I agree with Webster Tarpley's analysis; that the U.S., U.K., Israel, Saudi Arabia, and Pakistan collaborated to carry-out the 9/11 attacks. It was an inside job (U.S.) and an outside job (U.K., Israel, Saudis, and Pakistan) at the same time. Israel was one of the countries that admittedly warned the U.S. that attacks were imminent, in addition to the U.K., Italy, and Russia.
A BLOG ABOUT INDEPENDENT POLITICS, POLITICAL ETHICS, ECONOMICS, AND ANARCHISM. Political theory, U.S. politics & election statistics, the political spectrum, constitutional law & civil liberties, civil rights & interstate commerce, taxation & monetary policy, health care & insurance law, labor law & unions, unemployment & wages, homelessness, international relations, religion, technology; alternatives to the state
Monday, July 29, 2024
Summary of My Analysis Regarding Who Carried Out the Attacks of September 11th, 2001, and Their Ties to Jeffrey Epstein
Friday, June 28, 2024
Supreme Court Overrides Chevron Decision, Federal Bureaucracies to Be Weakened As a Result
Articles regarding the recent rulings:
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/supreme-court-chevron-deference-power-of-federal-agencies/?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR1Ff5fV8XWGzdmJTOum_QPlb0I8S4BW2VJzoyCjjC_7eEfe6ZNe_LmTyXE_aem_rqgauBp8x_FDOq-bvTWS5A
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/supreme-courts-chevron-deference-decision-could-make-science-based/
http://www.eenews.net/articles/supreme-court-may-overturn-major-environmental-precedent-this-week/
Interviews with Antonin Scalia:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qhDSngj8Wbo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KvttIukZEtM
Friday, June 21, 2024
Sixty-Two Ways to Decrease Your Dependence Upon the U.S. Dollar, Other Currencies, and Moneys in General
The following is a list of sixty-two things that you can do to wean yourself off your dependence upon the U.S. Dollar (USD) – and currencies and moneys in general – in order to survive.
Readers should be cautioned that some of these suggestions do not actually achieve the direct nor immediate abolition of currencies; but instead are merely alternatives to moneys, currencies, and/or the Dollar. Many solutions listed below also do not necessarily threaten to abolish the systems of capitalism, exchange, the wage system, market systems, pressured and coerced labor, and perhaps even private property, most or all of which are likely to still prove to remain problematic, even if and after currencies are successfully boycotted (or even, potentially, abolished).
[Notes: "Anagorism" is a term which refers to a system in which there are no markets. "Anideotism" is a term which refers to a system in which there is no private property.]
#10. Advocate for
laws which would result in the abolition of fiat currency, fractional banking,
and the “independent” private Federal Reserve System; and which would require
full-reserve banking. This would prevent the U.S. Dollar from continuing to
lose approximately fifty percent of its value every 20 to 25 years.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Full-reserve_banking
http://www.diggers.org/free_store.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutual_aid_(emergency_services)
#37. Advocate and
lobby for the offering of tax credits, and/or other tax incentives – to
landlords and managers, and housing boards – in exchange for allowing homeless
and low-income people to sleep and/or reside in whatever units they own which
may be going unused or empty.
#38. Advocate and lobby for the
passage of laws which would abolish absentee property ownership (i.e., the
legal claiming of ownership of properties which the actual claimed owner plays
no part in using, and/or no part in participating in their daily defense).
Learn more at:
http://www.rockethomes.com/blog/housing-market/absentee-owner
#39. Advocate and lobby for the
offering of tax incentives, to the owners and landlords and managers of
apartment buildings – and to housing boards – to allow homeless and low-income
people to sleep in whichever of their housing units may be going empty and
unused.
#40. Simply let people go get the things they need. Ensure universal and open access to the basic means of survival; i.e., make it illegal for law enforcement officials to use force and initiatory violence in order to administer and apply laws which prohibit people from collecting resources essential which are to their survival, which were provided to them for free by nature. These include – most notably and obviously – air and land (which people cannot help but use and occupy, except for killing themselves), as well as water (which is abundant, and falls from the sky).
#41. Advocate for the repeal or relaxation of laws which limit or prohibit people’s freedom to collect rainwater (provided that they are not stealing water from their neighbors, and/or altering the water table in a way that harms local plants or wildlife).
