alternatives in elections; to bring about an egalitarian funding system for governments through boycott and social convention; and to reject predatory lending, the manipulation of currency values and interest rates, and speculation without full possession of assets; in order to guard against the excessive and undue influence of unnatural monopolies and oligarchies of all varieties; be they representatives of government, labor, or capital.
            Kopsick’s campaign is active in social-media coordination; the candidate administers the Facebook group “Joe Kopsick for Congress in 2012”, and runs a YouTube channel called JoeKopsick4Congress, a blog called The Aquarian Agrarian, and an official website, which can be viewed at www.wix.com/dontvoteforjoe/2012.

- Joseph W. Kopsick
  Candidate and Committee Treasurer
  Joe Kopsick for Congress              





See version 2 at:
http://aquarianagrarian.blogspot.com/2012/10/october-12th-press-release-version-2.html



For more entries on Wisconsin politics, please visit:
    

Thursday, October 11, 2012

Wisconsin's 2nd District U.S. House Debates

   As a write-in independent candidate who failed to garner sufficient signatures to gain access to the ballot for Wisconsin's 2nd-district U.S. House seat, I have been excluded from three events wherein I would have had the opportunity to explain my views and positions.
   Being that my fellow independent candidate - Rocky Ison of the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost Party - also failed to garner enough signatures to secure ballot access, he has encountered the same obstacles as I have encountered in terms of debate access.
   Mr. Ison, myself, and possibly Libertarians State Assembly candidate Richard Martin - and / or other candidates for elected office living in Madison - will soon be mentioned in an article by Jack Craver for the Capital Times, explaining their support of Gary Johnson, the Libertarian Party candidate for the presidency.

   On September 28th, 2012, the League of Women Voters held a debate. Democratic nominee State Assemblyman Mark Pocan was the only candidate present (how that event qualified as a debate is beyond me). I did not find out about the debate until after it happened, but had I known, I would have been excluded from participating due to my lack of ballot access. The debate was broadcast by Madison City Channel 12.
   On October 13th, 2012, the businessmen's organization 100 Black Men of Madison will host a general membership meeting. Mr. Pocan and Republican nominee Chad Lee will appear as guest speakers. I am not yet aware whether their comments will be broadcast or recorded, nor whether the event format is that of a debate. I was excluded from speaking due to my lack of ballot access.
   On October 17th, the Rotary Club of Madison will host a debate at the Alliant Energy Center Exhibition Hall. Mark Pocan and Chad Lee will appear. I was excluded from the debate due to my lack of ballot access, and also due to the debate's 30-minute time limit (how the myriad of inter-related political issues can be covered in half an hour is beyond me). The debate will be broadcast by WisEye, and it will likely be available for free streaming the following day.

   On October 7th, I gave a three-minute speech on the steps of the Wisconsin State Capitol during the 42nd Annual Great Midwest Marijuana Harvest Festival, following the march from Library Mall to the Capitol. I criticized Chad Lee's lack of enthusiasm in communicating any position on marijuana, as well as Mark Pocan's inconsistent and unprincipled support of some personal freedoms in regards to legal and illicit medications. I also endorsed the legalization of the trade and use of marijuana for recreational, medicinal, industrial, and entheogenic purposes alike.
   I plan to record myself doing voice-over commentary on the Rotary Club's debate - which will feature only the Democratic and Republican nominees - and upload it onto my YouTube channel at www.youtube.com/user/joekopsick4congress.



For more entries on Wisconsin politics, please visit:

Tuesday, October 9, 2012

Speech at the Great Midwest Marijuana Harvest Fest on October 7th, 2012


Written in October 2012
Edited in May 2014



As a libertarian-leaning independent, I would urge my fellow [candidates for] representatives in the House to repeal all federal anti-marijuana legislation, vote to repeal all federal drug laws on Interstate Commerce Clause grounds, and urge the president – whoever he may be – to pardon all non-violent federal drug offenders.
If elected, I would invoke the Commerce Clause to dispute the constitutionality of not only federal drug laws, but also the states’ outright bans on the importation of illicit drugs across state lines. The only constitutional position on this issue is one which promotes the use of federal power to prohibit the states from regulating marijuana in a manner that causes undue inhibition of the freedom of trade of all commodities – marijuana included – across state borders.
My Republican opponent Chad Lee has not thus far made his stance on marijuana well-known, but I think this fact is sufficient to infer that Mr. Lee would not enthusiastically promote the N.O.R.M.L. agenda. While my Democratic opponent Mark Pocan has made some statements in support of decriminalization, I feel that his support of vice laws opposing freer trade and use of legal substances like alcohol and tobacco suggests that his support of personal freedoms could stand to be more principled and consistent.
If I am elected, I would be outspoken in my support of the decriminalization and legalization of marijuana – be it for medicinal, recreational, industrial, or entheogenic purposes – as well as in my opposition to the expansion of the drug war into overseas theaters such as Latin America, South America, Afghanistan, and others.
As a write-in candidate, I will not be on the ballot for U.S. House this November, but with enough write-in votes, I can still win the seat. Just remember to vote for independent Joe Kopsick – K-O-P-S-I-C-K – by writing-in my name on the ballot for U.S. Representative on Tuesday, November 6th.

Friday, October 5, 2012

The First Time I Learned Something During an Obama Speech


Originally Written on October 5th and 6th, 2012

Edited on February 15th, 2016



            On the afternoon of Thursday, October 4th, 2012 – the day after the first presidential debate between Barack Obama and Mitt Romney – President Obama spoke at the top of Bascom Hill on the University of Wisconsin-Madison campus. The event was planned four days prior, and it took place during a severe lull in Obama's campaign schedule. Earlier, Obama had cancelled a meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu; purportedly due to scheduling conflicts.
            At about 10 A.M., I showed up on Library Mall, which lies about a block away from the bottom of Bascom Hill. I got there early, so that I could protest the people attending the rally, to meet people and show them some of my signs, to inform them that I was running as a write-in candidate for U.S. House, and to tell them about the most murder-filled controversies of the Obama Administration, of which they'd probably never heard.
            One of the signs I carried displayed 124 possible Obama murder victims on one side. The other side read, “Pakistani Innocent Children Killed by Obama's Bureaucratic Authoritarian Militaristic Autocracy [P.I.C.K. O.B.A.M.A.]” and “Palestinian Israeli Conflict Kontinues thanks to Random Old Miser Nobody Ever Yearned for” [P.I.C.K. R.O.M.N.E.Y.].

            Coincidentally, there was a huge pro-life display set up on Library Mall. I say “coincidentally” because the pro-life group had planned their event several months prior, and thus, had no idea that Obama would be around on the same day, until probably the day before, or the day of. Their display featured at least a dozen three-foot by five-foot posters, at least half of them showing aborted fetuses.
            The pro-life group was comprised of about 20 people. They represented the Center for Bio-Ethical Reform, based in Ohio. Significant portions of their display were dedicated to defending the notion that abortion is akin to genocide, being that discriminate murder can be targeted towards those of different ages and genders, in addition to nationality. What I took away from it was this: fetuses don't have they own country, so there’s no genocide and I ain’t gotta listen to ‘em.
            A 30-year-old man in a cowboy hat named Darius spoke to me. He told me that he was brought up atheist, then converted to Christianity. Using amplification, he asked me about my views on abortion. Darius emphasized the desirability of an objective defense for a position, and I admitted that I had no objective justification for my pro-choice stance. We considered the legal, philosophical, ethical, and religious justifications for abortion.
His defense for his pro-life position was primarily religious, philosophical, and ethical. I defended the notion that subjective defense of the right to life is objective, in the solipsist sense articulated by the likes of René Descartes and Max Stirner, that we cannot know that anything outside our own perception is real.
I put forth what I should have recognized as an overtly “might makes right” type argument, in attempting to justify my views on abortion, and explain my general views on rights. I forgot that the point that I was trying to make was that the capability to exercise a right should be taken into account; not that it is necessary and sufficient to justify any and all action.
Darius pointed out that my justification of abortion rested upon the ability to abort a fetus. The farthest that Darius and I got in the discussion was agreeing that what the issue comes down to is whether responsibility and consciousness are necessary to deserve the right to live.