Learn more at:
http://source.colostate.edu/extension-offers-fact-sheet-on-how-to-harvest-rainwater-under-new-colorado-rules/
#42. Advocate and
lobby for relaxing and/or repealing laws which limit or prohibit people from
growing edible plant produce, and raising small livestock (such as bees, rabbits,
chickens, ducks, and goats) on or outside their homes.
Learn more at:
http://news.wttw.com/2018/02/05/chickens-and-goats-backyard-raising-livestock-chicago
#43. Advocate and
lobby for the repeal of laws against vagrancy; for example, laws which allow
police officers to arrest travelers, vagrants, and homeless people provided they
do not have enough money to stay in a hotel in the pertinent town for the night.
One example would be to advocate for the repeal of laws against loitering.
Learn more at:
http://www.law.virginia.edu/scholarship/publication/risa-goluboff/640716#:~:text=Vagrancy%20laws%20took%20myriad%20forms,some%20jurisdictions%20criminalized%20loitering%20separately.
#44. Advocate and lobby for the relaxation
and/or repeal of laws against sleeping (sometimes referred to as “camping”) and
of squatting; especially on town and city and other municipal property, and
other public lands.
#45. Advocate and lobby for the relaxation
of local building and construction codes, in a manner which would allow for a
wider range of experimentation in architecture. One way would be to amend the
law to allow homes to be made from recyclable and reusable materials.
Components of these homes – called “Earth Ships” – often include dirt packed
into tires, aluminum cans wrapped together with pieces of twine, and colored
glass bottles stacked together in mosaic patterns. These homes are usually
built with windows facing the sun, and have been known to retain heat and cold
well, which makes it extremely cheap (or even free) to regulate their
temperature, allowing such homes to go entirely without modern H.V.A.C. (heating,
ventilation, and air conditioning).
Architect Mike Reynolds successfully
lobbied the government of the State of New Mexico to do this, and then he
travelled to Indonesia to teach locals how to gather recyclable materials, and build
houses from them, after the 2004 tsunami in Banda Aceh.
Learn more at:
http://earthship.com
http://theministryofarchitecture.com/earthships/earthship-pros-cons/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a_ZTiocr3LU
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garbage_Warrior
#46. Advocate and lobby for the
repeal of laws which hinder people from – and/or punish people for – donating foods,
clothing, and other goods, to the homeless. One example would be to take down
signs which advise people not to give to panhandlers, and to instead donate to
homeless shelters and other homeless services. Raise awareness that voluntary
giving is not a crime.
#47. Urge your local homeless shelters to set up free laundry services for the people who use said shelters. Such services could be funded through additional donations from the public, and/or by whatever funds those shelters may already have available.
#48. Advocate and lobby for the repeal or relaxation of laws against public nudity, and of other legally binding dress codes which apply to the public (provided that such repeal would not result in the legalization of indecent exposure). This would help reduce the annual cost of clothing which is incurred by the poor.
#49. Lobby governments to stop sending public
taxpayer money – and other forms of public assistance – to food companies,
especially “Big Ag” (big agriculture) companies which make billions of dollars
each year and would likely thrive without public assistance.
Examples of such public assistance
include bailout funds, government contracts, monopoly privileges (such as
patents), bankruptcy assistance, corporate subsidies, trade promotions and
trade protections (such as finance and insurance from the Export-Import Bank), easy
credit and low interest rates (from the Federal Reserve System), discounts on
public utilities (such as roads and electricity), small business loans (such as
P.P.P. loans), and favorable zoning laws and professional regulations, among
others.
#50. Advocate and lobby for the offering
of tax incentives, to grocery stores and supermarkets, to donate food
(especially excess / surplus foods, and foods that will spoil and go bad if
they are not soon used) to the homeless and needy. Also, advocate and lobby for
requiring such stores to donate unsold foods to the homeless and needy;
or for revoking the charters of businesses which do not do so.
Learn more at:
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/feb/04/french-law-forbids-food-waste-by-supermarkets
http://recycle.ab.ca/newsletterarticle/france-becomes-first-country-to-ban-supermarket-food-waste/
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/is-frances-groundbreaking-food-waste-law-working
#51. Raise awareness about gleaning,
the gathering of plant produce which is going unused, sitting in fields,
because it is not suitable for sale. Such food is often perfectly edible.
A related task could be to advocate
for the repeal of laws which prohibit “dumpster diving” (i.e., “diving”
into dumpsters in order to find food that could still be eaten).
Learn more at:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gleaning
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steel_v_Houghton
#52. Instead of using mass-produced,
specialized, processed foods (which are often unhealthful and expensive), buy
generic foods, and engage in bulk purchasing. This is easy to do, if you shop
at wholesale food distribution stores (such as CostCo and WinCo), and food cooperatives
/ grocery cooperatives. Generic foods are often sold in bulk, but it is only efficient
to buy bulk foods if you live in a housing cooperative, and/or routinely share
meals with other people.
#53. Advocate and lobby for the repeal or relaxation
of laws which require local food and health inspectors, and/or the F.D.A. (Food
and Drug Administration) to inspect any and all foods offered for potential
purchase by the buying “public”. Foods which may be subject to such inspection
include farm-to-fork meals (meals which go directly from farm to the dinner
table), homemade baked goods offered for school bake sales, and children’s
lemonade stands. [The freedom to start a lemonade stand is referred to as “Lemonade
Liberty”.] The laws could be amended so as to prohibit the destruction of such
foods (including with bleach) simply because they were offered for sale before
or without inspection.
Learn more at:
http://www.farmtoconsumer.org/blog/2012/12/18/revisiting-the-farm-to-fork-fiasco/
http://www.northfortmyersneighbor.com/2011/09/20/lemonade-liberty-a-lesson-in-freedom/
#54. Agree to work, washing dishes or cleaning, in exchange
for food, provided that the owners of the restaurant are okay with you doing
so, and that you are not planning on doing it solely in the event that you get
caught attempting to “dine and dash” (i.e., eat, and then run out of the
restaurant without paying).
Musician Jon Bon Jovi opened a restaurant, called "JBJ Soul Kitchen", which advertises no prices for meals, and which is funded largely on donations and volunteering.
Learn more at:
http://jbjsoulkitchen.org/
#55. Advocate and lobby for the
reduction of patent terms on foods. This will allow generic versions of
patented foods to enter the market sooner, rather than later, usually in a
manner which allows such a food to be purchased more cheaply.
#56. Advocate and lobby for the
reduction of patent terms (sometimes called patent “lifespans”) on medications.
This will allow generic versions of patented medications to enter the market
sooner, rather than later, usually in a manner which allows such a food to be
purchased more cheaply.
I have proposed a law called “E.M.P.A.T.H.I.C.”
which would do just this. “E.M.P.A.T.H.I.C.” stands for “Eliminating Medical
Patents to Achieve Technology for Immortality Cheaply”. I like to say that we
should make medical patent “lifespans” shorter in order to help make human
lifespans last longer.
#57. Advocate and lobby for the
passage of a new law which would offer doctors and nurses opportunities to
voluntarily submit to legally enforcement of the provision of the Hippocratic
Oath which prohibits them from declining to treat people due to inability to
pay. The same oath also requires doctors to share medical knowledge for free,
and even to give their own money to patients who are in need. Such enforcement
could potentially provide for the revoking of medical licenses for any and all health
care workers who promise to provide free care, but then renege on their
promises.
The Hippocratic Oath reads, in part: “…when he
is in need of money to share mine with him… to teach them this art, if they
want to learn it, without fee or indenture; to impart precept, oral instruction…”.
Such a law, if widely adopted, would
drastically reduce not only the costs of health care, but also the costs of
medical education.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hippocratic_Oath
#59. Increase awareness that
scarcity is a myth, because it is an illusion, and artificial, and
manufactured, for the purposes of making us think that shortages are natural
and normal and occur frequently. Additionally, raise awareness that scarcity, shortages,
fixedness, finitude / finity, and limitation / limitedness, are not the
same thing; and that schools of economics are trying to lead us to think that
they are the same thing.
For more information, please read my
May 2023 article, titled “Economics Uses a False Definition of Scarcity (and
Ignores Abundance)”, which can be read at the following address:
http://aquarianagrarian.blogspot.com/2023/05/economics-uses-false-definition-of.html
#60. Read articles about – and/or watch
video interviews with – Daniel Suelo, “the man who quit money”, in order to get
more ideas about how to live without using moneys and currencies.