At one point, a few passers-by stopped to talk to an older male member of the group. I barely overheard him saying “women don't have penises”, for some reason or another, in defending his pro-life views. I immediately felt an urge to shout “I got some links that'd prove you wrong”, or “that's a generalization”, but I noticed that that would have been inappropriate, because there were teenage girls nearby. So I quickly turned around, to mask my maniacal, stifled snickering. For some reason, I have an aversion towards offending Christians, except when it comes in the form of very politely told jokes, or in the context of politics.
I especially hate to put-off beautiful creatures such as Sarah, a freckled, blonde activist in her thirties, whom I met at the event. To have been aware, right off the bat, that my interlocutor was so brave, devout, conscientious, and empathetic, made for such an astounding experience of the conversation; especially in those brief moments when I was attempting to hold her gaze, and we discussed our common interests (namely Ron Paul, Alex Jones, and hating on Obama).
It has been foretold that we will all one day know the word of G-d. So why dwell on our differences, instead of love and care for one-another, as son and daughter of the same Creator, in the meantime? I wouldn't be surprised if the quality of our care of and empathy for one another hastened the arrival of the Kingdom of G-d. Oh, my Christian sisters are such angels! I'm so proud of them, especially those as patient, calm, and open-minded as my Sarah. Sister Sarah, daughter Sarah, mother Sarah, L-rd, “I knew you before I created you in the womb”, and I knew I loved you the moment I met you.
We all share a common thread. We all help write one another's stories. We all help create one another. We all help give birth to one another. The nature of our intercourse is objective, because of its mutual subjectivity. We are all universally relative, and relevant to, and familiar with, and the family of, one another. As Martin Buber explained, “they” disappears, and only “we” remains. It is gnosis over logos; experience over word. Revelation incarnate, as carnal knowledge. The most devout marry only the L-rd. Engage me, wife. Namaste.

Any-whatever, most of my discussion with the pro-lifers took place between noon and 5 P.M.. I spent the 11:00 hour with an Army mechanic named Cory, who described himself as “kind of a nihilist”. Minutes after meeting me, he mentioned George Carlin's jokes about pro-lifers. I recited Carlin's line “Have you ever noticed that people who are pro-life are usually people you wouldn't want to fuck in the first place?" This sentence is to remind you, for the sake of juxtaposition, of the subject matter of the previous paragraph.
Although he was in the military, Cory didn't know who the governor of Wisconsin was, didn't know who Tammy Baldwin was, and didn't even know who was running to unseat Obama. He kept referring to Obama as “my boss”.
Cory talked about his neighborhood on the East Side of Madison (which is remarkably diverse, given its proximity to the rural parts of the metropolitan area), and about his neighbor's kids. He said the kids would ask him if he ever shot anyone in the military, and even though he was only a mechanic and never saw combat, he responded to them, “If I told you, I'd have to kill you. …Join the military!: I thought that was pretty damn nihilist of him. Cory had "cognitive dissonance", "Nuremburg Trials", and whatever the fuck Sartre was talking about, written all over him.
After I informed Cory that I was running for Congress, he insisted on buying me a soda. The “soda” turned into “let's go into a restaurant”, turned into “two sodas and a red brat”, turned into “it's 11:15 in the morning but fuck it, I'm gonna order two whiskeys anyway, and hey, why don't I order two cheeseburgers, even though I'm not hungry, and let you take them home”. Dude paid for a bunch of food for me without even batting an eyelash. I guess even the mechanics in the military get mercenary-level compensation.
Cory was out of his fucking mind. He talked to people randomly on the street a lot of the time during which we were walking down State Street together, while I wasn't talking to him for the time being. I was worried that he was going to piss someone off.
He asked when Obama was going to speak. I told him that Obama would speak at noon, but I later found out that noon was when the entrances opened; Obama ended up speaking from about 3:00 to 4:30. I told Cory that he would have had to print out proof that he had already R.S.V.P.’d, and then present it at the security entrance to the event. Security at the event was tight; people weren’t even allowed to bring their own water into the event.
Cory told me that he knew of an unguarded entrance into the building in front of which Obama was going to speak; Bascom Hall. Cory said he was going to try to sneak in, and then get into the rally without going through security or having legitimate access.

            Every time I heard the attendees applaud an indecipherable, distant “uuuhhh… blah-blah-blah…” – it was the clearest I’d ever heard the president articulate his ideas – I got creepy Satanic chills. After those ideas poured out of Barack Obama’s dick-sucking, crack-smoking (not that there’s anything wrong with that), lying mouth, for an hour and a half, the rally let out, and hundreds upon hundreds of Obama supporters poured from Bascom Hill onto Library Mall.
            The Obama supporters passed me, while I held a protest sign aloft, and shouted about Gabby Giffords having been targeted as a Fast and Furious whistleblower; that presidential advisor and Air Force undersecretary Jack Wheeler ending up dead in a landfill because he knew Dick Cheney tried to hijack control of between one and 50 nuclear weapons and redeploy them to the Middle East war theater; and that Obama was doing practically jack-fucking-shit to end the wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Libya, Syria, the Sudan, Kenya, Uganda, Yemen.
            What I had neglected to consider was that all these hundreds of Obama supporters saw, was me in the middle of a shit-ton of dead fetus pictures and shouting pro-lifers, holding a sign that said “Obama murders” on it. I tried to make it clear – at least at one point – that I wasn't holding a sign with a list of a bunch of names of dead fetuses on it. I did this by drawing attention to the fact that Obama is spending his supporters’ money to kill innocents abroad; I said “Obama is killing babies, and I’m not talking about fetuses, I’m talking about Pakistanis!” I wasn't all that successful; I got asked to defend the pro-life position by a couple people by mistake.
            I was told by the people walking by, that my beard probably smelled bad, and that nobody was listening to me. Another guy told me, earlier in the day, that he liked my “face-pubes”. A black woman walked by, and yelled at a pro-lifer – whom I hadn’t heard say anything – that you shouldn’t even talk about abortion unless you know what it’s like to be black. I miss the connection there.
            At one point, I yelled “Ahmadinejad for President!”, referring to Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the leader of Iran. I turned around to notice three Tunisian guys. I told them that I think conservatives are lying in their attempt to portray Obama as insufficiently supportive of the State of Israel, when Obama is a staunch Zionist whom has repeatedly promised to do everything in his power to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon. Incidentally, it's a lot easier to get a dude from a Muslim country on board with my views on Israel than it is to get Christians on board with them; not that Darius wasn't intrigued and receptive about it.
            At another point, I yelled “isn't it great to get bombed by a liberal president for once!?” This language heightened while a black helicopter or two buzzed past overhead. “This is change!”, I yelled. “This is freedom! This is liberal America!”. Stuff like “Freedom is the right to choose whether a liberal or a conservative will monitor you with drones!”.

            One of the people who thought I was pro-life, was a speedy blonde girl, probably a college freshman. Before finding out I wasn't pro-life, her response to my list of Obama murder victims was “What president gets into office without killing a shit-ton of people?". I responded, naturally, “are you saying murder is acceptable as long as other people do it?”.
            She'd assumed that I was bitching about Obama because I supported Romney, which I didn't. I told her that I supported Gary Johnson and Ron Paul. She asked why I wasn't focusing on the shit that Romney has done, and I responded that it was because Romney wasn’t currently in power, and because I haven't heard of anyone Romney might have had killed. If Romney showed up, I’d be focusing on how Romney sucks; not on how Obama sucks.
Incidentally, I have told people that Romney accepted campaign donations from Robert Lichfield, the founder of W.W.A.S.P. (the World Wide Association of Specialty Programs and Schools), a teen boot camp program that abuses at-risk minors both physically and psychologically.
I told the girl that a consistent libertarian shouldn't vote, but also that I wasn't one to talk, because I was a congressional candidate. I said that I wanted to take the system down from the inside, and she responded that every candidate says that, and they never follow through. I responded that Obama never said “I want to take the system down from the inside” publicly, nor verbatim, in the same manner that I was willing to do. That was enough to convince her to support me, but unfortunately, she lived in Minnesota, and couldn’t write my name on the ballot for U.S. House in Wisconsin.

            A few minutes later, I saw my Democratic opponent – Wisconsin State Assemblyman Mark Pocan – walk by. A few days earlier, I found out that I had been excluded from the Rotary Club's 30-minute debate, and also from having a guest speaker spot at a general membership meeting for local black businessmen's organization 100 Black Men of Madison; due to time constraints and failure to achieve ballot access.
            I shouted “Hey, Mark!” He turned, presumably noticing the “Obama murders” sign in my hand, to watch me point to my own face while shouting “Joe Kopsick for Congress!”. He didn't react much, and continued walking. I later told this story to a friend, whom remarked that that interaction was all the debate access that I would be allowed this election season. Later in the month of October 2012, I ended up speaking for five minutes at the end of a debate in DeForest, Wisconsin, between Mark Pocan and Chad Lee.