Learn more at:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suelo
http://www.becomingminimalist.com/the-man-who-quit-money-an-interview-with-daniel-suelo/
#61. Start a campaign which involves urging and encouraging others to boycott the U.S. Dollar, and/or to quit currency and/or money entirely, using the other tips which are listed, above and below, in this article. Remind people that you don’t die if you stop needing
money, and that money is not one of our basic means of survival; rather, air, water, food, clothing, shelter, and medicine are. Show this article to anybody you know, who claims that “you need money
to live” or that “you need money in order to survive”.
Learn more at:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-monetary_economy
#62. Stop associating with people who use money and currencies and the U.S. Dollar. This will only be practical and practicable on a mass scale, if, after, and when more people begin to attempt to boycott currencies, and are able to share this knowledge with others, and recover from their addiction to currencies, successfully.
Written, and originally published incomplete,
Originally published under the title
"Fifty-Seven Ways to Decrease Your Dependence
Upon the U.S. Dollar, Other Currencies, and Moneys in General"
Edited, expanded, and completed
on June 22nd, 2024.
Based on my February 2017 article
"You Don't Need Money to Live",
which was written on February 17th, 2017,
March 19th and 23rd, and April 4th, 2017,
Wednesday, June 12, 2024
Open Letter to Liz Wolfe Regarding Chase Oliver's Views on Puberty Blockers for Minors
1. Introduction
This article previously contained inaccurate information. Please scroll down, to the other author's note, if you wish to read it before reading the remainder of this article.
The Aquarian Agrarian regrets the error.]
On Monday, May 27th, 2024, the Libertarian Party nominated Chase Oliver to be its presidential candidate, at its national convention in Washington, D.C..
Within the following several days, numerous Libertarian Party members - especially those who didn't vote for Oliver to be the party's nominee - expressed concern and disapproval regarding Chase Oliver's stance regarding puberty blockers for minors.
Oliver has stated that, while he does oppose
giving bottom surgery (i.e., genital surgery) to people under the
age of 18, he does not think that the state should be in the
business of preventing parents from, or punishing parents for, making the
decision that puberty blockers are appropriate for their children.
That interview was published to YouTube, under the title
"What does Chase Oliver believe about trans kids?". That video can be
viewed at the following address:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=obFBd8AAMNs
I would urge my readers to watch that video before proceeding, as
the remarks which follow below, are a direct response to the comments made by
Oliver and Liz Wolfe in that interview.
2. The Letter
On June 12th, 2024, I sent an e-mail to Liz Wolfe, to explain why
I agree with her concerns and criticisms regarding Mr. Oliver.
[Notes about the formatting of this
article:
1. The portions of the letter below which appear in brackets,
and/or italics, were added to the text after it was sent.
2. For the reader's convenience, lengthy author's notes have been
placed between brackets and appear in italics, in order to contrast
against the original portions of the e-mail, which appear without either
brackets or italics.]
3. Single words which appear within brackets were either added, or
edited (but without significantly modifying the meaning of the text).
4. Paragraph breaks and spaces between lines have also been added
for the reader's convenience.]
That e-mail read as follows:
Hi Liz.
Thanks for pushing back against Chase Oliver in your recent interview. I
appreciate your trying to get him to be consistent.
I'm a former Libertarian and this is
one of the reasons why I left.
Oliver isn't even correct that bottom surgery is irreversible. Walt Heyer
underwent bottom surgery, and then had it reversed.
Not that that makes it OK, of course! The damage which bottom surgery and
puberty blockers do to the body should not be underestimated, and Oliver was
clearly trying to avoid discussing it.
Some women have described testosterone
as "poison to women", and one of the puberty blockers commonly used
is Lupron, which is used to chemically castrate sex offenders. So
we are treating "gender-questioning kids" like sex offenders,
while ignoring the possibility that they feel that way because they were
sexually abused as children.
Oliver also avoided discussing how these forms of
transitioning re-affirm harmful gender stereotypes (like the stereotypes that
tall people cannot be feminine, and that short people cannot be masculine; and
that if you are a boy who is attracted to other boys then you must really be a
girl inside).