            At some point, soon after the rally had ended, I saw Cory the Army mechanic again. He told me that he had sneaked into the basement of Bascom Hall, and had gotten into the rally. He even claimed that before the event began, he was in the basement of Bascom Hall, and saw Obama in the hallway. Cory – whom was dressed in black slacks, a dark blue button-down shirt, and a black tie, and had very short hair – told me that he walked up to Obama, put his finger into his own ear, mimicking the action of a Secret Service agent wearing an earpiece, and gave the president a high-five. Cory told me that Obama was convinced that Cory worked for him (I suppose that Cory does work for him, regardless). Initially believing his story, I told Cory that he was a madman, and that if he had wanted to, he could have taken the president out.

            One of the people making rounds during the pro-life protests, was a University of Wisconsin genetics student named Michael, a secular-humanist whom had grown up Jewish, and described himself as an “anti-theist”. I sat near him while he used geological and genetic science to debate pro-lifers on creationism. He told me that each Sunday, in the summer of 2011 – during the farmers’ market on Capitol Square in Madison – he had debated creationists for solid six-hour blocks. It showed.
            Two pro-lifers – one of them about 20 years old, and the other about 50 – debated Michael about creationism. The older one tried to defend the notion that people who believe in the scientific method, also, to some extent, base their epistemology on faith. I invited Michael to comment on Terence McKenna's remarks that the scientific method is flawed because the conditions of experiments are never perfectly repeatable. Michael admitted that I had a point, but he countered that conditions can and must be satisfactorily repeatable, and I agreed.
            Then I noticed the 50-year-old pro-lifer had walked away. Too bad for him, I guess. That wasn’t the only point that day when I defended some pro-life arguments; I corrected a young woman who claimed that fetuses do not have any legal protections.
            I told Michael, and also Darius (one of the leaders of the pro-life protest), about a gnostic experience which I had in Georgia at the age of 23. I explained to Michael that my interest in Judaism largely stemmed from my interest in Israeli politics and anti-Zionist Jewish thought, and that I felt that the supernatural experience which I had, confirmed that the subject matter in which I was interested at the time was mostly correct, and should be explored, especially considering the substantial knowledge of the topic which was possessed by the people whom I had met shortly before the experience.

            Two of the other people I met that day, comprised a lesbian couple in their mid- to late- twenties; a freckled redhead, and a brunette hipster-ish woman. The couple spoke to some of the pro-lifers, promoting alternatives to abortion, such as contraception and homosexuality. Of homosexuality, the brunette said “that’s the solution I choose.” I fought the urge to quip, “Oh, I didn’t know homosexuality was a choice; I thought people were born that way”.
            Rude shit like that went through my head all day. The pro-life group dismantled their display, and packed the pieces into their truck. A black dude beat me to saying that the stack of posters of aborted fetuses was reminiscent of the menu at Denny’s. Fry them shits up!

            Before leaving Library Mall, as the group dismantled their display, I made sure to give four different protesters handshakes goodbye. Just as I finished my third goodbye, the group leaders called the members together, to do a sort of prayer circle. I made my way towards Sarah to say a quick goodbye, and noticed her hug a fellow member or two.
            Seeing that, for the time being, that she was in the hugging mood – and seeing her shoulders buck forward the slightest bit, while catching her gaze, and reaching for her hand – the urge to hold her in my arms, tugged at me. But once again, just like another experience I had in Minneapolis, it was to no avail. With every woman I meet, these are my options: to choose to sin by disregarding their – and my own – needs for affection and connection, or else to lose their friendship.

            As I left the scene on foot, waves of amusement washed over me; and also of longing, but also of irrational, rationalized content. I walked to a friend’s house, smoked some dope (being a dope-head), told him what had happened to me over the previous seven hours, and decided that I needed to blog about it.
            So, in conclusion, it turns out that you really can learn something during an Obama speech. And that’s why I’m voting to re-elect Buh-Black Blow-Blah-Blah to the presidency in 2012.

How to Fold Two Square Pieces of Card Stock into a Box

      This series of images shows how to take two square pieces of card stock (or thick paper), and cut and fold them into two halves of a b...