The conversation also got nowhere near entertaining
the possibility that diagnosing a kid with gender dysphoria tends to distract
from any and all prior ailments from which they may be suffering, which may
have overlapping symptoms with gender dysphoria, or which may have caused that
dysphoria. Particularly, Dissociative Identity Disorder, general body
dysmorphia, gender-based bullying and harmful gender stereotypes, and prior
sexual abuse [as well as homosexuality, bisexuality, autism, fear of being sexually
assaulted or abused or objectified, and/or desire to please adults to want to
send the child chest binders]. In my book, ignoring previous sexual abuse is
basically the same thing as pedophile enabling.
Walt Heyer was forced to wear a dress by his
grandmother, and raped by an uncle, and developed gender dysphoria. I suspect
that Heyer internalized that harm, and reasoned that he might have an easier
time getting penetrated by his uncle, if he were to attempt to transition to
female.
[Note: Heyer has stated that he desired to become a
female in order to get away from the abuse, but in my opinion, it's
possible that making the abuse easier on himself could have been a subconscious
additional motivation. And even if he didn't feel that way, it's possible that
other people who suffered similar fates, have felt that way.]
Also, there is a man who is developing a line of
swimsuits, for his gender-dysphoric "daughter", which tucks the
genitals back.
[Source:
http://www.today.com/parents/dad-designs-swimwear-transgender-girls-daughter-t206361]
I would be shocked to discover that that father
did not sexually abuse his child.
Even if he didn't, the sheer amount of attention being paid
to the child's genitals is creepy, and amounts to indirect sexual abuse.
But according to these "pro-trans" people
(such as Briahna Joy Gray), wanting children to remain unmutilated is
the only real form of "obsession with children's
genitals".
Oliver was clearly trying to suggest, indirectly,
that your [i.e., Liz Wolfe's] concerns are motivated by the desire to
paint all pro-trans people and gays as pedophiles and groomers.
He claims to be against tattooing and giving plastic
surgery to minors, but nowhere in his interview did he discuss what to
do about it. I would say that he has a knee-jerk reaction to any attempt,
by the state, to "make decisions on parents' behalf", but he is
clearly biased when it comes to his own community.
[Note: By "his own community", I am
referring to "G.S.M.", an initialization which stands for
"gender and sexual minorities". Oliver is a same-sex-attracted
cisgender male; i.e., a homosexual.]
And his admission that he'd support a "religious
exemption" to a ban on circumcision for minors, is idiotic. There is a
pedophilic cult called the Children of God. They have a [“]holy book[“] that
depicts adults raping minors. I shudder to think what society would be like, if
their book The Story of Davidito could not be legally banned
from children's libraries, or if the Children of God were to receive a
"religious exemption" to a ban on minors having sex.
[Note: The possibility that bans on people under
18 years of age getting married or having sex, could be defeated - based on the
need to account for the supposed need to provide religious exemptions - is not
as far-fetched as some of my readers might imagine. In 2017, New Jersey
Governor Chris Christie declined to sign a law that would have prohibited
marriage for people under the age of 18, saying that it would "violate the
cultures and traditions of some communities" if an "exclusion without
exceptions" for parental and/or judicial consent were to become law.
Source:
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/new-jersey-chris-christie-child-marriage-ban-fails-religious-custom-a7735616.html
New Jersey is far from being the only state where judicial
and parental permission can override the minor's lack of ability to consent;
other states have this law too. The website of the Tahirih Justice Center has
more information about various state laws regarding this topic. Governor Phil
Murphy signed a law banning marriage for people under 18, without exceptions,
in June 2018.
Source:
http://www.nj.gov/governor/news/news/562018/approved/20180622b_child_marriage_ban.shtml]
Also, his statement that parents should make
decisions about transitioning, because "parents have unconditional love
for their children", is patently absurd. My father raped me when I was
[eight] and [nine] years old. He did not have unconditional love for me (unless
you count lust as love).
If I had been any stupider, or more gullible, or had
become financially independent from my parents any later in life, then there is
a good chance that I would have fallen for the lies told to me by my peers and
family, which is that I seemed gay or effeminate, or that "If you decided
to come out as transgender, we would support you." If I had not begun to
recover memories of the childhood sexual abuse at the age of [twenty-seven],
then for all we know, I might have begun identifying as gay or transgender out
of confusion.
There is a study that says 20% of minors with gender
dysphoria suffered previous sexual abuse.
[Note: The study to which I referred, which says
that 19% (not 20%) of transgender minors experienced sexual abuse, can be found
at the following address:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8344346/]
The same study says that minors with gender dysphoria
are twice as likely as the general population to have suffered sexual abuse.
These studies are out there, and Oliver either
doesn't know about them, or doesn't want to talk about them.
I don't know if Oliver is afraid to look like a
"self-hating homosexual", or maybe he sees that there is a lot of
money in being pro-transition (for example, Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker's
"sister" Jennifer is the world's only transgender billionaire, and
"she" has been supporting pro-transition causes).
The following five paragraphs - including the first, which was sent to Liz Wolfe, and the following four, which were not - were based on incorrect information. This article previously claimed that "O
The Aquarian Agrarian regrets the error, and plans to take Sisson to task for his deception soon.]
It's also possible that Oliver is an actual
pedophile. He said that "the age of consent is too damn high". (see
attached image). Which he wouldn't say, if he knew about the "federal
generic age of consent" of 16 years old. He wouldn't say that if he knew
about the case of Esquivel-Quintana v[.] Sessions (which
essentially held that state laws establishing an age of consent of 17 or 18 are
now invalid, giving an incentive for 16-to-20-year-olds
to traffic their victims across state lines, if they're less than four years
younger; because then, it would be a federal case instead of a state case). He
wouldn't say that if he knew that there are reduced penalties for someone
between 16 and 20 if they rape someone less than four years younger than they
are. This is why some people claim that the age of consent is actually twelve
years old.
Libertarians began this discussion, about [five] or
[ten] years ago, by (appropriately) criticizing making teenagers into
registered sex offenders for life, if they sext-message other teenagers and
acquire nudes of other minors that way. But after that, they stopped paying
attention to the erosion of the rights of the child, which ha[s] played out in
the courts since then. He is probably not even aware that there are several
states that have failed to establish an absolute minimum age for tattooing and
marriage, because their laws allow judges and parents to make decisions on
children's behalf. You read that correctly; there are states where an infant could
theoretically get married (and have sex) or get a tattoo, if the parents and/or
a judge are stupid or insane enough to allow it.
[Note: In my opinion, many Libertarians fail to
understand that some activities are so dangerous for children to
engage in, that parental, judicial, and/or physicians' permission, could
not possibly turn that dangerous activity into something that is
safe, or wise, or harmless, as if by magic. I blame Libertarians' adoption of
the idea that adults' permission can safely guide children through something
harmful, on a line of thinking which I heard an approximately 70-year-old man
say to a ten- or twelve-year-old girl at the 2018 Illinois Libertarian Party
Convention: "There's a safe way to do everything".
I suspect that this line of thinking is motivated by
the idea that the approach which the government of the Netherlands takes
towards activities such as drug use and prostitution. This holds true for
adults, but unlimited freedom - and the freedom to take dangerous risks which
carry lifetime consequences - is not for children; it's for adults.
This regulatory approach is arguably
indistinguishable from the approach which the Franklin Delano Roosevelt
administration undertook during the New Deal, when it closed banks and then
opened them back up again just several days later, and then created the
F.D.I.C. (Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation), in order to create
the illusion that the regulations being passed, were really for
everybody's benefit, and were really working, and were really being written and
enforced by moral and well-meaning people. They weren't. And Libertarians, as
some of the staunchest critics of the New Deal in America, ought to notice
this. But sadly, most of them they haven't.
Early libertarian C. Frederic Bastiat once said that
people should not accuse liberals of wanting nobody to raise grain, simply
because they don't want the state to do it. And that is a valid statement. But
while some Libertarians wisely reason that the state shouldn't be trusted to
solve a problem, they sometimes then fail to explain whom, aside from the
state, should solve that problem, and so, the problem continues, and
festers.]
Please reach out to me if you have any questions or
[need] clarifications. I am so tired of seeing people drastically oversimplify
how age of consent and statutory rape laws work, and treat people concerned
about kids as if they're full of hate.
Thanks for reading and
keep pushing back.
- Joseph W. Kopsick
jwkopsick@gmail.com
618-751-3229
E-mail written and sent on June 12th, 2024.
This article originally published, in shorter form, on June 12th, 2024.
Edited, expanded, and completed - and most notes added - on June 17th, 2024.
Author's notes regarding Harry J. Sisson's fake tweet about Chase Oliver
added to this article on July 15th, 2024.